07.01.2016 Views

Downloadable_Slides

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Across the Spectrum:<br />

Managing First-episode and<br />

Relapsed Schizophrenia


Leslie Citrome, MD, MPH<br />

Clinical Professor of Psychiatry &<br />

Behavioral Sciences<br />

New York Medical College<br />

Valhalla, NY


Diana O. Perkins, MD, MPH<br />

Professor, Department of Psychiatry<br />

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill<br />

Medical Director, Outreach and Support<br />

Intervention Services (OASIS)<br />

Chapel Hill, NC


Objectives<br />

• Examine diagnostic methodologies that assist in<br />

identifying first-episode schizophrenia so that the<br />

appropriate therapy can be administered early.<br />

• Assess therapeutic methods and modalities that<br />

assist providers and patients with improving<br />

adherence to schizophrenia treatment.<br />

• Evaluate the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of<br />

therapeutic advances that may improve outcomes<br />

in patients with first-episode or relapsed<br />

schizophrenia.


Outline<br />

• Achieving Appropriate and Timely Diagnosis<br />

– Symptomatic domains of schizophrenia and implications for treatment<br />

– DSM-5 and domain ratings<br />

– Diagnosis of early disease<br />

• Treatment of First-episode Schizophrenia and Reducing Relapse - New and<br />

Emerging Treatment Options<br />

– Treatment of first-episode schizophrenia<br />

– Review of the anticipated new second-generation antipsychotics<br />

– Compare and contrast new and older second-generation antipsychotics in reducing<br />

relapse<br />

• Adherence in Schizophrenia<br />

– Challenges of adherence in chronic illnesses<br />

– Strategies to improve adherence<br />

– Emerging therapies that may improve adherence<br />

– Emerging delivery and administration methods that may improve adherence


Outline<br />

• Achieving Appropriate and Timely<br />

Diagnosis<br />

– Symptomatic domains of schizophrenia and<br />

implications for treatment<br />

– DSM-5 and domain ratings<br />

– Diagnosis of early disease


When to Diagnose?<br />

Progressive Stages of Illness in Schizophrenia<br />

Premorbid<br />

Prodromal<br />

Onset/<br />

Deterioration<br />

Residual/Stable<br />

Healthy<br />

Margin of Prevention<br />

Worsening<br />

Severity of<br />

Signs and<br />

Symptoms<br />

Abnormal Brain<br />

Development<br />

Sensitization by dopamine (?)<br />

Excitatory neurotoxicity of glutamate (?)<br />

Neurochemical<br />

Dysregulation<br />

Neurodegeneration<br />

Gestation/Birth 10 Puberty 20 30 40 50<br />

Years<br />

Adapted from: Lieberman JA, et al. Biol Psychiatry. 2001;50(11):884-897.


When to Diagnose?<br />

Progressive Stages of Illness in Schizophrenia<br />

Premorbid<br />

Prodromal<br />

Onset/<br />

Deterioration<br />

Residual/Stable<br />

Healthy<br />

Margin of Prevention<br />

Worsening<br />

Severity of<br />

Signs and<br />

Symptoms<br />

Abnormal Brain<br />

Development<br />

Sensitization by dopamine (?)<br />

Excitatory neurotoxicity of glutamate (?)<br />

Neurochemical<br />

Dysregulation<br />

Neurodegeneration<br />

Gestation/Birth 10 Puberty 20 30 40 50<br />

Years<br />

Adapted from: Lieberman JA, et al. Biol Psychiatry. 2001;50(11):884-897.


When to Diagnose?<br />

Progressive Stages of Illness in Schizophrenia<br />

Premorbid<br />

Prodromal<br />

Onset/<br />

Deterioration<br />

Residual/Stable<br />

Healthy<br />

Margin of Prevention<br />

Worsening<br />

Severity of<br />

Signs and<br />

Symptoms<br />

Abnormal Brain<br />

Development<br />

Sensitization by dopamine (?)<br />

Excitatory neurotoxicity of glutamate (?)<br />

Neurochemical<br />

Dysregulation<br />

Neurodegeneration<br />

Gestation/Birth 10 Puberty 20 30 40 50<br />

Years<br />

Adapted from: Lieberman JA, et al. Biol Psychiatry. 2001;50(11):884-897.


