15.12.2012 Views

Management Systems Theory, Applications, and Design - Homepages

Management Systems Theory, Applications, and Design - Homepages

Management Systems Theory, Applications, and Design - Homepages

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tions so we can apply the engineering process<br />

to the management process.<br />

Scholars discussed conceptual frameworks like<br />

those shown in Figure 1.4.5.7. during the 1960’s<br />

<strong>and</strong> early 1970’s. Conceptual frameworks<br />

represent attempts to more clearly <strong>and</strong> completely<br />

structure our domain of responsibility.<br />

In the 1980’s <strong>and</strong> early 1990’s, the conceptual<br />

frameworks were ab<strong>and</strong>oned after the progress<br />

of the 1960’s <strong>and</strong> 1970’s to concentrate on<br />

managerial frameworks.<br />

Henry Lucas is a scholar of conceptual frameworks.<br />

He says, “We’ve shifted from conceptual<br />

to managerial frameworks. We now are<br />

into Hersey <strong>and</strong> Blanchard’s how do you do it<br />

rather than what it is. We’re now more practical<br />

than theoretical. The conceptual frameworks<br />

give us the big picture; now we use<br />

COMPREHENSIVENESS<br />

STRATEGIC<br />

TACTICAL<br />

OPERATIONAL<br />

CLERICAL<br />

ENDEAVORS<br />

592<br />

managerial frameworks to figure out how to do<br />

it.” (Personal Communication, Henry Lucas).<br />

The fact that our tools still aren’t working for<br />

us tells me we haven’t yet successfully evolved<br />

our conceptual frameworks. In many cases,<br />

the managerial frameworks are telling us how<br />

to do the wrong things well. We’re coming up<br />

with elegant solutions to the wrong problem.<br />

Of course, the answer is balance. Deming<br />

implores us to develop a foundation of theory<br />

<strong>and</strong> profound knowledge; then we can answer<br />

the question, “By what method?” So, our<br />

progression is from conceptual frameworks<br />

(what it is) to managerial frameworks (how to<br />

do it) to results (what we got). Many people<br />

today are looking at <strong>and</strong> acting on results (what<br />

we got) without any underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the theory<br />

(what it is) <strong>and</strong> without relating to <strong>and</strong> acting<br />

on the process (how to do it).<br />

MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS CAN BE VIEWED<br />

FROM FOUR INTERRELATED PERSPECTIVES.<br />

UNSTRUCTUREDNESS<br />

UNSTRUCTURED<br />

SEMI-STRUCTURED<br />

STRUCTURED<br />

DECISIONS<br />

UNCERTAINTY<br />

PERPLEXITY<br />

PROBLEM<br />

PROGRAM<br />

PROJECT<br />

PROCESS<br />

PURSUITS<br />

MATURITY<br />

OPTIMIZATION<br />

CONTROL<br />

VISIBILITY<br />

STAGES<br />

Figure 1.4.5.7. Whereas we can interrelate four frameworks holistically, the four together may not<br />

show the complete picture or provide firm linkages among frameworks.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!