07.12.2012 Views

v11n0203

v11n0203

v11n0203

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

168<br />

the Philippines’s (AFP) military Intelligence group (mIg);<br />

the national Intelligence and Coordinating Agency (nICA);<br />

the defunct Presidential Anti-Organized Crime Task Force<br />

(PAOCTF); and the Philippine national Police’s intelligence<br />

unit, the Regional Intelligence and Investigation Division<br />

(RIID), to interrogate persons despite these agencies not<br />

having the jurisdiction to do so. These other agencies are<br />

known to torture during interrogation.<br />

3.4. The police does not question or challenge arresting officers<br />

who are not from the police, for example soldiers, who have<br />

held persons in detention for days prior to turning them over<br />

to the police station, but simply receive the person into their<br />

custody. They do not question where the person had been<br />

held, what he has been through and why they failed to turned<br />

him over ‘promptly’ to them. They just simply record and<br />

accept the person. The police officers receiving this person<br />

do not inquire whether this person has been tortured. This<br />

practice is in direct contravention of the existing rules on<br />

arrest, but remains common.<br />

3.5. Soldiers usurp police powers: The manner in which<br />

members of the military carry out arrests, investigate and<br />

subsequently detain persons, usurps the power of the police.<br />

Only the police and some other investigating agencies, have<br />

the power to investigate a person suspected of committing<br />

crimes. The military does not have this power, in theory.<br />

Soldiers may carry out arrests, but such arrested persons<br />

should be turned over to the “proper judicial authorities”<br />

under specific provisions found in Article 125 of the Revised<br />

Penal Code.<br />

3.6. while arrests without a warrant can also be carried out<br />

under certain circumstances (under Rule 113, section 5<br />

of the Revised rules of Criminal Procedure), such as if a<br />

person was about to commit, was in the act of committing<br />

or had just committed a crime. members of the military,<br />

however, conduct warrant-less arrests without meeting such<br />

criteria and detain and subject persons to investigations.<br />

Furthermore, they deliberately do not inform the victims of<br />

their right to legal counsel. Such circumstances often result<br />

in torture or ill-treatment, with impunity.<br />

3.7. Such practices are common in conflict areas controlled by<br />

the military or in instances where operations are headed by<br />

the military. under the law, once a person is arrested other<br />

than by the police, the officials arresting them should turn<br />

them over immediately to the nearest police station. however,<br />

soldiers ignore this, especially in remote areas. The failure<br />

to turn over the arrested person, for instance those who are<br />

captured following an encounter, or those arrested from<br />

areas controlled by the military on suspicion of having been<br />

involved in a rebel activities, or villagers who simply happen<br />

article 2 � June-Sept 2012 Vol. 11, No. 2-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!