January/February 2012 • Volume 10 • Issue 1 - SKINmed Journal
January/February 2012 • Volume 10 • Issue 1 - SKINmed Journal
January/February 2012 • Volume 10 • Issue 1 - SKINmed Journal
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
EDITORIAL<br />
Modesty and the Skin: Why They Shouldn’t Mix<br />
Campbell and Parish<br />
COMMENTARY<br />
Origin and Evolution of Syphilis: Drifting Myth<br />
Sehgal, Verma, Chatterjee, Chaudhuri, Chatterjee, and Rasool<br />
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS<br />
A New Paradigm in the Treatment of Kerions:<br />
Treat the Inflammation<br />
Dolder, O’Neill, O’Brien, Ross, Allen, and Allen<br />
Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris: Evolution of Challenges in<br />
Promising Treatment Options<br />
Sehgal, Srivastava, and Verma<br />
REVIEW<br />
The Role of Surgical Debridement in Healing of<br />
Diabetic Foot Ulcers<br />
Gordon, Lebrun, Tomic-Canic, and Kirsner<br />
CORE CURRICULUM<br />
Cutaneous Tuberculosis: A Diagnostic Dilemma<br />
Sehgal, Verma, Bhattacharya, Sharma, Singh, and Verma<br />
DEPARTMENTS<br />
COSMETIC SCIENCE<br />
Repelling Insects With Safe and Effective<br />
Alternatives to DEET<br />
Epstein<br />
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />
PERILS OF DERMATOPATHOLOGY<br />
It’s Not Just Who You Are, It’s Also Where You Are:<br />
The Cutaneous Leiomyosarcoma Dilemma<br />
Tumer, Castilla, and Lambert<br />
INFECTIOUS DISEASE CAPSULE<br />
It May Be Vulgar, but It Isn’t a Bad Word<br />
Saunders, Herchline, and Bernstein<br />
CASE STUDIES<br />
Unusually Severe Case of Dermatosis Neglecta<br />
Turrentine, Blalock, and Davis<br />
Fixed-Drug Eruption Caused by Ashwagandha<br />
(Withania somnifera): A Widely Used Ayurvedic Drug<br />
Sehgal, Verma, and Bhattacharya<br />
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Revealed by a<br />
Granulomatous Zosteriform Eruption<br />
Trojjet, Hammami, Zaraa, Bouzguarrou, Joens,<br />
Haouet, Osman, and Mokni<br />
CORRESPONDENCE<br />
Mycobacterium marinum Cutaneous Infection<br />
With Sporotrichoid Distribution Treated With<br />
Azithromycin Monotherapy<br />
Rallis, Falidas, and Stavropoulos
DIFFERIN ® (adapalene) LOTION, 0.1%—<br />
THE ONLY RETINOID IN A LOTION FORMULATION<br />
ON THE JOB<br />
WITH GENTLE EFFICACY 1<br />
RESULTS PATIENTS WANT IN A FORMULATION THAT DOES THE WORK—<br />
PRESCRIBE DIFFERIN ® LOTION, 0.1% TODAY!<br />
* A 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of patients 12 to 18 years of age with acne vulgaris (N=<strong>10</strong>75).<br />
† The most frequent adverse event reported was dryness. Erythema, stinging/burning, and scaling may also occur. 1<br />
Important Safety Information<br />
Differin ® Lotion, 0.1% is indicated for the topical treatment of acne vulgaris in patients 12 years and older. A thin fi lm of<br />
Differin ® Lotion, 0.1% should be applied once per day to the face and other areas of the skin affected by acne. In clinical<br />
trials, the most common adverse event (>1%) reported with use of Differin ® Lotion, 0.1% was mild to moderate skin dryness.<br />
Erythema, scaling, stinging and burning may also occur. Excessive exposure to sunlight and sunlamps should be avoided<br />
during treatment, and use of sunscreen products and protective clothing is recommended. Concomitant use of drying or<br />
irritating topical products (like products containing resorcinol, salicylic acid or sulfur) should be used with caution. Instruct<br />
patients to avoid the eyes, lips and mucous membranes when applying Differin ® Lotion, 0.1%, and not to apply to areas<br />
that have been depilated with wax products. Differin ® Lotion, 0.1% has not been tested in pregnant or nursing women,<br />
or with the elderly. Pregnancy Category C.<br />
www.differin.com/HCP<br />
Please see Brief Summary<br />
of Prescribing Information<br />
on adjacent page.<br />
58.2% MEDIAN TOTAL LESION COUNT<br />
REDUCTION BY WEEK 12 1 *<br />
TOLERABILITY PROFILE SIMILAR TO<br />
DIFFERIN ® (adapalene) CREAM, 0.1% 1†<br />
AVAILABLE IN AN EASY-TO-USE<br />
PUMP DISPENSER
DIFFERIN ®<br />
Rx only<br />
(adapalene) Lotion 0.1%<br />
For Topical Use Only<br />
Not For Oral, Ophthalmic, or Intravaginal Use.<br />
BRIEF SUMMARY<br />
INDICATIONS AND USAGE<br />
DIFFERIN Lotion is a retinoid product indicated for the topical treatment of<br />
acne vulgaris in patients 12 years and older.<br />
CONTRAINDICATIONS<br />
None.<br />
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS<br />
Ultraviolet Light and Environmental Exposure: Avoid exposure to sunlight<br />
and sunlamps. Wear sunscreen when sun exposure cannot be avoided.<br />
Erythema, scaling, dryness, and stinging/burning may occur with use of<br />
DIFFERIN Lotion.<br />
ADVERSE REACTIONS<br />
Dry skin of mild to moderate severity was the most frequently reported<br />
(≥ 1%) treatment related adverse event. Erythema, scaling, dryness,<br />
burning/stinging were also seen during treatment.<br />
DRUG INTERACTIONS<br />
Concomitant use of topical products with a strong drying effect can increase<br />
skin irritation. Use with caution, especially in using preparations containing<br />
sulfur, resorcinol, or salicylic acid in combination with DIFFERIN Lotion. Wax<br />
depilation should not be performed on treated skin.<br />
Pregnancy<br />
Pregnancy Category C. There are no well-controlled trials in pregnant women<br />
treated with DIFFERIN Lotion. Therefore, DIFFERIN Lotion should be<br />
used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk<br />
to the fetus. Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with<br />
DIFFERIN Lotion. Furthermore, such studies are not always predictive of<br />
human response.<br />
Human Data<br />
In clinical trials involving DIFFERIN Lotion, 0.1% in the treatment of acne<br />
vulgaris, women of childbearing potential initiated treatment only after a<br />
negative pregnancy test. Two women became pregnant while using DIFFERIN<br />
Lotion, 0.1%. One patient delivered a healthy full term baby and the other<br />
patient electively terminated her pregnancy.<br />
Animal Data<br />
No teratogenic effects were observed in rats treated with oral doses of 0.15<br />
to 5.0 mg adapalene/kg/day, up to 25 times (mg/m2 /day) the maximum<br />
recommended human dose (MRHD) of 2 grams of DIFFERIN Lotion.<br />
However, teratogenic changes were observed in rats and rabbits when treated<br />
with oral doses of ≥ 25 mg adapalene/kg/day representing 123 and 246 times<br />
MRHD, respectively. Findings included cleft palate, microphthalmia,<br />
encephalocele and skeletal abnormalities in rats; and umbilical hernia,<br />
exophthalmos and kidney and skeletal abnormalities in rabbits.<br />
Dermal teratology studies conducted in rats and rabbits at doses of 0.6-<br />
6.0 mg adapalene/kg/day [25-59 times (mg/m2 ) the MRHD] exhibited no<br />
fetotoxicity and only minimal increases in supernumerary ribs in both species<br />
and delayed ossification in rabbits.<br />
Systemic exposure (AUC 0-24h) to adapalene at topical doses<br />
(6.0 mg/kg/day) in rats represented <strong>10</strong>1 times the exposure to adapalene in<br />
patients with acne treated with DIFFERIN Lotion applied to the face, chest<br />
and back (2 grams applied to <strong>10</strong>00 cm² of acne-involved skin).<br />
Nursing Mothers<br />
It is not known whether adapalene is excreted in human milk following<br />
use of DIFFERIN Lotion. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk,<br />
caution should be exercised when DIFFERIN Lotion is administered to a<br />
nursing woman.<br />
Pediatric Use<br />
Safety and effectiveness of DIFFERIN Lotion in pediatric patients under the<br />
age of 12 have not been established.<br />
Geriatric Use<br />
Clinical studies of DIFFERIN Lotion did not include sufficient numbers of<br />
subjects aged 65 and over to determine whether they respond differently<br />
from younger subjects.<br />
Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility<br />
No carcinogenicity, mutagenicity and impairment of fertility studies were<br />
conducted with DIFFERIN Lotion.<br />
Carcinogenicity studies with adapalene have been conducted in mice at<br />
topical doses of 0.4, 1.3, and 4.0 mg/kg/day (1.2, 3.9, and 12 mg/m²/day),<br />
and in rats at oral doses of 0.15, 0.5, and 1.5 mg/kg/day (0.9, 3.0, and<br />
9.0 mg/m 2 /day). In terms of body surface area, the highest dose levels are<br />
9.8 (mice) and 7.4 times (rats) the MRHD of 2 grams of DIFFERIN Lotion.<br />
In the rat study, an increased incidence of benign and malignant<br />
pheochromocytomas in the adrenal medulla of male rats was observed.<br />
No photocarcinogenicity studies were conducted with adapalene. However,<br />
animal studies have shown an increased tumorigenic risk with the use<br />
of pharmacologically similar drugs (e.g. retinoids) when exposed to UV<br />
irradiation in the laboratory or sunlight. Although the significance of these<br />
findings to humans is not clear, patients should be advised to avoid or<br />
minimize exposure to either sunlight or artificial irradiation sources.<br />
Adapalene did not exhibit mutagenic or genotoxic effects in vitro (Ames test,<br />
Chinese hamster ovary cell assay, mouse lymphoma TK assay) or in vivo<br />
(mouse micronucleus test).<br />
In rat oral studies, 20 mg adapalene/kg/day (120 mg/m 2 /day; 98 times the<br />
MRHD based on mg/m 2 /day comparison) did not affect the reproductive<br />
performance and fertility of F 0 males and females, or growth, development<br />
and reproductive function of F 1 offspring.<br />
PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION<br />
<strong>•</strong> Apply a thin film of DIFFERIN Lotion to the affected areas of the skin once<br />
daily, after washing gently with a mild soapless cleanser. Dispense a nickel<br />
size amount of DIFFERIN Lotion (3-4 actuations of the pump) to cover the<br />
entire face. Avoid application to the areas of skin around eyes, lips and<br />
mucous membranes. DIFFERIN Lotion may cause irritation such as<br />
erythema, scaling, dryness, stinging or burning.<br />
<strong>•</strong> Advise patients to cleanse the area to be treated with a mild or soapless<br />
cleanser; pat dry. Apply DIFFERIN Lotion to the entire face or other<br />
acne affected areas as a thin layer, avoiding the eyes, lips and mucous<br />
membranes.<br />
<strong>•</strong> Exposure of the eye to this medication may result in reactions such as<br />
swelling, conjunctivitis and eye irritation.<br />
<strong>•</strong> Patients should be advised not to use more than the recommended amount<br />
and not to apply more than once daily as this will not produce faster<br />
results, but may increase irritation.<br />
<strong>•</strong> Advise patients to minimize exposure to sunlight including sunlamps.<br />
Recommend the use of sunscreen products and protective apparel<br />
(e.g., hat) when exposure cannot be avoided.<br />
<strong>•</strong> Moisturizers may be used if necessary; however, products containing alpha<br />
hydroxy or glycolic acids should be avoided.<br />
<strong>•</strong> This medication should not be applied to cuts, abrasions, eczematous, or<br />
sunburned skin.<br />
<strong>•</strong> Wax depilation should not be performed on treated skin due to the<br />
potential for skin erosions.<br />
<strong>•</strong> This product is for external use only.<br />
Marketed by:<br />
GALDERMA LABORATORIES, L.P., Fort Worth, Texas 76177 USA<br />
Manufactured by:<br />
Galderma Production Canada Inc., Baie d’Urfé, QC, H9X 3S4 Canada<br />
Made in Canada.<br />
GALDERMA is a registered trademark.<br />
P51503-0<br />
Revised: March 20<strong>10</strong><br />
Reference: 1. Data on file. Galderma Laboratories, L.P.<br />
Galderma is a registered trademark.<br />
©20<strong>10</strong> Galderma Laboratories, L.P.<br />
Galderma Laboratories, L.P.<br />
14501 N. Freeway<br />
Fort Worth, TX 76177<br />
DIFF-113 Printed in USA 09/<strong>10</strong><br />
www.differin.com/HCP
EDITORIAL<br />
2<br />
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />
Modesty and the Skin: Why They Shouldn’t Mix ................................................................................................ 6<br />
Caren Campbell, BA; Lawrence Charles Parish, MD, MD (Hon)<br />
COMMENTARY<br />
Origin and Evolution of Syphilis: Drifting Myth .................................................................................................. 8<br />
Virendra N. Sehgal, MD; Prashant Verma, MD; Kingshuk Chatterjee, MBBS; Anita Chaudhuri, MD; Gautam Chatterjee, MS; Farhan Rasool, MBBS<br />
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS<br />
REVIEW<br />
A New Paradigm in the Treatment of Kerions: Treat the Inflammation ............................................................. 14<br />
Sarah E. Dolder, MD; Brendan J. O’Neill, MD; Meghan M. O’Brien, MD; Amy S. Ross, MD; Robert A. Allen, MD; Herbert B. Allen, MD<br />
Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris: Evolution of Challenges in Promising Treatment Options ............................................. 18<br />
Virendra N. Sehgal, MD; Govind Srivastava, MD; Prashant Verma, MD<br />
The Role of Surgical Debridement in Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers .............................................................. 24<br />
Katherine A. Gordon, BS; Elizabeth A. Lebrun, MD; Marjana Tomic-Canic, PhD; Robert S. Kirsner, MD, PhD<br />
CORE CURRICULUM<br />
Cutaneous Tuberculosis: A Diagnostic Dilemma ............................................................................................. 28<br />
Virendra N. Sehgal, MD; Prashant Verma, MD; Sambit N. Bhattacharya, MD; Sonal Sharma, MD; Navjeevan Singh, MD; Nishant Verma, MD<br />
Self-Test Review Questions (p. 34)<br />
DEPARTMENTS<br />
COSMETIC SCIENCE<br />
Howard A. Epstein, PhD, Section Editor<br />
Repelling Insects With Safe and Effective Alternatives to DEET ....................................................................... 36<br />
Howard A. Epstein, PhD<br />
PERILS OF DERMATOPATHOLOGY<br />
W. Clark Lambert, MD, PhD, Section Editor<br />
It’s Not Just Who You Are, It’s Also Where You Are: The Cutaneous Leiomyosarcoma Dilemma ......................... 40<br />
Gizem Tumer, MD; Carmen F. Castilla, BS; W. Clark Lambert, MD, PhD<br />
INFECTIOUS DISEASE CAPSULE<br />
Jack M. Bernstein, MD, Section Editor<br />
It May Be Vulgar, but It Isn’t a Bad Word......................................................................................................... 42<br />
David Saunders, MD;Thomas Herchline, MD; Jack M. Bernstein, MD<br />
CASE STUDIES<br />
Vesna Petronic-Rosic, MD, MSc, Section Editor<br />
Unusually Severe Case of Dermatosis Neglecta .............................................................................................. 46<br />
Jake E. Turrentine, BS; Travis W. Blalock, MD; Loretta S. Davis, MD<br />
Fixed-Drug Eruption Caused by Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera): A Widely Used Ayurvedic Drug ................ 48<br />
Virendra N. Sehgal, MD; Prashant Verma, MD; Sambit N. Bhattacharya, MD
3<br />
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Revealed by a Granulomatous Zosteriform Eruption ....................................... 50<br />
Sondes Trojjet, MD; Houda Hammami, MD; Inès Zaraa, MD; Alia Bouzguarrou, MD; Meriem Joens, MD; Slim Haouet, MD;<br />
Amel Ben Osman, MD; Mourad Mokni, MD<br />
CORRESPONDENCE<br />
Mycobacterium marinum Cutaneous Infection With Sporotrichoid Distribution Treated With<br />
Azithromycin Monotherapy ............................................................................................................................ 54<br />
Efstathios Rallis, MD, PhD; Evangelos Falidas, MD; Panagiotis Stavropoulos, MD, PhD<br />
ABOUT OUR JOURNAL<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>: Dermatology for the Clinician®, print ISSN 1540-9740, online<br />
ISSN 1751-7125, is published bimonthly by Pulse Marketing & Communications,<br />
LLC, located at 4 Peninsula Avenue, Sea Bright, NJ 07760.<br />
Printed in the USA.<br />
Disclaimer: The Publisher, Editors, and Editorial Board cannot be held<br />
responsible for errors or any consequences arising from the use of information<br />
contained in this journal; the views and opinions expressed herein<br />
do not necessarily reflect those of the Publisher, Editors, and Editorial<br />
Board, neither does the publication of advertisements constitute any endorsement<br />
by the Publisher, Editors, and Editorial Board of the products<br />
or services advertised. The Publisher, Editors, Editorial Board, Reviewers,<br />
Authors, and Affiliated Agents shall not be held responsible or in any way<br />
liable for the continued accuracy of the information or for any errors,<br />
inaccuracies, or omissions of any kind in this publication, whether arising<br />
from negligence or otherwise, or for any consequences arising thereafter.<br />
Copyright: © <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC. All rights<br />
reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted<br />
in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing<br />
from the Publisher. Requests should be addressed to the Permissions<br />
Editor at: Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC, 4 Peninsula Avenue,<br />
Sea Bright, NJ 07760.<br />
Abstracting & Indexing: The journal is indexed in Index Medicus/<br />
MEDLINE and Embase.<br />
To submit a manuscript for peer review, send as an e-mail attachment<br />
to the Editor in Chief at lparish@skinmedjournal.com. Please<br />
visit www.skinmedjournal.com for Information for Authors.<br />
EDITORIAL DIRECTOR<br />
Sarah D. Staats<br />
sstaats@skinmedjournal.com<br />
PUBLISHER<br />
Art Kalaka<br />
PRESIDENT<br />
Arthur Kalaka<br />
akalaka@skinmedjournal.com<br />
Editorial<br />
MEDIA WEB DIRECTOR<br />
Joan Osgoodby<br />
joan@skinmedjournal.com<br />
Publishing<br />
Corporate<br />
GENERAL COUNSEL<br />
Marianne Mckenzie<br />
mmckenzie@skinmedjournal.com<br />
COPYEDITOR<br />
Elizabeth Holcomb<br />
eholcomb@skinmedjournal.com<br />
ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER<br />
James R. Adams<br />
jadams@skinmedjournal.com<br />
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER<br />
Jo-Ann Kalaka-Adams<br />
jadams@skinmedjournal.com<br />
Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC<br />
4 Peninsula Avenue <strong>•</strong> Suite 401 <strong>•</strong> Sea Bright, NJ 07760<br />
Tel (732) 747-6525 <strong>•</strong> Fax (732) 747-70<strong>10</strong>
William Abramovits, MD<br />
Dallas, TX<br />
Mohamed Amer, MD<br />
Cairo, Egypt<br />
Robert L. Baran, MD<br />
Cannes, France<br />
Anthony V. Benedetto, DO<br />
Philadelphia, PA<br />
Brian Berman, MD, PhD<br />
Miami, FL<br />
Jack M. Bernstein, MD<br />
Dayton, OH<br />
Sarah Brenner, MD<br />
Tel Aviv, Israel<br />
Joaquin Calap Calatayud, MD<br />
Cadiz, Spain<br />
Henry H.L. Chan, MB, MD, PhD, FRCP<br />
Hong Kong, China<br />
Noah Craft, MD, PhD, DTMH<br />
Torrance, CA<br />
Ncoza C. Dlova, MBChB, FCDerm<br />
Durban, South Africa<br />
Richard L. Dobson, MD<br />
Mt Pleasant, SC<br />
William H. Eaglstein, MD<br />
Palo Alto, CA<br />
Boni E. Elewski, MD<br />
Birmingham, AL<br />
Charles N. Ellis, MD<br />
Ann Arbor, MI<br />
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> EDITORIAL BOARD<br />
Howard A. Epstein, PhD<br />
Gibbstown, NJ<br />
Ibrahim Hassan Galadari, MD, PhD, FRCP<br />
Dubai, United Arab Emirates<br />
Anthony A. Gaspari, MD<br />
Baltimore, MD<br />
Michael Geiges, MD<br />
Zurich, Switzerland<br />
Michael H. Gold, MD<br />
Nashville, TN<br />
Lowell A. Goldsmith, MD, MPH<br />
Chapel Hill, NC<br />
Aditya K. Gupta, MD, PhD, FRCP(C)<br />
London, Ontario<br />
Seung-Kyung Hann, MD, PhD<br />
Seoul, Korea<br />
Roderick J. Hay, BCh, DM, FRCP, FRCPath<br />
London, UK<br />
Tanya R. Humphreys, MD<br />
Philadelphia, PA<br />
Camila K. Janniger, MD<br />
Englewood, NJ<br />
Abdul-Ghani Kibbi, MD<br />
Beirut, Lebanon<br />
Andrew P. Lazar, MD<br />
Highland Park, IL<br />
EDITOR IN CHIEF<br />
Lawrence Charles Parish, MD, MD (Hon)<br />
Philadelphia, PA<br />
W. Clark Lambert, MD, PhD<br />
Newark, NJ<br />
Vesna Petronic-Rosic, MD, MSc<br />
Chicago, IL<br />
DEPUTY EDITORS<br />
EDITORIAL BOARD<br />
4<br />
Larry E. Millikan, MD<br />
Meridian, MS<br />
Marcia Ramos-e-Silva, MD, PhD<br />
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil<br />
Jasna Lipozencic, MD, PhD<br />
Zagreb, Croatia<br />
Eve J. Lowenstein, MD, PhD<br />
New York, NY<br />
George M. Martin, MD<br />
Kihei, HI<br />
Marc S. Micozzi, MD, PhD<br />
Bethesda, MD<br />
George F. Murphy, MD<br />
Boston, MA<br />
Oumeish Youssef Oumeish, MD, FRCP<br />
Amman, Jordan<br />
Joseph L. Pace, MD, FRCP<br />
Naxxar, Malta<br />
Art Papier, MD<br />
Rochester, NY<br />
Johannes Ring, MD, DPhil<br />
Munich, Germany<br />
Roy S. Rogers III, MD<br />
Rochester, MN<br />
Donald Rudikoff, MD<br />
New York, NY<br />
Robert I. Rudolph, MD<br />
Wyomissing, PA<br />
Vincenzo Ruocco, MD<br />
Naples, Italy<br />
Jennifer L. Parish, MD<br />
Philadelphia, PA<br />
Noah S. Scheinfeld, MD, JD<br />
New York, NY<br />
Virendra N. Sehgal, MD<br />
Delhi, India<br />
Charles Steffen, MD<br />
Oceanside, CA<br />
Alexander J. Stratigos, MD<br />
Athens, Greece<br />
James S. Studdiford III, MD<br />
Philadelphia, PA<br />
Robert J. Thomsen, MD<br />
Los Alamos, NM<br />
Julian Trevino, MD<br />
Dayton, OH<br />
Snejina Vassileva, MD, PhD<br />
Sofia, Bulgaria<br />
Daniel Wallach, MD<br />
Paris, France<br />
Michael A. Waugh, MB, FRCP<br />
Leeds, UK<br />
Wm. Philip Werschler, MD<br />
Spokane, WA<br />
Joseph A. Witkowski, MD<br />
Philadelphia, PA<br />
Ronni Wolf, MD<br />
Rechovot, Israel
A New Tretinoin Therapy<br />
From Triax Pharmaceuticals<br />
©20<strong>10</strong> Triax Pharmaceuticals, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Printed in USA TX-06<strong>10</strong>-02<br />
%
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
Modesty and the Skin: Why They Shouldn’t Mix<br />
Caren Campbell, BA; 1 Lawrence Charles Parish, MD, MD (Hon) 2<br />
Some years ago, the American Cancer Society first<br />
mounted a campaign against modesty to publicize the<br />
need for breast examinations. All too often, women<br />
were not only too embarrassed to let their physicians fully<br />
examine their chests, but they were also reluctant to perform<br />
self-examination.<br />
This was not the case of the young woman who presented with<br />
a black lesion on her right breast. She was concerned about the<br />
peculiarity of the lesion since its appearance 2 months prior<br />
(Figure). Fortunately, modesty did not play a role in her situation.<br />
The lesion was quickly excised and proved to be a level<br />
3 melanoma. How many other patients are not so fortunate to<br />
have appropriate removal and treatment before it is too late?<br />
CANCER SCREENING<br />