How to Diagnose?<br />

Domains of Psychosis<br />

Disorganized<br />

Speech<br />

Abnormal<br />

Psychomotor<br />

Behavior<br />

Negative<br />

Symptoms<br />

Impaired<br />

Cognition<br />

Depression<br />

Hallucinations<br />

Mania<br />

Delusions<br />

In DSM-5, severity for psychosis is rated quantitatively from 0 (not present) to 4 (present<br />

and severe) on delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech, abnormal psychomotor<br />

behavior, and negative symptoms, plus other domains are available to rate as needed.<br />

Heckers S, et al. Schizophr Res. 2013;150(1):11-14.


How to Diagnose?<br />

Domains of Psychosis<br />

Disorganized<br />

Speech<br />

Abnormal<br />

Psychomotor<br />

Behavior<br />

Negative<br />

Symptoms<br />

Impaired<br />

Cognition<br />

Depression<br />

MAY SEE<br />

THESE<br />

SYMPTOMS<br />

FIRST<br />

Hallucinations<br />

Mania<br />

Delusions<br />

In DSM-5, severity for psychosis is rated quantitatively from 0 (not present) to 4 (present<br />

and severe) on delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech, abnormal psychomotor<br />

behavior, and negative symptoms, plus other domains are available to rate as needed.<br />

Heckers S, et al. Schizophr Res. 2013;150(1):11-14.


Treatment of First-episode Schizophrenia and<br />

Reducing Relapse:<br />

New and Emerging Treatment Options<br />

• Treatment of first-episode schizophrenia<br />

• Review of the anticipated new secondgeneration<br />

antipsychotics<br />

• Compare and contrast new and older<br />

second-generation antipsychotics in<br />

reducing relapse


Treatment of First-episode<br />

Schizophrenia<br />

Diana Perkins, MD, MPH<br />

Professor, Department of Psychiatry<br />

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill<br />

Medical Director, Outreach and Support Intervention<br />

Services (OASIS)<br />

Chapel Hill, NC


Stage-based Interventions<br />

Acute Psychosis<br />

• Treatment goals:<br />

– Establish therapeutic alliance<br />

– Psychosis remission<br />

• Treatment modalities<br />

– Antipsychotic monotherapy<br />

§ Low dose<br />

§ Encourage use of LAI once efficacy and tolerability established<br />

§ Clozapine after 2 to 3 efficacy failure<br />

– Individual supportive psychotherapy<br />

– Family therapy


Stage-based Interventions<br />

Early Recovery<br />

• Metabolic adverse effects<br />

– Monitor: weight, lipids, A1C<br />

– Prevent:<br />

§ Lifestyle counseling<br />

§ Pharmacological: Metformin 500 to 2000 mg daily<br />

• Hyperprolactinemia-related adverse effects<br />

(bone demineralization, hypogonadism)<br />

– Monitor<br />

§ Measure prolactin in risperidone, paliperidone, and typical<br />

antipsychotic treated patients<br />

– Prevent<br />

§ Pharmacological: aripiprazole, bromocriptine<br />

Ajmal A, et al. Psychosomatics. 2014;55:29-36; Kelly DL, et al. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:214; Mizuno Y, et al. Schizophrenia<br />

Bull. 2014;40:1385-1403.


