22.09.2015 Views

Unemployment cycles

WP201526

WP201526

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The value of a vacancy to the firm is<br />

[ u<br />

rV = −c + q(θ(Ω))<br />

s (1 − π)J 1 + u s πJ 1 + λ(Ω)γ ]<br />

πJ<br />

s 2 ′ − V<br />

which reflects the fact that workers stay with the incumbent firm in case the worker draws the same<br />

match-specific productivity.<br />

The equilibrium wage in the terminal jobs is set such that the “losing” firm (which is the challenging<br />

firm with low match-specific productivity), when competing for the worker, is indifferent between paying<br />

that wage and opening a new vacancy. That implies:<br />

w 2 = w 2 ′ = w 2 = py<br />

since this equally holds for any firm trying to poach the worker when there is at least one y firm<br />

competing. When both competing firms are of type y, then the wage is:<br />

w 2 ′ = py.<br />

Observe that all the wages in the terminal jobs are time invariant.<br />

Then the equilibrium tightness can be written as:<br />

θ(Ω) =<br />

v<br />

s(Ω) =<br />

v<br />

u + λ(Ω) [ γ + γ ].<br />

We now derive the steady state equilibrium values where Ω is either 1 or 0. As before:<br />

U = pb<br />

r ,<br />

and using this expression for U to solve for E 1 and E 1 we get:<br />

E 1 = w 1(Ω) − Ωpk + λ(Ω)m(θ(Ω))((1 − π)E 2 + πE 2 ′)<br />

r + λ(Ω)m(θ(Ω))<br />

E 1 = w 1(Ω) − Ωpk + λ(Ω)m(θ(Ω))((1 − π)E 2 + πE 2 ′)<br />

.<br />

r + λ(Ω)m(θ(Ω))

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!