07.12.2012 Views

v11n0203

v11n0203

v11n0203

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

176<br />

b. Concerning Section 13 of the Ombudsman Act of<br />

1989, in order to avoid lengthy delays, there should<br />

be implementing rules and guidelines concerning the<br />

definition of the need to ‘act promptly on complaints.’<br />

Furthermore, there should be sanctions or punishments<br />

if the involved Ombudsman officers fail to comply with<br />

this time requirements;<br />

c. Concerning Section 3, 4, and 5 of Republic Act 7309,<br />

those who file claims should not necessarily be persons<br />

convicted and subsequently exonerated from charges.<br />

Claimants should be allowed to also include person<br />

released from detention after their case has been<br />

dismissed at the prosecutor’s level. The monetary<br />

compensation should be increased and the period in<br />

which claims can be filed should be extended. The<br />

documentary requirements should also be considered<br />

on a case to case basis, with a degree of flexibility<br />

being included where reasonable circumstances exist<br />

to explain the lack of certain documents, for example<br />

marriage certificates from relatives of victims who are<br />

indigenous people;<br />

d. Concerning section 3 of the witness Protection, Security<br />

and Benefit Act (RA 6981), potential witnesses or<br />

those facing threats in pursuing complaints, should<br />

be provided with interim protection, even before their<br />

cases are filed in respective courts or investigating<br />

bodies. memorandum Circular no. 2000-008 of the<br />

national Police Commission (nAPOLCOm) should also<br />

be effectively implemented;<br />

5. An effective and centralized register of detainees must be<br />

developed and maintained, including thos persons detained<br />

by the various national or local authorities (the Department<br />

of Justice (DOJ), which has jurisdiction over jails under the<br />

Bureau of Corrections (BuCor); the Department of Interior<br />

and Local government (DILg), which has supervisory power<br />

over the Bureau of Jail management and Penology (BJmP),<br />

which has jurisdiction over city and municipal detention<br />

facilities; and the provincial governments, which have<br />

supervisory jurisdiction over the provincial jails in their<br />

respective provinces, even though they are also under BJmP);<br />

6. The Commission on human Rights (ChR) and its regional<br />

offices should ensure that they document cases and provide<br />

assistance to torture victims, as provided for in Executive<br />

Order 163, section 3, which calls on the ChR to investigate<br />

complaints by any party concerning all forms of human rights<br />

violations. The ChR should not cite the excuse of ‘contempt<br />

of court’ and refuse to document and investigate victims’<br />

complaints.<br />

article 2 � June-Sept 2012 Vol. 11, No. 2-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!