27.11.2015 Views

WEARABLE/IMPLANTABLE

ISSCC2016AdvanceProgram

ISSCC2016AdvanceProgram

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EVENING EVENTS Monday February 1 st , 8:00 PM<br />

EE1: Class of 2025 – Where Will Be the Best Jobs?<br />

Organizers:<br />

Moderator:<br />

Xicheng Jiang, Broadcom, Irvine, CA<br />

Axel Thomsen, Cirrus Logic, Austin, TX<br />

Piero Malcovati, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy<br />

M.C. Frank Chang, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan<br />

Digital circuits have been driving the development of IC technologies for decades and they<br />

cover by far the widest share of the IC market. Analog and RF circuits, on the other hand, are<br />

essential for implementing crucial functions in electronic systems and require highly qualified<br />

and skilled designers. As a result, a widespread opinion is that there will always be request<br />

for competent analog and RF engineers, however, others argue that digital electronics is taking<br />

over and there will be little need for other disciplines. Indeed, for the past several decades,<br />

the camps of analog and digital engineers have been debating the year in which their<br />

opponents’ discipline will become obsolete. On top of this there is the common misconception<br />

that analog, RF, and power electronic circuits, compared to digital and memory designs, seem<br />

to be more of a whimsical art than a systematic science. In this context, which is the best<br />

choice for students? Is it worth pursuing the whimsical art of analog electronics, or is it better<br />

to focus entirely on digital systems and software? This panel will try to answer these basic<br />

questions, exploiting the know-how of top educators and industry experts active in either the<br />

analog or the digital field.<br />

Panelists:<br />

Willy Sansen, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<br />

Jan M. Rabaey, UC Berkeley, CA<br />

Lawrence Loh, MediaTek, Taiwan<br />

Alessandro Piovaccari, Slicon Labs, Austin, TX<br />

David Flynn, ARM, Cambridge, United Kingdom<br />

Tzi-Dar Chiueh, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan<br />

EE2:<br />

Organizers:<br />

Moderator:<br />

Do We Need to Downscale Our Radios<br />

Below 20nm?<br />

Harish Krishnaswamy, Columbia University, New York, NY<br />

Jan Craninckx, imec, Leuven, Belgium<br />

Tae Wook Kim, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea<br />

Harish Krishnaswamy, Columbia University, New York, NY<br />

It is well known that CMOS technology scaling benefits digital circuits and systems, but<br />

creates numerous challenges for analog/RF circuit designers. Analog and RF operating<br />

frequencies have ceased to noticeably improve as wiring dominates over raw transistor<br />

performance. The shrinking supply voltage limits dynamic range while gate-leakage mismatch<br />

dominates over conventional mismatch mechanisms. As this analog-digital divide widens<br />

below the 20nm technology node, it becomes important to ask: Should we continue to<br />

downscale our radios? Do analog and RF designers need to “get with the program” and figure<br />

out how to design in radically scaled technologies? Will analog and RF circuits look<br />

increasingly “digital”? Or, will economic forces rule all, and the high cost of scaled<br />

technologies eventually dictate a two-chip “best node for the operating mode” solution?<br />

Panelists:<br />

Aaron Thean, imec, Leuven, Belgium<br />

George Chien, Mediatek, San Jose, CA<br />

Peter Kinget, Columbia University, New York, NY<br />

Pietro Andreani, Lund University, Lund, Sweden<br />

Thomas Byunghak Cho, Samsung Electronics, South Korea<br />

Tony Montalvo, Analog Devices, Raleigh, NC<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!