01.02.2017 Views

Gender Integration

pbaae696

pbaae696

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• Is the use of sexual- and gender-based violence as a weapon<br />

of war criminalized?<br />

• How are males and females affected differently as victims<br />

of violence? What are the differences between males and<br />

females as perpetrators of violence?<br />

(See Module 9 on Integrating <strong>Gender</strong> into Reconciliation,<br />

Peacebuilding, and Transitional Justice for more information.)<br />

SECTION II. Integrating <strong>Gender</strong> into Rule<br />

of Law and Justice Sector Programming:<br />

Challenges and Opportunities<br />

1. Within the Formal Legal Framework<br />

Challenge: Create and implement gender-sensitive laws and<br />

legal mechanisms.<br />

Opportunities:<br />

• International treaties. Support civil society efforts to<br />

encourage governments to ratify international and regional<br />

human rights treaties, such as the Convention to Eliminate<br />

all forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and<br />

International Convention on the Elimination of all forms of<br />

Racial Discrimination (ICERD), and to allocate adequate<br />

resources to implement them fully through domestic law,<br />

administrative acts, and judicial decisions. Provide technical<br />

assistance on harmonizing domestic law with states’ treaty<br />

obligations.<br />

• Legislative reform. Provide support to legislators,<br />

legislative staff and advocates to create, revise, and amend<br />

laws to make them more inclusive and gender-sensitive in<br />

accordance with international human rights standards.<br />

See Module 4 on Integrating <strong>Gender</strong> into Legislative<br />

Strengthening Programming for more information.<br />

• Administrative law reforms. Support administrative law<br />

reforms, which could include: (1) Limitation of discretion<br />

(agency rule changes, second appeal process, establish<br />

precedent setting decisions to ensure consistency, judicial<br />

review to compare action with law and control arbitrariness),<br />

(2) increasing administrative due process (notice of<br />

rules, opportunity to be heard, impartial decisions, appeals),<br />

or (3) increasing information (publish rules, public allowed<br />

to provide commentary to rule changes).<br />

• <strong>Gender</strong> analysis. Build the capacity of local CSOs, think<br />

tanks and legislative staff to conduct gender analysis of draft<br />

legislation and to provide relevant resources and analysis<br />

to legislators.<br />

• Training and raising awareness. Raise awareness of<br />

gender (in)equality among government officials across all<br />

levels and sectors. Ensure that trainings of government staff<br />

or leaders build their capacity to apply a gender perspective<br />

to the laws, policies, and practices within their competency.<br />

• <strong>Gender</strong>-responsive budgeting. Train government officials<br />

on how to implement gender-responsive budgeting 2 and<br />

integrate gender-responsive budgeting into programming.<br />

• Monitoring. Support the creation of government, crosssectoral,<br />

and civil society bodies to monitor and oversee<br />

the inclusive and gender equitable implementation of laws.<br />

• Civil society capacity building. Enhance the ability of civil<br />

society organizations (CSOs) to monitor and advocate for<br />

legal changes on rule of law and justice sector issues and<br />

to integrate fully gender into these efforts.<br />

PROGRAM SNAPSHOT<br />

When Turkey ratified CEDAW in 1985,<br />

the women’s movement began lobbying<br />

for reform of the civil code, noting that<br />

it violated Turkey’s own constitutional<br />

guarantee of gender equality and its<br />

commitments under CEDAW. When<br />

the government prepared a more<br />

gender-equitable draft civil code in<br />

2000 it was blocked by conservative<br />

parliamentarians who claimed that the<br />

proposed equal division of matrimonial<br />

property was a threat to Turkish<br />

society. In response, the women’s movement<br />

built a coalition of over 120 NGOs<br />

from around the country and representing<br />

differing ideological viewpoints<br />

to campaign on a common platform in<br />

support of the reforms. The coalition<br />

successfully gained the attention of the<br />

media, leading to a public debate about<br />

women’s rights and gender roles in<br />

society. In 2001, a new civil code was<br />

passed that was “based on the principle<br />

of equal rights and responsibilities within<br />

the household.” The civil society<br />

coalition then advocated successfully<br />

for a new penal code, passed in 2004,<br />

which criminalized marital rape and<br />

workplace sexual harassment, and<br />

banned lenient sentencing in cases of<br />

“honor” killings and rape.<br />

Source: UN Women, “Progress of<br />

the World’s Women 2011–2012:<br />

In Pursuit of Justice,” 2011, p. 31.<br />

http://www.unwomen.org/en/digital<br />

-library/publications/2011/7/progress-of<br />

-the-world-s-women-in-pursuit-of-justice<br />

32<br />

USAID | <strong>Gender</strong> <strong>Integration</strong> in Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance (DRG) Programming Toolkit

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!