09.05.2017 Views

ZenExperience-obooko-rel0025

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Lao Tzu and Chuang Tzu did not see themselves as founders<br />

of any formal religion. They merely described the obvious,<br />

encouraging others to be a part of nature and not its antagonist.<br />

Their movement, now called Philosophical Taoism, was eclipsed<br />

during the Han Dynasty (206 B.C.-A.D. 220) in official circles by<br />

various other systems of thought, most particularly Confucianism<br />

(which stressed obedience to authority—both that of elders and of<br />

superiors—and reverence for formalized learning, not to mention<br />

the acceptance of a structured hierarchy as part of one's larger<br />

social responsibility). However, toward the end of the Han era<br />

there arose two new types of Taoism: an Esoteric Taoism that<br />

used physical disciplines to manipulate consciousness, and a<br />

Popular Taoism that came close to being a religion in the<br />

traditional mold. The first was mystical Esoteric Taoism, which<br />

pursued the prolonging of life and vigor, but this gave way during<br />

later times to Popular Taoism, a metaphysical alternative to the<br />

comfortless, arid Confucianism of the scholarly establishment.<br />

The post-Han era saw the Philosophical Taoism of Lao Tzu<br />

and Chuang Tzu emerge anew among Chinese intellectuals,<br />

actually coming to vie with Confucianism. This whole era<br />

witnessed a turning away from the accepted values of society, as<br />

the well-organized government of the Han era dissolved into<br />

political and intellectual confusion. Government was unstable and<br />

corrupt, and the Confucianism which had been its philosophical<br />

underpinning was stilted and unsatisfying. Whenever a society<br />

breaks down, the belief system supporting it naturally comes<br />

under question. This happened in China in the third and fourth<br />

centuries of the Christian era, and from it emerged a natural<br />

opposition to Confucianism. One form of this opposition was the<br />

imported religion of Buddhism, which provided a spiritual solace<br />

missing in the teachings of Confucius, while the other was a<br />

revival among intellectuals of Philosophical Taoism.<br />

KUO HSIANG: A NEO-TAOIST<br />

In this disruptive environment, certain intellectuals returned again<br />

to the insights of Lao Tzu and Chuang Tzu, creating a movement<br />

today known as Neo-Taoism. One of the thinkers who tried to<br />

reinterpret original Taoist ideas for the new times was Kuo Hsiang<br />

(d. ca. 312), who co-authored a major document of Neo-Taoism<br />

entitled Commentary on the Chuang Tzu. It focused on the<br />

important Taoist idea of wu-wei, once explained as follows: " . . .to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!