09.09.2015 Views

1 ADVANCE for Executive Insight

1 ADVANCE for Executive Insight

1 ADVANCE for Executive Insight

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CIO Perspective<br />

Extensive planning in the selection and implementation<br />

of IT projects can result in measurable benefits,<br />

but organizations must stay focused on true<br />

drivers <strong>for</strong> technology implementation in order to<br />

avoid ‘paper benefits.’<br />

sion assessment. At the onset of a new clinical<br />

system implementation, the nursing staff identified<br />

issues with the time required to document<br />

an admission assessment. Time studies<br />

conducted to validate anecdotal observations<br />

showed that the average admission assessment<br />

took 45 minutes. Nursing leadership felt that<br />

improved technology should reduce this timeframe<br />

and established that objective as a project<br />

success metric.<br />

After working with IT staff and the vendor,<br />

the nursing team felt that the documentation<br />

time could be reduced by 15 minutes using<br />

the new system. A multidisciplinary team including<br />

IT, nursing, ancillary clinical areas and<br />

others met to review the assessment process.<br />

Problem lists were consolidated and streamlined.<br />

Documentation tools were revised and<br />

mobile carts were introduced to permit bedside<br />

documentation.<br />

The result of this work was a reduction in the<br />

average time to document an admission assessment<br />

from 45 minutes to 27 minutes. Certainly,<br />

the outcome was positive and the goal was attained,<br />

but did the hospital see value from this<br />

increased efficiency? The math shows us that<br />

if the hospital admits 100 patients per day on<br />

average, the annual time savings amounts to almost<br />

11,000 hours or nearly 5 full time equivalent<br />

positions.<br />

Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, this is ‘marketing math’ and<br />

often does not translate to the ability to reduce<br />

staffing levels since small time savings may be<br />

difficult to aggregate effectively. The lesson<br />

learned was to ensure that the true intended<br />

value of any measureable benefit is understood<br />

and that metrics are set appropriately.<br />

To be sure, the time savings had benefits in improved<br />

documentation and enhanced nursing<br />

satisfaction, but those are difficult to translate<br />

to hard value.<br />

Barcoded med administration implemented<br />

to improve patient safety and reduce<br />

documentation time. The introduction of barcoding<br />

to the medication administration process<br />

has clear benefits in terms of the reduction<br />

in avoidable medication errors. Additionally,<br />

vendors also made claims that their systems<br />

would improve nursing workflow and enhance<br />

medication charge capture.<br />

While the rationale <strong>for</strong> implementing this<br />

technology is grounded firmly in patient safety,<br />

the organization conducted audits of medication<br />

charges and found that nurses were often<br />

double documenting medications. Rather than<br />

doing all documentation online, some RNs were<br />

documenting on paper in real-time and going<br />

back later in the shift to document electronically.<br />

The audits found that the nurses documented<br />

100 percent on paper, but failed to complete<br />

the electronic documentation 3.7 percent of the<br />

time. Since the medication charges flow from the<br />

electronic documentation, the resulting gap was<br />

an obvious improvement opportunity.<br />

A new process was streamlined in that documentation<br />

would take place in real-time at the<br />

bedside. Mobile carts with computers and lockable<br />

medication drawers were introduced to<br />

enable nurses to bring the medication and documentation<br />

system to the bedside. Documentation<br />

at the bedside was a significant disruption to<br />

nursing workflow and initially slowed down the<br />

nursing staff. However, by working closely with<br />

nursing leadership, the use of barcoding was<br />

standardized and the result was better charge<br />

capture without loss of nursing productivity.<br />

Evaluating Workflows<br />

Incentives are an excellent inducement to implement<br />

or upgrade clinical systems. However,<br />

clinical system implementations are complex<br />

and rushing through them can ultimately result<br />

in negative impacts. Carefully consider what<br />

efficiencies your organization is attempting to<br />

achieve by implementing new technology. Ensure<br />

that the measures are clear and translate directly<br />

to the desired benefits as in the case of time<br />

savings and FTE reductions. Evaluate workflows<br />

and processes carefully to make changes that are<br />

aligned with the flow of the new system. Proper<br />

planning will provide strong and lasting benefits<br />

to the organization.<br />

30 <strong>ADVANCE</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Insight</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!