07.12.2015 Views

Kitsch Magazine: Fall 2015

Binaries

Binaries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

art by Michelle Savran<br />

srsly, he’s pretty funny<br />

THE CATHARTIC ABSUR<br />

In today’s media, where there are so many outlets<br />

for comedy and so many funny people, I still always find<br />

myself returning to Mel Brooks. His brand of silliness is<br />

critically acclaimed (he is in the elite EGOT club), and I often<br />

regard him as a safe choice for a favorite comedian. Brooks’<br />

lowbrow vulgarity drives movies such as History of the World<br />

Part 1 (1981) and Robin Hood: Men in Tights (1993). While<br />

these are hysterical movies, he is most remembered for the<br />

films Blazing Saddles (1974) and The Producers (1967), which<br />

have stood the comedic test of time and include some of<br />

the most famous scenes in comedy history. Who knew that<br />

cowboys farting over and over again could be so funny?<br />

This clearly philistine humor coincides with Brooks’ efforts<br />

to push material boundaries. The Producers and Blazing<br />

Saddles were met with criticism regarding insensitivities<br />

toward race and religion, but the fact that the same two<br />

films eventually became celebrated by critics illustrates how<br />

movies can successfully tackle controversy if the material<br />

is enough of a spoof and still tells an honest human story.<br />

The controversy surrounding The Producers stems<br />

from issues of anti-Semitism and the film’s portrayal of<br />

Nazis. Max Bialystok and Leo Bloom, two Broadway theatre<br />

producers, enter into a get-rich-quick scheme when they<br />

realize they can make more money with a flop show than with<br />

a hit. They attempt to produce the worst show ever written<br />

by the worst director who ever lived, and decide on a little<br />

production called “Springtime for Hitler: A Gay Romp with Eva<br />

and Adolf at Berchtesgaden.” It is penned by Franz Liebkind,<br />

an ex-Nazi, and directed by Roger De Bris, a flamboyantly<br />

gay man. Naturally, controversy ensued with this plot.<br />

Released just 23 years after the end of World War II,<br />

the film was criticized for its insensitive ethnic humor. Renata<br />

Adler of The New York Times wrote in 1968 that many parts of<br />

the film are “shoddy and gross and cruel.” The film was thought<br />

to be crude, with many scenes in bad taste. While the uproar<br />

from critics was not unfounded, the film works because of<br />

its ridiculous, over-the-top nature. A few Nazi jokes sprinkled<br />

throughout a plot may cause concern, but a full-on Nazi<br />

musical production containing Nazi showgirls dancing around<br />

in the shape of a swastika? I beg you to try not to laugh. The<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!