You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A:Well, he…if I recall correctly…hmm. Hang on, give me a moment,<br />
please. I do believe that he may have had me blocked at that time. I<br />
think I recall him tweeting, though it wouldn’t be in this exhibit because I<br />
don’t think he tagged me in it, but I believe I was alerted to a tweet in<br />
which he said, “I blocked you, so…so there.” or something to that effect.<br />
So it’s possible he had me blocked at that time. However, there are<br />
many instances of evidence of him continuing to comment on my tweets.<br />
Comment on things that I was stated on Twitter that he would not have<br />
known if he was not continuing to monitor my activity on Twitter. 22<br />
27. Following Ms. Guthrie’s attempt to backtrack from her above-referenced<br />
testimony, Ms. Guthrie ultimately confirmed the following regarding whether she<br />
was aware if Mr. <strong>Elliott</strong> ever received her September 9 th tweets:<br />
Q: Okay. So I think my question was…you don’t know if he [Mr. <strong>Elliott</strong>]<br />
had blocked you on September 9 th ?<br />
A: I don’t know if he had blocked me, no.<br />
Q: So then, obviously you don’t know whether or not he ever received<br />
your message of stop?<br />
A: No, I don’t. 23<br />
28. Ms. Guthrie, herself, cannot therefore confirm that Mr. <strong>Elliott</strong> ever became aware<br />
that she wanted Mr. <strong>Elliott</strong> to stop contacting her. Indeed, although Ms. Guthrie<br />
had communicated with Mr. <strong>Elliott</strong> by email in the spring of 2012, she chose not<br />
to advise Mr. <strong>Elliott</strong> by email to stop contacting her, and she chose not to Direct<br />
Message Mr. <strong>Elliott</strong> on Twitter. Further to this point, prior to charging Mr.<br />
<strong>Elliott</strong> with criminal harassment, the police did not warn Mr. <strong>Elliott</strong> to stay away<br />
from the complainants. Mr. <strong>Elliott</strong> did not make any inculpatory statements to the<br />
police upon his arrest suggesting he was aware that Ms. Guthrie wanted him to<br />
stop contacting her. And the police did not obtain a Production Order in order to<br />
determine which tweets – if any – Mr. <strong>Elliott</strong> received. Certainly, therefore, one<br />
available inference on the evidence is that Mr. <strong>Elliott</strong> did not know that Ms.<br />
Guthrie wanted him to stop contacting her.<br />
29. Further, while a small percentage of Mr. <strong>Elliott</strong>’s tweets in Exhibit 2AJ were<br />
directed at either of the complainants, the vast majority of Mr. <strong>Elliott</strong>’s tweets<br />
were not. Indeed, as confirmed by the Crown Attorney’s expert witness, in the<br />
world of Twitter, messages are “directed to” the Twitter handles (i.e.:<br />
@paisleyrae) only when the handles are found at the front of the tweet.<br />
According to PC Dayler, if another user’s Twitter handle is used later in the tweet,<br />
22 Stephanie Guthrie: January 10, 2014, p. 69, line 22-‐p. 70, line 4. <br />
23 Stephanie Guthrie: January 10, 2014, p. 71, lines 27-‐32, p. 72, lines 1-‐2, <br />
<br />
10