THE PROBLEM

Recommendations

Info

Power of Attorney In the matter of Wright Ltd („Clients“) versus SantosD in respect of a contract Mr Horace Fasttrack („Lawyer“) is hereby granted unrestricted Power of Attorney to represent the Clients vis-à-vis third parties both before court and outside of court, in particular, before courts and authorities of all instances. The Lawyers shall, inter alia, be entitled to deliver declarations, including unilateral declarations such as termination notices, challenges, set-off declarations or declarations of rescission. This Power of Attorney encompasses the initiation, the withdrawal and the limitation of legal remedies and procedures of whatever kind as well as the decision not to pursue these. This Power of Attorney also encompasses collateral proceedings, in particular, seizure, injunction, taxation of costs, enforcement of judgement as well as insolvency proceedings and family matters. In addition, this Power of Attorney encompasses the conclusion of settlements and declarations of waiver and renunciation as well as of acknowledgement. The Lawyer shall be entitled to grant sub-Powers of Attorney. The Lawyer shall be entitled to accept items and assets of whatever kind on behalf of the Clients. The Lawyer is authorized to serve and to accept legal documents of whatever kind in respect of any kind of legal proceedings. Any claims for reimbursement of costs are hereby assigned to the Lawyer. The grant of this Power of Attorney shall thereby approve any actions already undertaken by the Lawyer. The contents and the validity of this Power of Attorney are subject to the law of Equatoriana. Oceanside, Equatoriana Place 5 June 2016 Date Beinhorn (COO) Signature © Association for the Organisation and Promotion of the Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot 21 Prof. Dr. Stefan Kröll
São Paulo, 08 June 2016. SantosD KG 77 Avenida O Rei Cafucopa, Mediterraneo Re: Notice for Commencement of Arbitration Proceeding Arbitration Proceeding Nr. 200/2016/SEC7 Claimant: Wright Ltd Respondent: SantosD KG Dear Sirs, On 31 May 2016, the Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada (“CAM-CCBC”) received the attached Request for Arbitration, presented by Wright Ltd (“Claimant”) against SantosD KG (“Respondent”). The original Request for Arbitration was supplemented on 07 June 2016 to comply with the requirements of Article 4. Therefore, pursuant to Article 4.3 1 of the CAM-CCBC Arbitration Rules, effective from 01 January 2012 2 (“Rules”), the Secretariat invites you to describe in brief the nature and circumstances of the dispute giving rise to the claims, the basis upon which the claims are made and their respective amount. We also invite you to comment on the place of arbitration, language, law or rules of law applicable to the arbitration. The description in brief and any additional comments must be received within fifteen (15) days. In light of the appointment of the arbitrator presented by Claimant in its Request for Arbitration, the CAM-CCBC also invites Respondent to appoint its arbitrator pursuant to Article 4.4 of the Rules 3 . Please do not hesitate to contact us for further inquiries. Kind regards, Case Manager 1 CAM-CCBC Rules, Article 4.3. The Secretariat of the CAM-CCBC will send a copy of the notice and respective documents that support it to the other party, requesting that, within fifteen (15) days, it describe in brief any matter that may be the subject of its claim and the respective amount, as well as comments regarding the seat of arbitration, language, law or rules of law applicable to the arbitration under the contract. 2 Please find attached a copy of the Rules and a copy of the List of Arbitrators. 3 CAM-CCBC Rules, Article 4.4. The Secretariat of the CAM-CCBC will send both parties a copy of these Rules and the list of the names of the members of the List of Arbitrators, inviting them to, within fifteen (15) days, each appoint one (1) arbitrator and, optionally, one (1) alternate to constitute the Arbitral Tribunal. © Association for the Organisation and Promotion of the Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot 22 Prof. Dr. Stefan Kröll
Page 1 and 2: Twenty Fourth Annual Willem C. Vis
Page 3 and 4: Horace Fasttrack Advocate at the Co
Page 5 and 6: 3. At the time of their sale in 201
Page 7 and 8: 15. Furthermore, Mr Lindbergh state
Page 9 and 10: CLAIMANT’s EXHIBIT C 1 1 May 2010
Page 11 and 12: 3. The BUYER undertakes to purchase
Page 13 and 14: CLAIMANT’s EXHIBIT C 3 Fri 15/01/
Page 15 and 16: CLAIMANT’s EXHIBIT C 5 Fri 15/01/
Page 17 and 18: CLAIMANT’s EXHIBIT C 7 Wed 10/02/
Page 19 and 20: Power of Attorney In the matter of
Page 21: Horace Fasttrack Advocate at the Co
Page 25 and 26: Nomination of Arbitrator and Jurisd
Page 27 and 28: 18. The 0.5% levy by the Central Ba
Page 29 and 30: RESPONDENT’s EXHIBIT R 2 Fr 22/10
Page 31 and 32: RESPONDENT’s EXHIBIT R 4 Mo 24/10
Page 33 and 34: Ms Martha Maracanã 41 Azteca Lane
Page 35 and 36: Arbitration Proceeding Nr. 200/2016
Page 37 and 38: 4. Where do you work or have worked
Page 39 and 40: São Paulo, 21 July 2016. Mr. Ronal
Page 41 and 42: Arbitration Proceeding Nr. 200/2016
Page 43 and 44: 4.2. The Arbitrators have answered
Page 45 and 46: PARTIES: WRIGHT LTD Herein represen
Page 47 and 48: Request for Security for Costs 1 RE
Page 49 and 50: From Mr Ronald O Zagallo President
Page 51 and 52: CLAIMANT’s EXHIBIT C 9 Witness St
Page 53 and 54: CAM-CCBC Arbitration Procedural Ord

THE PROBLEM

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?