Americans should be well informed on the importance of early<br />
detection in skin cancer. Much emphasis has been placed on this<br />
concept; however, while patients may be attuned to the idea of<br />
cancer screening for other body systems, they do not grasp the<br />
concept of the full body scan. This diagnostic procedure, needless<br />
to say, cannot be accomplished in a proper fashion without<br />
disrobing, but many patients are reluctant to do so.<br />
As any seasoned clinician can attest, melanomas and nonmelanoma<br />
skin cancers can be found in any area of the body from the<br />
breasts to the soles. They do not avoid the genitalia, let alone the<br />
intertriginous areas. Curiously, primary cutaneous melanomas in<br />
hidden anatomic sites are thicker than those in visible sites, likely<br />
because of a delay in diagnosis. 1,2 Additionally, the problem may<br />
be compounded by UV radiation from indoor tanning. Many a<br />
tanner disrobes completely to obtain his or her money’s worth at<br />
the tanning parlor but is reluctant to have the dermatologist see<br />
most of the body.<br />
MODESTY AT WORK<br />
Let’s reflect upon the skin examination. Isn’t its purpose to<br />
find anything that might create a problem? The reason for the<br />
procedure is to examine visually every skin surface. The act of<br />
wearing any clothing only serves to hinder and prolong the<br />
examination.<br />
Modesty is a behavior, manner, or appearance intended to avoid<br />
impropriety or indecency. During a physical examination, modesty<br />
is not serving to avoid impropriety or indecency. It is a false<br />
modesty. Much like the modesty panel underneath a desk or<br />
nude-colored hosiery worn by women, it is a social construct.<br />
The impropriety and judgment felt by the patient and others is<br />
also created by society.<br />
The subject of modesty has been examined in detail in other<br />
disciplines. For example, one such study on modesty sought to<br />
explore the role that culture played, finding that some perspectives<br />
on modesty are accounted for by culture, while others are<br />
not. 3 Modesty was found to be driven by maturity/age, religion/<br />
culture, or esteem/upbringing. For the maturity-driven group,<br />
modesty did not play a role in the health care setting, while the<br />
religiously/culturally driven group felt modesty should be considered<br />
in a health care setting. (Disrobing in this setting was not<br />
an issue.) Most interestingly, the esteem-driven group posed the<br />
greatest challenge to health care providers, as this group felt it<br />
stressful and uncomfortable to undress in the health care setting<br />
and would likely avoid screening for reasons of modesty.<br />
Although not formally studied, one realizes that body image plays<br />
a large role in patient modesty. Patients worry that as the physician<br />
examines their skin they are secretly being judged on their lingerie<br />
or less-than-ideal body weight. Here, the truth hurts—the clinicians<br />
are doing their job—to screen the patient for skin cancer.<br />
There are many papers detailing ways to protect patient modesty, 4–8<br />
but just as important as the patient’s comfort is the necessity to perform<br />
a thorough examination. The most obvious way to accomplish<br />
an appropriate examination to detect malignancy, including<br />
the scalp, oral cavity, genitals, and nails, would be disrobing. 9<br />
The patient may wear a gown to cover surfaces not being examined.<br />
An alternative involves the patient disrobing one quadrant at a<br />
time. It is both curious and unfortunate when a patient requests a<br />
full body scan but only permits limited views of the skin.<br />
From the Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; 1 and the Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous<br />
Biology, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA2 Address for Correspondence: Lawrence Charles Parish, MD, MD (Hon), 1760 Market Street, Suite 301, Philadelphia, PA 19<strong>10</strong>3<br />
<strong>•</strong> E-mail: larryderm@yahoo.com<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:6–7 6<br />
© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
Figure. A level 3 melanoma found on the right breast.<br />
REFLECTIONS<br />
When reflecting upon the situation, the role of modesty in<br />
prophylactic screening is raised. What stands out is a lack of compliance<br />
in both breast and colon cancer screening due to modesty.<br />
<strong>10</strong>,11 If patients are unwilling to undergo cancer screening<br />
developed for the sole purpose of early detection and prevention,<br />
we can only conclude that modesty should be considered<br />
dangerous to their health.<br />
Skin self-examination is one method that might prove an<br />
alternative for those too modest to allow yearly examination<br />
of the entire skin’s surface. Self-examination taught to<br />
both patient and partner improves self-efficacy for patients. 12<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:6–7<br />
7<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
Partnering with those trusted by the patient might improve<br />
detection and outcomes for patients too modest for frequent<br />
skin examination.<br />
Isn’t there an old adage: Modesty killed the cat?<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1 Nagore E, Oliver V, Moreno-Picot S, Fortea JM. Primary cutaneous melanoma<br />
in hidden sites is associated with thicker tumours—a study of 829<br />
patients. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:79–82.<br />
2 Hemo Y, Gutman M, Klausner JM. Anatomic site of primary melanoma<br />
is associated with depth of invasion. Arch Surg. 1999;134:148–150.<br />
3 Andrews CS. Defining and exploring modesty in Jewish American<br />
women. J Relig Health. 20<strong>10</strong>. http://www.springerlink.com.proxy1.lib.<br />
tju.edu:2048/content/r666v2x<strong>10</strong>0160487/. Accessed April 23, 2011.<br />
4 Baillie J. Making a difference to the patient experience. Health Estate.<br />
20<strong>10</strong>;64:48–50, 52–55.<br />
5 Wehbe-Alamah H. Bridging generic and professional care practices for<br />
Muslim patients through use of Leininger’s culture care modes. Contemp<br />
Nurse. 2008;28:83–97.<br />
6 Yosef ARO. Health beliefs, practice, and priorities for health care of Arab<br />
Muslims in the United States. J Transcult Nurs. 2008;19:284–291.<br />
7 Roberts KS. Providing culturally sensitive care to the child bearing Islamic<br />
family. Adv Neonatal Care. 2002;2:222–228.<br />
8 Lawrence P, Rozmus C. Culturally sensitive care of the Muslim patient.<br />
J Transcult Nurs. 2001;12:228–233.<br />
9 Craft N, Fox LP, Goldsmith LA. VisualDx: Essential Adult Dermatology.<br />
Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 20<strong>10</strong>.<br />
<strong>10</strong> Denberg TD, Melhado TV, Coombes JM, et al. Predictors of nonadherence<br />
to screening colonoscopy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:989–995.<br />
11 Parsa P, Kandiah M, Abdul Rahman H, Zulkefli NM. Barriers for breast<br />
cancer screening among Asian women: a mini literature review. Asian<br />
Pac J Cancer Prev. 2006;7:509–514.<br />
12 Robinson JK, Stapleton J, Turrisi R. Relationship and partner moderator<br />
variables increase self-efficacy of performing skin self-examination.<br />
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58:755–762.<br />
HISTORICAL DIAGNOSIS & TREATMENT<br />
Diagnosis and treatments have advanced over the past century. This feature depicts conditions from a<br />
collection of steroptic cards published in 19<strong>10</strong> by The Stereoscopic Skin Clinic, by Dr. S. I. Rainforth.<br />
(continued on page 12)<br />
Modesty and the Skin: Why They Shouldn’t Mix
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />
COMMENTARY<br />
Origin and Evolution of Syphilis: Drifting Myth<br />
Virendra N. Sehgal, MD; Prashant Verma, MD; Kingshuk Chatterjee, MBBS; Anita Chaudhuri, MD;<br />
Gautam Chatterjee, MS; Farhan Rasool, MBBS<br />
The venereal form of treponematosis, caused by the spirochete Treponema pallidum, plagued every major city in the preantibiotic era.<br />
“Civilization means syphilization,” was an idea touted by Richard von Krafft-Ebing in the late 19th, and early 20th centuries that the<br />
effects of modern life make men more susceptible to syphilis and other diseases. Christopher Columbus was thought of as an importer of<br />
syphilis to Europe. Because his serendipitous voyages to the New World initiated the process of Spanish colonization, which foreshadowed<br />
general European colonization of the New World, it is difficult to rule out the cultural and political animosity created by Columbus and<br />
his men. These recent revelations are intriguing and may create dialogue that may subsequently challenge the age-old theory of “East to<br />
West” spread of venereal syphilis. This contribution warrants the continuation of study in this direction, taking into account skeletal studies<br />
that utilized radiocarbon dating technique and the phylogenetic analysis of the bacterial strains, offering a possible consensus on the origin<br />
and evolution of syphilis.<br />
Syphilis, a treponemal disease, has undergone discernible<br />
metamorphosis in its natural history. The diverse clinical<br />
manifestations of syphilis are known to masquerade as<br />
a spectrum of clinical entities, earning itself the reputation of<br />
being the great imitator. 1 Syphilis was even mentioned in Act 3<br />
of Timon of Athens 2 by William Shakespeare:<br />
Live loathed and long,<br />
Most smiling, smooth, detested parasites,<br />
Courteous destroyers, affable wolves, meek bears,<br />
You fools of fortune, trencher-friends, time’s flies,<br />
Cap and knee slaves, vapours, and minute-jacks!<br />
Of man and beast the infinite malady<br />
Crust you quite o’er! What, dost thou go?<br />
Soft! take thy physic first—thou too—and thou;—<br />
Stay, I will lend thee money, borrow none.<br />
The name for syphilis is derived from Fracastorius’ 1530 epic<br />
poem in three parts, Syphilis sive morbus gallicus (“Syphilis or<br />
The French Disease”), about a shepherd boy named Syphilus<br />
who insulted the sun god of Haiti and was punished by that<br />
god with a horrible disease. The poem suggests using mercury<br />
and “guaiaco” as a cure. 3,4 Oil of guaiac is a fragrance used in<br />
soap, originating from the Palo Santo, sacred tree in Ecuador,<br />
which provides an essential oil that heals both body and spirit. 5<br />
Syphilis, with its antiquity, has carried social stigma. In order<br />
to avoid the cultural embarrassment, countries attempted “to<br />
pass the buck to others.” 6 Accordingly, variations in its nomenclature<br />
were likely; the English and the Germans called it the<br />
“French disease”; the French called it the “Neapolitan sickness”;<br />
the Russians, the “Polish sicknes”; the Poles, the “German<br />
sickness”; Flemish, Dutch, Portuguese, and North Americans<br />
called it the “Spanish sickness” or “Castilian sickness”; and<br />
the Japanese, the “Canton rash” or “Chinese ulcer.” The term<br />
Great pox was used for 2 centuries to differentiate syphilis from<br />
Smallpox. 7<br />
Christopher Columbus, the great Italian voyager, whose precise<br />
date of birth is only speculated, 8 left on his first voyage<br />
at the age of 41 years (1492–1493). His journey initiated the<br />
process of Spanish colonization, which foreshadowed the general<br />
European colonization of the “New World.” 9 The idea that<br />
“Civilization is Syphilization” has historically stamped Columbus<br />
as the importer of syphilis to Europe. <strong>10</strong> The current contribution<br />
attempts to review the more recent archeological reports,<br />
dendrochronologic findings, and radiocarbon dating studies in<br />
order to clarify the development of the disease. The origin and<br />
evolution of syphilis is currently unknown 11 and may continue<br />
to puzzle researchers until a plausible consensus is developed.<br />
From the Dermato-Venereology (Skin/VD) Center, Sehgal Nursing Home, Panchwati, Delhi; Department of Dermatology and STD, University<br />
College of Medical Sciences, and Associated Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Shahdara, Delhi; Department of Dermatology, Burdwan Medical<br />
College and Associated Hospital, Burdwan; Apollo Nursing Home, Burdwan; Skin Institute and School of Dermatology, Greater Kailash New<br />
Delhi, India<br />
Address for Correspondence: Virendra N. Sehgal MD, Dermato-Venerology (Skin/VD) Center, Sehgal Nursing Home, A/6 Panchwati,<br />
Delhi 1<strong>10</strong> 033 India <strong>•</strong> E-mail: drsehgal@ndf.vsnl.net.in<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:8–12 8<br />
© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
HYPOTHESIS OF THE ORIGIN OF SYPHILIS<br />
THE UNITARIAN THEORY<br />
Hudson 12 has been credited with the unitarian theory, which<br />
claims that treponemal diseases originating from one form,<br />
free-living treponemes in the mud, ultimately evolve into<br />
human saprophytes. “Yaws” appears to have first evolved in<br />
Central Africa, from where it spread to engulf the east and<br />
north, probably attributable to the importation of slaves to<br />
Egypt in 30th century BCE. 13,14 Yaws eventually spread to the<br />
Arabian Peninsula and the valleys of the Tigris and Euphrates<br />
rivers, where it was called Bejel. 15 Dissemination of yaws into<br />
Europe followed, peaking in the 8th century CE, when the<br />
Crusades made the slave trade from Africa more popular by<br />
transporting slaves for work to other countries. 16,17 The Crusades<br />
moved from Europe to the Holy Land between the 11th<br />
and 14th centuries.<br />
It was between the 17th and 19th centuries that a series of<br />
yaws-like diseases, the endemic syphilis, and pinta were identified<br />
in individuals who had a poor rural background and overcrowded<br />
living conditions. Endemic syphilis prevailed as the<br />
Spirocolon of Greece, the hills of Bosnia, the Pian of Nerac<br />
in South-West France, the Button scurvy of Ireland, the Sibbens<br />
of Scotland, the Radseyege of Scandinavia, Siti of Gambia,<br />
Therlijevo of Croatia, Njovera of Zimbawe, Frenjak of<br />
the Balkans, and nonvenereal endemic syphilis, Bejel disease.<br />
The Dithmarsh evil of Jutland and Schlesweig-Holstein is yet<br />
another entity. All of these diseases, including yaws, were considered<br />
to be a consequence of either direct or indirect social<br />
contact, affecting all age groups. Children and family members<br />
were the most susceptible.<br />
The histories of Button scurvy and Sibbens have also been documented.<br />
18,19 These entities have been defined and classified into<br />
endemic syphilis or treponarids, and are considered to be a form<br />
of yaws modified by climatic conditions, clothing customs, and<br />
even the sharing of drinking utensils. This seems plausible due to<br />
the fact that yaws was later shipped via slaves from West Africa<br />
to the West Indies. In addition, some treponemes adapted to<br />
the conditions by thriving in the moist and warm areas of the<br />
body and by mutating into more lethal organisms. The latter<br />
was acquired by sexual contact and expressed as syphilis in the<br />
contemporary context.<br />
In the absence of any viable means to control the transmission<br />
of treponemes, the advent of soap in the Arab peninsula and<br />
Europe in the 7th and the 14th century, respectively, and its<br />
widespread use was acknowledged as a possible mode for the<br />
reduced survival of treponemes in treponarids.<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:8–12<br />
9<br />
COMMENTARY<br />
NONUNITARIAN THEORY<br />
An African origin hypothesis developed, with endemic treponemes<br />
originally acquired from apes, brought back to Europe by<br />
the Portuguese during the Age of Exploration. 6<br />
Another theory for the post-1492 syphilis outbreak mentions<br />
the role of a human immunodeficiency virus–like immunosuppressive<br />
agent causing an uncharacteristically severe variant of<br />
syphilis, lues maligna.<br />
PRE-COLUMBIAN PERCEPTION<br />
The perception that treponemal infection existed in the pre-<br />
Columbian civilization, which is now the southwestern part of<br />
the United States, was documented by the lesions indicative of<br />
treponematosis in a burial site found in the central Great House<br />
of Chaco Canyon, Pueblo Bonito, New Mexico, an epicenter of<br />
a broad culture system that spanned the Four Corners regions, in<br />
contrast to numerous reports available from New World skeletal<br />
burial remains. This is an interesting revelation, which may open<br />
a venue for future workup. 20–24<br />
COLUMBIAN THEORY<br />
It is speculated that treponematoses was absent in Europe<br />
in the pre-Columbian era25 until the 13th century CE, when<br />
yaws appeared as a possible result of slave trading. 26 Berbers and<br />
Moors, from North and North-West Africa, established themselves<br />
in Southern Europe, mostly in Spain, in the 15th century.<br />
Half a century prior to Columbus’ first voyage (1492–1493),<br />
Spanish and Portuguese sailors already competed with more<br />
extensive journeys down the West coast of Africa and encouraged<br />
the migration of the Africans.<br />
Despite the efforts for quarantines, yaws spread to the European<br />
continent. According to the Columbian theory, venereal syphilis<br />
appears to have been brought from the New World and joined<br />
so-called endemic syphilis. An outbreak of the epidemic resurfaced<br />
upon the return of Columbus and his men from the New<br />
World. A similar presentation of the disease was identified in the<br />
indigenous people of the New World as well as in the members<br />
of Columbus’ crew. The epidemic in the earliest years, popularly<br />
called the Morbus gallicus, may have been the combination of<br />
2 diseases; the newly arrived sexually acquired venereal syphilis<br />
and the old socially acquired endemic syphilis forms of yaws. 19<br />
The changes in clinical presentation, particularly in the first half<br />
of the 16th century, might be the result of expanding influences<br />
of the Renaissance, including improved personal hygiene.<br />
Others explain the devastating Morbus gallicus as the relatively<br />
benign venereal syphilis of the New World, afflicting people with<br />
no previous contact with the condition and producing more<br />
Origin and Evolution of Syphilis
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
obvious signs and symptoms, both the views commensurate<br />
with the Columbian theory. Accordingly, the arguments for and<br />
against the Columbian theory are listed below.<br />
<strong>•</strong> Syphilis, as one form of pathologic treponematosis, has a<br />
skeletal signature. Rothschild demonstrated that the osseotype<br />
characteristics of syphilis were absent in specimens<br />
from pre-Columbian Europe, Africa, and Asia. 27<br />
<strong>•</strong> The sailors with Columbus in 1493 were said to have<br />
brought the disease back to Spain. The Spanish fleet, when<br />
they fought for King Alfonso II against the French forces of<br />
Charles VIII of France in 1494–1495, heavily infected the<br />
people of Naples. The illness spread rapidly around Europe<br />
and mercenaries, who in 1496 joined Perkin Warbeck in<br />
Scotland and with the support of James IV of Scotland,<br />
invaded England, bore both arms and the grandgore (Old<br />
French; grand gorre: grand = great + gore = syphilis), as it<br />
was then called. In 1497, the Minutes of the Town Council<br />
of Edinborough (Phil. Trans. XLII. 421) recognized: “This<br />
contagious sickness call it the Grandgore.” 28<br />
<strong>•</strong> The osseous evidence documents the presence of syphilis<br />
in Hispanola, where Columbus landed. Columbus’ crew<br />
had the opportunity and means to contract and spread this<br />
venereal disease. 27<br />
<strong>•</strong> In the work “Tractado contra el mal serpentino,” written<br />
in 15<strong>10</strong> and published in 1539, Ruy Diaz de Isla had<br />
been thought to have cured, during the travel of return in<br />
Europe, many members of the crew of Columbus, affections<br />
from certain luetic manifestations, and thought that<br />
the new disease was imported from Hispanola. This view<br />
was supported by Bartolomè de Las Casas. 29<br />
<strong>•</strong> The absence of evidence for congenital transmission of<br />
the disease in pre-1492 North America suggests that this<br />
treponemal disease was not the same venereal form we<br />
know today. 30<br />
CONTEMPORARY SCENARIO<br />
Several archeologic studies have taken cognizance of phylogenetically<br />
diverse material at different geographic locations and have<br />
gathered together enough evidence to suggest that the disease<br />
existed in Europe, long before the birth of Columbus (October<br />
31, 1451–May 20, 1506). 31 The osseotype characteristics of<br />
syphilis are absent in specimens from pre-Columbian Europe,<br />
Africa, and Asia. 32<br />
A study was conducted on approximately 240 skeletons exhumed<br />
at the site of a medieval friary in Hull. The skeletons were mostly<br />
of Augustinian friars, Mendicants serving the local poor, and seamen<br />
and prostitutes. Of the 245 well-preserved skeletons found,<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:8–12<br />
<strong>10</strong><br />
COMMENTARY<br />
207 were relatively complete. Many were buried in wooden<br />
coffins, prepared from the wood brought from the Baltic<br />
countries. Dendrochronologic examination indicated that the<br />
trees had fallen between 1340 and 1369. The interpretation of the<br />
findings was, therefore, found to be confusing. Three skeletons<br />
showed more variable and more widespread bony lesions. One<br />
of these three, number 1216, was that of a man aged between<br />
25 and 35 years. He showed signs of syphilitic stigmata; thickening<br />
with areas of localized disease of thigh bones, sabre-like<br />
thickening of shin bones, perforation of the palate, and erosion<br />
of the skull’s frontal bone, a condition called caries sicca.<br />
Caries sicca, a bony finding from gummatous syphilis has been<br />
described as “The only reliable and pathognomonic lesion of<br />
syphilis….” 33 Other findings are of variable reliability. 34<br />
Carbon-dating of the skeleton showed it to have lived sometime<br />
between 1300 and 1420, corresponding to about a century<br />
before Columbus’ first voyage in 1492 to 1493. Three paleopathologists<br />
opined on the skeleton number 1216. Charlotte<br />
Roberts recognized it as treponemal disease but could not distinguish<br />
among them, 35 while Rothschild suggested that the<br />
