13.10.2016 Views

World Energy Resources | 2016

World-Energy-Resources-Full-report-2016.10.03

World-Energy-Resources-Full-report-2016.10.03

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WORLD ENERGY COUNCIL | WORLD ENERGY RESOU RCES<br />

ConocoPhillips has moved away from pre-FID LNG projects referencing lower returns, low<br />

flexibility, and long cycle times. 71 Similarly, Chevron decided that no FID would be made on<br />

the Kitimat LNG project in 2015. 72<br />

RISK ANALYSIS<br />

The biggest risks to natural gas markets currently is their inability to compete against more<br />

economic, secure and environmentally friendly substitutes in transport, industrial use and<br />

power.<br />

Affordability<br />

Under current policies, existing coal, nuclear and hydro plants may provide more economic,<br />

and for many nations, more secure alternatives to natural gas for baseload power. While in<br />

Europe and the US, the levelised cost of generating power from new CCGT is now cheaper<br />

than from new coal-fired units, the competitiveness of new gas-fired and coal-fired plants is<br />

skewed towards coal in emerging economies that rely on imports for gas supplies. Absent a<br />

carbon price and more stringent regulations on air pollution and carbon emissions, natural<br />

gas has struggled to take share from cheap coal in these regions. In developing regions<br />

that rely heavily on LNG imports, governments must balance environmental sustainability<br />

with income and energy equity. In India for example, this has led to a delay in expanding<br />

natural gas infrastructure and continued growth in coal generation [1] . The Indian<br />

government has openly stated its views on coal as the current best option to deliver the<br />

energy needed to improve the standard of living for millions of people.<br />

FIGURE 21: GLOBAL UNSUBSIDISED LEVELISED COST OF ENERGY<br />

$- $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300<br />

Gas Combined Cycle<br />

$52<br />

$78<br />

Coal<br />

$65<br />

$150<br />

Nuclear<br />

$97<br />

$136<br />

IGCC<br />

$96<br />

$183<br />

Gas Peaking<br />

$165<br />

$218<br />

Natural Gas Reciprocating Engine<br />

$68<br />

$101<br />

Diesel reciprocating engine<br />

$212<br />

$281<br />

$- $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300<br />

71<br />

ConocoPhillips (2015) ConocoPhillips Investor Update: May 14<br />

72<br />

Chevron (2015) 2015 1Q Earnings Transcript.<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!