Stage-based Interventions<br />

Early Recovery<br />

• Treat-to-Target:<br />

– Negative symptoms: Primary versus secondary<br />

– Anxiety/poor stress tolerability<br />

• Treatment modalities<br />

– Antipsychotic dose adjustment<br />

– Individual psychotherapy with focus on functional<br />

recovery, improved stress tolerability<br />

– Complimentary treatments:<br />

§ N-acetyl-cysteine<br />

§ L-theanine


N-Acetyl Cysteine: Clinical Trial<br />

• Rationale<br />

– N-acetyl cysteine is a glutathione<br />

precursor, oral administration<br />

increases glutathione levels<br />

• Subjects: 140 subjects with<br />

schizophrenia<br />

• Design: 24-week, randomized,<br />

double-blind, placebocontrolled<br />

augmentation on<br />

current antipsychotic<br />

• Treatment: 1000 mg BID N-<br />

acetyl cysteine<br />

• Outcomes: N-acetyl cysteine<br />

augmentation is associated<br />

with reduced total (P = .009),<br />

negative (P = .028), and<br />

general psychopathology<br />

10<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

NAC<br />

PANSS<br />

Total<br />

Placebo<br />

PANSS<br />

Positive<br />

PANSS<br />

Negative<br />

Berk M, et al. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;64(5):361-368.


N-Acetyl Cysteine: Clinical Trial<br />

• Rationale<br />

– N-acetyl cysteine is a glutathione<br />

precursor, oral administration increases<br />

glutathione levels<br />

• Subjects: 42 subjects with<br />

schizophrenia, acutely psychotic<br />

• Design: 8-week, randomized,<br />

double-blind, placebo-controlled<br />

augmentation on current<br />

antipsychotic<br />

• Treatment: 1000 mg BID N-acetyl<br />

cysteine<br />

• Outcomes: N-acetyl cysteine<br />

augmentation is associated with<br />

reduced total (P = .006), negative<br />

(P = .001), and general<br />

psychopathology (P = .005), not for<br />

positive symptoms (P = .42)<br />

– No adverse effects were reported<br />

Farokhnia et al. Clinical Neuropharmacology 2013;36:185-192<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

PANSS<br />

Total<br />

NAC<br />

Placebo<br />

PANSS<br />

Positive<br />

PANSS<br />

Negative


L-Theanine: Clinical Trial<br />

• Rationale<br />

– L-theanine biologically active amino acid<br />

in tea<br />

– High affinity kainate, AMPA, NMDA<br />

receptors<br />

– Has anti-oxidant effects<br />

– Reduces stress response<br />

• Subjects: 60 subjects with schizophrenia<br />

• Design: 8-week, randomized, doubleblind,<br />

placebo-controlled augmentation<br />

on current antipsychotic<br />

• Treatment: 400 mg/day L-theanine<br />

• Outcomes: L-theanine augmentation<br />

associated with reduced positive<br />

symptoms (P = .004, and general<br />

psychopathology (P


Recently Approved<br />

Antipsychotics


Cariprazine: Clinical Trial<br />

• Rationale<br />

– D2 partial agonist: selective impact on<br />

dopamine system<br />

– D3 partial agonist: potential impact on<br />

negative symptoms and cognition<br />

• Subjects: 439 subjects with<br />

schizophrenia<br />

• Design: 6-week, randomized, doubleblind,<br />

placebo-controlled trial<br />

• Treatment: 3 to 6 mg, 6 to 9 mg dosing<br />

• Outcomes:<br />

– Placebo vs 3 to 6 mg dose: total P=.003,<br />

positive P=.003, and negative symptoms<br />

(P=.15)<br />

– Placebo vs 6 to 9 mg dose total P


Brexpiprazole: Clinical Trial<br />

• Rationale<br />

– D2 partial agonist: selective impact on<br />

dopamine system<br />

• Subjects: 636 subjects with<br />

schizophrenia<br />

• Design: 6-week, randomized, doubleblind,<br />

placebo-controlled trial<br />

• Treatment: 0.25 mg, 2 mg, 4 mg<br />

dosing<br />

• Outcomes:<br />

– Placebo vs 2 mg dose: total P=.0006,<br />

positive P=.003, and negative<br />

symptoms (P=.0007)<br />

– Placebo vs 4 mg dose total P


Paliperidone Palmitate versus Placebo for<br />

Relapse Prevention<br />

• N=506, Study compared once/3-mo formulation) versus placebo<br />

• First time to relapse significantly favored paliperidone palmitate versus<br />

