Fel! Hittar inte referenskälla

The dilemmas of victim positioning
remember it. In so far as it has any significance at all, she was
certainly in control of the situation — at least afterwards, when
she proved capable of surveying her options of movement in
order to avoid further confrontation. This, she remembers: her
mastering this situation, an important point in the revision of
her narrative of self as related to the interviewer. The mastery!
Not the fact that the fight took place.
In a certain way, the oppositions in the interview between
bullying and not bullying, bullying of Katinka and bullying of
others, and bullying in the past versus bullying in the present all
function as areas of dry land in the marshy landscape of
meanings and practices through which Katinka moves —
shifting between success and failure. In some places, the ground
beneath her gives way and, in other places, the ground holds
temporarily before subsiding and requiring a new jump. She has
to balance her act between, on the one hand, naming her fear
and tendency to marginalization (risking the reproduction of
this position), and, on the other hand, naming the new and
hopefully future situation (friends with everyone, mastering
most situations, not bullied, someone who sets the premises of
inclusion and exclusion through markers of youth) in order to
draw attention to the new as something that already exists in
the present. However, neither of these points can really become
sustainable claims to reality unless others recognize their
enunciative power. As soon as the statements are disqualified by
others, Katinka is forced to look for other areas of dry land in
her attempt to stay proactive in setting premises of description.
55