13.12.2012 Views

A proteomic view of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG

A proteomic view of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG

A proteomic view of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Re<strong>view</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Literature<br />

and thus help the host strengthen its innate<br />

defence mechanisms (Schlee et al., 2008; Wehkamp<br />

et al., 2004). Probiotics have also been<br />

shown to enhance the integrity <strong>of</strong> the host<br />

intestinal barrier; treatment <strong>of</strong> human colonic<br />

cells with L. <strong>rhamnosus</strong> <strong>GG</strong> prevented injuries<br />

in the epithelial cell barrier that were induced<br />

by enterohemorrhagic E. coli (Johnson-Henry<br />

et al., 2008), and L. acidophilus LB protected<br />

human colonic cells from aspirin-induced<br />

damage in tight junctions (Montalto et al.,<br />

2004).<br />

Submucosal eff ects include the eff ects <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>probiotic</strong>s on the host immune system. Probiotics<br />

have been shown to improve the intestine’s<br />

immunological barrier functions and<br />

alleviate the intestinal infl ammatory response<br />

by mechanisms that include diverse effects<br />

on immune activation, cytokine production,<br />

immunomodulation, and infl ammation (Delcenserie<br />

et al., 2008; Wells, 2011).<br />

1.1.1.2. Main proper� es <strong>of</strong> probio� c<br />

bacteria<br />

To be suitable for <strong>probiotic</strong> use, a bacterial<br />

strain should have certain characteristics.<br />

It should survive the passage through the<br />

GIT and thus be resistant to GIT conditions,<br />

including acidic pH and bile acids (Bezkorovainy,<br />

2001; Fuller, 1989). Th e safety <strong>of</strong> the<br />

strain must be evident (EFSA, 2008; FAO/<br />

WHO, 2002; Fuller, 1989), and strains <strong>of</strong><br />

human origin are usually preferred to achieve<br />

host-specifi c <strong>probiotic</strong> eff ects (Ouwehand et<br />

al., 2002). Th e ability to adhere to intestinal<br />

mucosa is a desired property <strong>of</strong> a <strong>probiotic</strong><br />

because close contact and prolonged colonization<br />

may intensify the favorable effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>probiotic</strong>s (Ouwehand et al., 2002). Good<br />

technological properties are also important<br />

for a strain to be used in a commercial <strong>probiotic</strong><br />

product; the strain should be suitable<br />

2<br />

for large-scale cultivation, remain viable and<br />

stable under storage, and should not confer<br />

an unpleasant taste on the product (Saarela et<br />

al., 2000). Naturally, a <strong>probiotic</strong> strain also has<br />

to impair benefi cial health eff ects to the host<br />

(FAO/WHO, 2002; Fuller, 1989).<br />

1.1.1.3. Health-benefi cial eff ects <strong>of</strong><br />

probio� cs<br />

Th e potential health eff ects <strong>of</strong> <strong>probiotic</strong>s have<br />

been studied for several diseases and conditions<br />

using a variety <strong>of</strong> diff erent strains, and<br />

varying results have been achieved. Th e bestproven<br />

health benefit for several <strong>probiotic</strong><br />

strains is the reduction <strong>of</strong> the risk <strong>of</strong> diarrhea<br />

(e.g., antibiotic-associated and traveler’s diarrhea)<br />

and the shortening <strong>of</strong> diarrheal episodes<br />

(Hickson et al., 2007; Minocha, 2009; Ouwehand<br />

et al., 2002; Saxelin et al., 2005; Weichselbaum,<br />

2009). A meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> 34 blinded,<br />

randomized, placebo-controlled trials studying<br />

the eff ect <strong>of</strong> diff erent <strong>probiotic</strong>s (mainly<br />

<strong>Lactobacillus</strong> strains) in the prevention <strong>of</strong><br />

acute diarrhea showed that <strong>probiotic</strong>s signifi -<br />

cantly reduced antibiotic-associated diarrhea<br />

by 52% and acute diarrhea <strong>of</strong> various causes<br />

by 34% (Sazawal et al., 2006). Other diseases<br />

<strong>of</strong> the gut may also be alleviated with <strong>probiotic</strong>s.<br />

A meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> twenty randomized,<br />

controlled, blinded trials showed that <strong>probiotic</strong><br />

use may be associated with an improvement<br />

in irritable bowel syndrome symptoms compared<br />

to placebo (McFarland & Dublin, 2008).<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> <strong>probiotic</strong>s may be related to the<br />

relief <strong>of</strong> constipation (Koebnick et al., 2003;<br />

Weichselbaum, 2009) and lactose intolerance<br />

(Vesa et al., 2000). Probiotics may increase<br />

host immune defenses and thus decrease the<br />

frequency or duration <strong>of</strong> infections like the<br />

common cold (de Vrese et al., 2005; Minocha,<br />

2009; Weichselbaum, 2009; Weizman et al.,<br />

2005). In a double-blind, randomized trial, the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!