population frequency of skeletal involvement was too high for<br />
treponemal disease. Secondly, the pattern of disease in the Hull<br />
site is classic for yaws. It matches in all details the reports of skeletal<br />
findings in yaws and is quite different than those for syphilis.<br />
Much of what was diagnosed as disease appeared taphonomic. 36<br />
George Armalegos, with extensive experience in viewing New<br />
World, pre-Columbian bones allegedly showing changes due to<br />
syphilis, was impressed but wanted the confirmation in terms of<br />
quantity rather than quality.<br />
Support for the existence of venereal syphilis in pre-Columbian<br />
Europe comes from Dr Mattie Hennenberg 37 and his wife<br />
based on the examination of 300 Greek skeletons buried in a<br />
southern Italian port in 600 BCE, with the claim that many<br />
of them showed changes similar to those of the Hull friary<br />
skeletons, indicative of syphilis; however, taphonomy could be<br />
a confounder. The term taphonomy (from the Greek taphos<br />
[τα´ φος] meaning burial and nomos [vóμoς] meaning law) was<br />
introduced to paleontology in 1940 by Russian scientist Ivan<br />
Efremov to describe the study of the transition of remains, parts,<br />
or products of organisms from the biosphere to the lithosphere,<br />
that is a creation of fossil assemblages. 38<br />
Hennenberg, a dental specialist, claimed that the upper central<br />
incisor teeth from two skeletons showed “grooves,” proof of<br />
congenital syphilis. A second “dig” of old bones from a port near<br />
Pompeii offers similar bony findings. Recent research based on<br />
exhumed human skeletons from a cemetery at an East London<br />
church, St Mary Spital, identified rough patches on skulls and<br />
Origin and Evolution of Syphilis
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
limbs of some of the skeletons, pointing toward a syphilitic origin<br />
for such findings. This study scores over its predecessors in terms of<br />
executing radiocarbon dating of the exhumed samples, estimated<br />
to be 95% accurate. Brian Connell, an expert from the Museum<br />
of London who studied the bones, opined that the skeletons were<br />
buried before the Columbus voyage. He said “We’re confident that<br />
Christopher Columbus is simply not a feature of the emergence,<br />
and timing of the disease in Europe.” 39 Two of the syphilitic skeletons<br />
unearthed from the site were from 1200–1250, while the<br />
other 5 were from 1250–1400, preceding Columbus’ birth. They<br />
were buried with coins and other objects that helped the experts<br />
corroborate the radiocarbon dating results. 11,39<br />
The Unitarian hypothesis, based on skeletal morphology data, 40<br />
has recently been challenged by analysis of the molecular evolution<br />
of the tpr C, D, I, K, G, and J genes in the pathogenic genus<br />
Treponema. 41 The elusive outcome of past research warrants future<br />
exploration. The advent of phylogenetic systematic analysis may<br />
prove beneficial in exploring the veracity of the findings. It is that<br />
field of biology that deals with identifying and understanding the<br />
evolutionary relationships among the many different kinds of life<br />
on earth, both living (extant) and dead (extinct).<br />
Evolutionary theory states that similarity among individuals or species<br />
is attributable to common descent or inheritance from a common<br />
ancestor. Thus, the relationships established by phylogenetic<br />
systematics often describe a species’ evolutionary history and, hence,<br />
its phylogeny, the historical relationships among lineages or organisms<br />
or their parts, such as their genes. 42 This modality was made<br />
use of to analyze the data from 21 genetic regions examined in 26<br />
geographically disparate strains of pathogenic Treponema. 43 Of all<br />
the strains examined, the venereal syphilis–causing strains originated<br />
most recently and were more closely related to yaws-causing<br />
strains from South America than to other nonvenereal strains.<br />
Old World yaws–causing strains occupied a basal position on the<br />
tree, indicating that they first arose in human history, and a simian<br />
strain of Treponema pallidum was found to be indistinguishable<br />
from them. These results lend support to the Columbian<br />
theory of syphilis’ origin, while suggesting that the nonsexually<br />
transmitted subspecies arose earlier in the Old World. In yet<br />
another study, 44 using an integrative phylogenetic and paleopathologic<br />
approach, syphilis seems to have emerged in the time<br />
span between 5000 years before present (yBP) and 16,500 yBP,<br />
in the Americas, because the resulting evolutionary rate is compatible<br />
with those observed in other bacteria; however, these<br />
studies relied on 2 bacterial isolates from individuals with alleged<br />
yaws from a site where antibiotic treatment of yaws had altered<br />
the picture. It is unclear what disease was present in the two<br />
isolates on which they based their studies. The suggested time<br />
span for origin of syphilis of 5000 to 16,500 yBP is still debat-<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:8–12<br />
11<br />
COMMENTARY<br />
able, especially in view of skeletal evidence supporting origin<br />
2000 to 1800 yBP. In contrast, if the claims of pre-Columbian<br />
venereal syphilis outside the Americas are taken into account,<br />
the place of origin remains unresolved.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1 King A, Nicol C, Rodin P, eds. Yaws: endemic syphilis: Bejel: Pinta. In:<br />
Venereal Diseases. 4th ed. London, England: Balliere Tindall; 1980:<br />
333–345.<br />
2 Soellner R. Timon of Athens: Shakespeare’s Pessimistic Tragedy. Columbus:<br />
Ohio State University Press; 1979.<br />
3 Baumgartner L, Fulton JF. A Bibliography of the Poem Syphilis Sive Morbus<br />
Gallicus, by Girolamo Fracastoro of Verona. New Haven, CT: Yale<br />
University Press; 1935:157–159.<br />
4 Opdyke DL. Bulnesia sarmientoi. Food Cosmet Toxicol. 1974;12:905<br />
5 Essential Oils Desk Reference. 4th ed. Orem, UT: Essential Science Publishing;<br />
2007.<br />
6 Rothschild BM. History of syphilis. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:<br />
1454–1463.<br />
7 Heymann WR. The history of syphilis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:<br />
322–323.<br />
8 Dunn O, Kelly J. The Diario of Christopher Columbus’s First Voyage<br />
to America 1492–1493. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press;<br />
1991:333–343.<br />
9 Stokes JH, Beerman H, Ingraham MR. Modern Clinical Syphilology.<br />
Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1945:1120–1121.<br />
<strong>10</strong> Miller H. Secrets of the Dead. London, England: Channel 4 Books: Mac-<br />
Millan; 2000:149–184.<br />
11 Morton R, Rashid S. “The syphilis enigma”: the riddle resolved? Sex<br />
Transm Inf. 2001;77:322–324.<br />
12 Hudson EH. Non-Venereal Syphilis: A Sociological and Medical Study of<br />
Bejel. Edinburgh and London: E & S Livingstone; 1958.<br />
13 Hackett CJ. On the origin of the human treponematosis. Bull World<br />
Health Organ. 1963;29:7–41.<br />
14 Scott HH. The influence of the slave trade in the spread of tropical diseases.<br />
Transcr R Soc Trop Med Hygiene. 1943;38:169.<br />
15 Wedad M. Is Bejel, Yaws? (In Arabic). Bagdad, Iraq: Government<br />
Press; 1936.<br />
16 Hudson EH. Treponematosis and African slavery. Br J Vener Dis.<br />
1964;40:43–52.<br />
17 Major RH. “Prince Henry the Navigator”: A Life. New Haven, CT: Yale<br />
University Press; 2000.<br />
18 Morton RS. The buttons scurvy of Ireland. Br J Vener Dis. 1964;40:<br />
271–274.<br />
19 Morton RS. A clinical look at the morbus gallicus. Eur J Sex Transm Dis.<br />
1985;2:133–140.<br />
20 Marden K, Ortner DJ. A case of treponematosis from pre-Columbian<br />
Chaco Canyon, New Mexico. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2011;21:19–31.<br />
21 Lahr MM, Bowman JE. Paleopathology of the Kechipawan site: health and<br />
disease in a southwestern Pueblo. J Archaeol Sci. 1992;19:639–654.<br />
22 Ortner DJ, Tuross N, Stix AI. New approaches to the study of disease in archaeological<br />
New World populations. Human Biology. 1992;64:337–360.<br />
23 Verano JW. Advances in the paleopathology of Andean South America.<br />
J World Prehistory. 1997;11:237–268.<br />
24 Baker BJ, Armelagos GJ. The origin and antiquity of syphilis: paleopathological<br />
diagnosis and interpretation. Curr Anthropol. 1988;29:703–738.<br />
25 Rothschild BM, Coppa A, Petrone PP. “Like a virgin”: absence of rheumatoid<br />
arthritis and treponematosis, good sanitation and only rare gout in<br />
Italy prior to the 15th century. Reumatismo. 2004;56:61–66.<br />
Origin and Evolution of Syphilis
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
26 Rothschild C, Rothschild BM. Patterns of periosteal reaction in England<br />
from Roman through Elizabethan epochs. J Paleopath 1995;7:130.<br />
27 Rothschild BM. History of syphilis. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:1454–1463.<br />
28 Pearce JMS. A note on the origins of syphilis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.<br />
1998;64:542.<br />
29 Di Cicco CO. History of syphilis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol.<br />
2005;19:1–11.<br />
30 Dutour O, Palfi G, Berato J, Brun JP. The Origin of Syphilis in Europe: Before<br />
or After 1493? Toulon: Centre Archéologique du Var; 1995.<br />
31 Stirland, A. Evidence for pre-Columbian treponematosis in Medieval Europe.<br />
In: L’Origine de la Syphilis en Europe Avant ou après 1493? Dutour<br />
O, Palfi G, Berato J, Brun JP, eds. Toulon, France: Centre Archéologique<br />
du Var; 1995:<strong>10</strong>9–115.<br />
32 Anderson T, Arcini C, Anda S, Tangerud A, Robertsen G. Suspected<br />
endemic syphilis (treponarid) in sixteenth-century Norway. Med Hist.<br />
1986;30:341–350.<br />
33 Virchow RLK. Beitrag zur geschichte der lues. Arch Dermatol. 1896;2:1–9.<br />
34 Lahr MM, Bowman JE. Palaeopathoogy of Kechipawan Site: health and<br />
disease in a south western pueblo. J Archeolog Sci. 1992;19:639–654.<br />
35 Roberts C, Millard A, Pearson G, Macpherson C, Nowell G. The origin<br />
and mobility of people with venereal syphilis buried in Hull, England in<br />
HISTORICAL DIAGNOSIS & TREATMENT: SYCOSIS (continued from page 7)<br />
SYNONYMS: ACNE SYCOSIS; SYCOSIS BARBAE, SEU MENTI;<br />
SYCOSIS NON PARASITICA; MENTAGRA; FOLLICULITIS<br />
BARBAE, SEU PILORUM.<br />
Sycosis is a chronic inflammatory disease of hairy parts of the<br />
skin characterized by tubercles, papules and pustules, each of<br />
which is pierced invariably by the shaft of a hair. In the great<br />
majority of cases the disease is limited to the region of the<br />
beard in men, though it may occur on the eyebrows, scalp,<br />
axillae and pubes. On the face it starts usually as one or more<br />
ill defined patches and may remain confined in certain areas or<br />
spread so as to include in time the whole bearded region. The<br />
disease does not extend to non-hairy parts. The lesions may<br />
be discrete and relatively few in number, or, in very severe<br />
cases, so numerous and closely set as to form almost continuous<br />
patches of infiltration. The inflammation starts in the walls<br />
of the hair follicles and the first surface manifestations are papules<br />
or tubercles situated at the orifices, with a hair passing<br />
through each little elevation. The papules and tubercles soon<br />
change into pustules. Occasionally in old patches, pustules<br />
develop about the hairs without preceding papulation. The pustules<br />
exhibit slight tendency to rupture, but the inflammatory<br />
exudate often escapes alongside the hairs from the mouths of<br />
the follicles and dries to form small crusts. When the lesions<br />
are closely set one crust may cover the openings of several<br />
follicles. The removal of such a crust does not expose a raw,<br />
oozing surface, but tears the top off a number of pustules. The<br />
amount of crusting is never very great. Burning and tension are<br />
usually the only subjective symptoms complained of. At the onset<br />
of an attack traction on the hairs which issue from inflamed<br />
follicles causes considerable pain, but later the root sheaths<br />
become swollen with pus and the hairs loosen and may be<br />
easily extracted. At times they fall out spontaneously. The hair<br />
loss is seldom permanent, though in some cases the thinning<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:8–12<br />
12<br />
COMMENTARY<br />
the late medieval period. Poster presented at: the 18th Paleopathology<br />
Association European Meeting, Vienna, Austria; 20<strong>10</strong>.<br />
36 Rothschild BM. History of syphilis. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:1454–1463.<br />
37 Henneberg RJ, Henneberg M. Possible occurrence of treponematosis<br />
in the ancient Greek colony of Metaponto. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1995<br />
(suppl 163):<strong>10</strong>7–<strong>10</strong>8.<br />
38 Efremov IA. Taphonomy: a new branch of paleontology. Pan-Am Geol.<br />
1940;74:81–93.<br />
39 Columbus Didn’t Sail Syphilis Back to Europe. Medieval Archives Illuminating<br />
the Dark Ages for the Digital World. Sci Technol. Oct 27, 20<strong>10</strong>.<br />
40 Hudson EH. Treponematosis and man’s social evolution. Am Anthropol.<br />
1965;67:885–901.<br />
41 Gray RR, Mulligan CJ, Molini BJ, et al. Molecular evolution of the tprC, D,<br />
I, K, G, and J genes in the pathogenic genus Treponema. Mol Biol Evol.<br />
2006;23:2220–2233.<br />
42 Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK, eds. Molecular Systematics. 2nd ed.<br />
Sunderland, MA; Sinauer Associates: 1996<br />
43 Harper KN, Ocampo PS, Steiner BM, et al. On the origin of the treponematoses:<br />
a phylogenetic approach. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2:e148.<br />
44 de Melo FL, de Mello JC, Fraga AM, et al. Syphilis at the crossroad of<br />
phylogenetics and paleopathology. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 20<strong>10</strong>;4:e575.<br />
of the beard is quite noticeable. Untreated the disease persists<br />
indefinitely. Periods of quiescence alternate with exacerbations<br />
and the outbreak of acute symptoms is as a rule without any<br />
apparent cause. Sycosis on the upper lip, which is a favorite<br />
location, is often associated with chronic rhinitis. The nasal<br />
secretion may be the cause of the sycosis or the sycosis by<br />
extension may affect the vibrissae and cause the Schneiderian<br />
membrane to become swollen and exquisitely sensitive. Sycosis<br />
sometimes develops from eczema of the bearded region.<br />
The disease is feebly contagious and in not infrequently transmitted<br />
by the barber shop razor. The pyogenic staphylococci<br />
are invariably present in the pus.<br />
DIAGNOSIS: Numerous pustules pierced by hairs are almost<br />
pathognomonic of the disease. Trichophytosis barbae begins<br />
as a scaling spot and later produces a lumpy condition of<br />
the skin; from every node many hairs project and these may<br />
be twisted, split or broken. The spores are easily found with<br />
the microscope. In pustular eczema the pustules are not so<br />
accurately located about the hairs, the crusting is greater and<br />
the crusts cover raw, oozing surfaces. The disease spreads<br />
readily to non-hairy parts. Itching is severe.<br />
TREATMENT: Epilation is the most essential part of the treatment.<br />
Each day all the hairs in a given area of the affected<br />
region should be extracted. Pasta zinci Lassar, N. F., is to be<br />
applied plentifully and kept as constantly as possible in close<br />
contact with the skin. In very obstinate cases with thickening<br />
of the skin the amount of salicylic acid may be increased to<br />
<strong>10</strong>-15 per cent. Exposures to the X-rays carried to the point<br />
of producing a slight erythema and falling of the hair, have a<br />
brilliant curative effect, but every precaution must be observed<br />
not to cause dermatitis actinica.<br />
Origin and Evolution of Syphilis
ABSTRACT<br />
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION<br />
A New Paradigm in the Treatment of Kerions:<br />
Treat the Inflammation<br />
Sarah E. Dolder, MD; Brendan J. O’Neill, MD; Meghan M. O’Brien, MD; Amy S. Ross, MD;<br />
Robert A. Allen, MD; Herbert B. Allen, MD<br />
Kerions result from a massive delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to a dermatophyte. Treatment traditionally has been directed primarily<br />
toward the dermatophyte. The authors propose, however, that inflammation should be the initial target of treatment. Clinical findings and<br />
treatment outcomes for two patients with kerions, treated with short courses of anti-inflammatory agents, are presented. Earlier studies<br />
showing minimal effects with corticosteroid treatment of kerions may have had design flaws. The anti-inflammatory treatment of kerions<br />
is both safe and effective and permits the duration of therapy to be shortened dramatically. (<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:14–16)<br />
We present two patients with kerions who are representative<br />
of more than 3 dozen similar patients<br />
seen in more than 2 decades of observation in our<br />
clinic. Recognizing that kerions are delayed-type hypersensitivity<br />
(DTH) reactions, 1 we treated all our patients with short courses of<br />
anti-inflammatory agents, and all had resolution of their lesions.<br />
CASE 1<br />
Patient 1 was a 7-year-old African American boy who was taking<br />
oral cephalexin for a cultured methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus<br />
aureus markedly crusted, boggy, alopectic tumefaction on the left<br />
lateral scalp that was associated with markedly enlarged postauricular<br />
and posterior cervical nodes. He had taken the antibiotic for<br />
2 weeks without any resolution. A fungal culture obtained from a<br />
scaling scalp site distant from the kerion was positive for Trichophyton<br />
tonsurans, and the diagnosis was kerion. He was treated with<br />
two drops (94 mg) of saturated solution of potassium iodide (SSKI)<br />
three times daily2,3 and 2.5% selenium shampoo twice weekly. 4 Two<br />
weeks later, the crusting, swelling, and adenopathy had resolved,<br />
and 2 months later the hair had regrown without scarring.<br />
CASE 2<br />
Patient 2 was a 9-year-old African American boy who had been<br />
treated with adequate doses of griseofulvin for 4 weeks for a<br />
crusted, nodular, alopectic plaque on the posterior scalp (Figure 1)<br />
along with a markedly enlarged posterior cervical node. Bacterial<br />
and fungal cultures were negative. The clinical diagnosis was<br />
kerion, and treatment with prednisolone 1 mg/kg/d and selenium<br />
sulfide shampoo was instituted. Three weeks later, the plaque<br />
had cleared and new hair started to regrow (Figure 2). Within<br />
2 months, the hair had completely regrown without scarring.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Kerion formation is the inflammatory extreme of tinea capitis,<br />
producing a large, painful, crusted plaque on the scalp, often with<br />
purulent discharge and cervical lymphadenopathy. Kerions are<br />
the result of a massive DTH reaction to a dermatophyte. 1 Positive<br />
DTH skin tests, lesional histopathology, and immunofluorescence<br />
studies are all consistent with this concept, 1,5,6 proposed originally<br />
by Birt and Wilt7 in 1954 and later supported by Rasmussen and<br />
Ahmed. 8 Inasmuch as the kerion is an immunologic event, this<br />
helps explain why antibiotics, whether antibacterial or antifungal,<br />
are ineffective (in spite of positive cultures) and why all our<br />
patients responded to anti-inflammatory treatment with complete<br />
resolution of the kerions and subsequent regrowth of hair.<br />
Treatment of kerions has been directed primarily toward the<br />
underlying dermatophyte, often with protracted courses of griseofulvin;<br />
however, we believe the inflammation, rather than the<br />
infection, should be the initial focus of kerion treatment. The<br />
clinical findings and treatment outcomes for our two patients<br />
with kerion treated with short courses of anti-inflammatory<br />
agents are representative and exactly similar to the other patients<br />
with kerion seen in our clinic.<br />
From the Department of Dermatology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA<br />
Address for Correspondence: Herbert B. Allen, MD, Department of Dermatology, Drexel University College of Medicine, 219 North Broad<br />
Street, Philadelphia, PA 19<strong>10</strong>7 <strong>•</strong> E-mail: hallen@drexelmed.edu<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:14–16 14<br />
© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
Figure 1. Case 2: Kerion before treatment shows crusted<br />
pustular plaque on posterior scalp with significant lymphadenopathy.<br />
Figure 2. Case 2: Kerion shows total resolution 2 weeks after<br />
treatment with prednisone.<br />
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION<br />
In patients treated prior to 2001, we saw complete resolution<br />
in kerions treated with SSKI in 22 of 25 patients within 2 to 4<br />
weeks. This is similar to the resolution of kerions alluded to by<br />
Dobson 2 and was also similar to the resolution routinely seen<br />
in sporotrichosis. 9 The three patients who did not respond to<br />
SSKI (2 did not take it due to the taste, and 1 had worsening<br />
of his “id” reaction) had rapid clearance on prednisolone. After<br />
2001, when SSKI became scarce because of the threat of nuclear<br />
attacks and dirty bombs, we shifted to prednisolone and noted<br />
complete response to treatment in 15 of 15 patients. With both<br />
treatment protocols, the kerions cleared and the patients’ hair<br />
subsequently regrew without scarring.<br />
Two prospective randomized, controlled studies by other investigators<br />
have examined the treatment of kerions with oral doses of corticosteroids.<br />
<strong>10</strong>,11 Neither demonstrated a difference in the management<br />
of kerion between using oral corticosteroids plus griseofulvin vs griseofulvin<br />
alone. These findings are contrary to our observations that all<br />
our patients responded to short courses of anti-inflammatory agents<br />
and are also contrary to oral corticosteroids being recommended for<br />
kerions that present simultaneously with “id” eruptions, 12 as well as<br />
in situations in which the kerion becomes “inflamed.” 13 In addition,<br />
John Kenney (personal communication, 1983), who treated this<br />
disease in many children, routinely included oral corticoids in his<br />
