Cauvery Basin2
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Tamil Research Institution (TRI)<br />
urgently require their intervention to get them released and their cases contested.<br />
The Tamilnadu SHRC may also take necessary steps for the effective protection to<br />
the three witnesses in the state who are presently under the protective custody of an<br />
NGO, People’s Watch in Madurai and recommend the State Government to look<br />
after their costs related to their shelter, food and other daily needs throughout their<br />
protective custody in addition to their continuous police protection.<br />
XIX.<br />
XX.<br />
XXI.<br />
We recommend that the National Legal Services Authority and all State Legal<br />
Services Authorities in the country recall their mandate under Sec 12 of the Legal<br />
Services Authorities Act, 1987 which mandates them to provide free legal services to<br />
all persons in ‘custody’. Hence in all such cases of police action where the poor are<br />
taken into custody, it is the duty of the Legal Services Authority to suo-moto step in<br />
and provide all assistance to the families of the deceased and also initiate where<br />
necessary the filing of PILs on their behalf to provide urgent and speedy justice at<br />
state cost to the poor families.<br />
We strongly recommend the Government of India to pass a new India law on<br />
preventing torture taking into full consideration the suggestions of the Select<br />
Committee of the Rajya Sabha in the year 2010 and urgently ratify the United<br />
Nations Convention on Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or<br />
Punishment as well as its Optional Protocol that it had undertaken to ratify in the<br />
UPR I [2008] and UPR II [2012] the ratification of the International Convention for the<br />
Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance. We further support the<br />
recommendations of the Law Commission of India to make consequential<br />
amendments to the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (insertion of section 114 b ) to provide<br />
that in case of custodial death the onus of proving of innocence is fixed on the police<br />
and the repeal section 197 of the Cr.P.C. to uphold the supremacy of the judiciary.<br />
We also strongly reiterate the recommendations of the UN Special Rapporteur on<br />
extra judicial killings after his visit to India in the year 2012 to the Government of<br />
India to<br />
• Establish a credible Commission of Inquiry into extrajudicial executions in<br />
India, or at least the areas most affected by extrajudicial executions, which<br />
inspires the confidence of the people. The Commission should also serve a<br />
transitional justice role. It should (a) investigate allegations concerning past<br />
and recent violations of the right to life; (b ) propose relevant measures to<br />
tackle them; and (c) work out a plan of action for the future to eradicate<br />
practices of extrajudicial executions. The Commission should submit<br />
recommendations on (a) legal reform; (b) the reform of State structures,<br />
including security bodies; and (c) the fight against impunity.<br />
www.tamilri.com<br />
26