08.09.2015 Views

Subsurface Iron and Arsenic Removal

qj78kp8

qj78kp8

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 Characterization of accumulated deposits<br />

%mol ratio was on average 4.8 (±1.65) <strong>and</strong> 5.4 (±1.26)<br />

near well 04 <strong>and</strong> the reference well, respectively. The<br />

precipitates in Figure 6.7(c) <strong>and</strong> (d) have been found<br />

in the deeper layer at 23-24m. ESEM-EDX showed<br />

that the Ca:S ratio in coating (c) is 0.85, which roughly<br />

corresponds to CaSO 4<br />

(gypsum). Calcium sulfate has<br />

not been observed in any of the samples taken between<br />

19 <strong>and</strong> 22m depth, neither near well 04 nor in the<br />

reference well. The same was the case for the occurrence<br />

of the framboidal pyrite (FeS 2<br />

, (d)). In the presence of<br />

oxygen, pyrite is known to oxidize <strong>and</strong> release sulphate<br />

<strong>and</strong> iron into the groundwater. In addition, pyrite<br />

oxidation is an acidifying reaction <strong>and</strong> therefore not<br />

promoting the (rapid) oxidation of Fe 2+ . The presence<br />

of sulphide minerals is a vital difference between the<br />

depths with iron accumulation (19-22m) <strong>and</strong> without<br />

iron accumulation (deeper than 22m).<br />

X-Ray Powder Diffraction <strong>and</strong> 57 Fe<br />

Mössbauer Spectroscopy<br />

The same ten soil samples (

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!