15.11.2016 Views

ePaper_2nd Edition_November 16, 2016

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10<br />

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER <strong>16</strong>, 20<strong>16</strong><br />

DT<br />

World<br />

India’s fight against fake currency<br />

• Tribune International Desk<br />

Since <strong>November</strong> 8 midnight, Indians have<br />

been experiencing a truly historic yet confusing<br />

period after the government took the unprecedented<br />

step of demonetising Rs500 and<br />

Rs1000 bank notes.<br />

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in his address<br />

to the nation, stated one of the reasons<br />

for this policy was to counter the rising menace<br />

of fake Indian currency notes.<br />

Counterfeiting money has been prevalent<br />

throughout history and is sometimes called<br />

the world’s “second oldest profession.” Traditional<br />

counterfeiters in most cases are individuals<br />

or a group who counterfeit money for<br />

their own profit. But during modern history, a<br />

new phenomenon appeared: states involved<br />

in counterfeiting the currency of enemy<br />

states to destabilise their economy. For example,<br />

during World War II, Hitler initiated “Operation<br />

Bernhard” and counterfeited British<br />

pounds. As a result Britain had to withdraw<br />

most of its currency notes.<br />

An Indian bank teller hands over notes as people gather inside a bank to deposit and exchange 500 and<br />

1000 rupee notes in Amritsar on Tuesday AFP<br />

Fake Indian currency notes on rise<br />

In India, the circulation of fake Indian currency<br />

notes (FICN) has been on the rise, according<br />

to the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) annual<br />

reports. The year 2014-2015 saw a steep rise,<br />

with 594,446 FICN detected, up from 488,273<br />

in the year 2013-14. When it comes to the type<br />

of notes counterfeited in 2014-15, RBI data<br />

showed that counterfeited Rs500 notes were<br />

most common, with 273,923 recorded. Rs100<br />

and Rs1000 notes were the second and third<br />

most counterfeited bills, respectively.<br />

India’s Financial Action Task Force<br />

(FATF) report of 2013 found that the Indian<br />

rupee was the ninth most counterfeited currency<br />

in terms of its value and stood third<br />

in terms of the number of FICN detected<br />

around the world. This is a grave concern to<br />

India and if not dealt with would have had<br />

serious implications as counterfeit currency<br />

can reduce the value of the currency and increase<br />

inflation.<br />

Transit points of fake currency<br />

As reported by various sources, most counterfeit<br />

Indian currency notes are printed in<br />

Pakistan. From Pakistan, FICN are either<br />

moved directly into India or make their way<br />

through a network of other countries. Major<br />

transit points include India’s neighbouring<br />

countries Nepal and Bangladesh. Dubai is another<br />

route that the traffickers use to smuggle<br />

the fake currency notes into India; other<br />

transit points include Thailand, Malaysia, and<br />

Sri Lanka. China is emerging as a new transit<br />

route. Pakistani nationals were involved in<br />

48% of FICN cases in Thailand, Malaysia, Myanmar,<br />

and Sri Lanka.<br />

Printed in Pakistan, distributed by ISI<br />

India’s Ministry of External Affairs for the last<br />

decade has consistently shown concern over<br />

ISI and its involvement in printing and distributing<br />

FICN. DRI sources have also voiced<br />

concern over the high quality of FICN, which<br />

makes them difficult to distinguish from real<br />

notes. Media reports from Bangladesh claim<br />

that the fake notes are printed at government<br />

presses in Karachi, Lahore, Peshawar, and<br />

Quetta with the support of ISI.<br />

Some of the important revelations that<br />

indicate ISI’s role in FICN have come from<br />

David Headley, who was convicted for his<br />

role in the 26/11 Mumbai attacks. In his statement,<br />

Headley mentioned that Major Iqbal,<br />

who was his ISI handler, gave him FICN for<br />

circulation and use in India. Another breakthrough<br />

in allegations of direct involvement<br />

by Pakistan authorities and ISI in FICN was<br />

the arrest of Syed Abdul Karim Tunda in 2013<br />

at the India-Nepal border. According to the<br />

police, Tunda received several consignments<br />

of FICN arranged by an ISI brigadier.<br />

Economic terrorism<br />

FICN, as mentioned earlier, could be seen as<br />

a form of “economic terrorism” practiced by<br />

external sources to damage India’s economy.<br />

Economic terrorism refers to the behind-thescenes<br />

manipulation of a nation’s economy<br />

by state or non-state actors.<br />

The printing and circulation of FICN provides<br />

dual benefits for terrorist organisations<br />

targeting India: the circulation of FICN threatens<br />

India’s economy while the profit that is<br />

earned from doing so is used to fund covert<br />

activities targeting India. News sources claim<br />

that ISI makes an annual profit of Rs5bn ($73<br />

million) from these activities, given an average<br />

of 30 to 40% profit on the face-value of<br />

the notes. The same money is said to be used<br />

to fund terrorist groups in India.<br />

India’s fight to uproot fake currency<br />

Given the multidimensional aspect of FICN,<br />

the problem needs to be dealt with in a holistic<br />

manner. Relevant agencies need to work<br />

together. Already, separate organisations<br />

have been taking steps. In 2010, India joined<br />

the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), an<br />

intergovernmental body seeking to fight<br />

money-laundering and terrorist financing. In<br />

2014, the Reserve Bank of India announced<br />

the withdrawal of notes issued before 2005,<br />

another measure to tackle the issue of FICN<br />

and improve security features.<br />

Modi, while addressing the nation last<br />

week, implicitly accused Pakistan by saying<br />

that “enemies across the border” have been<br />

responsible for the circulation of FICN in<br />

India. The decision to withdraw Rs500 and<br />

Rs1000 notes from circulation could have a<br />

massive positive impact by eliminating FICN<br />

from India’s economy. The Rs500 note in particular<br />

is the most commonly counterfeited<br />

note in India and demonetising it is quite a<br />

remarkable move to eradicate the threats emanating<br />

from FICN to the Indian economy. •<br />

[This is an excerpt of a The Diplomat article, which<br />

can be found at http://bit.ly/2ezQXpH]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!