Kitsch Magazine: Fall 2015
Binaries
Binaries
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
VHS versus<br />
which is the greatest obsolete viewing experience??<br />
by Yana Makuwa<br />
Price: At their prime, VHSs were a very reasonably priced<br />
product. You could buy a blockbuster film and have it in the<br />
comfort of your home for a mere $15-$20 (Nate’s Dad, <strong>2015</strong>).<br />
And now with a particularly good quality and rare first edition<br />
VHS, you have an anthropological artifact worth TENS of<br />
dollars!<br />
Availability: While DVDs may surpass VHS tapes in<br />
availability in stores, the trusty analog antecedent has a leg<br />
up when it comes to availability of content. During the years<br />
when VHS was the only (or most popular) distribution method<br />
for home video, Hollywood produced such gems as the first<br />
Star Wars trilogy and The Shining (which actually did better in<br />
VHS sales and rentals than at the box office). VHS gave people<br />
access to the best of the best in the comfort of their home. And<br />
now it both provides us with a piece of our cultural history, and<br />
holds the repsonbility of being the final format for many great<br />
films that were never transferred (see Listverse.com’s article<br />
“Top 15 Movies You Can’t Find on DVD” for more!).<br />
Video Quality: This may be an instance where one would<br />
expect the VHS to fall short. The image quality that comes from<br />
the process of magnetic tape recording is simply incapable of<br />
the aggressively crisp high definition that we get from our<br />
newest video technology. However, there is something to be<br />
said for the texture and ethereal quality that comes from the<br />
rich grain of an analog video experience. Being able to see<br />
Richard Gere’s pores and eye-wrinkles on a digitally remastered<br />
HD version of Pretty Woman cannot compare to the angelic<br />
glow that the slightly blurred image gives his face on VHS.<br />
The Middle Earth of The Return of The King on DVD practically<br />
shouts fake CGI and set-design when compared with the<br />
dreamlike quality of a distantly magical memory that it has in<br />
The Fellowship of the Ring on VHS (The Lord of the Rings series<br />
straddles the years when DVD overtook VHS, which explains<br />
why I have the first on VHS and the last on DVD).<br />
“Being able to see Richard<br />
Gere’s pores and eye-wrinkles<br />
on a digitally remastered HD<br />
version of Pretty Woman<br />
cannot compare to the angelic<br />
glow that the slightly blurred<br />
”<br />
image gives his face on VHS.<br />
User Interface: The popularization of DVD ruined<br />
and cast into the realm of memory<br />
the true home-video viewing<br />
experience. Watching a VHS tape<br />
is a physical experience with an<br />
incredibly satisfying arc. First,<br />
there’s the gratifying click when<br />
you open the case (or swoosh if<br />
you have the cheaper, cardboard<br />
version). As you slide the tape<br />
into the player the machinery<br />
accepts it like a gift, and whirs<br />
to life to bring you the film you<br />
hand-picked. Where DVDs have<br />
cold and distant digital dings<br />
and jarring bright blue menu<br />
screens, VHSs have warm colors<br />
and comforting static. And at the<br />
end of your movie, when all is said<br />
and done, you get up and hit the<br />
rewind button—a magical moment<br />
of returning everything to the way<br />
it was before. (BONUS: You get to<br />
watch the movie twice! Once going<br />
forward, and then again in reverse!)<br />
7