14.10.2017 Views

27-11draft

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Una Says<br />

➬<br />

wish to pay, especially if controls<br />

were more stringent and it affected<br />

commerce and profit. Therefore,<br />

the NOS was not adopted. It would<br />

have initiated the need for various<br />

training programmes etc if it had<br />

been embraced.” What about the<br />

European Standard? Where does<br />

that fit in? I asked. Felgate replied:<br />

“The EN standard was developed<br />

as a European Standard in 2015 and<br />

was reviewed by BS standards but<br />

not adopted for political reasons. It<br />

should have come into force in March<br />

2016 replacing any national standards.<br />

According to CEN-CENELEC<br />

Internal Regulations the standard<br />

should have been implemented by 33<br />

countries, including the UK. If it had<br />

been, security companies operating<br />

in ports would have to have upped<br />

the standards, especially as far as<br />

refresher training, CPD and HR<br />

development aspects are concerned.”<br />

Potential market<br />

continued ... from previous page<br />

We discussed the market further. It<br />

would appear that urgent action is<br />

required to marinize PFSOs sent to<br />

these specialist sites to work. Felgate<br />

also explained that the recognition<br />

of both international and European<br />

requirements should be considered. He<br />

said: “We also recognise the CoESS<br />

(Confederation of European Security<br />

Services) training manual for the ISPS<br />

code, used in Europe and by some UK<br />

companies. In the first introductory<br />

paragraph of the CoESS of the code it<br />

states: events in the recent past have<br />

proven that no country in the world<br />

is safe against terrorists. Terrorist<br />

attacks can, for whatever motives,<br />

occur at any time and at any place.<br />

Even the shipping industry cannot<br />

escape that fact. I would like people<br />

to realise that port security has never<br />

been more important than now. The<br />

private maritime security sector has a<br />

huge potential market for professional<br />

security companies. That is why here<br />

at IPSA we have identified that market<br />

and have created a specialist section<br />

to deal with this area with the hope<br />

of raising standards and compliance.<br />

We are a maritime nation and we<br />

depend on our sea ports to provide a<br />

secure conduit to import and export<br />

our goods and passenger traffic.” I<br />

asked what is Roger’s vision as the<br />

www.professionalsecurity.co.uk<br />

new chairman of the IPSA<br />

maritime section. He said: “I<br />

would like to see the section<br />

help transform the muddled<br />

state of port security! This<br />

could be achieved within<br />

the framework of the ISPS<br />

Code which came into<br />

force in 2004. Basically, it<br />

prescribes responsibilities<br />

to governments, shipping<br />

companies, shipboard<br />

personnel, and port/facility personnel<br />

to ‘detect security threats and take<br />

preventative measures against security<br />

incidents affecting ships or port<br />

facilities used in international trade’. I<br />

want to see that any security company<br />

operating in a port environment is,<br />

for a start, an SIA-ACS [approved<br />

contractor] company. I would also<br />

like as a minimum any security officer<br />

working in a port to be furnished with<br />

a maritime awareness endorsement<br />

plus specialist knowledge training of<br />

their own port. Any Port Facilities<br />

Security Officer should regularly<br />

update their knowledge and maintain a<br />

CPD record to stay in post.”<br />

Training and consultancy<br />

I asked Felgate to expand upon the<br />

new maritime section. He said: “At<br />

IPSA we have a strong resource and<br />

specialist knowledge in port security<br />

and port policing. This enables<br />

us to deliver quality training and<br />

consultancy within this sector. This<br />

professional specialisation along<br />

with current knowledge of counterterror<br />

operations and public and<br />

private platforms such as Project<br />

Griffin and operations Fairway,<br />

Kraken and Yali, afford us an overall<br />

approach to focused training.” I<br />

asked after commercial benefits.<br />

Felgate replied: “The market for<br />

providing security services in a port<br />

is constantly changing. We have one<br />

IPSA member company that continues<br />

to gain significant business across<br />

England and Scotland. The reason<br />

they are successfully competing for<br />

port business and winning it is due<br />

to their professional approach and<br />

quality of service. Other companies<br />

located close to docks, harbours, and<br />

waterways with active wharves, may<br />

be able to provide specialist security<br />

services complying to potential SIA<br />

standards.” I asked what is the<br />

biggest change Roger would like to<br />

see in the sector. Felgate said: “The<br />

biggest change that I would like to<br />

see in maritime security is a realistic<br />

view taken by the Government of the<br />

threats to our ports and coastline. I<br />

would like to seriously address the<br />

under-manning of our police and<br />

Border Force. I would like to see a<br />

cohesive approach to standards. I<br />

believe that the standards have not<br />

been applied in any way as stringently<br />

as in the aviation industry but there<br />

are as many security vulnerabilities<br />

and threats in the maritime industry.”<br />

I asked how he hopes to effect that<br />

change. He replied: “I hope that by<br />

developing the maritime section<br />

within IPSA we are able to develop<br />

best practice and stimulate interest<br />

centres where members can share<br />

thoughts and provide learning and<br />

development forums that will not<br />

only help IPSA but the maritime<br />

industry.”<br />

Anniversary of IPSA<br />

There are indeed many changes at<br />

IPSA right now, not least of all the<br />

election of the first female chairman,<br />

Jane Farrell, Head of Security for<br />

Sodexo, UK, and Ireland. The<br />

message is clear. IPSA is about the<br />

members on land or sea. This trade<br />

association was formed almost 60<br />

years ago to ensure professionalism<br />

within the private security industry.<br />

A new generation is set to embrace<br />

change to benefit members. While<br />

the ethos has not changed, everything<br />

else is being reviewed, hence the<br />

marine section, with others. There<br />

is a lot of energy being spent in<br />

IPSA with lots of positive things to<br />

look forward to, including their new<br />

e-learning packages. Next year a 60th<br />

anniversary of IPSA extravaganza is<br />

planned. p<br />

IPSA marine section:<br />

consultant James<br />

Henderson, chairman<br />

Jane Farrell, and Roger<br />

Felgate<br />

Background<br />

After 9-11 an International<br />

Ship and Port Facilities<br />

Security (ISPS) code of<br />

practice was introduced<br />

by the International<br />

Maritime Organisation.<br />

Most nations signed up<br />

including the UK. The<br />

code sets out standards<br />

for ports and ships.<br />

UK ports are regularly<br />

inspected and checked<br />

by the Department for<br />

Transport (DfT) or the<br />

Maritime and Coastguard<br />

Agency (MCA).<br />

Port of Dublin<br />

NOVEMBER 2017 PROFESSIONAL SECURITY<br />

29<br />

p28,9 Una <strong>27</strong>-11.indd 2 12/10/2017 11:22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!