31.01.2018 Views

Bay of Plenty Business News January/February 2018

From mid-2016 Bay of Plenty businesses have a new voice, Bay of Plenty Business News. This new publication reflects the region’s growth and importance as part of the wider central North Island economy.

From mid-2016 Bay of Plenty businesses have a new voice, Bay of Plenty Business News. This new publication reflects the region’s growth and importance as part of the wider central North Island economy.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10 BAY OF PLENTY BUSINESS NEWS <strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2018</strong><br />

Australian attempt to claim<br />

Manuka name draws fire<br />

New Zealand honey producers maintain<br />

that Manuka is a Maori word and there<br />

is no room for sharing it with Australian<br />

counterparts, despite efforts across the<br />

Tasman to claim the word when labelling<br />

their honey products.<br />

By RICHARD RENNIE<br />

The attempt by Australian<br />

producers to hijack the<br />

word came after New<br />

Zealand producers earned<br />

approval from the United<br />

Kingdom Trademark Registry<br />

authority to use “Manuka” as a<br />

recognised New Zealand name<br />

that could be attributed to the<br />

high value honey.<br />

The UK authority concluded<br />

that Manuka was a<br />

Maori word used to describe<br />

the plant whose scientific title<br />

is Leptospermum scoparium.<br />

While noting the tree also grew<br />

elsewhere, the authority stated<br />

it was known by different common<br />

names in those areas, with<br />

Apiculture NZ’s Karin Kos (left) and FOMA’s Traci<br />

Houpapa: Australia needs to get on with branding<br />

its honey under its own label. Photo/Supplied.<br />

Manuka specifically designating<br />

the plant growing in New<br />

Zealand.<br />

“It is definitely a Maori<br />

word and the Australians need<br />

to get on with branding their<br />

own honey with their own<br />

label,” said Apiculture NZ<br />

chief executive Karin Kos.<br />

“We have been given a clear<br />

mandate to use this as a certificate<br />

<strong>of</strong> origin stamp for us.”<br />

Similar honey produced<br />

in Australia is also known as<br />

Bush Jelly, but <strong>of</strong>ten branding<br />

will describe the honey as<br />

“Australian Manuka”.<br />

The Australian producers<br />

have lodged an appeal against<br />

the UK decision, but industry<br />

observers believe their efforts<br />

to reach out and suggest a<br />

trans-Tasman approach to marketing<br />

Manuka suggested they<br />

recognise their appeal grounds<br />

are weak.<br />

Those grounds included<br />

claiming there was evidence<br />

the term Manuka had been<br />

used for over a century in<br />

describing a certain honey<br />

type, particularly in Tasmania.<br />

The Australian claim on<br />

honey has particularly earned<br />

the ire <strong>of</strong> iwi honey producers.<br />

Federation <strong>of</strong> Maori<br />

Authorities (FOMA) chairwoman<br />

Traci Houpapa<br />

described the efforts to claim<br />

Manuka as “bizarre”, and in<br />

contempt not only <strong>of</strong> Maori,<br />

but <strong>of</strong> Australia’s own indigenous<br />

people.<br />

“For us here at FOMA<br />

we feel it is ludicrous,” said<br />

Houhapa.<br />

“Manuka is a Maori word<br />

with strong whakapapa, so<br />

for our members in the wider<br />

honey, forestry and food industry<br />

[the Australian claim] is<br />

unacceptable.”<br />

However, it had given the<br />

industry the motivation to<br />

come together to work alongside<br />

each other to get a definition<br />

<strong>of</strong> Manuka honey in place,<br />

and protection <strong>of</strong> it, she said.<br />

Experienced trade negotiator<br />

Ian Fletcher has been<br />

working alongside the Manuka<br />

UMF Association with trade<br />

access and developing the<br />

case for the UK certification<br />

approved late last year.<br />

He believes Australian<br />

honey producers have a point<br />

in seeking a trans-Tasman partnership<br />

to marketing honey,<br />

but it should not be specifically<br />

defined around Manuka.<br />

“If we could properly protect<br />

a palette <strong>of</strong> mono floral<br />

honeys we could have a<br />

trans-Tasman framework for<br />

Geographical Indicators (GI)<br />

over honey, it could be a good<br />

thing for protecting all special<br />

types <strong>of</strong> honey.”<br />

GIs are a certification that<br />

a product is from a defined<br />

geographic region, possessing<br />

qualities and reputation specific<br />

to that origin. The French and<br />

Italians jealously guard products<br />

like Modena Balsamic<br />

vinegar or Champagne, using<br />

such indicators.<br />

He said that, unusually,<br />

2016 amendment to the New<br />

Zealand legislation was only<br />

extended to wines and spirits,<br />

and it was high time New<br />

Zealand reviewed this position<br />

if it was to fend <strong>of</strong>f other<br />

attempts to claim its unique<br />

product names.<br />

Fletcher said he was hopeful<br />

that European Union attempts<br />

to tighten regulations around<br />

GI standards on food types<br />

like cheese would mean New<br />

Zealand was forced to do the<br />

same under any trade deal terms.<br />

Victor Goldsmith, general<br />

manager for Ngati Porou<br />

Miere, an East Coast iwi group<br />

working with beekeepers,<br />

said Australian honey producers<br />

should look to the term<br />

“Kallara” which is the aboriginal<br />

term for Tea Tree and use<br />

that to define their particular<br />

brand <strong>of</strong> honey.<br />

Apiculture NZ’s Kos said<br />

that while Australian producers<br />

had called for some sort<br />

<strong>of</strong> trans-Tasman approach to<br />

using the term when labelling,<br />

this was not the occasion for<br />

doing so.<br />

She added that for the<br />

New Zealand honey industry,<br />

claiming the UK rights to the<br />

Manuka brand was a second<br />

step in securing higher market<br />

premiums for the product.<br />

The first move was last<br />

year’s efforts to define exactly<br />

what Manuka is. However,<br />

the Ministry for Primary<br />

Industries’ new standards<br />

for identifying what was<br />

a Manuka honey left many<br />

in the industry unhappy. But<br />

just before the new standards<br />

were due to come into play<br />

in early <strong>February</strong>, MPI performed<br />

a last minute change<br />

on its definition - slashing the<br />

required level <strong>of</strong> a key chemical<br />

marker - in order to avoid<br />

a High Court challenge from<br />

NZ Beekeeping. As a result <strong>of</strong><br />

MPI’s move, the legal action<br />

has been discontinued.<br />

Since 2006 we have specialised in people, employment, culture and change.<br />

Visit us at events.everestpeople.co.nz/events for a full list <strong>of</strong> public<br />

workshops available (Tauranga and Hamilton locations).<br />

Half-day workshops, 9:00 am – 1:00 pm:<br />

How to Hire a Superstar<br />

Basics <strong>of</strong> Managing Disciplinaries and Dismissals<br />

Managing Employee Performance<br />

Courageous Conversations<br />

Be Smart with your Time<br />

Leadership Development Programme<br />

(6 x half-day modules)<br />

28 <strong>February</strong><br />

13 March<br />

10 April & 11 Sept<br />

18 April & 5 Sept<br />

18 May<br />

5 June<br />

Contact your local Human Resource Specialist:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!