17.06.2017 Views

Tafseer Usool at-Tafseer

http://www.islamicglobe.com

http://www.islamicglobe.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(<br />

ÇÍÍÈ tbrã Ïÿ»s3ø9$# ãNèd y7Í´¯»s9'ré'sù ª!$# tAt“Rr& !$yJÎ/ Oä3øts† óO©9 `tBur )<br />

“And whoever does not judge by wh<strong>at</strong> Allaah has revealed, is a kaafir<br />

(disbeliever).” 83<br />

Ibn ‘Abbaas said, “It is a form of kufr (disbelief) less than real kufr.” 84<br />

However, the tafseer transmitted from the Prophet (r) and the sahaabah did<br />

not cover all of the verses of the Qur’aan. The Prophet (r) explained only wh<strong>at</strong><br />

was unclear to the sahaabah, and they, in turn, only explained wh<strong>at</strong> was unclear<br />

to the taabi‘oon. But with each succeeding gener<strong>at</strong>ion, more areas became unclear<br />

due to the evolution of the language. Hence, the taabi‘oon had to make further<br />

explan<strong>at</strong>ions after the passing of the sahaabah’s era. These explan<strong>at</strong>ions are<br />

considered a part of tafseer by a<strong>at</strong>haar and should be given precedence over<br />

personal opinions where there is unanimity among them. Where they differed,<br />

none of their opinions is given preference over the others unless it is supported by<br />

the language.<br />

During the era of the taabi‘oon, many Christians and Jews became Muslim.<br />

As a result, some of the taabi‘oon narr<strong>at</strong>ed tales from Jewish and Christian<br />

sources in their explan<strong>at</strong>ions of the Qur’aan. Such narr<strong>at</strong>ions became known as<br />

Israa’eeleeya<strong>at</strong>. In l<strong>at</strong>er gener<strong>at</strong>ions, the books of tafseer became filled with such<br />

narr<strong>at</strong>ions, many of which could not be traced to any reliable source.<br />

4. <strong>Tafseer</strong> of Qur’aan by Language<br />

With the passage of time, words took on new meanings and old meanings<br />

became lost, foreign words entered into the language, and vast sections of<br />

83 Soorah al-Maa’idah (5):44.<br />

84 Collected by al-Haakim, vol. 2, p. 313. A similar st<strong>at</strong>ement was collected by Ibn Jareeer in his<br />

<strong>Tafseer</strong>, vol. 4, p. 597, no. 12068. This issue is one of the raging controversies of our time, the<br />

question being: Does Ibn ‘Abbaas’s st<strong>at</strong>ement apply to rulers in our time, who rule by mixtures of<br />

Sharee‘ah law and man-made law? The position of most scholars seems to be th<strong>at</strong> when the ruler<br />

believes th<strong>at</strong> man-made laws are better than or as good as the Sharee‘ah, or th<strong>at</strong> even though they<br />

aren’t as good as the Sharee‘ah, it is permissible to rule by them, then he is a kaafir who has left<br />

Islaam. If, however, he applies man-made laws while believing th<strong>at</strong> he is sinful in doing so, his<br />

kufr is kufr of actions, which makes him a major sinner, but doesn’t place him out of the fold of<br />

Islaam. See <strong>at</strong>-Tah-theer min Fitnah <strong>at</strong>-Takfeer by Shaykh al-Albaanee, who provides copious<br />

document<strong>at</strong>ion from the st<strong>at</strong>ements of classical and modern salafee scholars to support his<br />

position.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!