31.10.2016 Views

Palm Oil Buyers Scorecard

WWF_Palm_Oil_Scorecard_2016

WWF_Palm_Oil_Scorecard_2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PALM OIL BUYERS SCORECARD:<br />

THE JOURNEY SO FAR<br />

WWF published its first <strong>Palm</strong> <strong>Oil</strong> <strong>Buyers</strong><br />

<strong>Scorecard</strong> in 2009, a time when CSPO<br />

was new on the market and was in<br />

danger of faltering as initial demand did<br />

not meet supply. There was very little<br />

transparency around corporate use of<br />

palm oil.<br />

This first <strong>Scorecard</strong> showed that few<br />

companies were making commitments to<br />

CSPO, and of those that were, far too few<br />

were taking even the basic steps to keep<br />

them, such as working out how much<br />

palm oil they were using. The <strong>Scorecard</strong><br />

played an important role in jumpstarting<br />

the market for CSPO, and helping to spur<br />

a drive for greater transparency in the<br />

industry.<br />

68<br />

100<br />

ASSOCIATED<br />

BRITISH FOODS<br />

IMUSA DOLUPTATIOS<br />

VOLORE EICIIS IMUS<br />

A AUT ET AUT QUI.<br />

DAE COMNIS<br />

CORROVIDUNT AD<br />

Our next <strong>Scorecard</strong> in 2011 assessed a<br />

greater number of companies. While<br />

supply of and demand for CSPO<br />

had increased markedly, still only<br />

around half of CSPO supply was being<br />

Ad mos ipsapic<br />

tatecatum aut<br />

quo que am<br />

purchased and claimed as CSPO. This<br />

was, and still is, used as an excuse<br />

by growers not to pursue RSPO<br />

certification for additional land.<br />

Building on our previous <strong>Scorecard</strong>s, WWF’s 2016<br />

<strong>Scorecard</strong> aims to bring into sharp focus which<br />

companies have met their commitments on palm oil –<br />

and which are falling behind.<br />

Many users of palm oil set 2015 as their<br />

target for reaching 100 per cent CSPO.<br />

With the deadline two years away, WWF<br />

helped focus the attention of these<br />

companies – and their customers – on<br />

whether they were making enough progress.<br />

For the European companies, we also<br />

took a closer look at which of the RSPOapproved<br />

supply chain options palm oil<br />

buyers were using, with the objective of<br />

promoting faster and greater uptake of<br />

segregated CSPO.<br />

WWF chose to wait until 2016 to issue<br />

this latest <strong>Scorecard</strong>. We felt it was<br />

crucial to score companies on the actions<br />

they took in 2015 – the milestone year by<br />

which many frontrunners promised to<br />

have their entire palm oil supply certified.<br />

So which companies actually followed<br />

through? Which stalled or pushed back<br />

their deadlines?<br />

2009 2011 2013 2016<br />

As in 2013, this <strong>Scorecard</strong> looks at the<br />

supply chain choices that companies are<br />

using when they buy CSPO. We have scored<br />

many of the brands on their progress<br />

toward buying only CSPO that comes from<br />

fully segregated supply chains.<br />

The 2016 <strong>Scorecard</strong> includes several new<br />

countries, evaluating key retailers and<br />

brands from Poland and Canada for the<br />

first time.<br />

13<br />

WWF PALM OIL BUYERS SCORECARD 2016

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!