07.12.2015 Views

Kitsch Magazine: Fall 2015

Binaries

Binaries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

than just a hairstyle, it was an incredibly powerful symbol of<br />

the civil rights movement.” It is radical in its rejection of the<br />

idea that “‘nappy’ hair [is] unattractive and undesirable” and<br />

that “possessing nappy hair was negative and shameful.” This<br />

article identifies the extent to which wearing your hair in this<br />

“<br />

And as I was realizing this,<br />

certain hairsyles on certain<br />

women began piquing<br />

my interest—women with<br />

long blonde hair, but worn<br />

in dreadlocks; my gut<br />

reaction was a mix of envy,<br />

proprietary anger, and<br />

disdain<br />

”<br />

style was a marker of political affiliation—many women who<br />

had afros did so in imitation of civil rights activist Angela Davis:<br />

“a black person wearing a ‘fro was dubbed as militant and<br />

threatening.” The politicization of black hair was something<br />

you could not escape in the 70s, and as much as wearing a ‘fro<br />

was a symbol of participating in the movement, not wearing<br />

one was by default not participating.<br />

The political nature of black hair didn’t leave us in<br />

the 70s. In the same article, Edwards later comments that the<br />

movement towards natural hair in our own time, a period of<br />

renewed interest in the need for social change around race<br />

issues in America, is parallel to the natural hair movement<br />

of the 1970s. In a similar (though perhaps less intense) way,<br />

wearing your hair natural today makes a statement that you<br />

believe that aesthetic to have as much, if not more worth<br />

than the “European standards,” and carry a subtle but implicit<br />

rejection of those standards. With her light condemning of<br />

“abrasive methods” to “alter who [she] was naturally” and hope<br />

that “it’s not just a style” for her readers, she clearly points to<br />

the unavoidable political affiliations that black women make<br />

with their hair.<br />

This brings us back to the present, to a younger me<br />

thrust into the realization that in America (the magnified<br />

and intensified college-campus version), the way I wear my<br />

hair carries a very particular and very heavy weight. The ten<br />

cornrows my mother learned how to plait across my head are<br />

from a centuries-old African tradition that used to express<br />

kinship, status, religion—a tradition that then moved through<br />

American history, picking up traces of devaluation, critique,<br />

and eventually empowerment. My relaxed hair wasn’t just<br />

something I decided to do when I was 12, it was me participating<br />

in one of the first industries led by and for a marginalized and<br />

excluded social group.<br />

In my new collegiate context I started to work through<br />

all of this new information. I had to come to terms with the<br />

history of women of color in America. I had to learn what new<br />

codes applied to me now that I occupied a new social space. I<br />

realized that I could no longer be blissfully ignorant of the fact<br />

that even if I do my hair based on a whim, it will always carry<br />

the history of people with hair like mine.<br />

And as I was realizing this, certain hairstyles on certain<br />

women began piquing my interest—women with long blonde<br />

hair, but worn in dreadlocks; women braiding thin cornrows<br />

into their straight dark hair, fixing them with beads. Every time<br />

I saw them, my gut reaction was a mix of envy, proprietary<br />

anger, and disdain. At first I tried to quash my negative kneejerk<br />

response to these hairstyles, telling myself that judging<br />

other women for their hair choices was participating in the<br />

practice that I fell victim to. Maybe they weren’t thoughtlessly<br />

following what they assumed was a fad, or callously assuming<br />

wearing their hair that way gave them cultural capital. Perhaps<br />

they know more about the importance of the hairstyle than I;<br />

who am I to judge a prominent scholar or devout Rastafarian<br />

based only on the color of their skin or texture of their hair?<br />

But try as I might I couldn’t wrangle the anger into a generous<br />

benefit of the doubt.<br />

I existed in this limbo for ages, feeling anxious about<br />

how my hair was perceived, about how it was and wasn’t<br />

what I wanted it to be, and anxious about what I thought<br />

was irrational anger. I spent my time resenting that anxiety,<br />

and searching for a way to tame my mane while in Ithaca<br />

(my daunting experience of trying to find a place to get my<br />

hair done as a freshmen in this town is a story for another<br />

time). And then I started hearing grumbles from corners of the<br />

Internet that I stumbled upon during my hair research. I read<br />

about Bo Derek, a white actress, who is famed for popularizing<br />

cornrows in 1979 when Cicely Tyson had been wearing them<br />

on screen in the early 70s. I read about how Madonna wore an<br />

afro in the 90s as one of her many “out there” looks, and how<br />

Lady Gaga did the same with dreadlocks in 2013. I read about<br />

magazines like Elle and Marie Claire touting Gwen Stefani and<br />

Katy Perry as trendsetters of styles like bantu knots and babyhairs<br />

which had been black hairstyles without fanfare for ages.<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!