30.05.2016 Views

A First Look at Communication Theory (6th edition)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 36<br />

ORDER OUT OF CHAOS<br />

Outline<br />

I. Introduction.<br />

A. However useful, the one-chapter-one-theory organiz<strong>at</strong>ion of the book<br />

compartmentalizes communic<strong>at</strong>ion theory.<br />

B. This chapter seeks to integr<strong>at</strong>e the m<strong>at</strong>erial.<br />

C. This text has used the objective/interpretive dichotomy to classify theories, but some<br />

theorists resist being pigeonholed.<br />

D. In light of these problems, James Anderson loc<strong>at</strong>es theories on a worldview<br />

continuum anchored by the terms “objective” and “hermeneutic” (or “interpretive”).<br />

E. This continuum places theories based on how their authors view the n<strong>at</strong>ure of the<br />

phenomenal world.<br />

II.<br />

III.<br />

Plotting theories on an objective-interpretive scale.<br />

A. Objective theorists believe in the unity of science.<br />

B. Interpretive theorists believe in multiple domains.<br />

C. Anderson c<strong>at</strong>alogs other differences between worldviews.<br />

1. Whereas objective theorists hold to a singular, independent, autonomous social<br />

reality, interpretive scholars assume th<strong>at</strong> reality is a conferred st<strong>at</strong>us.<br />

2. Whereas objective scholars posit a timeless social reality, interpretive scholars<br />

see knowledge as contextually based.<br />

3. Whereas objective scholars tre<strong>at</strong> language as referential, interpretive scholars<br />

question its represent<strong>at</strong>ional n<strong>at</strong>ure.<br />

D. Figure 36.1 places each theory along the objective-interpretive continuum.<br />

1. Some theories fit easily into c<strong>at</strong>egories, but others are hard to c<strong>at</strong>egorize.<br />

2. The continuum is a work-in-progress.<br />

E. The entire text has worked toward this synthesis.<br />

F. Scholars consulted about the continuum did not always agree on the placement of<br />

individual theories, but such disagreements are enlightening.<br />

“On the one hand . . . on the other.”<br />

A. The worldview of semiotics and rel<strong>at</strong>ional dialectics are difficult to place because<br />

they have shifted steadily toward interpretivism.<br />

B. Although Harding and Wood have a strong postmodern influence, their belief th<strong>at</strong><br />

there is a truth th<strong>at</strong> can be partially apprehended inserts some objectivity into their<br />

theory and therefore, their theory is loc<strong>at</strong>ed in column 4.<br />

C. Some scholars such as Delia, McLuhan, and Aristotle are difficult to place because of<br />

apparent discrepancies between their st<strong>at</strong>ed philosophical commitments and their<br />

research methodologies.<br />

D. The lack of critical consensus allows readers a chance to join the deb<strong>at</strong>e.<br />

E. Excluding the midscale range, there is a 50/50 split between objective and<br />

interpretive theories, which parallel the r<strong>at</strong>io in the field of communic<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

493

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!