Ombudsmann-Tätigkeitsbericht 2014 Englisch
To settle disputes between banks and their customers as quickly and smoothly as possible, Germany's private commercial banks introduced an out-of-court conciliation procedure as early as 1992: the Ombudsman Scheme. The Ombudsman Scheme is the centrepiece of the private commercial banks overall consumer policy scheme, which rests on four pillars: consumer education, consumer information, contract transparency and out-of-court dispute-resolution facilities.
To settle disputes between banks and their customers as quickly and smoothly as possible, Germany's private commercial banks introduced an out-of-court conciliation procedure as early as 1992: the Ombudsman Scheme. The Ombudsman Scheme is the centrepiece of the private commercial banks overall consumer policy scheme, which rests on four pillars: consumer education, consumer information, contract transparency and out-of-court dispute-resolution facilities.
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
8<br />
c. Management of complaints<br />
A Customer Complaints Office was set up at the<br />
Association of German Banks as a gateway to the<br />
Ombudsman Scheme. Any customer of a private<br />
commercial bank can contact this office in writing if they<br />
feel that they have been treated unfairly by their bank.<br />
All they have to do is give a brief account of the facts of<br />
the matter, enclosing copies of the required documents<br />
(e.g. cash account or securities account statements).<br />
Complaints in English and French submitted by<br />
customers resident abroad are also processed; in this<br />
case, however, the ombudsman proceedings can take<br />
8.2 Special effect in <strong>2014</strong>: Complaints<br />
about inadmissible consumer loan<br />
processing fees<br />
In a total of four decisions, the Federal Court of Justice<br />
departed in <strong>2014</strong> from its previous judgements on the<br />
admissibility of consumer loan processing fees. On<br />
13 May <strong>2014</strong>, it issued two rulings on the validity of<br />
loan fee clauses in banks’ general terms and conditions<br />
of business, following these up with two rulings on<br />
28 October <strong>2014</strong> on the question of when claims for<br />
reimbursement of such fees become time-barred under<br />
the statute of limitations.<br />
longer, as translations may be required. A fully intended<br />
consequence of the introduction of the Ombudsmen<br />
Scheme is that most private commercial banks have<br />
established schemes of their own to handle customer<br />
complaints. These in-house complaint-settlement<br />
schemes have been a success. A large number of<br />
complaints do not need to be settled by an ombudsman.<br />
In many cases, simply explaining banking procedures or<br />
sometimes complex and abstract banking transactions<br />
takes care of any disputes in advance.<br />
The controversial decisions on time-barring had<br />
an enormous impact on the Ombudsman Scheme.<br />
Particularly because claims for reimbursement of fees<br />
charged under some existing loan agreements had<br />
to be filed by 31 December <strong>2014</strong> at the latest, large<br />
numbers of consumers contacted the Ombudsman<br />
Scheme shortly before the end of the year. On<br />
29 December <strong>2014</strong> alone, the Customer Complaints<br />
Office received over 29,000 complaints. By the end of<br />
the year, fee-related complaints totalled 102,770.<br />
The Association of German Banks responded to this<br />
challenge by taking a number of emergency measures.<br />
For example, it introduced a simplified processing<br />
procedure which, on the one hand, complied with the<br />
94 <strong>Tätigkeitsbericht</strong> <strong>2014</strong>