A NEW BREED

Recommendations

Info

column IA’s resident thought leader Richard Lee cracks the whip on the latest IT issues Changing leadership: anarchy or opportunity? M anagers come and go, bureaucrats seem to stick around forever – but when a true leader decides to leave the organisation, there can be change and upheaval to contend with. This is especially true in long-term transformation programmes where over the course of the journey many individual contributors may ‘roll on and roll off’ along the way, but there is always an emphasis on continuity of leadership at the highest levels so as to ensure successful outcomes while maintaining acceptable risk levels at all times. By definition, transformation leaders define the mission and vision of the programme and then take a hands-on approach to its successful realisation. Most leaders are subordinate to a more senior authority (CEO, board, civil service exec, cabinet minister, etc) who are typically more political and subject to greater volatility in their oversight role. Friction at this level or a change in the direction of the programme can force even the strongest leaders to re-evaluate their role and its longevity. This is when leadership changes can be precipitated either voluntarily or via a very public sacking, and typifies the high-wire act that all transformational leaders undertake each day. The recent events at the UK’s Government Digital Service (GDS) programme are classic in terms of this scenario and may play out similarly in the US and Australia’s nascent digital transformation endeavours as well. Transformation leadership is like war. You must consider yourself already dead in order to fight on to the finish without consideration of your own survival. A harsh analogy, but a true one from my observations. However, anarchy and disruption do not need to be the norm. Changes in leadership can be very cathartic events allowing for a detailed and transparent examination of the mission, vision and progress to date, such that lessons can be learned and strategic realignment activities can be undertaken in near real time, while the new leaders are brought in and acclimatised to both the culture and the plan for the programme. Speed bumps This may disrupt some of the momentum that had been built up prior to the leadership change, but that is a small price to pay compared with the potential catastrophe that can result from everyone taking the attitude that ‘it is business as usual until I am told otherwise’. It will not be business as usual until the plan, its leaders and all contributors are re-synced and moving forward on a common plan once again. Additionally, there must be time allotted to mourn the leaders who have left, to celebrate all accomplishments to date and to build a bond of trust amongst those who will continue the journey to a successful conclusion. Much is said in the startup and consulting communities about the notion of effective leadership. Many these days believe that it can be ‘learned’ as part of an MBA curriculum or in venture capital-sponsored workshops. I find both of these efforts laughable given the scarcity of true leaders around us. The mantle of leadership is earned, not learned, in my experience. Needless to say, vetting and selecting a new transformation leader is a critical task once there has been a change in the current leadership. This person cannot be a clone of the previous leader, nor should they be expected to simply ‘carry on’ in respect to the current plan. They must be allowed to examine all programme-related factors and create an updated plan that reflects their leadership approach and the new business as usual going forward. This process will allow for updates in mission, vision, scope and budgetary realities so that a successful outcome can be achieved and everyone who contributes has had a say in the matter. No matter the strength or background of the new leader, there must be a process of reflection and collaboration so that an initial level of trust can be built and then nurtured by a healthy group dynamic going forward. If not, the organisation will be looking for a new transformation leader or oversight executive in short order. 50 information-age.com September 15
Information Age magazine available as an app for your Apple device The app is FREE to download from the Apple App Store and will be updated with the contents of each new issue, complete with additional multimedia content, free of charge for three years. To download the app, scan this unique bar code using your iPhone
Page 1 and 2: SEPTEMBER 2015 + + 3D PRINTING: TRA
Page 3 and 4: editor’s letter A new way of scor
Page 5 and 6: NEWS FLASH 8 Rounding up the top in
Page 7 and 8: Cloud Servers Simple, secure and co
Page 9 and 10: Nash, which found that women made u
Page 11 and 12: insider A state school in Rocinha,
Page 13 and 14: on the case board guys and a few ot
Page 16 and 17: deployment watch Government Digital
Page 18 and 19: on the cover Calculated risk Say go
Page 20 and 21: on the cover ‘If you empower peop
Page 22 and 23: innovationage 22 information-age.co
Page 24 and 25: innovationage ‘It is poised to be
Page 26 and 27: innovationage 26 information-age.co
Page 28 and 29: 26TH NOVEMBER 2015 CENTRAL LONDON T
Page 30 and 31: storageage and workloads across the
Page 33 and 34: networkage Hardening software-defin
Page 35 and 36: networkage very challenging to mana
Page 37 and 38: securityage A wolf in sheep’s clo
Page 39 and 40: 25 FEBRUARY 2016 | CENTRAL LONDON S
Page 41 and 42: 18-19 November, 2015 | ExCeL, Londo
Page 43 and 44: in the boardroom has always been to
Page 45 and 46: analyst eye Dominance, disruption a
Page 47 and 48: Tomorrow’s Tech Leaders Today 201
Page 49: product corner Toshiba Satellite Ra

A NEW BREED

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?