17.09.2015 Views

Ralph Cator

Joining Meat Hall's Class of 2010 - Canadian Meat Business

Joining Meat Hall's Class of 2010 - Canadian Meat Business

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LifeStudies<br />

Challenge and Shelf<br />

Testing for the worst-case scenario, and pushing the limits of your<br />

food product.<br />

By Dawn Van Dam<br />

D<br />

etermining how your<br />

product reacts to microbial<br />

contamination and confirming<br />

shelf life provides invaluable information<br />

to the food industry in terms of product<br />

quality and safety. Challenge and shelf<br />

life studies provide this information by<br />

evaluating a product over the course of<br />

the intended shelf life.<br />

Challenge studies<br />

Drills are an essential component<br />

of safety; fire drills, lifeboat drills, CPR<br />

drills...their merit is unquestioned. The reason: learning<br />

how to deal with the worst-case scenario – safely. Challenge<br />

studies are of the same nature. They allow food producers<br />

to reduce risks to food safety by preparing for the worst-case<br />

scenario.<br />

Challenge studies are similar to shelf life studies in that<br />

they examine how microorganisms in a product change<br />

over time. The main difference is that in a challenge study<br />

the product is purposefully inoculated with pathogens,<br />

simulating a chance contamination.<br />

There are two types of challenge studies. The type<br />

known as an inactivation study determines the ability of a<br />

processing step or formulation to ‘inactivate’ the growth<br />

of pathogens of concern (pathogens that historically have<br />

been identified as a risk for a certain type of product). For<br />

example, physical processes such as heating, irradiation and<br />

high pressure treatments can ‘inactivate’ pathogens in a<br />

product.<br />

The other type of challenge study is called an inhibition<br />

study. This type of study confirms the success of a specific<br />

formulation and/or packaging strategy in inhibiting<br />

the growth of pathogens of concern. For example, the<br />

application of sodium acetate or diacetate has been shown<br />

to inhibit the growth of listeria during post-processing steps.<br />

For products like ready-to-eat meats, the application of<br />

antimicrobial additives can decrease the risk to consumers.<br />

So, with challenge studies you can determine how well<br />

your product stands up against microbial contamination.<br />

Shelf life studies<br />

While challenge studies address the issue of chance<br />

contamination, shelf life testing determines the length of<br />

time that a food product will maintain its quality before it<br />

begins to spoil.<br />

As a means of providing consumers with the most reliable<br />

information about the lifespan of a product, and as a measure<br />

of the success of your shelf life-extending strategies, these<br />

studies provide invaluable information to the food industry.<br />

Consumer preferences have shifted towards labels such<br />

as ‘no additives or preservatives’ or<br />

‘no sugar/sodium added.’ The food<br />

industry is continuously looking for<br />

new ways to preserve the freshness and<br />

quality of food over an extended period<br />

of time without the addition of such<br />

additives. Shelf life studies evaluate the<br />

efficacy of new technologies/methods<br />

for extending shelf life, so you can<br />

maintain product quality while adapting<br />

to consumer demands.<br />

Periodic reexamination of shelf life<br />

can also determine if changes made<br />

in your manufacturing process, such as new materials or<br />

suppliers, or new equipment or formulations have affected<br />

the microbiological profile and changed the shelf life.<br />

Shelf life studies are not simple step-by-step procedures;<br />

they rely heavily upon the experience and expertise of the<br />

scientists involved. Each individual shelf life study must<br />

be designed to reflect the unique conditions of a product<br />

including pH, moisture and temperature. Microbial<br />

examination is then conducted over the course of the<br />

intended shelf life, or even beyond to determine the point of<br />

spoilage. Ultimately, consumers use their senses to determine<br />

whether or not a product is desirable, but microbial growth<br />

can reach unsafe levels before any unpleasant changes are<br />

noted.<br />

Evaluating shelf life can help you identify and minimize<br />

risks, determine the most effective methods to prolong your<br />

products’ freshness or marketability, and provide information<br />

to consumers about the lifespan of your product.<br />

University of Guelph<br />

The University of Guelph, Agriculture & Food Laboratory<br />

(AFL) offers customized studies that provide reliable results<br />

and information on how your products react to microbial<br />

contaminations, and how to confirm the shelf life of your<br />

products. When it comes to protecting consumers and brand<br />

names, accurate results are paramount. The AFL is supported<br />

by an integrated quality management system that achieves<br />

the ISO 9001:2008 and ISO/IEC 17025 international quality<br />

standards as well as for specific tests listed on our Scope of<br />

Accreditation, and is happy to work with you to customize<br />

studies, providing the scientific support you need to have<br />

peace of mind.<br />

For more information about conducting shelf life or<br />

challenge studies, you can reach AFL at 519-767-6299 or<br />

1-877-863-4235 (1-877-UofG-AFL), or through email at<br />

aflinfo@uoguelph.ca.<br />

Dawn Van Dam is the Chief Marketing Officer for the University of<br />

Guelph, Laboratory Services, Agriculture & Food Laboratory.<br />

16 Canadian Meat Business September/October 2010 meatbusiness.ca

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!