Answer to an Enemy of Islam
Answer to an Enemy of Islam This is a refutation of the lies and slanders which the lâ-madhhabî Rashîd Rıdâ of Egypt, who appeared in the disguise of a religious man and wrote against the scholars of Islam in his book Muhâwarât.
Answer to an Enemy of Islam
This is a refutation of the lies and slanders which the lâ-madhhabî Rashîd Rıdâ of Egypt, who appeared in the disguise of a religious man and wrote against the scholars of Islam in his book Muhâwarât.
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The imâms or their disciples did not say that it was<br />
necessary <strong>to</strong> admit their deductions or ijtihâds. Imâm Abû<br />
H<strong>an</strong>îfa said, ‘This is my ijtihâd. If there should be <strong>an</strong>yone<br />
<strong>to</strong> say the better I will follow him.’ When Hârûn ar-Rashîd<br />
w<strong>an</strong>ted <strong>to</strong> comm<strong>an</strong>d everybody <strong>to</strong> follow the ijtihâds <strong>of</strong><br />
Imâm Mâlik, the imâm said, ‘Do not do that! A hadîth<br />
which is not known at some place is known at some other<br />
place.’ A hadîth reported by only one person denotes<br />
supposition. Such a hadîth, even if it is sahîh, is <strong>to</strong> be given<br />
up if it is against the public adv<strong>an</strong>tage. The Sunna will not<br />
be ab<strong>an</strong>doned by doing so. It will have been omitted<br />
because strong evidence against it has been seen. So is the<br />
case with Hadrat ’Umar’s ijtihâd upon divorce <strong>an</strong>d mut’a.<br />
Hadrat ’Umar c<strong>an</strong>not be said <strong>to</strong> have opposed <strong>to</strong> the<br />
hadîth.”<br />
He boasts <strong>of</strong> himself by writing through the preacher’s <strong>to</strong>ngue:<br />
“O you virtuous young m<strong>an</strong>! I now appreciate your deep<br />
<strong>an</strong>d extensive knowledge.”<br />
He writes again through the preacher’s <strong>to</strong>ngue:<br />
“The harm <strong>of</strong> taqlîd, even if it were only getting stuck<br />
in<strong>to</strong> the books <strong>of</strong> one’s own madhhab <strong>an</strong>d neglecting the<br />
books <strong>of</strong> hadîth, will prove it [taqlîd] wrong.”<br />
Not only Imâm Ahmad but also the other a’immat al-madhâhib<br />
said <strong>to</strong> their disciples, “Do not follow <strong>an</strong>ybody, not even me. Take<br />
what is conveyed from as-Sahâba,” because there were mujtahids<br />
among their disciples. Mujtahids had <strong>to</strong> do so. And the statement,<br />
“You are free <strong>to</strong> adapt yourself <strong>to</strong> those who came after as-<br />
Sahâba” is a lie, for, a mujtahid was not permitted <strong>to</strong> follow<br />
<strong>an</strong>other mujtahid. Hadrat ’Abd al-Wahhâb ash-Sha’rânî wrote in<br />
Al-mîzân al-kubrâ:<br />
“An ’âlim in the grade <strong>of</strong> ijtihâd, that is, a scholar who c<strong>an</strong> find<br />
out the adilla <strong>an</strong>d infer rules from them, is not permitted <strong>to</strong> follow<br />
somebody else. However, according <strong>to</strong> the ’ulamâ’, it is wâjib for<br />
<strong>an</strong> ordinary Muslim <strong>to</strong> follow a mujtahid. They said that if a nonmujtahid<br />
Muslim did not follow a mujtahid, he would deviate from<br />
the right path. All mujtahids inferred rules from the documentary<br />
evidences they found in <strong>Islam</strong>. No mujtahid has ever talked out <strong>of</strong><br />
his own opinion concerning the religion <strong>of</strong> Allâhu ta’âlâ. Each<br />
madhhab is like a tissue woven with the threads <strong>of</strong> the Book <strong>an</strong>d<br />
the Sunna. Anybody who is not in the grade enabling him <strong>to</strong><br />
employ ijtihâd has <strong>to</strong> choose <strong>an</strong>d follow <strong>an</strong>y one he likes <strong>of</strong> the<br />
– 78 –