08.09.2015 Views

Subsurface Iron and Arsenic Removal

qj78kp8

qj78kp8

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6 Characterization of accumulated deposits<br />

similar to Figure 6.3, indicating that indeed the injected<br />

water affected mainly certain soil layers. Compared to<br />

the reference samples, amorphous iron has accumulated<br />

up to 35.0 <strong>and</strong> 62.2 mmol.(kg.ds) -1 for well 03 <strong>and</strong> 04,<br />

respectively.<br />

Based on the assumption that all iron accumulates<br />

as iron (oxy)hydroxides, it can be calculated what<br />

portion of accumulated iron is amorphous or crystalline:<br />

Fe crys<br />

=Fe total<br />

-Fe amorph<br />

. The percentage of amorphous <strong>and</strong><br />

crystalline iron that has accumulated over 12 years in<br />

12<br />

mmol Fe.(kg.ds) -1<br />

0 200 400 600 800<br />

the affected layers was found to be 56-100% crystalline<br />

near well 03 <strong>and</strong>, 67-100% near well 04. In order to<br />

ascertain the limited contribution of iron in carbonates<br />

on the soil grains, the carbonates were dissolved at pH<br />

3.5-4.0 with Hydrochloric Acid at the different mesh<br />

sizes (Kroetsch <strong>and</strong> Wang, 2006). All samples taken<br />

in the reference well <strong>and</strong> near well 04 between 19 <strong>and</strong><br />

22m confirmed that the iron release during carbonate<br />

removal was very small at

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!