21.06.2018 Views

CM July and August 2018

The CICM magazine for consumer and commercial credit professionals

The CICM magazine for consumer and commercial credit professionals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EDITOR’S COLUMN<br />

Pays your money, takes<br />

your choice<br />

Sean Feast<br />

Managing Editor<br />

ONE of the trickiest<br />

problems facing debt<br />

collection agencies in<br />

recent times has been how<br />

to recognise <strong>and</strong> reward<br />

their collections staff.<br />

And by ‘recognition’ I mean, of course,<br />

money, for as much as the new generation<br />

of Millennials might harp on about job<br />

satisfaction being more important than<br />

cold, hard lucre, they will soon discover<br />

with a mortgage to pay <strong>and</strong> children to<br />

bring up that bean bags, meeting pods <strong>and</strong><br />

a fridge fully stocked with Fever Tree tonic<br />

isn't all it’s cracked up to be!<br />

The Financial Conduct Authority<br />

consulted on the issue of remuneration,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the industry perhaps wondered why<br />

they bothered. All they really seemed to<br />

say was that they had ruled nothing in or<br />

out when it came to incentivising staff <strong>and</strong><br />

that any incentives needed to be balanced<br />

by monitoring <strong>and</strong> identifying trends or<br />

patterns in individual agent’s behaviour<br />

(see article page 21).<br />

The l<strong>and</strong>scape for collections has<br />

changed dramatically in the last decade<br />

or so, <strong>and</strong> examples of poor practice are<br />

now few <strong>and</strong> far between. Those that do<br />

make the headlines are often historic. It is<br />

true that financial incentives can lead to<br />

wrong behaviours – one only has to think<br />

of PPI to know this is true – <strong>and</strong> some<br />

agencies have removed the concept of an<br />

additional financial reward altogether in<br />

favour of a higher basic salary coupled<br />

with additional holidays, vouchers or<br />

other such goodwill gestures.<br />

But there is still a worrying disconnect,<br />

in my opinion, between what the<br />

clients (like the banks) say <strong>and</strong> what<br />

they do, when it comes to measuring<br />

performance. Sure, they talk a good fight<br />

about high compliance <strong>and</strong> QA scores,<br />

<strong>and</strong> low numbers of complaints, but the<br />

ultimate measure is still how much of<br />

the customers’ money has the agency<br />

managed to recover. They even publish<br />

league tables to show how each of the<br />

agencies are performing against their<br />

peers.<br />

It is hardly surprising, therefore, that<br />

agencies have, in the past, adopted a<br />

similar mindset. They are, after all, in the<br />

business of collecting money. And that is<br />

the point I am trying to make. Agencies<br />

should indeed look at creative ways of<br />

recognising <strong>and</strong> rewarding their staff to<br />

meet the needs of a modern generation<br />

of client <strong>and</strong> customer, but they must also<br />

recognise that in the end, whatever they<br />

do, money talks.<br />

The Recognised St<strong>and</strong>ard / www.cicm.com / <strong>July</strong>/<strong>August</strong> <strong>2018</strong> / PAGE 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!