24.10.2016 Views

Necessity as the mother of invention monetary policy after the crisis

n?u=RePEc:dnb:dnbwpp:525&r=mac

n?u=RePEc:dnb:dnbwpp:525&r=mac

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

egulatory limits on leverage and short-term funding, <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> stronger underwriting<br />

standards, represent far more direct and likely more effective methods to address <strong>the</strong>se<br />

vulnerabilities” than <strong>monetary</strong> <strong>policy</strong>. 12 In o<strong>the</strong>r words, yes, we’re ultimately responsible<br />

for financial stability, but not by using <strong>monetary</strong> <strong>policy</strong>.<br />

Our survey results (displayed in Table 3 below) show that almost 80% <strong>of</strong> governors<br />

report that <strong>the</strong>ir institution used some form <strong>of</strong> macro-prudential <strong>policy</strong> in recent years.<br />

What are <strong>the</strong>se “o<strong>the</strong>r” (than interest rates) macro-prudential instruments? Figure 4 shows<br />

<strong>the</strong> five instruments that were most actively used in 2013, according to <strong>the</strong> datab<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

Cerutti et al. (2015).<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

Loan-to-Value<br />

Ratio Caps<br />

Debt-to-Income<br />

Ratio<br />

Limits on<br />

Interbank<br />

Exposures<br />

Concentration<br />

Limits<br />

Levy/Tax on<br />

Financial<br />

Institutions<br />

All Countries Emerging/Developing Economies Advanced Economies<br />

Figure 4. Most actively used macro-prudential instruments<br />

Source: Cerutti et al. (2015)<br />

If we were to suggest, or imagine, a future consensus on financial stability, it might be<br />

this: Central banks should pay more attention to <strong>the</strong> build-up <strong>of</strong> financial imbalances,<br />

notably credit bubbles. But macro-prudential policies, not <strong>monetary</strong> <strong>policy</strong>, should be <strong>the</strong><br />

first line <strong>of</strong> defense. In normal situations, conventional <strong>monetary</strong> <strong>policy</strong> should focus on<br />

price stability, while macro-prudential instruments are used to lean against excessive<br />

credit expansion.<br />

This leaves open <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> “who”—whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> central bank should be given a macroprudential<br />

mandate, or whe<strong>the</strong>r this is best done by a separate body, restricting <strong>the</strong> central<br />

bank to conduct <strong>monetary</strong> <strong>policy</strong>. There is consensus that separate tools are required for<br />

<strong>the</strong> different t<strong>as</strong>ks, but it is also important to consider <strong>the</strong> strategic interactions between<br />

different <strong>policy</strong> makers when <strong>as</strong>signing a role to <strong>the</strong> central bank, an issue discussed in<br />

Davig and Gürkaynak (2015).<br />

12<br />

The most extensive study to date on <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> macro-prudential policies is by Claessens et al. (2016). Using a newly<br />

compiled datab<strong>as</strong>e for a large number <strong>of</strong> countries over <strong>the</strong> 2000-13 period, with information on 12 macro-prudential instruments,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y report that policies such <strong>as</strong> limits on leverage and dynamic provisioning are effective restraints, especially when growth<br />

rates <strong>of</strong> credit are very high. But <strong>the</strong>y provide less supportive impact in busts.<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!