07.12.2015 Views

Kitsch Magazine: Fall 2015

Binaries

Binaries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

VHS versus<br />

which is the greatest obsolete viewing experience??<br />

by Yana Makuwa<br />

Price: At their prime, VHSs were a very reasonably priced<br />

product. You could buy a blockbuster film and have it in the<br />

comfort of your home for a mere $15-$20 (Nate’s Dad, <strong>2015</strong>).<br />

And now with a particularly good quality and rare first edition<br />

VHS, you have an anthropological artifact worth TENS of<br />

dollars!<br />

Availability: While DVDs may surpass VHS tapes in<br />

availability in stores, the trusty analog antecedent has a leg<br />

up when it comes to availability of content. During the years<br />

when VHS was the only (or most popular) distribution method<br />

for home video, Hollywood produced such gems as the first<br />

Star Wars trilogy and The Shining (which actually did better in<br />

VHS sales and rentals than at the box office). VHS gave people<br />

access to the best of the best in the comfort of their home. And<br />

now it both provides us with a piece of our cultural history, and<br />

holds the repsonbility of being the final format for many great<br />

films that were never transferred (see Listverse.com’s article<br />

“Top 15 Movies You Can’t Find on DVD” for more!).<br />

Video Quality: This may be an instance where one would<br />

expect the VHS to fall short. The image quality that comes from<br />

the process of magnetic tape recording is simply incapable of<br />

the aggressively crisp high definition that we get from our<br />

newest video technology. However, there is something to be<br />

said for the texture and ethereal quality that comes from the<br />

rich grain of an analog video experience. Being able to see<br />

Richard Gere’s pores and eye-wrinkles on a digitally remastered<br />

HD version of Pretty Woman cannot compare to the angelic<br />

glow that the slightly blurred image gives his face on VHS.<br />

The Middle Earth of The Return of The King on DVD practically<br />

shouts fake CGI and set-design when compared with the<br />

dreamlike quality of a distantly magical memory that it has in<br />

The Fellowship of the Ring on VHS (The Lord of the Rings series<br />

straddles the years when DVD overtook VHS, which explains<br />

why I have the first on VHS and the last on DVD).<br />

“Being able to see Richard<br />

Gere’s pores and eye-wrinkles<br />

on a digitally remastered HD<br />

version of Pretty Woman<br />

cannot compare to the angelic<br />

glow that the slightly blurred<br />

”<br />

image gives his face on VHS.<br />

User Interface: The popularization of DVD ruined<br />

and cast into the realm of memory<br />

the true home-video viewing<br />

experience. Watching a VHS tape<br />

is a physical experience with an<br />

incredibly satisfying arc. First,<br />

there’s the gratifying click when<br />

you open the case (or swoosh if<br />

you have the cheaper, cardboard<br />

version). As you slide the tape<br />

into the player the machinery<br />

accepts it like a gift, and whirs<br />

to life to bring you the film you<br />

hand-picked. Where DVDs have<br />

cold and distant digital dings<br />

and jarring bright blue menu<br />

screens, VHSs have warm colors<br />

and comforting static. And at the<br />

end of your movie, when all is said<br />

and done, you get up and hit the<br />

rewind button—a magical moment<br />

of returning everything to the way<br />

it was before. (BONUS: You get to<br />

watch the movie twice! Once going<br />

forward, and then again in reverse!)<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!