16.09.2015 Views

EMERGING

Emerging Markets:

Emerging Markets:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>EMERGING</strong> MARKETS:<br />

A Review of Business and Legal Issues<br />

Table 1. Comparative table of types of preventive measures according to Agreement of<br />

TRIPS, CCP and ECP of Ukraine<br />

No<br />

Types of preventive measures<br />

As to article 50 of Agreements<br />

of TRIPS 1<br />

As to article 133 of CCP of<br />

Ukraine<br />

1 Actions directed on keeping of Obtaining on demand and (or)<br />

proofs (obtaining of proofs on review of proofs, including on<br />

demand )<br />

their location<br />

2 Actions which prevent<br />

Interrogation of witness<br />

appearance of violation,<br />

including administrative<br />

measures (stopping of custom<br />

procedures)<br />

As to article 432 of ECP of<br />

Ukraine<br />

Obtaining of proofs on demand<br />

Imposition of arrest on property<br />

which belongs to the person or is<br />

in his possession or in other<br />

people’s possession to whom the<br />

preventive measures have been<br />

used.<br />

3 Setting of examination Inspection of rooms in which<br />

actions related to violation of<br />

rights take place;<br />

4 Other ways of proofs provision<br />

Experience of foreign countries in relation to practical application of temporary<br />

measures in accordance with Agreement TRIPS is interesting for the awareness of essence of<br />

preventive measures and peculiarities of their application.<br />

For example, in Great Britain there exists famous practical application of decision in<br />

case of Anton Piller [13, p. 719] (warrant of Anton Piller), according to which search and<br />

confiscation of proofs in the apartment of a probable violator is possible according to the<br />

court decision , however in other countries such a measure is sometimes considered too<br />

difficult 2 .<br />

A decision in the case of the company Doorstep is considered effective for application<br />

[14, p. 252], by which way enquiries can be sent for the receipt of documents and objects<br />

without a right to get into the apartment.<br />

Another measure, known as a decision on freezing or decision in the case of company<br />

Mareva [15, p. 509], is used to block bank accounts and other assets of the defendant, until the<br />

1 Agreement of TRIPS does not list any specific procedural actions , it only specifies the criteria these actions are<br />

to meet.<br />

2 Analoguous to English Anton Piller warrant French legislation has the institute of proofs provision (saisiecontrefaçon).<br />

Page 106 Volume 1, April 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!