2016 ET CARBON RANKINGS REPORT

Recommendations

Info

26 CARBON REDUCTION POTENTIAL Non-Renewable Resources is the second most carbon-intensive SICS sector. If the least carbon-efficient companies achieved the median level it would cut sector emissions by 28%, saving 483 million tonnes of carbon dioxide a year, roughly equivalent to the annual emissions of Saudi Arabia. 30 Royal Dutch Shell, Siam Cement and Rio Tinto are among 31 companies disclosing complete data in this sector. The Resource Transformation sector has the potential to achieve the third greatest savings in emissions and the greatest percentage reduction. If the least carbonefficient companies achieved the median level it would cut sector emissions by 54%, saving 193 million tonnes of carbon dioxide a year, half the annual emissions of Australia. 31 Mitsubishi Electric Corp, Siemens and General Electric are among 46 companies disclosing complete data in this sector. FIGURE 12: SECTORS WITH THE GREATEST ABSOLUTE EMISSIONS REDUCTION POTENTIAL (COMPANIES DISCLOSING COMPLETE SCOPE 1 & 2 DATA) – WORLD’S 800 LARGEST LISTED COMPANIES. Infrastructure Non−Renewable Resources Resource Transformation Consumption I Technology and Communications Health Care Transportation Services Consumption II Financials Renewable Resources and Alternative Energy 0 500,000,000 1,000,000,000 1,500,000,000 GHG Emissions (tCO2e) GHG Emissions after Reduction Potential Achieved Potential Reduction in GHG Emissions (tCO2) Figure 12 shows the 11 SICS sectors in order of their potential to reduce absolute carbon emissions, if every company with an emissions intensity greater than the median value were to achieve the same level as the median company within the sector. FIgure 13 shows the 11 SICS sectors ranked in order of their potential to reduce carbon emissions relative to total emissions intensity for the sector, under the same scenario as Figure 12 and Table 4. The emissions-intensity reduction potential is shown by calculating the emissions that could be saved if every company with an emissions intensity greater than the median value were to achieve the same level as the median company within the sector. Figure 14 displays country level emissions figures that these reductions can be compared to. ET INDEX RESEARCH 2016 CARBON RANKINGS REPORT
CARBON REDUCTION POTENTIAL 27 Infrastructure Non−Renewable Resources Resource Transformation Consumption I FIGURE 13: SECTORS WITH THE GREATEST PROPORTIONAL EMISSIONS REDUCTION POTENTIAL (COMPANIES DISCLOSING COMPLETE SCOPE 1 & 2 DATA) – WORLD’S 800 LARGEST LISTED COMPANIES. Technology and Communications Health Care Transportation Services Consumption II Financials Renewable Resources and Alternative Energy 0 200 400 600 800 Carbon intensity (tCO2e/$m Revenue) Carbon Intensity after Reduction Potential Achieved Potential Reduction in Carbon intensity (tCO2e/$m Revenue) FIGURE 14: GLOBAL CO2 EMISSIONS FROM FOSSIL FUEL USE AND CEMENT PRODUCTION 2014 CANADA 566 MT CO2 GERMANY 767 MT CO2 TURKEY 353 MT CO2 IRAN 618 MT CO2 RUSSIAN FEDERATION 1,766 MT CO2 SOUTH KOREA 610 MT CO2 UK 415 MT CO2 Mt CO2 (million tonnes) 0 – 100 MEXICO 456 MT CO2 UNITED STATES 5,335 MT CO2 BRAZIL 501 MT CO2 SAUDI ARABIA 495 MT CO2 INDIA 2,342 MT CO2 CHINA 10,541 MT CO2 INDONESIA 453 MT CO2 JAPAN 1,279 MT CO2 100 – 500 500 – 700 700 – 1500 1500 – 5000 SOUTH AFRICA 393 MT CO2 AUSTRALIA 409 MT CO2 > 5000 Source: Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) 2016 CARBON RANKINGS REPORT ET INDEX RESEARCH
Page 1 and 2: FOREWORD 1 2016 ET CARBON RANKINGS
Page 3 and 4: 3 ABOUT ET INDEX RESEARCH ET Index
Page 5 and 6: FOREWORD 5 The international Financ
Page 7 and 8: 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2016 ET Car
Page 9 and 10: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 Carbon Context
Page 11 and 12: ENGAGED INDEXES, CARBON RISK AND PE
Page 13 and 14: ENGAGED INDEXES, CARBON RISK AND PE
Page 15 and 16: UNDERSTANDING THE ET CARBON RANKING
Page 25: CARBON REDUCTION POTENTIAL 25 CARBO
Page 29 and 30: CARBON REDUCTION POTENTIAL 29 TABLE
Page 31 and 32: CARBON REDUCTION POTENTIAL 31 Table
Page 33 and 34: CARBON REDUCTION POTENTIAL 33 Oil a
Page 35 and 36: ET GLOBAL CARBON RANKINGS 2016 35 C
Page 37 and 38: ET GLOBAL CARBON RANKINGS 2016 37 C
Page 39 and 40: ET GLOBAL CARBON RANKINGS 2016 39 T
Page 41 and 42: ET GLOBAL CARBON RANKINGS 2016 41 T
Page 43 and 44: 43 ET CARBON RANKING METHODOLOGY: E
Page 45 and 46: ET CARBON RANKING METHODOLOGY 45 KN
Page 47 and 48: ET CARBON RANKING METHODOLOGY 47 SP
Page 49 and 50: ET CARBON RANKING METHODOLOGY 49 DI
Page 51 and 52: APPENDIX 51 ET Europe 300 Carbon Ra
Page 53 and 54: APPENDIX 53 INFORMATION FOR REPORTI
Page 55 and 56: APPENDIX 55 Level 1 Thematic Sector
Page 57 and 58: APPENDIX 57 Michael is non-executiv
Page 59 and 60: APPENDIX 59 References 1 Carbon Tra
Page 61: FOREWORD 61 2016 CARBON RANKINGS RE

2016 ET CARBON RANKINGS REPORT

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?