02.12.2016 Views

(Part 1)

JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016

JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

JBTM Book Reviews<br />

137<br />

Beyond the form and structure of the work, the content is excellent and clearly fulfills the<br />

aim advertised in the subtitle, “A Guide for Pastors, Health Care Professionals, and Families.”<br />

The book is divided into four unequal parts: <strong>Part</strong> I: Christian Bioethics; <strong>Part</strong> II: Taking Life;<br />

<strong>Part</strong> III: Making Life; <strong>Part</strong> IV: Remaking/Faking Life. The authors credit the memorable (and<br />

rhyming) titles of the final three parts to Nigel M. de S. Cameron, one of Riley’s mentors at<br />

Trinity International University (xiii).<br />

The authors set the scene in the introduction by describing an infertile couple’s<br />

dilemma, and after outlining the book’s contents they return to the couple and conclude<br />

the introduction by setting a goal for themselves and their readers: “Our prayer is that by<br />

the time you have read this book you will have a better idea how you would help Phil and<br />

Sara and the other people whose cases you will find in this volume” (5). The authors go even<br />

further by unabashedly stating the rationale behind the book. After clearly subscribing to the<br />

“all truth is God’s truth” view, Mitchell and Riley explain that they “see science and faith,<br />

medicine and theology as friends, not enemies” (5). This explains their approach, which is<br />

further evidenced by the “common ground” dynamic between them in the pages that follow.<br />

They do not engage in a dialogue to show the flaws in one field or another. Instead, the coauthorship<br />

approach exhibits their appreciation for one another, because they are not in<br />

combat but in collaboration.<br />

In “<strong>Part</strong> I: Christian Bioethics,” the authors open the discussion by focusing on the<br />

morality of medicine. Chapter 2 sets up the purpose and payoff of the book by framing the<br />

challenges inherent in bioethics, covering the ancient challenges, up to the twenty-first<br />

century. <strong>Part</strong> I clearly foreshadows the book as one that refuses to settle for easy answers to<br />

simple questions.<br />

The authors cover euthanasia, assisted suicide, and abortion in “<strong>Part</strong> II: Taking Life.”<br />

Chapter 3 focuses on the sanctity of human life and abortion. The authors cover a range of<br />

important questions, including: “Under what circumstances, if any, can abortion be morally<br />

justified?” “Do the doctors have the moral authority to end the life of an unborn child?” and<br />

“What biblical norms or principles, if any, apply to medical technologies that did not exist<br />

when the Bible was written?” (47). This sample shows the authors’ refusal to evade some of<br />

the most challenging questions raised in bioethics. Chapter 4, on human dignity and dying,<br />

covers a range of questions, including, “Is it ever right to remove life-sustaining treatment<br />

like a ventilator” (68), as well as a helpful taxonomy of suffering (79–81).<br />

In “<strong>Part</strong> III: Making Life,” Mitchell and Riley turn their attention to the ethical boundaries<br />

and moral quandaries involved in procreation technologies. Chapter 5 covers infertility and<br />

Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART). In chapter 6, the authors explains the ethical<br />

dilemmas and life-saving potentialities of organ donation and transplantation. To conclude<br />

<strong>Part</strong> III, Mitchell and Riley discuss in chapter 7 the tantalizing and (arguably) terrifying<br />

prospect of clones and human-animal hybrids.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!