placebo (HR=3.45; 95% CI, P


Relapse Prevention<br />

• Relapse<br />

– Most patients will relapse if antipsychotics are discontinued<br />

– Interferes with normal psychosocial development<br />

– Interferes with educational and vocational achievements<br />

– Risk of harm to self, others, or property higher during active psychosis<br />

– Risk of involuntary hospitalization increases<br />

– Prognosis may be negatively impacted<br />

• Some people have worse schizophrenia than others<br />

– 10% to 15% highly treatment resistant<br />

– 10% to 15% benign course<br />

• Treatment approach<br />

– Collaborative, informed decision making<br />

– Relapse prevention planning and monitoring<br />

– Early recognition and intervention if symptoms return


Meta-analysis: Relapse Rates<br />

First Generation versus Second Generation<br />

• Subjects: 23 studies, n=4504 with schizophrenia<br />

• Study duration: ≥3 months<br />

• Outcomes:<br />

• Risk of relapse higher in persons treated with first<br />

generation versus second generation<br />

antipsychotics (P=.0007), Number-needed-totreat<br />

= 17 (95% CI: 10-50)<br />

• Lower rates with second versus first generation:<br />

• Relapse at 3, 6, 12 months (P=.04, P


Not All First-episode Patients Relapse<br />

• 207 persons with first-episode<br />

schizophrenia<br />

100<br />

• 24 had only a single episode in<br />

7.5 years<br />

75<br />

• Predictors* of a single episode<br />

included shorter duration of<br />

untreated psychosis and more<br />

rapid time to response to<br />

medication<br />

50<br />

25<br />

• Single-episode patients all<br />

stopped taking antipsychotic<br />

medication during follow-up<br />

period**<br />

0<br />

Single Episode<br />

Multiple Episode<br />

*Including only predictors that survived adjustment for multiple testing; **Personal communication Alvarez-Jimenez<br />

Alvarez-Jimenez M, et al. Schizophr Res. 2011;125:236-246.<br />

26


Are Some Patients<br />

Harmed by Antipsychotics?<br />

• Subjects: 7-year follow-up of 128 subjects, 103 agreed<br />

to participate<br />

• Following initial remission, half randomized to dose<br />

reduction, half to maintenance treatment<br />

• ~10% on typical antipsychotic<br />

• Outcomes<br />

• DR group had less overall exposure to<br />

antipsychotics<br />

• Relapse rates similar, most patients in both groups<br />

had trial off of antipsychotic<br />

• Symptom remission at 7 years similar in both<br />

groups<br />

• Functional remission* 46% DR vs 20% MT (P=.01)<br />

• Full recovery 40% DR vs 18% MT (P=.004)<br />

• 8 DR and 3 MT did not relapse after stopping<br />

antipsychotics<br />

Wunderink L, et al. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;70(9):913-20.<br />

Cumulative Survival<br />

0.9<br />

0.6<br />

0.3<br />

0<br />

DR MT<br />

500 Days 3000 Days<br />

Time to Relapse from t6, d<br />

*Groningen Social Disability Schedule


Do Antipsychotics Contribute to<br />

Gray Matter Loss?<br />

All Antipsychotics, size of circle reflects relative sample size in study.<br />

P=0.028<br />

Mean Daily Antipsychotic Dose Administered During Scan Interval<br />

(chlorpromazine equivalents)<br />

Image used with permission. Vita A, et al. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;78(6):403-412.<br />

28


Do Antipsychotics Contribute to<br />

Gray Matter Loss?<br />

Any treatment with “typical” antipsychotics, size of circle reflects relative sample size in study.<br />

P=0.003<br />

Mean Daily Antipsychotic Dose Administered During Scan Interval<br />

(chlorpromazine equivalents)<br />

Image used with permission. Vita A, et al. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;78(6):403-412.<br />

29


Do Antipsychotics Contribute to<br />

Gray Matter Loss?<br />

Only treated with “atypical” antipsychotics, size of circle reflects relative sample size in study.<br />

clozapine olanzapine quetiapine risperidone ziprasidone multiple-atypicals<br />

P=0.003<br />

Mean Daily Antipsychotic Dose Administered During Scan Interval<br />

(chlorpromazine equivalents)<br />

Image used with permission. Vita A, et al. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;78(6):403-412.<br />

