2016 ET CARBON RANKINGS REPORT

Recommendations

Info

22 UNDERSTANDING THE ET CARBON RANKINGS FIGURE 9: AVERAGE SCOPE 1 AND 2 INTENSITY COMPARED WITH SCOPE 3 INTENSITY AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL FOOTPRINT FOR COMPANIES DISCLOSING ALL 15 SCOPE 3 CATEGORIES IN THE ET CARBON RANKING UNIVERSE. 80% 20% Material Scope 3 categories by sector Table 3 seeks to highlight which of the 15 Scope 3 categories are more likely to be material for any given sector. In every sector, for each Scope 3 category, the maximum percentage of total Scope 3 intensity represented by that category for a single company is shown. The three highest categories for each sector are highlighted in the table and are likely to be ‘material’. FIGURE 10: AVERAGE SCOPE 1 AND 2 INTENSITY COMPARED WITH SCOPE 3 INTENSITY AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL FOOTPRINT FOR COMPANIES DISCLOSING AT LEAST 10 SCOPE 3 CATEGORIES IN THE ET CARBON RANKING UNIVERSE. Average Scope 3 as % of Total Intensity 76% Average Scope 3 as % of Total Intensity Average Scope 1 and 2 as % of Total Intensity 24% Average Scope 1 and 2 as % of Total Intensity Thus, in the Infrastructure sector we can see that Fuel and Energy-related Activities make up 99% of one company’s Scope 3 emissions and Downstream Leased Assets make up 97% of another company’s Scope 3 emissions. Both these categories are likely to be highly material. Conversely, Business Travel, Employee Commuting, Processing of Sold Products and Upstream Leased Assets make up no more than 1% of any company’s Scope 3 emissions within the sector, suggesting these may not be material categories for this sector. The data sample includes all companies that are disclosing 10 or more Scope 3 categories. Thus, the percentages can be considered to be calculated on fairly complete Scope 3 disclosures only. If relatively incomplete disclosures were included, then a sector with a company which disclosed only one category would have a 100% maximum percentage for that particular category. There are likely to be some categories which are material but are not highlighted in this table, because there has not yet been adequate disclosure. The ET Carbon Ranking methodology includes all Scope 3 categories in the analysis of companies in each sector. ET INDEX RESEARCH 2016 CARBON RANKINGS REPORT
UNDERSTANDING THE ET CARBON RANKINGS 23 SICS sector Business travel Capital goods Downstream leased assets Downstream transportation and distribution Employee commuting End of life treatment of sold products Franchises Fuel-and-energy-related activities Investments Processing of sold products Purchased goods and services Upstream leased assets Upstream transportation and distribution Use of sold products Waste generated in operations Infrastructure 1% 29% 97% 2% 1% 7% 0% 99% 17% 1% 44% 0% 14% 83% 7% Financials 49% 12% 0% 33% 81% 1% 0% 34% 0% 0% 51% 0% 0% 1% 19% Resource Transformation 1% 17% 0% 9% 1% 34% 0% 74% 2% 0% 51% 0% 2% 99% 2% Technology and Communications 52% 92% 9% 5% 26% 7% 1% 65% 8% 1% 70% 6% 18% 88% 1% Transportation 1% 23% 0% 1% 12% 7% 0% 59% 1% 0% 87% 0% 84% 100% 0% Consumption I 5% 16% 0% 8% 1% 34% 0% 2% 34% 0% 72% 0% 7% 5% 1% Health Care 6% 36% 1% 5% 4% 4% 0% 7% 6% 0% 76% 2% 16% 60% 5% Non-Renewable Resources 0% 1% 0% 9% 2% 4% 0% 43% 0% 96% 53% 0% 19% 99% 0% Services 2% 4% 0% 13% 1% 10% 98% 0% 0% 0% 68% 0% 9% 84% 0% Consumption II 0% 26% 14% 0% 1% 1% 0% 5% 1% 0% 48% 0% 4% 0% 1% Renewable Resources and Alternative Energy 0% 0% 0% 9% 0% 0% 0% 15% 0% 20% 28% 0% 28% 0% 1% TABLE 3: MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL SCOPE 3 EMISSIONS INTENSITY BY CATEGORY. 2016 CARBON RANKINGS REPORT ET INDEX RESEARCH
Page 1 and 2: FOREWORD 1 2016 ET CARBON RANKINGS
Page 3 and 4: 3 ABOUT ET INDEX RESEARCH ET Index
Page 5 and 6: FOREWORD 5 The international Financ
Page 7 and 8: 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2016 ET Car
Page 9 and 10: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 Carbon Context
Page 11 and 12: ENGAGED INDEXES, CARBON RISK AND PE
Page 13 and 14: ENGAGED INDEXES, CARBON RISK AND PE
Page 15 and 16: UNDERSTANDING THE ET CARBON RANKING
Page 21: UNDERSTANDING THE ET CARBON RANKING
Page 25 and 26: CARBON REDUCTION POTENTIAL 25 CARBO
Page 27 and 28: CARBON REDUCTION POTENTIAL 27 Infra
Page 29 and 30: CARBON REDUCTION POTENTIAL 29 TABLE
Page 31 and 32: CARBON REDUCTION POTENTIAL 31 Table
Page 33 and 34: CARBON REDUCTION POTENTIAL 33 Oil a
Page 35 and 36: ET GLOBAL CARBON RANKINGS 2016 35 C
Page 37 and 38: ET GLOBAL CARBON RANKINGS 2016 37 C
Page 39 and 40: ET GLOBAL CARBON RANKINGS 2016 39 T
Page 41 and 42: ET GLOBAL CARBON RANKINGS 2016 41 T
Page 43 and 44: 43 ET CARBON RANKING METHODOLOGY: E
Page 45 and 46: ET CARBON RANKING METHODOLOGY 45 KN
Page 47 and 48: ET CARBON RANKING METHODOLOGY 47 SP
Page 49 and 50: ET CARBON RANKING METHODOLOGY 49 DI
Page 51 and 52: APPENDIX 51 ET Europe 300 Carbon Ra
Page 53 and 54: APPENDIX 53 INFORMATION FOR REPORTI
Page 55 and 56: APPENDIX 55 Level 1 Thematic Sector
Page 57 and 58: APPENDIX 57 Michael is non-executiv
Page 59 and 60: APPENDIX 59 References 1 Carbon Tra
Page 61: FOREWORD 61 2016 CARBON RANKINGS RE

2016 ET CARBON RANKINGS REPORT

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?