regimen for kerions and saw results similar to ours.<br />
We believe the findings by some investigators 11 demonstrate the<br />
natural resolution of kerions. Similarly, findings in another study <strong>10</strong><br />
may also show the natural resolution; moreover, their treatment<br />
protocol, which included untapered prednisone at a maximum<br />
dose of 30 mg/d for only <strong>10</strong> days, in our opinion, may have been<br />
insufficient. 14<br />
We believe untreated kerions require 3 to 6 months to resolve.<br />
Many case reports consistent with this concept have been published.<br />
15–17 In one of our patients, who preferred not to take<br />
prednisolone and was treated with griseofulvin alone, the kerion<br />
took 4 months to resolve. In contrast, patients treated with antiinflammatory<br />
treatment responded rapidly.<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
Based on our observations, we believe the addition of prednisolone<br />
to the treatment of kerions is safe and allows the duration of therapy<br />
to be dramatically shortened. Adjunctive therapy with selenium<br />
sulfide shampooing remains useful, 4 and griseofulvin may<br />
be continued if scaling from tinea capitis remains after the kerion<br />
resolves. 18 Further studies would help resolve the differences in the<br />
prospective trials compared with the clinical observations.<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:14–16 15<br />
Treatment of Kerions
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
REFERENCES<br />
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION<br />
1 Arenas R, Toussaint S, Isa-Isa R. Kerion and dermatophytic granuloma.<br />
Mycological and histopathological findings in 19 children with<br />
inflammatory tinea capitis of the scalp. Int J Dermatol. 2006;45:<br />
215–219.<br />
2 Dobson RL. In: Dobson RL, ed. Yearbook of Dermatology. Chicago, IL:<br />
Yearbook Publishers; 1979:124.<br />
3 Sterling JB, Heymann WR. Potassium iodide in dermatology: a 19th century<br />
drug for the 21st century—uses, pharmacology, adverse effects,<br />
and contraindications. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43:691–697.<br />
4 Allen HB, Honig PJ, Leyden JJ, McGinley KJ. Selenium sulfide: adjunctive<br />
therapy for tinea capitis. Pediatrics. 1982; 69:81–83.<br />
5 Woodfolk JA, Platts-Mills TA. The immune response to dermatophytes.<br />
Res Immunol. 1998;149:436–445; discussion 522–523.<br />
6 Woodfolk JA. Allergy and dermatophytes. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18:<br />
30–43.<br />
7 Birt AR, Wilt JC. Mycology, bacteriology, and histopathology of suppurative<br />
ringworm. AMA Arch Derm Syphilol. 1954;69:441–448.<br />
8 Rasmussen JE, Ahmed AR. Trichophytin reactions in children with tinea<br />
capitis. Arch Dermatol. 1978;114:371–372.<br />
9 Sandhu K, Gupta S. Potassium iodide remains the most effective<br />
therapy for cutaneous sporotrichosis. J Dermatol Treat. 2003;14:<br />
200–202.<br />
<strong>10</strong> Honig PJ, Caputo GL, Leyden JJ, et al. Treatment of kerions. Pediatr<br />
Dermatol. 1994;11:69–71.<br />
11 Hussain I, Muzaffar F, Rashid T, et al. A randomized, comparative trial of<br />
treatment of kerion celsi with griseofulvin plus oral prednisolone vs. griseofulvin<br />
alone. Med Mycol. 1999;37:97–99.<br />
12 Alvarez MS, Silverberg NB. Tinea capitis. In: Kelly AP, Taylor SC,<br />
eds. Dermatology for Skin of Color. New York, NY: McGraw Hill;<br />
2009:253.<br />
13 Tinea capitis. In: James WD, Berger TG, Elston DM, eds. Andrews’<br />
Diseases of the Skin: Clinical Dermatology. <strong>10</strong>th ed. Philadelphia, PA:<br />
Elsevier; 2006:298.<br />
14 Pomeranz AJ, Sabnis SS. Tinea capitis: epidemiology, diagnosis and<br />
management strategies. Paediatr Drugs. 2002;4:779–783.<br />
15 Van Rooij P, Detandt M, Nolard N. Trichophyton mentagrophytes of rabbit<br />
origin causing family incidence of kerion: an environmental study.<br />
Mycoses. 2006;49:426–430.<br />
16 Schauder S. Itraconazole in the treatment of tinea capitis in children.<br />
Case reports with long-term follow-up evaluation. Review of the literature.<br />
Mycoses. 2002;45:1–9.<br />
17 Gibbon KL, Goldsmith P, Salisbury JA, Bewley AP. Unnecessary surgical<br />
treatment of fungal kerions in children. BMJ. 2000;320:696–697.<br />
18 Allen HB, Honig PJ. Scaling scalp diseases in children. Clin Pediatr<br />
(Phila). 1983;22:374–377.<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:14–16 16<br />
Treatment of Kerions
ONE PRESCRIPTION.<br />
TWO POWERFUL EFFECTS.<br />
The power to calm inflammatory acne<br />
Inflammation is an important aspect in the<br />
pathophysiology of acne 1<br />
Both laboratory and clinical studies document the<br />
anti-inflammatory effects of minocycline 1<br />
TM<br />
CALMING<br />
WIPES<br />
(30 WIPES)<br />
Complementary T 3 Calming Wipes<br />
Soothing and alcohol-free —<br />
part of a complete approach<br />
to acne treatment<br />
+<br />
The only pelletized form of Minocycline available...<br />
A dual approach to acne care<br />
The power to eradicate P acnes<br />
Significant reduction in P acnes—even up to 3 weeks<br />
after discontinuation 2<br />
A decrease in P acnes can lead to a drop in<br />
pro-inflammatory cytokines and reduced inflammation1 Minimal resistance in an in vitro study<br />
—The majority of tetracycline-resistant P acnes<br />
were cross-resistant to doxycycline—but sensitive<br />
to minocycline* 3<br />
The most common adverse events associated with MINOCIN are nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. CNS adverse effects may include<br />
dizziness, vertigo, and headache.<br />
Important Information<br />
The most common adverse events associated with MINOCIN are nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Central nervous system adverse events including<br />
light-headedness, dizziness, or vertigo have been reported with minocycline therapy, but are generally transient in nature. Other adverse events<br />
include tinnitus, headache, sedation, and skin pigmentation, particularly on the face and mucous membranes. MINOCIN is contraindicated in persons<br />
who have shown hypersensitivity to any of the tetracyclines or to any of the components of the product formulation. WARNING: MINOCIN Pellet-<br />
Filled Capsules, like other tetracycline-class antibiotics, can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. The use of drugs of the<br />
tetracycline class during tooth development (last half of pregnancy, infancy, and childhood to the age of 8 years) may cause permanent<br />
discoloration of teeth (yellow-gray-brown). Concurrent use of tetracyclines may render oral contraceptives less effective.<br />
References: 1. SapadinAN,Fleischmajer R.Tetracyclines:nonantibiotic properties and their clinical implications.JAmAcad Dermatol. 2006;54(2):258-265. 2. Leyden JJ,McGinley KJ,KligmanAM.Tetracycline and minocycline<br />
treatment.Arch Dermatol. 1982;118(1):19-22. 3. Hubbell CG,Hobbs ER,RistT,White JW Jr.Efficacy of minocycline compared with tetracycline in treatment of acne vulgaris.Arch Dermatol.1982;118(12):989-992.<br />
*In vitro activity does not necessarily correlate to in vivo activity.<br />
©20<strong>10</strong> Triax Pharmaceuticals, LLC All rights reserved. Printed in USA. MN-08<strong>10</strong>-280<br />
For more information, go to www.minocin-kit.com
ABSTRACT<br />
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION<br />
Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris:<br />
Evolution of Challenges in<br />
Promising Treatment Options<br />
Virendra N. Sehgal, MD; 1 Govind Srivastava, MD; 2 Prashant Verma, MD3 Pityriasis rubra pilaris is an uncommon inflammatory dermatosis that is well recognized across the globe. Erythroderma is a common<br />
presentation. A precise diagnosis of pityriasis rubra pilaris is based on morphologic features and is classified into 6 types: classic adult<br />
onset (type I), atypical adult (type II), classic juvenile (type III), circumscribed juvenile (type IV), atypical juvenile (type V), and human<br />
immunodeficiency virus–associated (type VI). Several conventional systemic and/or topical treatments are currently in use. Largely, their<br />
results are unsatisfactory and limited by long-term toxicity. The authors investigate the efficacy of a wide spectrum of drugs by examining<br />
historical (archive) and promising (modern) treatment modalities for the treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris. (<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:18–23)<br />
Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) comprises a group of chronic<br />
disorders that demonstrate circumscribed follicular<br />
keratosis with palmoplantar keratoderma. Both familial<br />
and acquired forms have been recognized. The former is<br />
infrequent and usually occurs in childhood. The bimodal or<br />
trimodal distribution usually involves a peak case incidence<br />
in the first and second decades of life, 1,2 and it affects both<br />
men and women. Its etiology and management has remained a<br />
challenge. Occasionally, PRP is associated with other diseases,<br />
and it was speculated that the disorder might be the result<br />
of an abnormal immune response to some antigenic stimuli.<br />
Familial occurrence of the disease might point to genes that<br />
predispose the individual to develop the disorder after certain<br />
precipitating events. The occurrence of PRP in patients with<br />
the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/AIDS is a topic of<br />
recent debate. 3<br />
METHODS<br />
Medline/PubMed (1936–20<strong>10</strong>) was searched using the terms<br />
“PRP” and “treatment.” Accordingly, this contribution outlines<br />
the published reports on the topic, with the objective to<br />
focus on the evolution and challenges of promising treatment<br />
options.<br />
CLINICAL CRITERIA/CLASSIFICATION<br />
Management of PRP varies according to the type, extent, and age<br />
at onset of the disease. Thus, an understanding of the classification<br />
of the disease offers insight into individualizing treatment.<br />
Griffiths1 classified PRP into 6 types according to the age at onset,<br />
behavior, clinical appearance, and prognosis (Table I). Classic<br />
adult-onset PRP (type I) shows the characteristic generalized<br />
rash with palmo-plantar keratoderma, whereas atypical adultonset<br />
PRP (type II) is chronic, with ichthyosiform and lamellar<br />
scales on the palms and soles and alopecia of varying degrees. The<br />
association of PRP and HIV infection has recently been identified<br />
as type VI PRP, and most of the cases have been reported in<br />
young heterosexual/homosexual men. It is characterized by nodulocystic<br />
and lichen spinulosus–like lesions, with poor prognosis<br />
and resistance to treatment. 2 Another classification5 divides the<br />
disease into 4 types based only on physical findings (Table II);<br />
however, Griffiths1 classification continues to be the mainstay in<br />
practice for delineating the disease.<br />
CHALLENGES AND PROMISING TREATMENTS<br />
HISTORICALLY (ARCHIVE) IMPORTANT MODALITIES<br />
The diagnosis and treatment of PRP have always been a source<br />
of great interest. At present, there is no acclaimed treatment<br />
From the Dermato Venereology (Skin/VD) Center, Sehgal Nursing Home, Panchwati, Azadpur, Delhi, India; 1 the Skin Institute and School of<br />
Dermatology, Greater Kailash, New Delhi, India; 2 Department of Dermatology, and STD University College of Medical Sciences and Associated<br />
Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Shahdara, Delhi, India3 Address for Correspondence: Virendra N. Sehgal MD, Dermato Venerology (Skin/VD) Center, Sehgal Nursing Home, A/6 Panchwati, Delhi,<br />
1<strong>10</strong> 033, India <strong>•</strong> E-mail: drsehgal@ndf.vsnl.net.in<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:18–23 18<br />
© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> ���������������������<br />
Table I. Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris: Griffiths Clinical Classification<br />
CLINICAL TYPE LESIONS’ DISTRIBUTION NATURAL COURSE PERCENTAGE OF CASES<br />
������������� ����������� ������������������ 55<br />
�������������� ����������� ������������������� 5<br />
���������������� ����������� ������������������ <strong>10</strong><br />
���������������������� ��������� ������������� 25<br />
�������� ����������� ������������������� 5<br />
����������������������������<br />
������������������ �������������������� ���������� ����������<br />
���������������������������������������������������������������<br />
����������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
������ ����� ������ ����� ����� ��� ��� ��� ��������� ��� ���������� ��� ����<br />
���������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
���������������������������������������������������������������<br />
������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
��������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
���� � ����������������������������������������������������������<br />
����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�������������������������������������������������������<br />
PROMISING (MODERN) MODALITIES<br />
����������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
���������������������������������������������������������������<br />
����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
����������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
���������������������������������������������������������������� 15–18<br />
������������������������������������������������������������ 8<br />
����������������������������������������������������� �� �������-<br />
������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
��������������������������������������������������������� �����<br />
Table II. Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris: Piamphongsant and Akaraphant Classification 5<br />
TYPES<br />
168 PATIENTS<br />
ADULTS CHILDREN<br />
CLINICAL FEATURES<br />
������ ���������� ����������� �������� ������������� 22 � ���������<br />
��������� ����� ������������ 25 ������������������������������� �� �������<br />
�������������������� ���� ��� ������������� ��� ��������� �������<br />
����������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
����������������������������������������������������������������<br />
����������������� �����<br />
������ ����� ������������ ���� ����������� �������� ��� ������<br />
������ ���� ���� ��� ���������������� ���������� ��� ����������-<br />
����� ���������� ��� ���������� ������������ ����������� ��������<br />
��������� ���������� ������� ������������� ���� �� ���� ������<br />
��� ������� ������ ���������� ��� ���������� ��� ���� �������� �����<br />
���� �������� ��� �������� ����������� ������������ �������� ��-<br />
������� �������������� �������������� ��� ��������������� ���������<br />
���������� �������� ����� �������������� ���������� �� ����������<br />
������������� 21 �������������������� 28 ������������������������-<br />
������� �� �������������������������������������������<br />
RETINOIDS/VITAMIN A DERIVATIVES<br />
����������21�������������������������������������������������� �������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
�����������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�����������������������������������������������������������������<br />
���������� ���� ������ ������������� ��������� ��� ��������� ����<br />
������ 11 21 ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
���������������������������������<br />
������� �� �� ��������������������������������������������������<br />
�������� �� 20 �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�������� <strong>10</strong> � �������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:18–23 ��<br />
������������������������
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> ���������������������<br />
���������������������������������������������������������������<br />
������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�������������������������������� �� ���������������������������<br />
��������������� ������������� ����� ��� �������� ������ ���� ���� �����<br />
������������������������������������������ ��<br />
��������������������������������������������������������������<br />
������������ ������� ���� ���� ���������� ��� ���� ���� ��������� ���<br />
�������������� �� ����������������������������������������������<br />
���������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�������������������������������������������������������� 35<br />
IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPY<br />
����������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
������������������������������������������������������������������������- �������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
������������� ��� �� ������� ��� ��� ��� ��� ���� ��� ������ ���� �����<br />
����������������������������������������31��������������������������� ����������������������������������������������������������������� ��<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
������������� 32�����������������������������������������������- �����������������������������������������������������������������33 PHOTOTHERAPY<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������<br />
��������� �������� ���� 21� ��� ����� ��������� ��������� ����������<br />
��� ����������� ����� �������� �������� ����� ��������� �����<br />
������������������������������������������������������������<br />
����������������������������������������������� 28<br />
TOPICAL THERAPY<br />
������������������������������������������������������������� ���������������������������������������������������������������<br />
����������� ������� �� ��������������� ����������� ���������� ����<br />
�����������������������������������������������������������������- ���������������������������������������������������������������<br />
������������������� �������� �� ���� ����� ������ ���� ������������8 ������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
���������������������������������������������38 ����������������������������������������������������������������- �����������������������������8�����������������������������������<strong>10</strong> ���������11� �������������������� �������� �� �������� ��12 and<br />
�������������13�������������������������������������������������� ��� ���������� ���� ��������� ��� ����� ��� ������������ ��������<br />
����������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�����������������������������������������������<br />
BIOLOGICS<br />
������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������<br />
��������������������������������������������������������������� ����������������������������������������������������������������<br />
Table III. Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris: Challenges and Promising Treatment—Historical (Archive) Importance<br />
AUTHOR(S) YEAR(S) RECOMMENDED DRUG(S) DOSAGE RESPONSE/RESULT PATIENTS<br />
������ �<br />
������������������ �<br />
����<br />
����<br />
��������� �������������������´����� Good ����������<br />
����������� 8 ���� ���������������� ��������������������� ����������������������<br />
�������<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:18–23 20<br />
������������������������<br />
��������<br />
�������������� ���� ������������� �������� ���������� �����������<br />
��������������������<strong>10</strong> ���� ����������������� �������� Good –<br />
����������������11 ���� �������� – ������������������ –<br />
����������������12 ���� ���������������� ����������������������������<br />
����������������������������-<br />
�����������������<br />
��������� ����������<br />
������ 13 ���� ������������� ������������������������������ �������������������<br />
�����<br />
��������������� �� ���� ���������������<br />
��������������<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
���������������������������<br />
��������������������������<br />
��������� ����������<br />
–
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> ���������������������<br />
Table IV. Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris (PRP): Challenges and Promising Treatment—Modern Modalities<br />
AUTHOR(S) YEAR RECOMMENDED DRUG(S) DOSAGE RESPONSE/RESULT PATIENTS<br />
����������� �� ���� �����������������������-<br />
���������<br />
– – –<br />
��������30 ���� ������������ ���������� �������������� –<br />
�����������������31 ���� ������������ ����������� Good ������<br />
������������� 2000 ������������ ���������� ���������������������<br />
���<br />
�����������<br />
������������� ���� ��������������������� ����������� �������������������� ����������<br />
�����������������25 ���� ���������� ������ ��������������������<br />
�����<br />
�����������<br />
�������������������<br />
�������� ��<br />
���� ������������ ������������-<br />
�����������<br />
������������ 28 2000 ������������������� ������������<br />
�������<br />
������������<br />
���������������� 21 2000 �������������������������<br />
����<br />
����������<br />
�����������<br />
���������������������� �����������<br />
����������� �����������<br />
�������� –<br />
���������������� �� 2005 ������������ – ������ –<br />
�������������� �� ���� �����������������������-<br />
���������<br />
������ 2 /mo on<br />
��������������<br />
����<br />
������������������������<br />
�����<br />
�����������50 ���� ������������������������ – �������������������� –<br />
������������������� ���� ������������������-<br />
��������<br />
– ������������� –<br />
����������������� ���� ������������������ �������� ������������������ �����������<br />
������������������ ���� ��������� ����������<br />
�������������� 2008 ��������� ���������������<br />
���������������� 2008 ��������� ��������<br />
����������� 2008 ���������� ������������� ����������<br />
�������������� 2008 ���������� ����������<br />
������������������������� 2008 ������������������ �������� �����������������������<br />
���<br />
������������� ���� �������������������� ���������� �������� �����������<br />
�������<br />
�������<br />
�������������<br />
�����������<br />
�������������� ���� ����������� ����������� �������������<br />
������������������� ���� ���������� ����������� �������������<br />
���������������������20 ���� ��������������� ������������������� �����������<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:18–23 21<br />
������������������������<br />
–<br />
Continued »
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> ���������������������<br />
������������ 35 ���� ������������������������ ���������������<br />
��������������<br />
����������<br />
��������������� �� 20<strong>10</strong> ����������������������a<br />
���������������������<br />
������������������������<br />
���������������<br />
���������������������������������������������������������������<br />
���� �� ��� ������� ��������� ����������� ����� � ���� ������������<br />
