16.12.2017 Views

Diplomatic World_nummer 55

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

46<br />

than civil unions for a long period of time. But businessmen<br />

had more opportunities to represent their interests. For<br />

example, the 1869 Charter of the Moscow Exchange<br />

Committee gave its members the right to discuss proposals<br />

on the development of trade and industry and submit them<br />

to government agencies. I should say that back then the<br />

word ‘exchange’ signified not only the place of trade but<br />

also the community of participating parties. In other words,<br />

in contrast to those in Western Europe, Russian exchanges<br />

(i.e. the community of their participants) assumed some<br />

functions of chambers of commerce via their committees.<br />

In the case of Moscow, the community was<br />

gathering on Ilyinka Street.<br />

Exactly. The first building of the Exchange erected on<br />

Ilyinka Street in 1839 cost half a million rubles. There was<br />

a terrace between two arch entrances to the Exchange, and<br />

brokers who for some reason refused to work in the central<br />

hall for a long time, gathered there, in the open air, at first.<br />

The transformation of Ilyinka into the main business street<br />

of Moscow was completed in the second half of the 19th<br />

century. The square in front of the Exchange was named<br />

Exchange Square. The Exchange was overcrowded, so it<br />

underwent profound renovations and expansion from<br />

1873-1875. Today, it accommodates the Chamber of<br />

Commerce and Industry of Russia.<br />

But let’s go back to our history. In the early 20th century,<br />

once again at the proposal of the authorities, Russian<br />

exchange committees started working on a model of Russian<br />

chambers of commerce and industry. The work was slow.<br />

Why is that? Was it the notorious bureaucratic<br />

red tape?<br />

Oh no, bureaucracy has nothing to do with that.<br />

Interestingly, except for the Moscow Exchange Committee,<br />

every other exchange committee, which, as I have already<br />

said, was executing functions of chambers of commerce<br />

and industry, as well as merchant boards and factory<br />

councils that once called for business self-governance were<br />

obstinately stalling territorial chamber projects. The reason<br />

was simple: they did not want to lose their privileges,<br />

opportunities, and representative capacities. One way<br />

or another, the process was set in motion. First, Russian<br />

chambers of commerce were created abroad, such as the<br />

Russian Chamber of Commerce in Alexandria (1902), the<br />

Russian Chamber of Commerce in London (1915), etc.<br />

A number of bi-national or mixed chambers came into being,<br />

among them the Russo-British Chamber of Commerce in<br />

St. Petersburg (1908) and the Russian-American Chamber<br />

of Commerce in Moscow (1913). In addition, a number of<br />

strictly domestic chambers of commerce were formed with<br />

emphasis on boosting foreign trade.<br />

Nonetheless, the Regulations on Chambers of Commerce<br />

and Industry were approved only on October 19 (formerly<br />

6), 1917, to lay down the institutional foundation of Russian<br />

business self-governance; the document defined principle<br />

objectives, tasks, and powers of chambers of commerce and<br />

industry in Russia. The new law envisaged the establishment<br />

of territorial chambers of commerce and industry and the<br />

mandatory participation of every business entity, the clear<br />

territorial jurisdiction within one province, the obligation<br />

to execute state duties, and the payment of membership<br />

fees. Hence, as I have said before, the national system of<br />

chambers of commerce and industry marked its centenary<br />

in October of this year.<br />

Then you are sort of coeval with the October<br />

Revolution, about which so much has been said<br />

and written?<br />

I am not sure this is symbolic. No doubt, the birth year is<br />

the same. But after the Socialist Revolution, the CCI was<br />

definitely not an organization of business self-governance,<br />

simply because there was no entrepreneurship in its current<br />

meaning in the Soviet Union and the government owned all<br />

means of production. Nevertheless, the All-Union Chamber<br />

of Commerce that was established after the revolution<br />

(renamed the USSR Chamber of Commerce and Industry<br />

in 1971) had the status of a civil organization, actively<br />

participated in the development of the national economy,<br />

promoted contacts with foreign trade and economic<br />

organizations, including chambers of commerce, export<br />

companies, exchanges, etc., or actually performed every CCI<br />

function possible in a socialist state.<br />

The CCI of Russia held a founding congress in 1991 after<br />

socialism fell and the Soviet Union collapsed. Nineteen<br />

regional chambers and several dozen business associations<br />

took part in it. That happened on October 19, 74 years after<br />

the adoption of the first law on chambers of commerce and<br />

industry. A historical circle or, if you prefer, a historical<br />

cycle was completed.<br />

How did you begin?<br />

It was not easy. I was directly involved in the establishment<br />

of the Russian chamber and worked for it from the start, so<br />

I can say there is a huge difference between how we started

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!