Evaluation of individual research units - Norges forskningsråd

More documents

Recommendations

Info

12 Evaluation of biology, medicine and health research in Norway (2011) A Note from the Panel on Grades of Assessment The Panel were asked to grade each research evaluation unit (level 2) according to the following five categories, which were supplied and defined by the Research Council of Norway. Excellent Very good Good Fair Weak Research at the international front position: undertaking original research of international interest, publishing in internationally leading journals. High productivity. Research with high degree of originality, but nonetheless falls short of the highest standards of excellence. A publication profile with a high degree of publications in internationally leading journals. High productivity and very relevant to international research within its sub-field. Research at good international level with publications in internationally and nationally recognised journals. Research of relevance both to national and international research development. Research that only partly meets good international standard, international publication profile is modest. Mainly national publications. Limited contribution to research. Research of insufficient quality and the publication profile is meagre: few international publications. No original research and little relevance to national problems. Before undertaking this report, the Panel decided that a range of adjacent categories would be used, when appropriate, to represent the diversity of research activity generated within a single research unit. Evaluations of individual researchers are not given in this report. Although the Panel adhered to the categories stipulated by the research council, it is mindful that no one set of criteria can wholly capture the quality and impact of the diverse range of activities undertaken by Norwegian biologists. Several Departments or Institutes have a clear service-orientated mandate, which means their output is difficult to measure
Evaluation of biology, medicine and health research in Norway (2011) directly using numbers of peer-reviewed research papers, numbers of students, or by impact factor. Similarly, units located in museums have a unique mandate that includes education and public outreach. The Panel appreciated these issues and noted that the time allocated to research varied among groups and institutions. For the next evaluation, the Panel recommends that a clearer indication is given of the approximate percentage of time that each unit allocates to research versus service and/or outreach. 13
Page 1: Public Health and Health-related Re
Page 4 and 5: © The Research Council of Norway 2
Page 6 and 7: 2 Evaluation of biology, medicine a
Page 10 and 11: Statement from the Panel To the Res
Page 14 and 15: 10 Evaluation of biology, medicine
Page 24 and 25: Evaluation of individual research u
Page 44 and 45: University of Nordland Faculty of B
Page 48 and 49: Seafood Quality Grading of scientif
Page 62 and 63: Fish Biology & Population Genetics
Page 64 and 65: Marine Plankton Grading of scientif
Page 66 and 67:
62 Evaluation of biology, medicine
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Deep Sea Species Grading of scienti
Page 74 and 75:
Observation Methodology Grading of
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Section of Plant Pathology Grading
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Norwegian Polar Institute 90 Evalua
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
SNP Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
2. Organization and methods 100 Eva
Page 106 and 107:
102 o Gender and age balance in aca
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Dialog og tilbakemelding 106 Evalua
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Vedlegg 2 Avgrensning og organiseri
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
124 2. Fungal systematics Evaluatio
show all

Evaluation of individual research units - Norges forskningsråd

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?