����������� ������������ ��������� �������� � ���� ����������� ������<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
��������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�������������������������������� ��<br />
������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
������������������������������������������������������������<br />
������ ���� ������� ��� �������� ��� ������������ ������������� ��������<br />
����������������������������������������������������������������<br />
����� �� � ����������� ���� ����� ����� ������ ����� �������� ����� ���<br />
����������������������������� ����� �����������������������������<br />
������������������������������������������������������ �����<br />
�������������� � ������������ ����������� ���� ������������ �����<br />
����������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
���������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
���������������������������������������������������������������<br />
���� ��������� ��������� ��������� ���������� ������ �� ������� �������<br />
������������ �����������������������������������������������<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
����� ������������ ��� ����� ��� ����� �������� ����� ��� ����� ����<br />
������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�����������������������������������������������������������-<br />
��������������������������������������<br />
FIVE-YEAR VIEW<br />
��������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�� ������������� ��������� ���� ����������� �������� ���� ��������� ����<br />
����������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�����������������������������������������������������������������<br />
��������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
��� ��� ��������� ������� ��������� ��� ���������� ��������������<br />
���������������<br />
��������<br />
�����������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
����������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
�����������������������������������������������������������������<br />
������������������������������������������������������������<br />
������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
���������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
���������<br />
��������������������������������������������������������������<br />
��������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
���������������������������������������������������������������<br />
����������������������������������������������������������������<br />
������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
����������������������������������������������������������������<br />
��� ������������ �������������� ��� ���� ����� �� ������� �����������<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�����������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
���������������������������������������<br />
REFERENCES<br />
��������������������������<br />
�����������������������<br />
��������<br />
1 Griffiths WA. Pityriasis rubra pilaris–an historical approach. 2. Clinical<br />
features. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1976;1:37–50.<br />
2 Sehgal VN, Srivastava G, Dogra S. Adult onset pityriasis rubra pilaris.<br />
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2008;74:311–321.<br />
3� ��������� ���� ������ ��� ��� ���� ������ ���� ��� ���� ����������� ��������laris<br />
and human immunodeficiency virus infection. Br J Dermatol.<br />
1995;133:990–993.<br />
4� �����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
and HIV infection: a part of the spectrum of HIV-associated follicular<br />
syndrome. Br J Dermatol. 1995;135:818–819.<br />
5 Piamphongsant T, Akarphant R. Pityriasis rubra pilaris: a new proposed<br />
classification. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994;19:134–138.<br />
6 Petter MF. Pityriasis rubra pilaris, with particular reference to vitamin<br />
medication and dietary control. Penn Med J. 1936;39:864–866.<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:18–23 22<br />
������������������������<br />
����������<br />
a �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
������������������������������������������������ b �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
������������������������� � ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> ���������������������<br />
7 Gunther S, Alston W. Follicular keratoses. Pilot studies of serum level of<br />
vitamin A and liver function tests during administration of retinoic acid in<br />
hyperkeratosis follicularis et parafollicularis (Kyrle’s disease), pityriasis<br />
rubra pilaris, and keratosis follicularis (Darier’s disease). Dermatologica.<br />
1973;147:274–283.<br />
8 Ayres S Jr, Mihan R, Scribner MD. Synergism of vitamin A and<br />
���������������������������������Cutis. 1979;23:600–603, 689–690.<br />
9� ������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
diseases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1981;5:222.<br />
<strong>10</strong>� ���������������������������������������������������������������������Arch<br />
Dermatol Syphilol. 1941;43:42–61.<br />
11� ������� ���� ������ ���� ����������� ������ �������� ��� ��������� ����� ������ence<br />
in therapy with carotene and vitamin A. Arch Dermatol Syphilol.<br />
1943;48:288–296.<br />
12 Webster JR, Falk AB. Pityriasis rubra pilaris; clinical and laboratory<br />
observation on combined treatment with corticotropin and vitamin A.<br />
AMA Arch Dermatol Syphilol. 1952;65:685–700.<br />
13 Irgang S. Pityriasis rubra pilaris responsive to ascorbic acid. Australas J<br />
Dermatol. 1968;9:211–217.<br />
14� ����� ���� �������� ���� ����������� ������ ������������������� ���� ����������������<br />
drugs as possible therapeutic agents. Arch Dermatol. 1965;92:428–430.<br />
15� ���������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
rubra pilaris. Arch Dermatol. 1981;117:749–750.<br />
16� ���������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
the retinol binding protein. Br J Dermatol. 1981;<strong>10</strong>4:253–256.<br />
17� ����������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
13-cis-retinoic acid (isotretinoin). J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982;6:7<strong>10</strong>–715.<br />
18� ����������������������������������������������������������������������������riasis<br />
rubra pilaris: unapproved use. Int J Dermatol. 2006;45:1238–1240.<br />
19� �����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
pilaris with calcipotriol. Br J Dermatol. 1994;130:675–678.<br />
20 Vergilis-Kalner IJ, Mann DJ, Wasserman J, Petronic-Rosic V, Tsoukas MM.<br />
Pityriasis rubra pilaris sensitive to narrow band-ultraviolet B light therapy.<br />
J Drugs Dermatol. 2009;8:270–273.<br />
21 Kirby B, Watson R. Pityriasis rubra pilaris treated with acitretin and<br />
���������������������������������������Br J Dermatol. 2000;142:376–377.<br />
22 Hanke CW, Steck WD. Childhood-onset pityriasis rubra pilaris treated with<br />
�����������������������������������������Cleve Clin Q. 1983;50:201–203.<br />
23 Wetzig T, Sticherleng M. Juvenile pityriasis rubra pilaris: successful<br />
treatment with cyclosporine. Br J Dermatol. 2003;149:202–203.<br />
24 Usuki K, Sekiyama M, Shimada T, et al. Three cases of pityriasis rubra<br />
pilaris successfully treated with cyclosporine A. Dermatology.<br />
2000;200:324–327.<br />
25� ������ ���� �������� ���� ����������� ��� ���� ���������� ��� ����������� ������<br />
pilaris. Arch Dermatol. 1985;121:<strong>10</strong>5–<strong>10</strong>6.<br />
26� ��������������� ��� �������� ��� ����� ��� ��� ���� ��������������� �����������<br />
rubra pilaris responsive to triple anti-retroviral therapy. Br J Dermatol.<br />
1999;140:931–934.<br />
27 Bonomo RA, Kormam N, Nagashima-Wholen I, et al. Pityriasis rubra<br />
pilaris–an unusual cutaneous complication of AIDS. Am J Med Sci.<br />
1997;314:118–121.<br />
28� ������� ���� ����������� ��� ������ ��� ��� ���� ��������� ������������ ���<br />
radiation and acitretin therapy as a treatment option for pityriasis rubra<br />
pilaris. Br J Dermatol. 2000;142:574–575.<br />
29� ����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
for the treatment of erythrodermic pityriasis rubra pilaris. Arch Dermatol.<br />
1999;135:475–476.<br />
30� �����������������������������������������������������������������Aust J<br />
Dermatol. 1966;8:183–185.<br />
31 Hunter GA, Forbes IJ. Treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris with azathioprine.<br />
Br J Dermatol. 1972;87:42–45.<br />
32 Wetzig T, Sticherling M. Juvenile pityriasis rubra pilaris: successful<br />
treatment with ciclosporin. Br J Dermatol. 2003;149:202–203.<br />
33� ���� ��� �������� ���� ��������� ���� �������� ���������� ��� ����������� ������<br />
pilaris with calcipotriol. Br J Dermatol. 1994;130:675–678.<br />
34� �������������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
�������� ���� ���� ���������� ��� ������������� ����������� ������ ��������� Clin<br />
Exp Dermatol. 2004;29:244–246.<br />
35� �����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
therapeutic agents in pityriasis rubra pilaris. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges.<br />
20<strong>10</strong>;8:354–356.<br />
36� ���������������������������������������������������������������������ment<br />
of pityriasis rubra pilaris with pimecrolimus cream 1%. J Drugs<br />
Dermatol. 2007;6:340–342.<br />
37� ��������������������������������������������������������������������scribed<br />
pityriasis rubra pilaris to topical tazarotene treatment. Pediatr<br />
Dermatol. 2008;25:125–126.<br />
38 Raza N, Bari AU, Dar NR. Juvenile onset classical pityriasis rubra pilaris:<br />
every patient may not require systemic therapy. J Coll Physicians Surg<br />
Pak. 2007;17:564–565.<br />
39� ����������� ���� ����������������� ���� ������������� ��� ��� ���� �����������<br />
������ �������� ������������� �������� ����� ����������� Acta Derm Venereol.<br />
2007;87:552–553.<br />
40� ����������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
pilaris with etanercept. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59:113–114.<br />
41� ������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
rubra pilaris. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158:642–644.<br />
42 Barth D, Harth W, Treudler R, et al. Successful treatment of pityriasis<br />
������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2009;7:<strong>10</strong>71–<strong>10</strong>73.<br />
43� ����������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
treatment for adult-onset pityriasis rubra pilaris: case report and review<br />
of the literature on biologic therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59:<br />
65–70.<br />
44� �����������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
������������������������������������������������J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol.<br />
2008;22:117–118.<br />
45 Garcovich S, Di Giampetruzzi AR, Antonelli G, Garcovich A, Didona B.<br />
Treatment of refractory adult-onset pityriasis rubra pilaris with TNFalpha<br />
antagonists: a case series. J Eur Acad Dermatol. 20<strong>10</strong>;24:<br />
881–884.<br />
46� ����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
of pityriasis rubra pilaris with adalimumab treatment. Clin Exp Dermatol.<br />
2009;35:e155–e156.<br />
47� ��������������������������������������������������������������������������mumab.<br />
Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:99–<strong>10</strong>1.<br />
48 Kerr AC, Ferguson J. Type II adult-onset pityriasis rubra pilaris successfully<br />
treated with intravenous immunoglobulin. Br J Dermatol.<br />
2007;156:<strong>10</strong>55–<strong>10</strong>56.<br />
49� ��������������������������������������������������������Clin Exp Dermatol.<br />
1991;16:181–184.<br />
50� ����������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
pilaris with combination eternacept and acitretin therapy. Arch Dermatol.<br />
2007;143:1597–1599.<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:18–23 23<br />
������������������������
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />
REVIEW<br />
The Role of Surgical Debridement in Healing<br />
of Diabetic Foot Ulcers<br />
Katherine A. Gordon, BS; Elizabeth A. Lebrun, MD; Marjana Tomic-Canic, PhD; Robert S. Kirsner MD, PhD<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
A critical question in the treatment of chronic wounds is whether and when debridement is needed. The three most common chronic<br />
wounds are the diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), the venous leg ulcer, and the pressure or decubitus ulcer. Surgical debridement, aimed at removing<br />
necrotic, devitalized wound bed and wound edge tissue that inhibits healing, is a longstanding standard of care for the treatment<br />
of chronic, nonhealing wounds. Debridement encourages healing by converting a chronic nonhealing wound environment into a more<br />
responsive acute healing environment. While the rationale for debridement seems logical, the evidence to support its use in enhancing<br />
healing is scarce. Currently, there is more evidence in the literature for debridement for DFUs than for venous ulcers and pressure ulcers;<br />
however, the studies on which clinicians have based their rationale for debridement in DFUs possess methodologic flaws, small sample<br />
sizes, and bias. Thus, further studies are needed to develop clinical evidence for its inclusion in treatment protocols for chronic wounds.<br />
Here, the authors review the scientific evidence for debridement of DFUs, the rationale for debridement of DFUs, and the insufficient data<br />
supporting debridement for venous ulcers and pressure ulcers. (<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:24–26)<br />
A<br />
question commonly encountered when treating chronic<br />
wounds is whether and when debridement is needed.<br />
The 3 most common chronic wounds are the diabetic<br />
foot ulcer (DFU), the venous leg ulcer, and the pressure or decubitus<br />
ulcer. The former 2 chronic wounds have been more extensively<br />
studied. Using DFU as an example, certainly the question<br />
is of importance, considering that an estimated 15% of the 170<br />
million people currently with diabetes mellitus will develop a<br />
foot ulcer during their lifetime. 1,2<br />
The multifactor etiology of DFUs includes peripheral vascular disease<br />
along with sensory, motor, and autonomic neuropathy. 3 DFUs<br />
are a major cause of morbidity and mortality due to increased<br />
amputations, infections, and hospitalizations in diabetic patients. 4<br />
At first glance it would seem to be a rather simple question.<br />
Surgical debridement is a longstanding standard of care for<br />
DFUs, aimed at removing necrotic, devitalized wound bed and<br />
wound edge tissue that inhibits healing. Such tissue includes<br />
hyperkeratotic epidermis (callus) and necrotic dermal tissue,<br />
foreign debris, and harmful bacterial elements. 5 Various debridement<br />
methods exist, including surgery, wet-to-dry dressings,<br />
biosurgery (ie, maggots), enzyme preparations, polysaccharide<br />
beads or paste dextranomer polysaccharide, and hydrogels. 3 This<br />
contribution focuses on surgical debridement.<br />
Debridement encourages healing by converting a chronic<br />
nonhealing wound environment into a more responsive acute<br />
healing environment. 6 Debridement is included in multiple<br />
guidelines for the care of DFUs, including the American Diabetes<br />
Association, the American College of Foot and Ankle<br />
Surgeons, and the Wound Healing Society; however, herein lies<br />
the issue: while the rationale for debridement seems logical, the<br />
evidence to support its use in enhancing healing is scarce.<br />
REVIEW OF CURRENT LITERATURE<br />
Many studies on which clinicians have based their rationale for<br />
debridement possess methodologic flaws, small sample sizes,<br />
and bias. 3 A recent paper7 systematically reviewed 5 published<br />
clinical trials that investigated surgical debridement of DFUs<br />
to enhance healing. 5,8,9 These clinical trials were found to be<br />
defective in their methodology, statistically insignificant, or<br />
lacking in definitive scientific evidence for surgical debridement<br />
in the treatment of DFUs. 7 In addition, most existing studies<br />
are not randomized clinical trials optimized to test the relationship<br />
between debridement of DFUs and wound healing.<br />
A focused, well-designed study is needed, therefore, to elucidate<br />
the effect of surgical debridement on the healing status of<br />
chronic wounds.<br />
From the Department of Dermatology & Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL<br />
Address for Correspondence: Robert S. Kirsner, MD, PhD, Department of Dermatology & Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller<br />
School of Medicine, 1600 NW <strong>10</strong>th Avenue, RMSB, Room 2023-A, Miami, FL 33136 <strong>•</strong> E-mail: rkirsner@med.miami.edu<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:24–26 24<br />
© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE FOR DFU DEBRIDEMENT<br />
The biological and molecular basis for debridement has been<br />
investigated in several studies. <strong>10</strong>,11 Molecular and histologic analyses<br />
of biopsies from the nonhealing edge of a chronic wound<br />
have been suggested to validate the use of debridement. <strong>10</strong><br />
Keratinocytes become activated following wounding and are key<br />
players in restoring the epidermal barrier during wound healing. 12<br />
Keratinocytes and fibroblasts at the nonhealing edges of chronic<br />
wounds were shown to exhibit not only a pathogenic phenotype<br />
detrimental to healing but also a slowed migratory capacity. <strong>10</strong>–13 In<br />
chronic wounds, the keratinocytes multiply at a higher rate than<br />
usual (hyperproliferation), yet they are unable to migrate into the<br />
wound as would be normally expected. <strong>10</strong>–13 Basically, keratinocytes<br />
on a chronic wound edge are capable of proliferating but are<br />
unable to migrate properly. 12 These nonhealing keratinocytes of the<br />
chronic wound edge are marked by induction of c-Myc and nuclearization<br />
of β-catenin, which may contribute to the inhibition of<br />
migration. <strong>10</strong>–12 Many clinicians visually identify this nonhealing<br />
phenotype as a “callus,” indicating the need for removal to facilitate<br />
wound healing. 14 Debridement seems to be a reasonable solution<br />
to the problem of nonmigratory tissue in the margins of chronic<br />
wounds. Researchers suggest that debridement will be effective if<br />
unresponsive cells are surgically removed, and cells responsive to<br />
wound healing signals and topical agents are optimized. 11<br />
RATIONALE FOR DEBRIDEMENT OF DFUS<br />
The benefits of debridement include removal of bacteria,<br />
senescent cells, and hyperproliferative nonmigratory tissue and<br />
stimulation of growth factor activity. 15<br />
Bacterial burden in a wound likely impedes healing, 16 as greater<br />
bacterial load and certain types of bacteria have been shown<br />
to reduce healing responses. 17,18 Bacteria in chronic wounds<br />
stimulate a prolonged inflammatory response with a concomitant<br />
release of free oxygen radicals and various lytic enzymes,<br />
ultimately causing tissue damage. 19 In addition, biofilms, which<br />
are communities of bacteria and other organisms embedded<br />
in an extrapolysaccharide matrix within the wound bed, show<br />
increased resistance to antimicrobial agents and to the host<br />
immune system. 20,21 Debridement is an effective way to remove<br />
bacterial burden and biofilms from nonhealing wounds.<br />
Additionally, growth factors are reduced in chronic wounds,<br />
including platelet-derived growth factor, fibroblast growth factor,<br />
epidermal growth factor, and transforming growth factor<br />
β. 22 Dead tissue within chronic wounds, which is removed by<br />
surgical debridement, is unreceptive to growth factors. 23 In addition,<br />
the bleeding and platelet activation caused by debridement<br />
stimulates the production of blood-borne growth factors, further<br />
promoting wound healing. 24<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:24–26<br />
25<br />
REVIEW<br />
Senescent cells have markedly decreased proliferation and protein<br />
production. 17 Chronic wound fibroblasts are less receptive to<br />
growth factor stimuli, 25 making these wounds less likely to heal<br />
or respond to treatments. 26 Overall, debridement removes both<br />
the hyperproliferative edge and the senescent cells of the chronic<br />
wound, thus allowing the remaining cells to undergo normal<br />
proliferation, migration, response to treatment, and healing.<br />
DEBRIDEMENT AND VENOUS ULCERS<br />
Another example of a chronic wound is venous ulcer. Venous insufficiency<br />
is the most common cause of lower-extremity ulcers and<br />
accounts for the development of approximately 1 million venous<br />
ulcers in patients in the United States with venous insufficiency. 27<br />
There are many theories for the mechanism of venous ulcer development,<br />
including pericapillary fibrin cuff deposition, abnormalities<br />
of the fibrinolytic system, trapping of growth factors by macromolecules<br />
in the dermis, and leukocyte plugging in the vessels of the lower<br />
extremities. 28–30 The treatment modalities for venous ulcers include<br />
bed rest with leg elevation31 ; compression therapy32 ; aspirin33 ; pentoxifylline34<br />
; skin grafting, 35 including cultured epidermal autografts<br />
and allografts36,37 ; superficial venous surgery38 ; and debridement. 17,39<br />
The data supporting debridement for venous ulcers are even<br />
more sparse than for DFUs. The role of debridement in the<br />
treatment of venous ulcers has not been proven, although it is<br />
used as a standard of care. 39 One controlled, prospective cohort<br />
study involving 53 patients for 12 months evaluated sharp<br />
debridement in combination with standard treatment regimens<br />
for nonhealing venous leg ulcers. 40 The study group contained<br />
ulcers that had slough, nonviable tissue and no granulation tissue,<br />
while the control group had ulcers with 15% to 20% granulation<br />
tissue without slough or nonviable tissue. Although they<br />
failed to reach statistical significance, the authors concluded that<br />
sharp debridement was effective at initiating the healing process.<br />
They found a 6-cm 2 reduction in the mean surface area of the<br />
study group ulcers, compared with a 1-cm 2 reduction in the<br />
control group in the first 4 weeks (P = .02). 40<br />
Clinical experience also dictates that venous ulcers are commonly<br />
more difficult to debride than most DFUs, and it is more<br />
