Brahman

BRAHMAN: THE DISCOVERY OF THE GOD OF ABRAHAM: M. M. NINAN
After Noah landed, he had a son named Shem, from whom came the man whom the Bible names
Eber. (Ever, Aver, Ab-ra). Eber is said to have resisted Nimrod's command to build the Tower of
Babel: In an act of outrageous disloyalty to Nimrod, Eber crossed over from Babylon to the land
across the river - The Rivers of Euphrates and Tigris.In this wilderness, Ever and his people
retained the Hebrew language while back in Babylon the rest of the languages were confused.
Dravids claim that this original language was Tamil. The name 'Hebrew' rested on Abraham,
whose name comes from that of his Great-Grandaddy Eber
Abraham and his sons distinguished themselves as men who would migrate away rather than fight
over territory. One of this group is the Dravids of the Harappa and Mohen Jodeira area. Just as
Abraham, and all this children 'crossed over' from their homeland to new territory rather than fight,
the Aryans who left their home land of Iran when the tribes were in fight could very well may be
called Hebrews in the wider sense. Iranian Aryans worshipped Asuras and Indian Aryans
worshipped Devas when the two groups seperated.
Abraham migrated from place to place and coexisted peacefully with the locals as the Bible clearly
shows. The only time he went to war was when his nephew was taken captive. This peaceful
coexistence was typical of the Hebrews until their coming to take over Canaan and the formation of
the Kingdom as Jews. This peaceful character of Abraham was passed onto the children of of his
cousin sister Keturah. Archealogy shows that the Mohenjodero Harappa remained peaceful until
the coming of the Aryans. They apparently knew no war.
Archaeologists have long wondered whether the Harappan civilization could actually have thrived
for roughly 2,000 years without any major wars or leadership cults. Obviously people had conflicts,
sometimes with deadly results — graves reveal ample skull injuries caused by blows to the head.
But there is no evidence that any Harappan city was ever burned, besieged by an army, or taken
over by force from within. Sifting through the archaeological layers of these cities, scientists find no
layers of ash that would suggest the city had been burned down, and no signs of mass destruction.
There are no enormous caches of weapons, and not even any art representing warfare.
That would make the Harappan civilization an historical outlier in any era. But it's especially
noteworthy at a time when neighboring civilizations in Mesopotamia were erecting massive war
monuments, and using cuneiform writing on clay tablets to chronicle how their leaders slaughtered
and enslaved thousands.
What exactly were the Harappans doing instead of focusing their energies on military conquest? “
http://io9.com/a-civilization-without-war-1595540812
105