30


Outline<br />

• Adherence in Schizophrenia<br />

– Challenges of adherence in chronic illnesses<br />

– Strategies to improve adherence<br />

– Emerging therapies that may improve<br />

adherence<br />

– Emerging delivery and administration methods<br />

that may improve adherence


Scope of the Adherence Problem<br />

§ Medication adherence is poor across physical<br />

and psychiatric disorders 1<br />

§<br />

Medication adherence is particularly poor in persistent<br />

disorders where treatments are designed to prevent symptom<br />

onset or recurrence, and the consequences of stopping<br />

treatment are delayed<br />

§ ~75% of patients with schizophrenia become<br />

nonadherent within 2 years of hospital<br />

discharge 2<br />

1<br />

Nose A, et al. Psychol Med. 2003;33:1149-1160. 2 Weiden PJ, et al. Psychiatry Serv. 1995;46:1049-1054.


Clinical Consequences of<br />

Nonadherence Are Severe<br />

• ~50% of patients who discontinue/do not take<br />

antipsychotics will relapse within 3 to 10<br />

months 1,2<br />

• Relapse rates are much higher in nonadherent<br />

patients 3<br />

§ 69% of patients with poor adherence relapsed compared<br />

with 18% of patients with good adherence (NNT=2)<br />

1<br />

Blackwell B. Clin Pharmacol Therapy. 1972;13:841-848. 2 Hirsch SR, et al. Schizophrenia. Oxford,<br />

England: Blackwell Science; 1995:443-468. 3Morken G, et al. BMC Psychiatry. 2008;8:32.


Partial Adherence Increases the<br />

Rate of Rehospitalization<br />

Patients Rehospitalized, %<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

6<br />

12<br />

0 1-10<br />

16<br />

11-30 >30<br />

22<br />

Maximum Therapy Gap, Days within 1 year<br />

Weiden PJ, et al. Psychiatr Serv. 2004;55:886-891.


Suicide Attempts Increase<br />

When Therapy Is Interrupted<br />

100<br />

Suicide Attempt Rate/<br />

1000 person/y<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

20<br />

72<br />

Age/gender-adjusted<br />

relative risk increased<br />

4.2 times (95% CI:<br />

1.7-10.1)<br />

0<br />

No Interruption<br />

n=399<br />

≥30-day Interruption<br />

n=204<br />

Data obtained from drug-dispensing and hospital discharge records (Netherlands) for<br />

schizophrenic patients (sample size, 603) in database (N=865,000) with drug interruption and<br />

≥30-day gap in treatment. Risk estimates were controlled for differences in age and gender.<br />

Herings RM, et al. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003;112:423-424.


Hazard Ratio<br />

Stopping Medication Is the Most Powerful<br />

Predictor of First-episode Relapse<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

4.89<br />

First<br />

Relapse<br />

4.57<br />

Second<br />

Relapse<br />

Sample of 104 first-episode schizophrenia patients<br />

who responded to treatment of their index episode but<br />

were at risk for relapse.<br />

• Relapse risk is 5 times<br />

higher after a first-episode<br />

patient stops antipsychotic<br />

medication 1<br />

• Predictors of nonadherence<br />

in first year:<br />

– Early adolescent premorbid<br />

adjustment (P


Unfortunately,<br />

We Overestimate Adherence<br />

– Nonadherence viewed as failure → consistent bias to<br />

overestimate adherence/underestimate nonadherence<br />

– We assume lack of adequate response as “treatmentresistance”<br />

and lack of efficacy for the antipsychotic for<br />

that patient<br />

§ This is a possible explanation for high dosing of antipsychotics,<br />

polypharmacy with other antipsychotics and combination<br />

treatment with anticonvulsants<br />

♦ This is a no-win cycle: adherence is even more of a challenge<br />

with complex regimens<br />

Velligan DI, et al. Psychiatr Serv. 2007;58(9):1187-1192.