time-consuming for the clinician to achieve viable tissue margins<br />
in these cases; therefore, chronic venous ulcers, much like DFUs,<br />
are in need of evidence-based standardized treatment plans.<br />
DEBRIDEMENT AND PRESSURE ULCERS<br />
The most common cause of chronic wounds is the pressure<br />
ulcer. While the rationale for debridement is excellent as part<br />
of standard care when treating pressure ulcers, given the multiple<br />
comorbidities coexistent in patients with pressure ulcers,<br />
the data supporting debridement for pressure ulcers are the least<br />
substantial of the 3 common chronic wounds.<br />
Surgical Debridement in DFUs
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
Surgical debridement, despite the need for better data, is part of<br />
standard care in the treatment of chronic, nonhealing wounds,<br />
with better evidence for DFUs than for venous ulcers. Some may<br />
be concerned that debridement may create a new portal of entry<br />
for bacterial organisms, but studies have shown that the rate of<br />
infection does not increase in debrided wounds. 40 Debridement is<br />
relatively safe and convenient in the outpatient setting, but studies<br />
validating the effects on healing continue to be limited. While<br />
debridement continues to be a mainstay of treatment, further<br />
studies are needed to develop clinical evidence for its inclusion<br />
in treatment protocols for chronic wounds. Ideally, a randomized<br />
controlled trial would provide the necessary data for future<br />
evidence-based practice in the treatment of chronic wounds.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1 Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes:<br />
estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes<br />
Care. 2004;27:<strong>10</strong>47–<strong>10</strong>53.<br />
2 American Diabetes Association. Consensus development conference<br />
on diabetic foot wound care: April 7–8, 1999; Boston, MA. Adv Wound<br />
Care. 1999;12:353–361.<br />
3 Edwards J, Stapley S. Debridement of diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane<br />
Database Syst Rev. 20<strong>10</strong>;(1):CD003556.<br />
4 Margolis DJ, Kantor J, Berlin JA. Healing of diabetic neuropathic foot<br />
ulcers receiving standard treatment. A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care.<br />
1999;22:692–695.<br />
5 Cardinal M, Eisenbud DE, Armstrong DG, et al. Serial surgical<br />
debridement: a retrospective study on clinical outcomes in chronic lower<br />
extremity wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17:306–311.<br />
6 Golinko MS, Joffe R, Maggi J, et al. Operative debridement of diabetic<br />
foot ulcers. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:e1–e16.<br />
7 Lebrun E, Tomic-Canic M, Kirsner RS. The role of surgical debridement in<br />
healing of diabetic foot ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 20<strong>10</strong>;18:433–438.<br />
8 Steed DL, Donohoe D, Webster MW, Lindsley L. Effect of extensive<br />
debridement and treatment on the healing of diabetic foot ulcers.<br />
Diabetic Ulcer Study Group. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183:61–64.<br />
9 Piaggesi A, Schipani E, Campi F, et al. Conservative surgical approach<br />
versus non-surgical management for diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers: a randomized<br />
trial. Diabet Med. 1998;15:412–417.<br />
<strong>10</strong> Piaggesi A, Viacava P, Rizzo L, et al. Semiquantitative analysis of the<br />
histopathological features of the neuropathic foot ulcer: effects of pressure<br />
relief. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:3123–3128.<br />
11 Saap LJ, Falanga V. Debridement performance index and its correlation<br />
with complete closure of diabetic foot ulcers. Wound Repair Regen.<br />
2002;<strong>10</strong>:354–359.<br />
12 Brem H, Stojadinovic O, Diegelmann RF, et al. Molecular markers in<br />
patients with chronic wounds to guide surgical debridement. Mol Med.<br />
2007;13:30–39.<br />
13 Stojadinovic O, Brem H, Vouthounis C, et al. Molecular pathogenesis<br />
of chronic wounds: the role of beta-catenin and c-myc in the inhibition<br />
of epithelialization and wound healing. Am J Pathol. 2005;167:59–69.<br />
14 Tomic-Canic M, Ayello EA, Stojadinovic O, Golinko MS, Brem H.<br />
Using gene transcription patterns (bar coding scans) to guide wound<br />
debridement and healing. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2008;21:487–492;<br />
quiz 493–494.<br />
15 Morasso MI, Tomic-Canic M. Epidermal stem cells: the cradle of epidermal<br />
determination, differentiation and wound healing. Biol Cell.<br />
2005;97:173–183.<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:24–26<br />
26<br />
REVIEW<br />
16 Schultz GS, Sibbald RG, Falanga V, et al. Wound bed preparation: a<br />
systematic approach to wound management. Wound Repair Regen.<br />
2003;11 suppl 1:S1–S28.<br />
17 Zacur H, Kirsner RS. Debridement: rationale and therapeutic options.<br />
Wounds. 2002;14(suppl E):2E–7E.<br />
18 Bucknall TE. The effect of local infection upon wound healing: an experimental<br />
study. Br J Surg. 1980;67:851–855.<br />
19 Robson MC, Stenberg BD, Heggers JP. Wound healing alterations caused<br />
by infection. Clin Plast Surg. 1990;17:485–492.<br />
20 Robson MC, Heggers JP. Surgical infection. II. The beta-hemolytic<br />
streptococcus. J Surg Res. 1969;9:289–292.<br />
21 Serralta VW, Harrison-Balestra C, Cazzaniga AL, Davis SC, Mertz<br />
M. Lifestyles of bacteria in wounds: presence of biofilms? Wounds.<br />
2001;13:29–34.<br />
22 Kerstein MD, Reis ED. Current surgical perspectives in wound healing.<br />
Wounds. 2001;13:53–58.<br />
23 Mulder GD, Vande Berg JS. Cellular senescence and matrix metalloproteinase<br />
activity in chronic wounds. Relevance to debridement and new<br />
technologies. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2002;92:34–37.<br />
24 Hunt TK, Hopf H, Hussain Z. Physiology of wound healing. Adv Skin<br />
Wound Care. 2007;13(2 suppl):6–11.<br />
25 Hasan A, Murata H, Falabella A, et al. Dermal fibroblasts from venous<br />
ulcers are unresponsive to the action of transforming growth factor-beta<br />
1. J Dermatol Sci. 2007;16:59–66.<br />
26 Margolis DJ, Berlin JA, Strom BL. Which venous leg ulcers will heal with<br />
limb compression bandages? Am J Med. 2000;<strong>10</strong>9:15–19.<br />
27 Valencia IC, Falabella A, Kirsner RS, Eaglstein WH. Chronic venous insufficiency<br />
and venous leg ulceration. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;44:<br />
401–421; quiz 422–424.<br />
28 Falanga V, Eaglstein WH. The “trap” hypothesis of venous ulceration.<br />
Lancet. 1993;341:<strong>10</strong>06–<strong>10</strong>08.<br />
29 Browse NL, Burnand KG. The cause of venous ulceration. Lancet.<br />
1982;2:243–245.<br />
30 Thomas PR, Nash GB, Dormandy JA. White cell accumulation in dependent<br />
legs of patients with venous hypertension: a possible mechanism for trophic<br />
changes in the skin. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988;296:1693–1695.<br />
31 Abu-Own A, Scurr JH, Coleridge Smith PD. Effect of leg elevation on<br />
the skin microcirculation in chronic venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg.<br />
1994;20:705–7<strong>10</strong>.<br />
32 Blair SD, Wright DD, Backhouse CM, Riddle E, McCollum CN.<br />
Sustained compression and healing of chronic venous ulcers. BMJ.<br />
1988;297:1159–1161.<br />
33 Layton AM, Ibbotson SH, Davies JA, Goodfield MJ. Randomised trial of<br />
oral aspirin for chronic venous leg ulcers. Lancet. 1994;344:164–165.<br />
34 Jull AB, Waters J, Arroll B. Pentoxifylline for treating venous leg ulcers.<br />
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD001733.<br />
35 Douglas WS, Simpson NB. Guidelines for the management of<br />
chronic venous leg ulceration. Report of a multidisciplinary workshop.<br />
British Association of Dermatologists and the Research Unit of the<br />
Royal College of Physicians. Br J Dermatol. 1995;132:446–452.<br />
36 Limova M, Mauro T. Treatment of leg ulcers with cultured epithelial<br />
autografts: treatment protocol and five year experience. Wounds.<br />
1995;7:170–180.<br />
37 Phillips TJ, Kehinde O, Green H, Gilchrest BA. Treatment of skin ulcers<br />
with cultured epidermal allografts. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;21(2 pt<br />
1):191–199.<br />
38 Olivencia JA. Subfascial endoscopic ligation of perforator veins (SEPS) in<br />
the treatment of venous ulcers. Int Surg. 2000;85:266–269.<br />
39 de Araujo T, Valencia I, Federman DG, Kirsner RS. Managing the patient<br />
with venous ulcers. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:326–334.<br />
40 Williams D, Enoch S, Miller D, et al. Effect of sharp debridement using<br />
curette on recalcitrant nonhealing venous leg ulcers: a concurrently<br />
controlled, prospective cohort study. Wound Repair Regen.<br />
2005;13:131–137.<br />
Surgical Debridement in DFUs
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />
Tuberculosis (TB) is a common disease worldwide, 1<br />
and its clinical incidence has been impacted by the<br />
emergence of the human immunodeficiency virus<br />
(HIV), increased transmigration from endemic countries,<br />
and its transmission in health care facilities, prisons, homeless<br />
shelters, and other crowded settings. 2–5 TB is largely an airborne<br />
infection; however, skin manifestations may be caused<br />
by hematogenous spread or the contiguity from latent and/or<br />
active foci of infection. Primary inoculation, although uncommon,<br />
is another known mode of transmission. HIV infection,<br />
intravenous drug abuse, diabetes mellitus, immunosuppressive<br />
therapy, malignancies, end-stage renal disease, and infancy may<br />
predispose to TB. Although cutaneous TB (CTB) is a well-<br />
recognized clinical entity, it often poses a diagnostic dilemma<br />
for physicians 6 ; therefore, it is important to perform a careful<br />
review of clinical presentations in each patient, which may prove<br />
predictive of its diagnosis. 7,8<br />
CLASSIFICATION<br />
The most widely accepted CTB classification is based on the<br />
route of infection. 6,9 Exogenous inoculation occurs after the<br />
direct inoculation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis into the skin of a<br />
person who is susceptible to infection (vide infra). This may cause<br />
TB verrucosa cutis (TBVC), TB chancre, and some cases of lupus<br />
vulgaris (LV), whereas endogenous infection is caused by either<br />
lymphatic or hematogenous spread or a contiguous extension.<br />
Occasionally, lymphatic spread is seen in LV. Hematogenous<br />
spread, on the other hand, is responsible for acute miliary TB,<br />
metastatic tubercular abscess, gummatous TB, papulonecrotic<br />
tuberculid (PNT), and lupus vugaris. Contiguous extension<br />
CORE CURRICULUM<br />
Virendra N. Sehgal, MD, Section Editor<br />
Cutaneous Tuberculosis: A Diagnostic Dilemma<br />
Virendra N. Sehgal, MD; 1 Prashant Verma, MD; 2 Sambit N. Bhattacharya, MD; 2 Sonal Sharma, MD; 3<br />
Navjeevan Singh, MD; 3 Nishant Verma, MD 4<br />
Cutaneous tuberculosis continues to be one of the most difficult conditions to diagnose. It is a challenge particularly in developing<br />
countries due to the lack of resources. The authors define the classification and clinical manifestations considered predictive of its diagnosis.<br />
from the underlying lesion is a characteristic feature of both<br />
scrofuloderma and TB cutis orificialis (TBCO).<br />
In attempt to embellish the preceding classification, it has been<br />
divided into multibacillary and paucibacillary variants based on<br />
the bacterial load. The former is recognized by the characteristic<br />
morphology of the organism in the tissue sections stained<br />
with Ziehl-Neelsen method, complemented by in vitro recovery<br />
of M tuberculosis, while sparse bacilli on histological examination<br />
and rare in vitro culture isolation 2 identify the latter.<br />
Unfortunately, it is difficult to distinguish the organisms in<br />
paucibacillary TB.<br />
CLINICAL FEATURES<br />
Although the prevalence of CTB accounts for 1.5% of all cases<br />
of TB, it is, nevertheless, important to consider the entity when<br />
patients present with a suggestive clinical morphology. CTB has<br />
many forms, including multibacillary and paucibacillary CTB,<br />
which are defined in detail below.<br />
MULTIBACILLARY CTB<br />
TB CHANCRE/INOCULATION TB<br />
Tuberculous chancre (primary inoculation TB) is a variant of<br />
multibacillary CTB that results from direct introduction of<br />
mycobacteria into the skin or mucosa of an individual who neither<br />
had tubercular infection in the past nor was immunized<br />
with Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG). Trauma also facilitates the<br />
entry of the organism into the skin. <strong>10</strong>,11<br />
Face and other exposed areas are vulnerable sites of introduction.<br />
The organism multiplies in tissue macrophages and migrates to<br />
From the Dermato-Venereology (Skin/VD) Center, Sehgal Nursing Home, Panchwati, Delhi; 1 the Departments of Dermatology and STD2 and<br />
Pathology, 3 University College of Medical Sciences and Associated Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi; and the Department of Microbiology,<br />
Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya, Delhi, 4 India<br />
Address for Correspondence: Virendra N. Sehgal, MD, Dermato-Venerology (Skin/VD) Center, Sehgal Nursing Home, A/6 Panchwati, Delhi<br />
1<strong>10</strong> 033 India <strong>•</strong> E-mail: drsehgal@ndf.vsnl.net.in<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:28–33 28<br />
© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
regional lymph nodes. An inflammatory papule develops in 2<br />
to 4 weeks after inoculation that breaks down into a firm, nonhealing,<br />
shallow, nontender, undermined ulcer with a granulomatous<br />
base. Painless regional lymphadenopathy is a cardinal<br />
sign, appearing after about 3 to 8 weeks. Numerous bacilli are<br />
demonstrable at the inoculation site and regional lymph node.<br />
The ultimate ulceroglandular lesion is a “mirror image” of the<br />
Ghon’s complex. Its clinical course varies according to the hostimmune<br />
response. 12<br />
The primary lesion heals with scarring after 1 to 3 months;<br />
however, with a less effective host-immune response, the bacterial<br />
load remains high, and healing may be delayed up to<br />
12 months. Regional nodes may suppurate, erode, and perforate<br />
the surface of overlying skin, resulting in scrofuloderma. Latent<br />
foci of infection may persist at the site and progress to either<br />
LV or TBVC despite evident tuberculin sensitivity. Hematogenous<br />
dissemination of mycobacteria from skin can result in TB<br />
at other sites, particularly bones or joints, or progress to acute<br />
miliary disease with poor outcome.<br />
SCROFULODERMA (TB COLLIQUATIVE CUTIS)<br />
Scrofuloderma (TB colliquative cutis) is the most common<br />
form of CTB in children. It results from the direct extension<br />
from an underlying TB focus, such as a regional lymph node<br />
or infected bone or joint, to the overlying skin. Lesions present<br />
as firm, painless, subcutaneous, red-brown nodules overlying an<br />
infected focus, which gradually enlarge and suppurate, forming<br />
ulcers and sinus tracts that drain watery, purulent, and/or caseous<br />
material. The ulcers heal with typical puckered scarring. 13<br />
TB CUTIS ORIFICIALIS<br />
The lesions associated with TBCO are frequently characterized<br />
by erythematous, edematous nodules, and/or plaques. Painful<br />
central ulceration covered by necrotic pseudomembranous<br />
material with an irregular border is apparent. Constitutional<br />
symptoms of TBCO include fever, malaise, weight loss, and<br />
night sweats. The oral mucosa and tongue are the most commonly<br />
afflicted sites. 2 The exact mechanism resulting in TBCO<br />
is unknown; however, ingestion of bacilli in sputum from active<br />
pulmonary TB, hematogenous and lymphatic spread, and direct<br />
spread from adjacent organs has been alleged, 14 with ingestion<br />
of bacilli in sputum being the most accepted mode. 15 There has<br />
been a reported case of isolated perianal TB without pulmonary<br />
or gastrointestinal involvement. 16<br />
DISSEMINATED MILIARY TB<br />
Disseminated miliary TB is characterized by a wide dissemination<br />
of M tuberculosis in the body and shows a distinctive<br />
CORE CURRICULUM<br />
pattern of millet-sized, multiple, tiny lesions on chest x-ray,<br />
distributed throughout the lung fields. It may hematogenously<br />
infect any number of organs including the lungs, liver, and<br />
spleen in patients with advanced TB. There is a systemic failure<br />
of the cell-mediated immune system that allows and facilitates<br />
the spread of infection, resulting in rapid deterioration<br />
and death. 4,17,18 Certain events, infections, and medications<br />
that suppress the body’s cell-mediated immune system may<br />
precipitate this infection. Although miliary TB is rare and<br />
well known for its occurrence in children, it is an increasingly<br />
serious infection in immunosuppressed patients, such as those<br />
infected with HIV and those on long-term oral corticosteroid<br />
therapy or other immunosuppressive therapies for organ<br />
transplant or inflammatory and autoimmune conditions.<br />
Cutaneous skin lesions associated with miliary TB consist of<br />
small, erythematous to violaceous papules or pustules with<br />
hemorrhagic necrosis and umbilication affecting a substantial<br />
portion of the body. Healing is indicated by the presence of<br />
atrophic, depressed scars surrounded by a brownish, hyperpigmented<br />
halo.<br />
METASTATIC TUBERCULOUS ABSCESSES (GUMMA)<br />
Metastatic tuberculous abscesses (gumma) may either arise<br />
from the breakdown of an old healed tubercle that still has<br />
live organisms or in immunocompromised individuals. 2,4<br />
Accordingly, it is usually seen in malnourished children and<br />
immunosuppressed adults. 6 Single or multiple, nontender, fluctuant<br />
nodules develop, forming draining sinuses and abscesses<br />
(Figure 1). Nodules may occur at any location without specific<br />
predominance.<br />
Figure 1. Metastatic tuberculous abscesses (gumma): a<br />
single, nontender, fluctuant nodule, draining sinus is apparent.<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:28–33 29<br />
Cutaneous Tuberculosis
PAUCIBACILLARY CTB<br />
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
TB VERRUCOSA CUTIS<br />
TBVC occurs after direct inoculation of M tuberculosis into the<br />
skin of previously infected individuals. It manifests as a painless,<br />
solitary, purplish or brownish red warty plaque that may extend<br />
peripherally, causing central atrophy, or form fissures that exude<br />
pus or keratinous material (Figure 2). It is often accompanied by<br />
lymphadenopathy. Skin lesions may evolve and persist for years,<br />
although spontaneous resolution may also occur. Response to<br />
treatment is favorable. 6,19<br />
LUPUS VULGARIS<br />
LV is a chronic and progressive form of CTB that is widely<br />
described as the most common form. Lesions occur on normal<br />
skin as a result of direct extension from underlying deeper TB<br />
focus, by lymphatic or hematogenous spread, after primary inoculation<br />
or BCG vaccination, or in scars of old scrofuloderma. 20<br />
Lesions are typically small, solitary, nodular, sharply defined,<br />
and reddish brown with a gelatinous consistency. “Apple-jelly”<br />
nodules present on the head and neck of individuals in Western<br />
Figure 2. Tuberculosis verrucosa cutis illustrating verrucous,<br />
hyperkeratotic fissured lesions.<br />
CORE CURRICULUM<br />
Figure 3. Lupus vulgaris: well-circumscribed plaque,<br />
displaying coalesce of discrete, red-brown papules, elevated<br />
verrucous border, and central atrophy.<br />
countries, while lesions on the lower extremities or buttocks<br />
are present in individuals in tropical and subtropical areas. It<br />
has several clinical variations such as classic plaque or keratotic<br />
hypertrophic, ulcerative, and vegetating. The plaque type begins<br />
as discrete, red-brown papules that coalesce and form plaques<br />
with a slightly elevated verrucous border and central atrophy<br />
(Figure 3). Persistent lesions may damage underlying tissue and<br />
ulcerate, causing severe disfigurement and an increased risk of<br />
skin cancer. 21<br />
TUBERCULIDS<br />
The relationship between tuberculids and TB is a subject of continuing<br />
debate. They are generalized exanthems with a moderate<br />
to high degree of host immunity to TB. Patients are usually in<br />
good health and show (1) positive tuberculin skin test results;<br />
(2) inactive tuberculous involvement of viscera or lymph nodes;<br />
(3) negative staining and culture for pathogenic mycobacteria<br />
in affected tissue; and (4) skin lesions that heal with remission<br />
or treatment of TB. Its morphological variations include lichen<br />
scrofulosorum (LS), 22 erythema induratum of Bazin (EIB),<br />
and PNT.<br />
Tuberculids may be classified into 2 groups: (1) true tuberculids,<br />
and (2) facultative tuberculids. M tuberculosis plays a major<br />
etiologic role in the former, while it is one of several possible<br />
etiologic agents in the latter. Tuberculids were once believed to<br />
be a result of hypersensitivity to the presence of mycobacterial<br />
antigens within a host of previously acquired immunity to TB;<br />
however, most are now known not to be uniquely caused by<br />
M tuberculosis. PNT and LS are still widely accepted as true<br />
tuberculids and EIB as a facultative tuberculid. 22<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:28–33 30<br />
Cutaneous Tuberculosis
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
Figure 4. Lichen scrofulosorum: multiple, small, grouped,<br />
firm, perifollicular, lichenoid papules and/or plaques.<br />
LICHEN SCROFULOSORUM<br />
LS is an eruption of multiple, small, grouped, asymptomatic,<br />
firm, perifollicular, lichenoid papules and/or plaques (Figure<br />
4), most often affecting children or young adults, that progresses<br />
and subsides within weeks to months without scarring.<br />
4,23 An association between LV, caries of the spine, LS, 24<br />
and its unusual occurrence in pulmonary TB25 has been<br />
described in the past.<br />
ERYTHEMA INDURATUM OF BAZIN<br />
EIB is a TB-associated panniculitis that presents with multiple,<br />
painful, recurring, ulcerated nodules that affect the legs of<br />
women. 4,6 Pre-existing vascular disease may predispose patients<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:28–33<br />
