CCChat-Magazine_3

He simultaneously used all of them to
post about my work and my thoughts –
and to watch everything I was saying
in real time.
After 8 weeks, I submitted a cease and
desist letter which was responded to
with arrogance and a complete denial
of any wrong doing. The reply even
argued that they would not be looking
into it because I had no evidence.
However, I had 22 pages of evidence
and had logged over 280 posts in 8
weeks from the four accounts so I
decided to log a formal complaint
against the employee.
I submitted the 22 pages of evidence
and eventually got a phone call from
the person ‘investigating’ the employee
to say that the employee had admitted
watching me and posting about me,
that he was angry about what was
being talked about (CSE films being
unethical).
He also told his employer that other
employees and professionals were
involve and he didn’t act alone.
Once I had blocked his accounts, he
enlisted others to help him. He also
told his employer that he used my
twitter feed on my website to watch me
after he realised he was blocked.
“I had 22 pages of evidence and had logged
over 280 posts in 8 weeks.”
The complaint was eventually accepted
but only after a number of difficult
conversations with MESMAC staff.
The CEO refusing to investigate
himself because he was compromised
in the first email which said I had no
evidence and copied him in.
I was repeatedly told that I couldn’t
prove the employee was watching me,
even before they had seen the
evidence.
During this process, I was sent the
workers conduct policy which
contained the clauses allowing sex,
personal relationships and exchange of
personal details with clients.
I sent it to a group of experts in the
field and asked for their advice.
I sent it to the LSCB and reported the
policy as unethical – especially in the
light of their behaviour I was
experiencing from the employees.
It was clear to me that the organisation
were preparing to protect the
employee right from the beginning.
CCChat Magazine - Making the Invisible Visible