Waikato Business News February/March 2018
Waikato Business News has for a quarter of a century been the voice of the region’s business community, a business community with a very real commitment to innovation and an ethos of co-operation.
Waikato Business News has for a quarter of a century been the voice of the region’s business community, a business community with a very real commitment to innovation and an ethos of co-operation.
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
WAIKATO BUSINESS NEWS <strong>February</strong>/<strong>March</strong> <strong>2018</strong><br />
45<br />
Changes afoot to combat profit shifting<br />
This time last year, we discussed the New<br />
Zealand Government’s intentions to adopt<br />
recommendations from the Organisation for<br />
Economic Cooperation and Development<br />
(OECD) in relation to BEPS(Base Erosion<br />
and Profiting Shifting).<br />
The new Government endorsed<br />
these proposals in<br />
December by introducing<br />
the Taxation (Neutralising Base<br />
Erosion and Profit Shifting) Bill<br />
into Parliament.<br />
If enacted as proposed, the<br />
provisions could come into<br />
effect from July 1 this year or<br />
in the case of the new deemed<br />
permanent establishment rules,<br />
from the date of enactment.<br />
Base erosion and profit<br />
shifting (BEPS) encompasses<br />
tax planning strategies used to<br />
exploit gaps and mismatches<br />
between countries’ tax rules to<br />
shift profits to low or no-tax jurisdictions.<br />
Although the provisions introduced<br />
in the December bill<br />
are aimed at large multinationals,<br />
they could affect any business<br />
that engages in cross-border<br />
transactions.<br />
The provisions proposed in<br />
the Bill will prevent multinationals<br />
from using:<br />
- Artificially high interest rates<br />
on loans from related parties;<br />
- Cross jurisdiction hybrid<br />
mismatch arrangements to<br />
achieve an advantageous tax<br />
position;<br />
- Artificial arrangements to<br />
circumvent having a taxable<br />
presence (or ‘permanent establishment’)<br />
in New Zea-<br />
land; and<br />
- Related-party transactions<br />
to shift profits offshore in a<br />
manner that does not reflect<br />
the economic activity undertaken<br />
in each jurisdiction.<br />
We briefly outline these key<br />
proposals below.<br />
The Bill proposes to implement<br />
a ‘restricted transfer pricing<br />
rule’ to price related-party<br />
debt (for borrowings more than<br />
$10m). It will require borrowings<br />
from an offshore-related<br />
party to be priced using a credit<br />
rating one notch lower than the<br />
ultimate parent’s credit rating,<br />
and any features not typically<br />
found in third-party debt must<br />
be removed.<br />
As currently drafted, the<br />
legislation is complicated and<br />
complying with it could result<br />
in high compliance costs and<br />
cross-border interest rate mismatches.<br />
Hybrid mismatches typically<br />
arise where a payment is<br />
deductible in one jurisdiction,<br />
but the receipt is not taxable in<br />
another. The new rules will either<br />
deny deductions or trigger<br />
taxable income. If enacted when<br />
proposed, New Zealand will be<br />
the second country globally to<br />
adopt these rules, which could<br />
result in transitional cases where<br />
the New Zealand rules apply,<br />
until the other country has enacted<br />
the rules.<br />
The Bill will change the way<br />
thin capitalisation ratios are calculated<br />
which could lead to further<br />
restrictions on the deductibility<br />
of interest and excessive<br />
debt levels. For example, the<br />
debt percentage under the thin<br />
capitalisation regime is currently<br />
calculated based on an entity’s<br />
interest-bearing debt relative<br />
to its gross assets. The Bill<br />
will require an entity’s asset value<br />
to be reduced by the amount<br />
of its “non-debt liabilities”, such<br />
as trade payables.<br />
A deemed permanent establishment<br />
(PE) rule targeted at<br />
large multinational groups who<br />
have a total global turnover of<br />
more than €750 million will be<br />
introduced. If a member of the<br />
group conducts sales activities<br />
in New Zealand on behalf of a<br />
non-resident, the non-resident<br />
is deemed to have a PE in New<br />
Zealand thereby triggering a<br />
New Zealand tax liability. These<br />
rules will apply regardless of<br />
any applicable Double Tax<br />
Agreement (DTA), unless the<br />
DTA incorporates the OECD’s<br />
latest PE article, which has a<br />
similar scope.<br />
Finally, the BEPS Bill extends<br />
the reach of the transfer<br />
pricing regime and will enable<br />
Inland Revenue to adopt a more<br />
stringent approach.<br />
The concept of a “control<br />
group” – a group that acts together<br />
or in concert to effectively<br />
control a taxpayer – will be<br />
introduced.<br />
New Zealand companies<br />
owned by investors in the same<br />
control group will become subject<br />
to the transfer pricing regime.<br />
IRD will also be able to disregard<br />
or displace legal arrangements<br />
where the commercial rational<br />
and economic substance<br />
are uncommercial. The onus of<br />
proof will also shift to the taxpayer<br />
to prove arrangements are<br />
on an arm’s length basis, rather<br />
than the Inland Revenue having<br />
TAXATION AND THE LAW<br />
> BY HAYDEN FARROW<br />
Hayden Farrow is a PwC Executive Director based in the<br />
<strong>Waikato</strong> office. Email: hayden.d.farrow@nz.pwc.com<br />
to disprove it.<br />
Inland Revenue has estimated<br />
that the new proposals could<br />
raise $200 million per year, but<br />
they are extremely complex,<br />
far-reaching and will affect numerous<br />
businesses.<br />
With the proposed enactment<br />
date less than five months<br />
away, there is not much time for<br />
taxpayers to prepare.<br />
We recommend becoming<br />
familiar with the proposed provisions<br />
and evaluating how they<br />
will impact your business.<br />
The comments in this article<br />
of a general nature and should<br />
not be relied on for specific cases.<br />
Taxpayers should seek specific<br />
advice.<br />
New provisional tax option<br />
for small business<br />
Provisional tax is about to be made a<br />
whole lot easier for small businesses.<br />
Inland Revenue (IR) is urging businesses<br />
with annual turnover under $5 million<br />
to talk with their accounting software provider<br />
or tax agent about a new option that allows<br />
them to pay provisional tax only when they are<br />
making a profit.<br />
The Accounting Income Method or AIM<br />
makes managing cash flows simpler because<br />
provisional tax payments are based on the<br />
business’ actual results.<br />
Inland Revenue’s deputy commissioner for<br />
transformation Greg James says IR has created<br />
a product that takes away the guesswork.<br />
“The beauty of AIM is that your tax payments<br />
are in line with your business cycles and<br />
if you go into loss you can collect your refund<br />
of overpaid provisional tax immediately.”<br />
A series of webinars are being hosted to explain<br />
how it all works.<br />
Three accounting software providers will<br />
be offering AIM as part of their package –<br />
MYOB, Reckon and Xero.<br />
“You don’t have to be a tax genius to make<br />
the calculation,” Mr James says. “The accounting<br />
software does all the work.<br />
“We think this could make life easier for<br />
tens of thousands of small businesses but now<br />
is the time to check if it suits your circumstances.<br />
We suggest they talk it over with their<br />
tax professional or software provider.”<br />
Find out more and sign up for an AIM webinar<br />
at www.ird.govt.nz/AIM