31<br />
CORE CURRICULUM<br />
to lesions during exposure to cold weather. Lesions are chronic,<br />
slow to resolve (if at all), and result in atrophic hyperpigmented<br />
scarring after several months (Figure 5). Although patients show<br />
TB skin hypersensitivity, acid-fast bacilli (AFB) are rarely identified.<br />
A study from Spain demonstrated that about <strong>10</strong>% of cases<br />
were positive for M tuberculosis using polymerase chain reaction<br />
(PCR). 26 A case series and literature review revealed that organisms,<br />
such as Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium marinum,<br />
may also be involved in the etiology of EIB, although no<br />
evidence of such was found during the investigation. It was<br />
suggested that EIB has diverse etiologies with varying pathogenesis,<br />
leading to similar histological changes, and the cases<br />
analyzed may not have had an infectious etiology (suggesting a<br />
facultative tuberculid picture). 27<br />
PAPULONECROTIC TUBERCULID<br />
Papulonecrotic tuberculid occurs as a chronic and recurrent symmetric<br />
eruption of necrotizing skin papules appearing in clusters<br />
and healing with varioliform scars (Figure 6). Tubercle bacilli are<br />
difficult to demonstrate, but patients typically have an internal<br />
focus of TB and are tuberculin sensitive, and skin lesions resolve<br />
after anti-TB therapy. TB DNA has been detected in these<br />
lesions using PCR amplification reactions. 28 Lesions appear on<br />
the exterior aspects of extremities, knees, elbows, buttocks, and<br />
lower trunk in a symmetric distribution, often in clusters. Individual<br />
lesions are asymptomatic, small, dusky red papules with<br />
a central punctum or crust. Involution is common after 6 to 8<br />
weeks. 29<br />
DIAGNOSIS<br />
Diagnosis of CTB is based on relative and absolute criteria, in<br />
addition to supportive immunologic evidence. 30<br />
Figure 5. Erythema induratum occupying the lower leg. Figure 6. Papulonecrotic tuberculid.<br />
Cutaneous Tuberculosis
RELATIVE DIAGNOSIS<br />
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
CARDINAL MORPHOLOGIC FEATURES (VIDE SUPRA)<br />
A characteristic history of evolution of the disease is distinct<br />
in re-infection and re-activation. In re-infection, a history<br />
of primary infection or BCG vaccination must be obtained.<br />
The latter forms an important component of the immunization<br />
program in some countries, including India, and may be<br />
identified by a BCG vaccination scar at the insertion point on<br />
the left deltoid. In re-activation, on the other hand, a history<br />
of TB, established by clinical and/or investigative procedures,<br />
followed by cure and an asymptomatic period on completion<br />
of specific anti-tubercular therapy. Often, the only evidence<br />
of past infection may be pulmonary scarring and calcification<br />
visible on radiography. Subsequently, any event that lowers<br />
the cell-mediated immunity may re-activate the condition,<br />
resulting in its relapse.<br />
MANTOUX TEST<br />
A positive Mantoux test indicates the cell-mediated skin hypersensitivity<br />
to tuberculin. The response in re-infection may be<br />
higher as compared with that in re-activation TB. This in vivo<br />
test correlates well with the migratory index of lymphocytes to<br />
tuberculin antigen, assayed through leukocyte migration inhibition<br />
test. A strongly positive reaction, however, indicates<br />
active TB. It has only a limited diagnostic application in countries<br />
where the infection is highly prevalent and BCG forms an<br />
integral part of the immunization program and the majority of<br />
adults are tuberculin positive; nevertheless, it may be a useful<br />
adjunct in developed countries.<br />
Microscopic examination of the tissue section may depict a<br />
tuberculoid and tuberculous granuloma. The former, characterized<br />
by a focal accumulation of epithelioid cells, a few giant<br />
cells, and surrounding mantle of mononuclear cells, is a relative<br />
parameter encountered in LV and TBVC. It also demonstrates<br />
caseation necrosis in the center. It may be possible to demonstrate<br />
AFB on Fite’s stain. This granuloma fulfills an absolute<br />
criterion for diagnosis of TB and typifies scrofuloderma.<br />
ABSOLUTE DIAGNOSIS<br />
An absolute diagnosis consists in the demonstration of AFB on<br />
Ziehl-Neelsen’s staining of the smear, prepared from material<br />
from lesions. The colonies should be further subjected to biochemical<br />
and pigment production tests to confirm M tuberculosis.<br />
Recovery of M tuberculosis on inoculation of material from<br />
lesions into guinea pigs.<br />
In an effort to achieve universal access to high-quality diagnosis<br />
and ultimate patient-centered treatment as envisaged by World<br />
CORE CURRICULUM<br />
Health Organization (WHO), it is important to be aware of the<br />
diagnostic modalities thus far available in the global arena. 31<br />
NONTUBERCULOUS MYCOBACTERIA<br />
Physicians should be aware of nontuberculous mycobacteria<br />
(NTMB) in the current context, because they are environmental<br />
organisms capable of causing chronic disease in humans worldwide.<br />
The prevalence of NTMB disease is steadily increasing and<br />
has emerged in previously unrecognized populations. They, too,<br />
are a diagnostic challenge. 32 TB verrucosa cutis–like lesions may<br />
be caused by M bovis. 33<br />
ATYPICAL MYCOBACTERIOSIS<br />
Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare (MAI) is now a wellestablished<br />
cause of cervical lymphadenitis, simulating scrofuloderma,<br />
especially in the pediatric age group in the developed<br />
world. 34 In addition, LV-like morphology may also be encountered<br />
following primary MAI infection. 35<br />
HIV INFECTION AND CTB<br />
HIV-infected patients are vulnerable to contract TB. 36 TB may present<br />
as a rapidly progressive disease in immunosuppressed patients.<br />
Miliary TB is common and may be associated with cutaneous<br />
manifestations. 37 Disseminated CTB may show a high yield of<br />
mycobacterium from an unusual dermatitis in this group. Despite<br />
the dissemination of the organism, the diagnosis of TB may be difficult.<br />
38,39 In addition, atypical presentations of oesophago-pleurocutaneous<br />
and pleuro-cutaneous fistula may be seen. 40,41<br />
In addition to the decrease in tuberculin reactivity, atypical<br />
chest radiographic patterns are common. Biopsy and aspirates<br />
of peripheral and regional lymph nodes, liver, and bone marrow<br />
provide the highest yield and are used for early diagnosis. 42<br />
Co-lesional acquired immunodeficiency syndrome– associated<br />
cutaneous Kaposi’s sarcoma and M tuberculosis–associated<br />
granulomatous inflammation have recently been documented. 43<br />
Tuberculous gumma, new-onset cervical lymphadenopathy, and<br />
worsening of the pre-existing lymphadenitis, yet another highrisk<br />
immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, has previously<br />
been described. 44<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
Reviewing the prevalence and variations in the clinical expression<br />
of CTB across the globe may assist in evolving a uniform<br />
pattern of the disease vital for a core curriculum. The comprehension<br />
of the text is, therefore, crucial in developing treatment<br />
strategy through the recommendations of WHO. WHO<br />
believes that the same treatment regimen for pulmonary and/or<br />
extrapulmonary TB should be used. 45<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:28–33 32<br />
Cutaneous Tuberculosis
REFERENCES<br />
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
1 Sehgal VN, Wagh SA. The history of cutaneous tuberculosis.<br />
Int J Dermatol. 1990;29:666–668.<br />
2 Bravo FG, Gotuzzo E. Cutaneous tuberculosis. Clin Dermatol.<br />
2007;25:173–180.<br />
3 Fariña MC, Gegundez MI, Piqué E, et al. Cutaneous tuberculosis: a<br />
clinical, histopathologic, and bacteriologic study. J Am Acad Dermatol.<br />
1995;33:433–440.<br />
4 MacGregor RR. Cutaneous tuberculosis. Clin Dermatol. 1995;13:245–255.<br />
5 Bhutto AM, Solangi A, Khaskhely NM, et al. Clinical and epidemiological<br />
observations of cutaneous tuberculosis in Larkana, Pakistan. Int J Dermatol.<br />
2002;41:159–165.<br />
6 Barbagallo J, Tager P, Ingleton R, et al. Cutaneous tuberculosis: diagnosis<br />
and treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002;3:319–328.<br />
7 Regnier S, Ouagari Z, Perez ZL, et al. Cutaneous miliary resistant tuberculosis<br />
in a patient infected with human immunodeficiency virus: case<br />
report and literature review. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009;34:e690–e692.<br />
8 Rai VM, Shenoi SD, Gowrinath. Tuberculous gluteal abscess coexisting<br />
with scrofuloderma and tubercular lymphadenitis. Dermatol Online J.<br />
2005;11:14.<br />
9 Lai-Chong JE, Perez A, Tang V, et al. Cutaneous manifestations of tuberculosis.<br />
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2007;32:461–466.<br />
<strong>10</strong> Glickman FS, Price E. Primary inoculation complex (tuberculous chancre).<br />
Arch Dermatol. 1969;<strong>10</strong>0:646–647.<br />
11 Ara M, Seral C, Baselga C, et al. Primary tuberculous chancre caused by<br />
Mycobacterium bovis after goring with a bull’s horn. J Am Acad Dermatol.<br />
2000;43:535–537.<br />
12 Mataix J, Botella R, Herrero A, et al. Tuberculous primary complex of the<br />
skin. Int J Dermatol. 2008;47:479–481.<br />
13 Kiliç A, Gül U, Soylu S, et al. Scrofuloderma: a forgotten disease?<br />
Skinmed. 2007;6:303–304.<br />
14 Sharma MP, Bhatia V. Abdominal tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res.<br />
2004;120:305–315.<br />
15 Ichihashi K, Katoh N, Takenaka H, et al. Orificial tuberculosis: presenting<br />
as a refractory perianal ulcer. Acta Derm Venereol. 2004;84:331–332.<br />
16 Akgun E, Tekin F, Ersin S, et al. Isolated perianal tuberculosis. Neth J<br />
Med. 2005;63:115–117.<br />
17 Sehgal VN, Sharma S, Verma P, et al. Disseminated cutaneous tuberculosis<br />
an atypical presentation of re-infection (secondary) tuberculosis in<br />
an immuno-competent individual. Am J Dermatopathol. 2011. Sep 13.<br />
[Epub ahead of print]<br />
18 Regnier S, Ouagari Z, Perez ZL, et al. Cutaneous miliary resistant tuberculosis<br />
in a patient infected with human immunodeficiency virus: case<br />
report and literature review. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009;34:e690–e692.<br />
19 Afshar K, Mundi M. Tuberculosis verrucosa cutis. Mayo Clin Proc.<br />
2004;79:1562.<br />
20 Marcoval J, Servitje O, Moreno A, et al. Lupus vulgaris. Clinical, histopathologic,<br />
and bacteriologic study of <strong>10</strong> cases. J Am Acad Dermatol.<br />
1992;26:404–407.<br />
21 Akoglu G, Karaduman A, Boztepe G, et al. A case of lupus vulgaris successfully<br />
treated with antituberculous therapy despite negative PCR and<br />
culture. Dermatology. 2005;211:290–292.<br />
22 Frankel A, Penrose C, Emer J. Cutaneous tuberculosis: a practical<br />
case report and review for the dermatologist. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol.<br />
2009;2:19–27.<br />
23 Singal A, Bhattacharya SN. Lichen scrofulosorum: a prospective study of<br />
39 patients. Int J Dermatol. 2005;44:489–493.<br />
24 Sehgal VN, Srivastava G, Sharma VK. Lupus vulgaris, caries of the spine<br />
and lichen scrofulosorum—an intriguing association. Clin Exp Dermatol.<br />
1987;12:280–282.<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:28–33<br />
33<br />
CORE CURRICULUM<br />
25 Seghal VN, Chander R, Logani K. Lichen scrofulosorum: an unusual<br />
expression of pulmonary tuberculosis in a child. J Eur Acad Dermatol<br />
Venereol. 1995;4:71–74.<br />
26 Vieites B, Suárez-Peñaranda JM, Pérez Del Molino ML, et al. Recovery of<br />
Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in biopsies of erythema induratum—<br />
results in a series of patients using an improved polymerase chain reaction<br />
technique. Br J Dermatol. 2005;152:1394–1396.<br />
27 Bayer-Garner IB, Cox MD, Scott MA, et al. Mycobacteria other than<br />
Mycobacterium tuberculosis are not present in erythema induratum/<br />
nodular vasculitis: a case series and literature review of the clinical and<br />
histologic findings. J Cutan Pathol. 2005;32:220–226.<br />
28 Quirós E, Bettinardi A, Quirós A, et al. Detection of mycobacterial DNA<br />
in papulonecrotic tuberculid lesions by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin<br />
Lab Anal. 2000;14:133–135.<br />
29 Freiman A, Ting P, Miller M, et al. Papulonecrotic tuberculid: a rare form<br />
of cutaneous tuberculosis. Cutis. 2005;75:341–346.<br />
30 Sehgal VN. Cutaneous tuberculosis. Dermatol Clin. 1994;12:645–653.<br />
31 The Regional Strategic Plan for TB Control 2006–2015. World Health<br />
Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, World Health<br />
House, Indraprastha Estate, Mahatma Gandhi Road, New Delhi<br />
1<strong>10</strong>002, India.<br />
32 Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, et al. An official ATS/IDSA statement:<br />
diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of non tuberculous mycobacterial<br />
diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:367–416.<br />
33 Wolff K, Tappeiner G. Mycobacterial diseases: tuberculosis and<br />
atypical mycobacterial infection. In: Fitzpatrick TB, Eisen AZ, Wolff<br />
K, eds. Dermatology in General Medicine. 3rd ed. New York, NY:<br />
McGraw Hill; 1987:2152–2170.<br />
34 Starke JR. Management of nontuberculous mycobacterial cervical adenitis.<br />
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000;19:674–675.<br />
35 Kullavanijaya P, Sirimachan S, Surarak S. Primary cutaneous infection<br />
with Mycobacterium avium intracellulare complex resembling<br />
lupus vulgaris. Br J Dermatol. 1997;136:264–266.<br />
36 Starke JR. Tuberculosis. In: Jenson HB, Baltimore RS, eds. Pediatric<br />
Infectious Diseases: Principles and Practices. Philadelphia, PA: WB<br />
Saunders; 2002:396–419.<br />
37 Sharma SK, Mohan A, Sharma A, et al. Miliary tuberculosis: new insights<br />
into an old disease. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:415–430.<br />
38 Regnier S, Ouagari Z, Perez ZL, et al. Cutaneous miliary resistant tuberculosis<br />
in a patient infected with human immunodeficiency virus: case<br />
report and literature review. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009;34:e690-e692.<br />
39 Corbett EL, Crossley I, De Cock KM, et al. Disseminated cutaneous<br />
Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in a patient with AIDS. Genitourin<br />
Med. 1995;71:308–3<strong>10</strong>.<br />
40 Arif M. Oesophago-pleuro-cutaneous fistula in an HIV-positive patient.<br />
Braz J Infect Dis. 20<strong>10</strong>;14:183–185.<br />
41 Gulinelli A, Toledo DO, Coelho-Neto AP, et al. Parasternum pleuralcutaneous<br />
fistula in a severely immunosuppressed HIV-positive patient.<br />
Braz J Infect Dis. 20<strong>10</strong>;14:183–185.<br />
42 Shafer RW, Kim DS, Weiss JP, Quale JM. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis<br />
in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Medicine<br />
(Baltimore). 1991;70:384–397.<br />
43 Ramdial PK, Sing Y, Subrayan S, et al. Granulomas in acquired<br />
immunodeficiency syndrome-associated cutaneous Kaposi sarcoma:<br />
evidence for a role for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Cutan Pathol.<br />
20<strong>10</strong>;37:827–834.<br />
44 Sharma SK, Dhooria S, Barwad P, et al. A study of TB-associated<br />
immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome using the consensus<br />
case-definition. Indian J Med Res. 20<strong>10</strong>;131:804–808.<br />
45 World Health Organization. Treatment of tuberculosis guidelines.<br />
Treatment of extrapulmonary TB and of TB in special situations.<br />
4th ed. Geneva 27, Switzerland; 2009: 95–99.<br />
Cutaneous Tuberculosis
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
SELF-TEST REVIEW QUESTIONS<br />
34<br />
<strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />
W. Clark Lambert, MD, PhD, Section Editor<br />
Instructions: For each of the following numbered questions, choose the most appropriate lettered response(s) Unless directed to choose only one lettered<br />
response, all, some, or none of the responses may be correct.<br />
1) Exogenous inoculation, due to the direct inoculation of Mycobacterium<br />
tuberculosis into the skin of a person who is susceptible<br />
to infection, may be responsible for: (Answer as<br />
many as apply.)<br />
a. acute military tuberculosis.<br />
b. gummatous tuberculosis.<br />
c. lupus vulgaris.<br />
d. papulo-necrotic tuberculid.<br />
e. tuberculous chancre.<br />
f. tuberculosis verrucosa cutis.<br />
2) Exogenous inoculation, due to the direct inoculation of Mycobacterium<br />
tuberculosis into the skin of a person who has<br />
been previously infected but is susceptible to infection, is<br />
most likely to be responsible for: (Choose the single best<br />
response.)<br />
a. acute military tuberculosis.<br />
b. gummatous tuberculosis.<br />
c. lupus vulgaris.<br />
d. papulo-necrotic tuberculid.<br />
e. tuberculous chancre.<br />
f. tuberculosis verrucosa cutis.<br />
3) Which of the following is widely described as the most common<br />
form of cutaneous tuberculosis? (Choose the single best<br />
response.)<br />
a. Acute military tuberculosis<br />
b. Gummatous tuberculosis<br />
c. Lupus vulgaris<br />
d. Papulo-necrotic tuberculid<br />
e. Tuberculous chancre<br />
f. Tuberculosis verrucosa cutis<br />
4) The most accepted mode of development of tuberculosis<br />
cutis oroficialis is: (Choose the single best response.)<br />
a. direct spread from adjacent organs.<br />
b. hematogenous spread.<br />
c. ingestion of bacilli in sputum.<br />
d. lymphatic spread.<br />
e. exogenous inoculation due to the direct inoculation of<br />
Mycobacterium tuberculosis into the skin/mucosa of a<br />
person who is susceptible to infection.<br />
5) “Apple-jelly” nodules present on the head and neck of individuals<br />
in Western countries are most characteristic of: (Choose<br />
the single best response.)<br />
a. erythema induratum of Bazin.<br />
b. lichen scrofulosorum.<br />
c. lupus vulgaris.<br />
d. papulonecrotic tuberculid.<br />
e. tuberculosis verrucosa cutis.<br />
ANSWERS TO SELF-TEST REVIEW QUESTIONS:<br />
1) c, e, f; 2) f; 3) c; 4) c; 5) c<br />
From the Departments of Pathology and Dermatology, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ<br />
Address for Correspondence: W. Clark Lambert, MD, PhD, Room C520 MSB, UMDNJ-NJMS, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07<strong>10</strong>1<br />
<strong>•</strong> E-mail: lamberwc@umdnj.edu<br />
RESTLESS LEG SYNDROME<br />
Drugs that may cause restless leg syndrome (RLS)<br />
Alcohol Haldol Prozac Topamax<br />
Caffeine Iron Remeron Ultram<br />
Celexa Klonopin Risperdal Zoloft<br />
Dilantin Neurotin Seroquel Zyprexa<br />
Elavil Paxil<br />
Adapted from Litt, JZ. Curious, Odd, Rare, and Abnormal Reactions to Medications. Fort Lee,<br />
NJ: Barricade Books; 2009:<strong>10</strong>7.<br />
© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC
Arnika Forte ®<br />
SPEED THE HEALING<br />
Arnika Forte ®<br />
The New Gold Standard<br />
for treating bruising,<br />
swelling, pain<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
1st and only combination<br />
of Arnica Montana 30x and<br />
Bromelain<br />
One convenient capsule<br />
twice a day<br />
All natural, safe,<br />
physician - formulated<br />
Speed the healing time<br />
from bruising, swelling and<br />
pain after surgery or dermal<br />
filler injections<br />
To Order Call 484-568-0306
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />
COSMETIC SCIENCE<br />
Howard A. Epstein, PhD, Section Editor<br />
Repelling Insects With Safe and Effective<br />
Alternatives to DEET<br />
In addition to the annoying itch that results from biting<br />
insects, insect-borne diseases, including Lyme disease,<br />
encephalitis, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, and West Nile<br />
virus, are all causes of concern for many individuals who wish to<br />
enjoy the outdoor environment during the warmer months of the<br />
year. The military of various nations experienced the same problems<br />
and have conducted much research in developing repellents<br />
to protect their soldiers. The Indian Army used oils of citronella,<br />
camphor, and paraffin as repellents. These agents were effective<br />
for limited periods and therefore the search for more effective<br />
repellents continued. In 1953, N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide<br />
(DEET) was discovered (Figure 1). As of 2007, it was estimated<br />
that 15 million people in the United Kingdom, 78 million people<br />
in the United States, and 200 million people globally use<br />
DEET each year. 1 Over the years, as cases of insect-borne diseases<br />
continued to be reported in the news, so has the use of<br />
DEET. Reports of adverse reactions associated with DEET have<br />
increased with its use.<br />
HEALTH-RELATED ISSUES AND<br />
CONSUMER CONCERNS<br />
In 2004, the Oregon State University (OSU) Agricultural Experiment<br />
Station issued a press release entitled “OSU Scientist Gives<br />
Safety Tips for Use of DEET Against Mosquitoes & West Nile<br />
Virus.” In the release, Dr Damiel Sudakin, an assistant professor<br />
at OSU’s Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology<br />
and toxicologist at the Agricultural Experiment Station was quoted<br />
as expressing concern that hundreds of adverse reactions, most commonly<br />
affecting the skin, are reported each year. The majority of<br />
these adverse reactions occur when DEET is overused or misused. 2<br />
In 2009, Science Daily published a paper entitled “Popular Insect<br />
Repellent DEET Is Neurotoxic.” 3 The contribution referenced a<br />
study that concluded that DEET is not simply a behavior-modifying<br />
chemical, but also inhibits the activity of a key central nervous system<br />
enzyme, acetylcholinesterase, in both insects and mammals. 4<br />
Howard A. Epstein, PhD<br />
In 2004, the Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry issued<br />
a report on the health effects of DEET in humans. The report mentioned<br />
6 cases of DEET ingestion, 3 led to death after ingestion<br />
of 15 mL to 50 mL of 47.5% to 95% DEET filled in bottles. In<br />
2 of these cases, the individuals drank an unspecified amount of<br />
alcohol. In the third case, the individual ingested an unspecified<br />
number of pills with 50 mL of DEET. In yet another case, a woman<br />
ingested 15 mL to 25 mL of 95% DEET and was admitted to a<br />
