GUIDEBOOK

Recommendations

Info

Figure 3: policy analysis tool based on heritage taxonomy + answer options HOW Process Steps Categories Taxonomy Definitions Step 1 - inventory resources Step 2 - define value Step 3 - define vulnerability Step 4 - develop strategy Step 5 - integrate strategies Step 6 - prioritize Step 7 - built partnerships Step 8 - monitor resources YH YH YH YH YH YH YH YH YA YA YA YA YA YA YA YA NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO HOW HOW - PROCESS STEPS 1 Step 1 - Inventory NO 2 Step 2 - Value 3 Step 3 - Vulnerability 4 Step 4 - Strategy 5 Step 5 - Integrate 6 Step 6 - Prioritize 7 Step 7 - Partnerships 8 Step 8 - Monitor 1 Building element WHAT Tangible attributes asset area landscape 2 Building 3 Urban element 4 Natural element 5 Ensemble 6 Context or setting 7 Area 8 The result of layering 9 Urban landscape / Everything Intangible attributes asset related societal process 10 Concept or artistic trend 11 Relation(s) to context (location) 12 Character 13 Use, function 14 Knowledge, traditions, practices 15 Relation(s) to meaning (association) 16 Community / people(s) 17 Management process 18 Development or evolution 54
Categories WHY Values WHO actors community experts asset process societal traditional Taxonomy Definitions 19 Aesthetic value 20 Age value 21 Historic value 22 Scientific value 23 Social value 24 Ecological value 25 Political value 26 Economic value 27 Other cultural value 28 Politicians 29 Policy makers 30 Policy officers 31 Scientific experts 32 Professional experts 33 Non-professional experts 34 Developers / private sector 35 Directly involved community 36 Indirectly involved community Step 1 - inventory resources YH YA NO Step 2 - define value YH YA NO HOW Process Steps Step 3 - define vulnerability Step 4 - develop strategy Step 5 - integrate strategies Step 6 - prioritize YH YH YH YH YA YA YA YA NO NO NO NO Step 7 - built partnerships YH YA NO Step 8 - monitor resources YH YA NO CASE STUDY: Heritage policy tool for the HUL approach Role Description SHORT Answer Decision making Enrolled Consulted Responsible in decision making and related processes Participating in decision making and related processes Advising in decision making and related processes NO YH YA NO | Don’t know YES for Heritage Resources (designated) YES for All Urban Resources Informed Being notified about decision making and related processes No role Not notified or involved
Page 1 and 2:
THE HUL GUIDEBOOK Managing heritage
Page 3 and 4: 1. About this guidebook 05 2. A new
Page 5 and 6: 1. ABOUT THIS GUIDEBOOK Introductio
Page 7 and 8: A new international framework for u
Page 9 and 10: 2011 Recommendation on the Historic
Page 11 and 12: 3. WHAT IS THE HUL APPROACH? The Hi
Page 13 and 14: PARQUE NACIONAL CAJAS Av. 27 de Feb
Page 15 and 16: The HUL toolkit can be adapted to s
Page 17 and 18: 5. CASE STUDIES AND BEST PRACTICE I
Page 19 and 20: Similar to other cities, the need f
Page 21 and 22: Ballarat AUSTRALIA People, Culture
Page 23 and 24: 3. Management of change A key objec
Page 25 and 26: Ballarat’s HUL model Ballarat’s
Page 27 and 28: Shanghai CHINA Hongkou River Area,
Page 29 and 30: CASE STUDY: Shanghai, China 4. Pers
Page 31 and 32: Wujiang District, Suzhou CHINA Pres
Page 33 and 34: Fig. 3. The presentation of the dev
Page 35 and 36: Cuenca ECUADOR The text shown is pa
Page 37 and 38: At this event, cities were able to
Page 39 and 40: Rawalpindi PAKISTAN Ayesha-Pamela R
Page 41 and 42: of the historic city and the attrib
Page 43 and 44: Zanzibar TANZANIA Ng’ambo Tuikayo
Page 45 and 46: 4. Perspectives and results In 2013
Page 47 and 48: Naples ITALY Pilot application of t
Page 49 and 50: 4. Perspectives and results Althoug
Page 51 and 52: Amsterdam heritage policy analysis
Page 53: Heritage officers were more focused
Page 57 and 58: OTHER INSTITUTIONS: • American Pl
Page 59 and 60: REFERENCES Page 7: UNESCO (2015) ht
show all

GUIDEBOOK

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?