20.12.2016 Views

Scotland’s Place in Europe

5tSyKxiOE

5tSyKxiOE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SCOTLAND’S PLACE IN EUROPE | 25<br />

Government’s position moves towards the WTO position the more significant the<br />

damage will be to the UK and Scottish economy and society.<br />

99. We are advocat<strong>in</strong>g that the UK should rema<strong>in</strong> a full member of the <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />

Economic Area (EEA). This would likely mean the UK jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g EFTA <strong>in</strong> the first<br />

<strong>in</strong>stance and, thereafter, reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g – or renew<strong>in</strong>g – its membership of the EEA<br />

Agreement or by direct association to the EEA.<br />

100. Although the EFTA members of the <strong>Europe</strong>an S<strong>in</strong>gle Market are required to comply<br />

with all <strong>Europe</strong>an S<strong>in</strong>gle Market and related legislation, compliance is managed<br />

through the EFTA structures under the EEA Agreement. This could enable the UK<br />

Government to address one of the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal red l<strong>in</strong>es set out by the Prime M<strong>in</strong>ister<br />

– that the UK Government should not be subject directly to the authority of the<br />

Court of Justice of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union (CJEU).<br />

101. Another apparent red l<strong>in</strong>e for the UK Government is control of the border. We<br />

accept that freedom of movement of people is a strict condition of the <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle Market. However, there are ongo<strong>in</strong>g discussions with<strong>in</strong> the EU about how<br />

this pr<strong>in</strong>ciple is implemented <strong>in</strong> the face of current challenges which may lead to<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> its practical operation. Nonetheless, we believe that the only way to<br />

tackle these challenges effectively is through cont<strong>in</strong>ued collaboration with our EU<br />

partners.<br />

102. Membership of the EEA would also entail f<strong>in</strong>ancial commitments from the UK.<br />

There are two k<strong>in</strong>ds of EU expenditure that the EEA EFTA States contribute to –<br />

operational and adm<strong>in</strong>istrative. The EU operational expenditure is the total EU<br />

programme budget less the adm<strong>in</strong>istrative expenditure. A proportionality factor<br />

based on the relative size of the gross domestic product (GDP) figures of the EEA<br />

EFTA States, compared to the total GDP of the EEA, is calculated every year. The<br />

annual EEA EFTA f<strong>in</strong>ancial contribution to operational costs is reached by<br />

multiply<strong>in</strong>g the proportionality factor with the amount of the relevant EU budget<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

103. Exactly what the UK would contribute if it opted for EEA membership would depend<br />

on negotiation over its contributions to poorer areas of the EU, which EU<br />

programmes it decided to participate <strong>in</strong>, and its success <strong>in</strong> secur<strong>in</strong>g fund<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

those programmes. However, if it contributed and received back the same proportion<br />

of national <strong>in</strong>come as Norway, the UK’s net contribution would be around £52 per<br />

person (£3.3 billion <strong>in</strong> aggregate) per year compared to a net contribution to the EU<br />

budget of £121 per person per year if we rema<strong>in</strong> part of the EU 51 .<br />

104. Our firm view is that, alongside rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Europe</strong>an S<strong>in</strong>gle Market, the UK<br />

should rema<strong>in</strong> with<strong>in</strong> the EU Customs Union. This would reduce to a degree the<br />

disruption of years of negotiat<strong>in</strong>g new FTAs, with no evidence that the eventual<br />

outcome will be better. If rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the EU Customs Union proves unacceptable<br />

to the UK Government and it is <strong>in</strong>tent on pursu<strong>in</strong>g its own <strong>in</strong>ternational trade<br />

policy, this should not rule out rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Europe</strong>an S<strong>in</strong>gle Market. Reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

UK membership of the <strong>Europe</strong>an S<strong>in</strong>gle Market as a non-member state under the<br />

51 See p14 https://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/publications/comms/r116.pdf

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!