hospital with right and left atrial enlargement that returned to normal<br />
within 24 hours. This woman survived with no further cardiac<br />
abnormalities. 5 From 1961 to 2002, the Agency reported 8 deaths<br />
related to DEET exposure, 3 resulting from deliberate ingestion,<br />
and 2 following dermal exposure to DEET. The remaining 3 cases<br />
were girls aged 17 months, 5 years, and 6 years. All 3 children were<br />
described as having “heavy, frequent, or nightly applications of<br />
DEET.” The 6-year-old had congenital ornithine carbamoyl transferase<br />
deficiency, which may have contributed to her death. 5 Two<br />
other reported cases involved 2 men, aged 27 and 30 years, who<br />
developed severe psychological effects from exposure to DEET. In<br />
both cases, the men recovered after hospitalization. 5<br />
MILITARY AND GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL:<br />
DERMAL EFFECTS OF DEET EXPOSURE<br />
Unique cutaneous side effects were reported in 15 soldiers who<br />
applied military-issued DEET repellents. One soldier applied a<br />
33% DEET repellent to his skin without washing it off at bedtime.<br />
He developed a vesiculobullous eruption, which cleared after<br />
14 days. Another soldier who went to bed without removing<br />
DEET applied to his skin woke up 8 hours later complaining of<br />
a burning sensation and skin eruptions. A <strong>10</strong>-day treatment with<br />
corticosteroids cleared the condition. Other soldiers reported<br />
burning skin and erythema after application of 50% DEET<br />
solution applied just before bedtime. Three soldiers were referred<br />
to treatment by a dermatologist: 2 of the soldiers developed a<br />
permanent scar and 1 required corrective surgery. 5<br />
From EMD Chemicals Inc, Gibbstown, NJ<br />
Address for Correspondence: Howard A. Epstein, PhD, EMD Chemicals Inc, One International Plaza, Suite 300, Philadelphia, PA 19113 <strong>•</strong><br />
E-mail: howard.epstein@merckgroup.com<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:36–39 36<br />
© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
O<br />
N<br />
Figure 1. DEET CAS<br />
134–62–3.<br />
Other controlled studies in which DEET was applied to 63 volunteers<br />
with a gauze pad soaked in DEET determined that DEET<br />
should be washed from skin prior to sleeping directly related to the<br />
irritant effects of DEET. 5 Additional studies involving 143 National<br />
Park Service employees at Everglades National Park resulted in 36<br />
of the workers having adverse health effects to the applied DEET.<br />
The effects included skin or mucous membrane irritation, transient<br />
numb or burning lips, dizziness, disorientation, and difficulty in<br />
concentration. Headache and nausea were also reported. 5<br />
MULTIPLE CASE STUDIES OF DEET EXPOSURE<br />
An analysis of phone calls to poison control centers in the United<br />
States from 1985 to 1989 represented more than 6 million human<br />
exposures to a variety of chemicals. Of these, 9086 were related to<br />
DEET. Of the DEET-related calls, 54% of patients had no symptoms<br />
at the time of the call and 40% had symptoms thought<br />
to be related to DEET exposure. The most commonly reported<br />
exposure was inhalation of DEET or spray into the eyes. These<br />
exposures were more likely to cause adverse reactions compared<br />
with cases in which small quantities of DEET were ingested. Of<br />
the individuals with symptoms, 88% did not require medical<br />
attention, 35% had minor skin irritation, and 1% experienced<br />
disorientation or brief seizures. There was a reported death from<br />
deliberate consumption of an 8-oz bottle of DEET. Children<br />
were not more likely to develop side effects than adults. 5<br />
CASE REPORTS OF CHILD EXPOSURES<br />
During 1961 to 2002, 14 of the 17 reported cases of significant<br />
DEET toxicity were in children younger than 8 years. The most<br />
frequently reported symptoms of DEET toxicity in children<br />
were lethargy, headaches, tremors, involuntary movements, seizures,<br />
and convulsions. 5 The common route of exposure in children<br />
is frequently dermal or accidental ingestion. Adverse effects<br />
have been reported in an 18.5-month child who was sprayed<br />
with 20% DEET daily for 3 months and a 6-year-old who was<br />
sprayed with 15% DEET on <strong>10</strong> occasions. Generally, children<br />
recover from exposure. In 1989, there were 4 cases of children<br />
ages 3 to 7 years and a 29-year-old man having generalized<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:36–39<br />
37<br />
COSMETIC SCIENCE<br />
seizures associated with the dermal application of DEET, with<br />
fewer than 3 applications. 5<br />
ALTERNATIVES TO DEET<br />
Picaridin, 1-piperidine carboxylic acid-2(2-hydroxxyethyl)-1methpropylester<br />
(Figure 2) was developed by Bayer in the 1980s.<br />
It is a synthetic molecule chemically based on the active agent<br />
in pepper (Piper sp). Picaridin was first registered with the US<br />
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2001 and entered<br />
the market in 2005. Picaridin has a favorable safety profile, most<br />
likely because the compound has not been as commercially<br />
available for as long as DEET, and therefore there is far less information<br />
regarding adverse reactions.<br />
The first report of a contact allergy during commercial use was<br />
reported in 2005, in which a 39-year-old man experienced an<br />
itchy erythematous reaction to a spray a few hours after application<br />
to the skin. 1 Australian soldiers evaluated 19.2% Picaridin<br />
compared with 35% DEET in a gel formulation, with significantly<br />
more soldiers reporting mild discomfort and irritation<br />
with the use of the DEET gel. Published studies indicate that<br />
Picaridin may be as effective as DEET. There are variations in<br />
repellent efficacy depending on species of insect and levels of<br />
use. The literature reports that Picaridin is aesthetically more<br />
“elegant” than DEET in various formulations. 1 It is registered<br />
for use on the human body and clothing to repel biting flies,<br />
ticks, chiggers, fleas, and mosquitoes. 6<br />
NATURAL AND EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVES<br />
IR3535, [3-(N-acetyl-N-butyl)aminopropionic acid ethyl ester]<br />
(Figure 3) has been marketed by Merck KGaA, Darmstadt,<br />
Germany, for the past 30 years. It was registered by the US EPA<br />
in 1999. IR3535 is unique in that it is classified as a biopesticide<br />
repellent. DEET and Picaridin are classified as conventional<br />
insect repellent pesticides. The EPA defines a biopesticide as a<br />
pesticide derived from natural materials including animal, plant,<br />
bacteria, and minerals. Canola oil and baking soda have pesticidal<br />
applications and are considered biopesticides. 7 Biochemical<br />
pesticides are naturally occurring substances that control pests<br />
N<br />
O<br />
C O<br />
CH 2<br />
Me<br />
CH 2<br />
CH<br />
Figure 2. Picaridin,<br />
Chemical Abstracts<br />
Service registry number<br />
119515–38–7.<br />
Et<br />
OH<br />
O O<br />
Figure 3. Ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate<br />
(IR3535), Chemical<br />
Abstracts Service registry<br />
number 52304–36–6.<br />
Alternatives to DEET<br />
N O
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
by nontoxic mechanisms. The EPA has established a special<br />
committee to determine the most appropriate classification<br />
based on established criteria. 7<br />
Biopesticides are usually less toxic than conventional pesticides.<br />
They generally affect only the target pest and closely<br />
related organisms compared with broad-spectrum conventional<br />
pesticides that may affect other organisms including birds and<br />
mammals. 7 IR3535 received this classification because it is functionally<br />
identical to naturally occurring b-alanine. It is a substituted<br />
B amino acid that contains 98% 3-(N-acetyl-N-butyl)<br />
aminopropionic acid, ethyl ester as an active ingredient and 2%<br />
inert ingredients. The end groups are not likely to contribute<br />
to toxicity and it acts to control the target pest via a nontoxic<br />
mode of action. 7 In various studies, IR3535 has been shown to<br />
be as effective as DEET. As with Picaridin the formulation, level<br />
of repellent, and species of insect may be a factor with respect<br />
to repellent efficacy. 1 IR3535 is also reported to be more cosmetically<br />
elegant than DEET when evaluated in various human<br />
Table I. Comparative Toxicology Data for IR3535, 7,8 Picaridin, 9 and DEET <strong>10</strong><br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:36–39<br />
38<br />
COSMETIC SCIENCE<br />
studies. As of publication in 2007, the authors of Insect Repellents:<br />
Principles, Methods, and Uses claim there were no reported<br />
adverse reactions to IR3535. 1 IR3535 is registered for use as an<br />
insect repellent against mosquitoes, deer ticks, body lice, and<br />
biting flies. The formulated products are applied directly to skin.<br />
The low toxicity data for IR3535 implies that there is reasonable<br />
certainty of no harm for the general population, as well as subgroups<br />
including infants and children. 7<br />
REVIEW OF TOXICITY DATA FOR DEET,<br />
PICARIDIN, AND IR3535<br />
Tables I and II review toxicological data obtained from various<br />
sources. Regarding safety classification, the World Health<br />
Organization (WHO) classification for IR3535 is hazard class<br />
U, indicating that the compound is unlikely to present acute<br />
hazard in normal use. 8 The WHO classified Picaridin as class III,<br />
indicating a slight hazard. 9,11 DEET was also designated as class<br />
III by the WHO. 12,13<br />
TEST IR3535 PICARIDIN DEET REPORTED DOSE<br />
Acute toxicity oral rat (lethal dose, 50%) >5000 2236 2170 mg/kg body weight<br />
Acute dermal toxicity rabbit or rat (lethal dose, 50%) >3000 >2000 4280 mg/kg body weight<br />
Acute inhalation (lethal dose, 50%) >5.1 >4.3 NA mg/L<br />
Eye irritation in rabbit Irritating to eye Moderate irritant Irritating<br />
Skin sensitization in guinea pig No No No<br />
Dermal sensitization human (NOEL) No No No mg/kg/d<br />
Subchronic dermal rat (NOEL) 3000 200 300 mg/kg/d<br />
Developmental rat (oral) <strong>10</strong>00 400 250 mg/kg/d<br />
Ames test (Salmonella typhimurium) Nonmutagenic Nonmutagenic Nonmutagenic<br />
Micronucleus assay Nonmutagenic Nonmutagenic Nonmutagenic<br />
Abbreviations: DEET, N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide; NA, not applicable; NOEL, no observed effect level. Higher scores indicate lower potential<br />
for toxicity.<br />
Table II. Information From Various EPA Fact Sheets5,7,9 EPA FACT SHEET CLASS IR3535 PICARIDIN DEET<br />
Acute inhalation toxicity IV IV IV<br />
Primary dermal irritation IV IV III<br />
Acute oral IV III III<br />
Acute dermal III III III<br />
Primary eye II III III<br />
Abbreviations: DEET, N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide; EPA, Environmental Protection Agency. Category I, very highly or highly toxic; category<br />
II, moderately toxic; category III, slightly toxic; category IV, practically nontoxic.<br />
Alternatives to DEET
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
Insect repellents are more effective at higher concentrations. In<br />
addition to the level of actives in the formulation, the degree<br />
of efficacy may be related to the species of insect to be repelled.<br />
Another factor is proper use of the repellent. When there is<br />
concern that label directions for use may not be properly followed,<br />
the best option is to suggest the compound with the<br />
least hazard risk. The WHO notes that classification criteria are<br />
guide-points intended to supplement but never substitute for<br />
special knowledge, sound clinical judgment, or experience with<br />
a compound. 13<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1 Debboun M, Frances SP, Strickman D, eds. Insect Repellents: Principles,<br />
Methods, and Uses. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2006.<br />
2 Gewin V. OSU scientist gives safety tips for use of DEET against<br />
mosquitoes & West Nile virus. http://extension.oregonstate.edu/news/<br />
release/2004/08/osu-scientist. Accessed June 24, 2011.<br />
3 Science Daily. Popular insect repellant DEET is neurotoxic. http://www.<br />
sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08/090804193230.htm. Accessed<br />
June 24, 2011.<br />
4 Corbel V, Stankiewicz M, Pennetier C, et al. Evidence for inhibition of<br />
cholinesterases in insect and mammalian nervous systems by the insect<br />
repellant deet. BMC Biology. 2009;7:47.<br />
5 Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry Division of Toxicology<br />
and Environmental Medicine. Health Effects in Humans: DEET (N,N-<br />
Diethyl-meta-toluamide). Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and<br />
Disease Registry; December 6, 2004. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/consultations/deet/health-effects.html.<br />
Accessed July 12, 2011.<br />
VINTAGE LABEL<br />
Courtesy of BuyEnlarge, Philadelphia, PA<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:36–39<br />
39<br />
COSMETIC SCIENCE<br />
6 National Pesticide Information Center. Picaridin Technical Fact Sheet.<br />
Corvalis, OR: Oregon State University; March 2009. http://npic.orst.<br />
edu. Accessed July 14, 2011.<br />
7 United States Environmental Protection Agency. Pesticides: Regulating<br />
Pesticides. 3-[N-Butyl-N-acetyl]-aminopropionic acid, ethyl ester (113509)<br />
Technical Document. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection<br />
Agency; <strong>February</strong> 1999. http://.epa.gov/opp00001/biopesticides/<br />
ingredients. Accessed July 13, 2011.<br />
8 World Health Organization. Specifications and Evaluations for Public<br />
Health Pesticides. Ethyl Butylacetylaminopropionate also known as<br />
IR3535 3-(N-acetyl-N-butyl) aminopropionic acid ethyl ester. Geneva,<br />
Switzerland: World Health Organization; <strong>February</strong> 2006. htt://www.who.<br />
int/quality/en/. Accessed July 12, 2011.<br />
9 United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA New Pesticide Fact<br />
Sheet Picaridin. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection<br />
Agency; May 2005. http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/factsheets/.<br />
Accessed July 12, 2011.<br />
<strong>10</strong> United States Environmental Protection Agency. Reregistration<br />
Eligibility Decision (RED) DEET. Washington, DC: United States Environmental<br />
Protection Agency; September 1998. EPA738-R-0<strong>10</strong>.<br />
11 World Health Organization. Specifications and Evaluations for Public Health<br />
Pesticides. Icaridin, 1-piperidinecarboxylic acid 2-(2-hydroxxxyethyl)-1methylpropylester<br />
also known as isobutyl piperidine carboxylate. Geneva,<br />
Switzerland: World Health Organization; October 2004. http://www.who.<br />
int/quality/en/. Accessed July 12, 2011.<br />
12 World Health Organization. International Program on Chemical Safety PCS<br />
INCHEM. Data Sheet on Pesticide No. 80 DEET. Geneva, Switzerland:<br />
World Health Organization. WHO/VBC/DS/87.80. http://www.inchem.<br />
org/documents/pds/pds/pest80. Accessed June 24, 2011.<br />
13 World Health Organization. IPCS, IOMC. The WHO Recommended<br />
Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification<br />
2009. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 20<strong>10</strong>.<br />
http://www.who.int/ipcs/publications/pesticides_hazard. Accessed<br />
July 12, 2011.<br />
Alternatives to DEET
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />
PERILS OF DERMATOPATHOLOGY<br />
W. Clark Lambert, MD, PhD, Section Editor<br />
It’s Not Just Who You Are, It’s Also Where You Are:<br />
The Cutaneous Leiomyosarcoma Dilemma<br />
Gizem Tumer, MD; Carmen F. Castilla, BS; W. Clark Lambert, MD, PhD<br />
“To understand a name you must be acquainted with the particular of which it is a name.”—Bertrard Russell<br />
Leiomyosarcoma of the skin is a rare soft tissue neoplasm<br />
of smooth muscle origin. Treatment and prognosis of<br />
this lesion are dependent on its depth, with deep soft tissue<br />
tumors carrying a significantly worse prognosis and requiring<br />
more extensive surgery than cutaneous ones. It is essential<br />
that all physicians involved know this. It is also critical that the<br />
dermatopathologist report the depth of a leiomyosarcoma in<br />
order for the clinician to render appropriate therapy. Failure to<br />
report the location of this neoplasm and/or failure to comprehend<br />
the prognostic significance of this information, can lead to<br />
inappropriate therapy and increased morbidity in patients.<br />
CLASSIFICATION<br />
Three classifications of smooth muscle tumors of the skin have<br />
been described1 :<br />
<strong>•</strong> Atypical smooth muscle tumor of the dermis (purely dermal<br />
lesion);<br />
<strong>•</strong> Cutaneous leiomyosarcoma (dermal lesion with minimal<br />
extension into the subcutis);<br />
<strong>•</strong> Subcutaneous leiomyosarcoma. 2<br />
Microscopically, the cutaneous leiomyosarcoma lesion involves<br />
the dermis and focally, the subcutis. It is composed of bluntended,<br />
cigar-shaped fusiform neoplastic spindle cells with eosinophillic<br />
cytoplasm forming fascicles and bundles. 2–5 This neoplasm<br />
may appear in two different architectural patterns: a fasciculated<br />
growth pattern and a pilar-type architectural pattern (Figure 1 and<br />
Figure 2). The latter generally represents a low-grade neoplasm<br />
showing histologic features suggestive of pilar leiomyoma with the<br />
addition of a variable degree of cytological atypia and mitoses. 2<br />
CLINICAL FINDINGS<br />
Cutaneous leiomyosarcomas typically follow an indolent clinical<br />
course. Local recurrence does occur; however, distant metastasis<br />
is uncommon and mortality related to tumor progression<br />
is unusual. 2,6–<strong>10</strong> In contrast to cutaneous leiomyosarcoma,<br />
subcutaneous leiomyosarcoma presents as a larger mass of a<br />
higher grade. Although still superficially located above the fascia,<br />
the local recurrence rate and metastatic rate of subcutaneous<br />
leiomyosarcoma is closer to the more ominous deep soft tissue<br />
leiomyosarcoma. 5,6,11<br />
Based on the differences in their prognoses, investigators proposed<br />
the term atypical intradermal smooth muscle neoplasm<br />
instead of cutaneous leiomyosarcoma to highlight the benign<br />
nature of cutaneous leiomyosarcoma vs the more aggressive<br />
soft tissue leiomyosarcoma and subcutaneous leiomyosarcoma.<br />
The same group also argued that grading primary dermal atypical<br />
smooth muscle neoplasms is inappropriate given the fact<br />
that the only prognostic predictor is margin status at the time of<br />
excision and no other reliable prognostic factor has been identified.<br />
5 While we respect these investigators’ opinion, we believe<br />
that thus terming such lesions is a bit like a tail wagging the<br />
dog. We believe it is more sensible to name a tumor in the most<br />
logical way based on its histological features, and subsequently<br />
to note if some subset of these lesions has a different prognosis.<br />
TREATMENT<br />
Treatments for cutaneous and deep soft tissue leiomyosarcoma<br />
differ significantly. Unlike deep soft tissue leiomyosarcoma,<br />
which requires extensive surgery, the standard treatment for<br />
cutaneous leiomyosarcoma and subcutaneous leiomyosarcoma is<br />
wide local excision, with margins ranging from 2 cm to 5 cm. 12,13<br />
Mohs’ micrographic surgery (MMS) has also been used for cutaneous<br />
leiomyosarcomas. This technique can be beneficial as it<br />
provides the ability to examine all margins as the lesion is excised<br />
while sparing normal tissue. 9 At this time, only a few small studies<br />
investigating MMS have been reported and further studies<br />
are required to investigate this technique. 13–16<br />
From the Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ<br />
Address for Correspondence: W. Clark Lambert, MD, PhD, Room C520 MSB, UMDNJ-NJMS, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07<strong>10</strong>3<br />
<strong>•</strong> E-mail: lamberwc@umdnj.edu<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:40–41 40<br />
© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
Figure 1. Subcutaneous skin biopsy of tumor cells composed<br />
of cigar-shaped spindle cells with mitotic figures (black arrows)<br />
(hematoxylin-eosin stain, original magnification ×20).<br />
OBSERVATIONS<br />
Due to the increased risk of metastasis and the worse prognosis of<br />
subcutaneous leiomyosarcoma, an analysis of the subcutaneous<br />
tissue is crucial when the diagnosis of cutaneous leiomyosarcoma<br />
is made. Undergrading of the tumor may occur if a shave biopsy<br />
is utilized to diagnose the lesion.<br />
In contrast to deep soft tissue leiomyosarcomas, which may<br />
require extensive surgery, overly aggressive treatment or mutilating<br />
surgeries are not warranted in cutaneous leiomyosarcoma.<br />
The standard of care for cutaneous leiomyosarcoma remains<br />
wide excisional biopsy; however, recent studies have shown benefits<br />
to using MMS.<br />
The dermatopathologist must report the depth of the tumor<br />
and the closest distance from the margin in order to provide the<br />
best therapeutic approach. The clinician must then understand<br />
the significance of this interpretation. Failure to distinguish and<br />
report the exact depth of this neoplasm or a failure of the clinician<br />
to understand the significance of this information may lead<br />
to inappropriate and aggressive treatment with excess morbidity.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1 Hornick JL, Fletcher CD. Criteria for malignancy in nonvisceral smooth<br />
muscle tumors. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2003;7;60–66.<br />
2 Massi D, Franchi A, Alos L, et al. Primary cutaneous leiomyosarcoma:<br />
clinicopathological analysis of 36 cases. Histopathology. 20<strong>10</strong>;56:<br />
251–262.<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:40–41<br />
41<br />
PERILS OF DERMATOPATHOLOGY<br />
Figure 2. Spindle cell lesion with areas of mitosis (arrowheads).<br />
3 Mentzel T. Sarcomas in the skin of the elderly. Clin Dermatol.<br />
2011;29:80–90.<br />
4 De Giorgi V, Sestini S, Massi D, et al. Superficial cutaneous leiomyosarcoma:<br />
a rare, misleading tumor. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2008;9:185–187.<br />
5 Kraft S, Fletcher CD. Atypical intradermal smooth muscle neoplasms:<br />
clinicopathologic analysis of 84 cases and a reappraisal of cutaneous<br />
“leiomyosarcoma.” