•Recommendations: ‣ The recommendations outlined in Section 2.3 are relevant to the investigation of the possibility for e-Teleportation. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. 54
5.0 p-TELEPORTATION 5.1 PK Phenomenon P-Teleportation is a form of psychokinesis (or PK) similar to telekinesis but generally used to designate the movement of objects (called apports) through other physical objects or over great distances. Telekinesis is a form of PK, which describes the movement of stationary objects without the use of any known physical force. And PK is essentially the direct influence of mind on matter without any known intermediate physical energy or instrumentation. Rigorously controlled modern scientific laboratory PK, and related psychic (a.k.a. “psi”, “paranormal” or parapsychology), research has been performed and/or documented by Rhine (1970), Schmidt (1974), Mitchell (1974a, b, see also the references cited therein), Swann (1974), Puthoff and Targ (1974, 1975), Hasted et al. (1975), Targ and Puthoff (1977), Nash (1978, see also the references cited therein), Shigemi et al. (1978), Hasted (1979), Houck (1984a), Wolman et al. (1986, see also the references cited therein), Schmidt (1987), Alexander et al. (1990), Giroldini (1991), Gissurarson (1992), Radin (1997, see also the references cited therein), Tart et al. (2002), Shoup (2002), and Alexander (2003). A well-known theoretical/experimental/operational program directed by H. E. Puthoff, R. Targ, E. May and I. Swann was conducted at SRI International and the NSA, and sponsored at various times by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), and the Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) over more than two decades; and the program was later carried on by E. May at SAIC (Alexander, 1980; Puthoff, 1996; Targ, 1996; Schnabel, 1997; Tart et al., 2002). This was called the Remote Viewing program, and it was a compartmentalized special access program possessing a variety of codenames during its 22 years of operation. Remote viewing involves precognition and clairvoyance, and it allows a practitioner to acquire information irrespective of intervening distance or time. The Remote Viewing program ended in 1994 and President W. J. Clinton officially declassified it in 1995. The reader should note that the very first U. S. military-intelligence R&D programs on psi, PK and mind control were conducted by H. K. (Andrija) Puharich, M.D., L.L.D during his military service at the Army Chemical and Biological Warfare Center at Fort Detrick, Maryland in the 1940s-50s. Puharich had an interest in clairvoyance and PK, and dabbled in theories for electronically and pharmaceutically enhancing and synthesizing psychic abilities. While in the Army, Puharich took part in a variety of parapsychology experiments, and he lectured Army, Air Force and Navy groups on possibilities for mind warfare. He was a recognized expert in hypnotism and microelectronics. PK phenomenon was also explored in the Remote Viewing program. Col. J. B. Alexander (USA ret.) credits professional aerospace engineer Jack Houck for “capturing PK phenomenon and transitioning it into an observable form” (Houck, 1982, 1984a, b; Alexander et al., 1990; Alexander, 2003). During the past three decades, Houck (along with Alexander) held a number of PK sessions, whereby attendees are taught the PK induction process, and initiate their own PK events using various metal specimens (forks, spoons, etc.). Individuals were able to completely bend or contort their metal specimens with no physical force being applied whatsoever. Numerous government science advisors and senior military officials took part in and/or witnessed these events, which took place at the Pentagon, at officers’ or scientists’ homes, and at one quarterly INSCOM retreat attended by the commanding general and a group of colonels and generals commanding INSCOM units around the globe. Spontaneous deformation of the metal specimens was observed at the PK session conducted during the INSCOM retreat, causing a great deal of excitement among those present. Other notable trained observers were also present at this session, and they critically reviewed the events. Psychic Uri Geller (1975) is the original model for demonstrating Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. 55
- Page 1 and 2:
DTIC Copy AFRL-PR-ED-TR-2003-0034 A
- Page 3 and 4:
NOTICE USING GOVERNMENT DRAWINGS, S
- Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents Section Page 1.0
- Page 7 and 8:
List of Tables Table Page Table 1.
- Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgements This study would n
- Page 11 and 12:
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction T
- Page 13 and 14: 2.0 vm-TELEPORTATION 2.1 Engineerin
- Page 15 and 16: Figure 1. Diagram of a Simultaneous
- Page 17 and 18: The resulting spacetime is everywhe
- Page 19 and 20: It is a standard result of the thin
- Page 21 and 22: which is a remarkable result. A fur
- Page 23 and 24: Figure 4. A Schematic of Vacuum Qua
- Page 25 and 26: Figure 5. A Schematic of the Casimi
- Page 27 and 28: where T is the temperature of the v
- Page 29 and 30: 2 ∆ c 44 2 ⎛ π c ⎞ 0 1 ⎛
- Page 31 and 32: As recently elaborated by Puthoff (
- Page 33 and 34: where K (a function of position) is
- Page 35 and 36: ∇ 2 K − ( c K) 0 1 2 ∂ K ∂t
- Page 37 and 38: tabletop lasers are thus the ideal
- Page 39 and 40: characterize and model the negative
- Page 41 and 42: information representing them when
- Page 43 and 44: should have a definite value even b
- Page 45 and 46: Figure 6. Classical Facsimile Trans
- Page 47 and 48: We now go one more final step to gi
- Page 49 and 50: He showed that his algorithm rises
- Page 51 and 52: • investigators are still develop
- Page 53 and 54: Figure 8. Quantum Teleportation (Fr
- Page 55 and 56: parties want to communicate with on
- Page 57 and 58: entanglement/teleportation process,
- Page 59 and 60: • FTL Communication: Experiments
- Page 61 and 62: membrane called a D-brane (D = Diri
- Page 63: Leshan’s model. Thus, a teleporta
- Page 67 and 68: unaffected by being teleported. The
- Page 69 and 70: clairvoyance, i.e., using the mind
- Page 71 and 72: Proposition 1 and Fact 2: It has be
- Page 73 and 74: 6.0 REFERENCES 1. Aczel, A. D. (200
- Page 75 and 76: 51. de Sabbata, V. and Schmutzer, E
- Page 77 and 78: 103. Jammer, M. (1974), The Philoso
- Page 79 and 80: 155. Pan, J.-W., et al. (1998), “
- Page 81 and 82: 210. Swann, I. (1974), “Scientolo
- Page 83 and 84: APPENDIX A - A Few Words About Nega
- Page 85 and 86: Appendix B - THεµ Methodology In
- Page 87 and 88: Dr. Ingrid Wysong (1 CD) EOARD 223-