We Can Identify<br />

Risk Factors for Nonadherence<br />

These Can Differ for Each Patient<br />

Patient-related 1<br />

• Poor insight<br />

• Negative attitude<br />

toward medication<br />

• Prior nonadherence<br />

• Substance abuse<br />

• Cognitive impairment<br />

Treatment-related 1<br />

• Adverse effects<br />

• Lack of efficacy/<br />

continued symptoms<br />

Environment/Relationshiprelated<br />

1<br />

• Lack of family/social support<br />

• Problems with therapeutic alliance<br />

• Practical problems<br />

(financial, transportation, etc.)<br />

Societal-related 2<br />

• Stigma attached to illness<br />

• Stigma caused by medication<br />

adverse effects<br />

1. Velligan DI, et al. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(suppl 4):1-46.<br />

2. Lee S, et al. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(7):1685-1696.


Reverberations from Adverse Effects<br />

How Patient and Clinician Responses May Differ<br />

Adverse effect<br />

appears<br />

Influencing patient response<br />

Subjective<br />

Distress<br />

Objective<br />

Severity<br />

Influencing clinician response<br />

Adherence<br />

Impact<br />

Safety and Risk<br />

Weiden PJ, et al. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;68(suppl 6):14-23.


It Is Nice to Have Choices<br />

– Different antipsychotics, each with their own tolerability profiles<br />

– Different formulations, each with their own advantages and<br />

disadvantages<br />

§ Regular capsules and tablets<br />

§ Liquid concentrates/oral suspensions<br />

§ Orally disintegrating tablets (swallowed)<br />

§ Orally disintegrating tablets (sublingual administration)<br />

§ Inhaled powders (use in agitation only)<br />

§ Fast-acting intramuscular antipsychotics (use in agitation)<br />

§ Long-acting intramuscular antipsychotics (acute or maintenance<br />

treatment)<br />

§ Long-acting oral antipsychotics?


Long-acting Injectable Antipsychotics Lower<br />

Risk of Rehospitalization After First<br />

Hospitalization for Schizophrenia<br />

Any depot injection compared with equivalent oral formulation<br />

Adjusted<br />

Hazard Ratio<br />

Rehospitalization<br />

95% CI P<br />

0.36 0.17-0.75 .0007<br />

Tiihonen J, et al. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168:603-609.


Long-acting Injectable Antipsychotics Lower<br />

Risk of Rehospitalization After First<br />

Hospitalization for Schizophrenia<br />

Any depot injection compared with equivalent oral formulation<br />

Adjusted<br />

Hazard Ratio<br />

Rehospitalization<br />

95% CI P<br />

0.36 0.17-0.75 .0007<br />

Tiihonen J, et al. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168:603-609.


Impact of Collaborative Care<br />

• Recovery of a normal life in the community<br />

• Reduce impairments, disabilities, and handicaps<br />

• Active family involvement<br />

• Build on patients’ strengths, interests, and<br />

capabilities<br />

• Integrate + coordinate services<br />

• Requires time, patience, and resilience<br />

Individualization of treatment is a<br />

fundamental pillar of rehabilitation.<br />

Littrell KH, et al. Psychiatr Ann. 1998;28(7):371-377.


Treatment Is a Dynamic Process<br />

• Switches offer both opportunity and risk<br />

• A medication does not have to be perfect<br />

– Does it relieve symptoms well enough?<br />

– Is it tolerated well enough?<br />

– Is the patient willing to take it?<br />

• Shared decision-making: Getting the patient to “buy in” is<br />

key in promoting adherence<br />

– Individuals have their own preferences and values regarding<br />

which symptoms are important to them<br />

– Individuals have their own preferences and values regarding<br />

which tolerability issues are important to them


Choosing an Antipsychotic:<br />

Switch or Stay?<br />

• Past history of efficacy of drug response<br />

• Nature of psychiatric condition, acuity<br />

• Target signs and symptoms<br />

• Patient preference, history of adherence<br />

• Need for special monitoring<br />

• Amenable to other interventions to address tolerability?<br />

– Diet, exercise, and statins for obesity and dyslipidemia<br />

– Beta-blockers for akathisia<br />

– Anticholinergic medications for EPS


Thank you for your participation!<br />

Please remember to take the posttest to<br />

receive CME credit for this activity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!