GUIDEBOOK

Recommendations

Info

CASE STUDY: Heritage policy analysis tool for the HUL approach PROGRAMME LEAD: Dr. Loes Veldpaus, PhD research, Eindhoven University of Technology TIMELINE: 2011-2015 (PhD); workshops May & November 2014 APPLICATION: FUNDING: The application of the HUL approach is being clarified within current governance frameworks MoU Gemeente Amsterdam and TU Eindhoven. PROGRAMME PARTNERS: Gemeente Amsterdam and TU Eindhoven PROFILE: KEY CHALLENGES: Population: 838,338 (city), 1,335,115 (urban) For the purpose of this research: assessment and integration of urban and heritage policies In general: urban development pressures, tourism, water management, infrastructure and traffic. 50 | The 50 HUL Guidebook
Amsterdam heritage policy analysis tool for the HUL approach Dr. Loes Veldpaus, Research Associate at Newcastle University. This case study presents a short overview of research undertaken in Amsterdam, expanding the understanding of the effective implementation of HUL. Even in Amsterdam – considered a forerunner and early adopter– HUL was not ‘simply’ implemented. It is not only difficult to change ways, but hard in the first place to identify. A purpose-built taxonomy-based policy analysis tool (Veldpaus, 2015) allowed for the identification of disparities, similarities and complementarities between urban and heritage policies, processes and departments which can now be debated. Theses disparities are food for thought, as they might preclude the holistic approach for which HUL aims. Amsterdam Herengracht in winter. The Canal Ring Area as a World Heritage property is a distinct area within the historic urban landscape of Amsterdam. © Johan J.Swart The HUL Guidebook | 51
Page 1 and 2: THE HUL GUIDEBOOK Managing heritage
Page 3 and 4: 1. About this guidebook 05 2. A new
Page 5 and 6: 1. ABOUT THIS GUIDEBOOK Introductio
Page 7 and 8: A new international framework for u
Page 9 and 10: 2011 Recommendation on the Historic
Page 11 and 12: 3. WHAT IS THE HUL APPROACH? The Hi
Page 13 and 14: PARQUE NACIONAL CAJAS Av. 27 de Feb
Page 15 and 16: The HUL toolkit can be adapted to s
Page 17 and 18: 5. CASE STUDIES AND BEST PRACTICE I
Page 19 and 20: Similar to other cities, the need f
Page 21 and 22: Ballarat AUSTRALIA People, Culture
Page 23 and 24: 3. Management of change A key objec
Page 25 and 26: Ballarat’s HUL model Ballarat’s
Page 27 and 28: Shanghai CHINA Hongkou River Area,
Page 29 and 30: CASE STUDY: Shanghai, China 4. Pers
Page 31 and 32: Wujiang District, Suzhou CHINA Pres
Page 33 and 34: Fig. 3. The presentation of the dev
Page 35 and 36: Cuenca ECUADOR The text shown is pa
Page 37 and 38: At this event, cities were able to
Page 39 and 40: Rawalpindi PAKISTAN Ayesha-Pamela R
Page 41 and 42: of the historic city and the attrib
Page 43 and 44: Zanzibar TANZANIA Ng’ambo Tuikayo
Page 45 and 46: 4. Perspectives and results In 2013
Page 47 and 48: Naples ITALY Pilot application of t
Page 49: 4. Perspectives and results Althoug
Page 53 and 54: Heritage officers were more focused
Page 55 and 56: Categories WHY Values WHO actors co
Page 57 and 58: OTHER INSTITUTIONS: • American Pl
Page 59 and 60: REFERENCES Page 7: UNESCO (2015) ht

GUIDEBOOK

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?