30.05.2018 Views

The Star: May 31, 2018

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

motoring<br />

7<br />

Price – Ford Ranger Wildtrak, $69,640<br />

Dimensions – Length, 5351mm; width, 1860mm; height, 1848mm<br />

Configuration – Five-cylinder, four-wheel-drive, <strong>31</strong>98cc, 147kW, 470Nm, six-speed automatic.<br />

Performance – 0-100km/h, 10sec<br />

Fuel usage – 8.9l/100km<br />

By RoSS KIddIE<br />

I’m still amazed that a light commercial<br />

utility is the top selling vehicle in New<br />

Zealand.<br />

I guess I shouldn’t be that surprised,<br />

it is the same scenario in many overseas<br />

countries, however, for many years<br />

mainstream cars were the dominant sellers<br />

here.<br />

That has all changed recently, Ford’s<br />

Ranger has stolen the top spot and it<br />

dominates new vehicle sales. However,<br />

Ford can’t be complacent with Ranger,<br />

Toyota’s Hilux and Holden’s Colorado are<br />

lurking in its shadows and if you add in<br />

Mitsubishi’s Triton, Nissan’s Navara and<br />

a host of others from lower in the price<br />

range, the choice of ute in New Zealand<br />

is overwhelming. Add in, too, the new<br />

prestige X-Class ute from Mercedes-Benz<br />

and Ford will have to work hard to keep<br />

Ranger in a dominant position.<br />

It’s fair to say that Ranger hasn’t changed<br />

a lot mechanically since it became popular<br />

four years ago, but it has been refreshed<br />

considerably all along its journey.<br />

This evaluation focuses on the Wildtrak<br />

version. It’s an upmarket model with all<br />

the bells and whistles you are ever likely<br />

to find in a ute. Actually, it’s almost unfair<br />

to call the Ranger a ute, other than its<br />

length of over 5.3m, it is almost car-like to<br />

drive. I say that taking into consideration<br />

it is engineered for load carrying, but<br />

the Ranger is very sophisticated for what<br />

could be loosely termed a truck.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Ranger is also a lot<br />

more comfortable than<br />

ever before, thanks to<br />

the continual process<br />

of refinement that<br />

has gone into its<br />

manufacturing<br />

process, it is quieter<br />

as a vehicle and<br />

there’s been a<br />

greater emphasis on<br />

eliminating road and<br />

wind noise.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Ranger also has<br />

a controlled ride, I had to<br />

keep reminding myself that<br />

there was a deck area behind the rear<br />

seats; it is smooth in its delivery, yet it is<br />

the quintessential model for work and<br />

recreational use.<br />

Up front sits a five-cylinder<br />

turbocharged diesel engine which harks<br />

back to Ford’s Transit programme. I’m a<br />

bit of a five-potter fan, and the 3.2-litre<br />

unit lives up to all expectation. It is strong<br />

toP SELLINg<br />

utility vehicle<br />

and smooth and, other than a gruff growl<br />

under load, it is quiet and efficient.<br />

Ford rates it at 147kW with 470Nm of<br />

torque, which are strong outputs capable<br />

of claiming an under 10sec time to make<br />

100m/h from a standstill.<br />

On the subject of figures, Ford also<br />

claims an 8.9-litre per 100km (32mpg)<br />

combined cycle fuel usage average. <strong>The</strong><br />

trip computer was constantly listing<br />

around 10.3l/100km (27mpg)<br />

during my time with the<br />

evaluation car.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se figures are for<br />

an unladen vehicle, it<br />

must be taken into<br />

account the Ranger is<br />

classed with a 3500kg<br />

tow figure along with<br />

a payload weight of<br />

835kg.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Ranger comes<br />

with a six-speed<br />

automatic gearbox, it is<br />

characterised by smooth shifts<br />

and ratios which don’t load the<br />

engine, it is happy to work tirelessly low<br />

down and responds quickly to throttle<br />

request with strong turbo boost.<br />

Underneath, the Ranger’s suspension is<br />

strictly working class. It’s a front-wishbone<br />

system with a live rear axle located by leaf<br />

springs. That’s the traditional load bearing<br />

design, yet it works well, the suspension<br />

isn’t firmed dramatically, instead the ride<br />

is comfortable and controlled with just<br />

a small jiggle or two transmitted incabin<br />

over the worst of our uneven road<br />

surfaces.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Ranger gets an electronically<br />

controlled transfer system. In typical fourwheel-drive<br />

fashion there’s a high and low<br />

ratio drive system easily manipulated by a<br />

control console dial.<br />

According to the terms of Ford’s loan<br />

agreement, I wasn’t able to take the test<br />

vehicle off-road, but I did descend a<br />

short incline into a into a new housing<br />

development to take photos. Between<br />

the hill descent control system and the<br />

seriously low ratio mechanism, serious<br />

off-road travel is a given. Consider as well,<br />

Ford claims a 237mm ground clearance<br />

figure.<br />

In terms of on-road handling, the<br />

Ranger steers with well-weighted steering<br />

and directional accuracy not always found<br />

in the traditional double-cab ute.<br />

A work colleague purchased a new<br />

Ranger a year or two back, and while it<br />

is his quintessential family vehicle, it is<br />

frequently put through its paces off-road.<br />

He, like many other buyers, has discovered<br />

that the double cab format can used in<br />

many roles.<br />

It’s that versatility that has made Ranger<br />

and most other utes in today’s market the<br />

vehicle of choice. I can’t see that scenario<br />

changing any time soon.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!