Flying in the Face oF jobs and growth - British Chambers of Commerce
Flying in the Face oF jobs and growth - British Chambers of Commerce
Flying in the Face oF jobs and growth - British Chambers of Commerce
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
36<br />
chaPter 2:<br />
wHAt uK Bus<strong>in</strong>ess needs FroM AviAtion<br />
to HelP deliver joBs And growtH<br />
55. cAA (2010), op. cit<br />
56. department for<br />
transport (2011) ‘uK<br />
Air Passenger <strong>and</strong> co2<br />
dem<strong>and</strong> Forecast’<br />
57. cAA (2010), op. cit.<br />
wHy coMPetitive Air<br />
trAnsPort Pric<strong>in</strong>g HelPs<br />
Foreign trAde<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess trAvel Price<br />
elAsticity<br />
Price elasticity measures <strong>the</strong> change<br />
<strong>in</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> for flights triggered by<br />
a change <strong>in</strong> ticket prices. <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last<br />
decade, experts have estimated <strong>the</strong><br />
price elasticity <strong>of</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess travel<br />
as rang<strong>in</strong>g from -0.2 to -0.7 55 . this<br />
means a 10% rise <strong>in</strong> ticket prices<br />
would result <strong>in</strong> a reduction <strong>in</strong><br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess flights taken <strong>of</strong> between 2%<br />
<strong>and</strong> 7%. <strong>in</strong> its 2011 traffic forecasts,<br />
<strong>the</strong> department for transport (dft) 56<br />
uses price elasticities <strong>of</strong> -0.2 <strong>and</strong> -0.3<br />
for foreign <strong>and</strong> domestic bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
travel, respectively.<br />
tHe Bus<strong>in</strong>ess MArKet<br />
BecoMes More<br />
segMented And More<br />
Price sensitive<br />
However, broad economic ratios<br />
like price elasticity only provide an<br />
overall guide to <strong>the</strong> behaviour <strong>of</strong><br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess travellers. Behaviour with<strong>in</strong><br />
specific segments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
flight market may be different.<br />
over <strong>the</strong> last two decades, airl<strong>in</strong>es<br />
have tailored <strong>the</strong> types <strong>of</strong> tickets<br />
<strong>the</strong>y <strong>of</strong>fer to an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number<br />
<strong>of</strong> different categories <strong>of</strong> passenger,<br />
lead<strong>in</strong>g to greater choice. <strong>the</strong><br />
result has been a s<strong>of</strong>ten<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
boundaries between <strong>the</strong> traditional<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>and</strong> leisure segments <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> market. <strong>in</strong> a recent analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess travel 57 , <strong>the</strong> cAA analysed<br />
<strong>the</strong>se trends. it presents data<br />
show<strong>in</strong>g how an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number<br />
<strong>of</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess travellers make use <strong>of</strong><br />
economy tickets <strong>and</strong> summarises <strong>the</strong><br />
trend as follows:<br />
Aga<strong>in</strong>st a background<br />
<strong>of</strong> tighter travel<br />
policies, short haul<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess passengers<br />
are now more likely<br />
to choose ‘best fare<br />
on <strong>the</strong> day’, despite<br />
any penalties for rebook<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
because <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> potential<br />
sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
table 4: Bus<strong>in</strong>ess PAssengers<br />
trAvell<strong>in</strong>g econoMy on<br />
FligHts to/FroM MA<strong>in</strong> london<br />
AirPorts<br />
FroM ProPortion <strong>oF</strong><br />
bUs<strong>in</strong>ess Passengers<br />
<strong>Fly<strong>in</strong>g</strong> econoMy<br />
nortH<br />
AMericA<br />
otHer<br />
long-HAul<br />
1996 2007 2009<br />
62% 59% 67%<br />
67% 67% 79%<br />
sHort-HAul 59% 91% 95%<br />
(source: cAA)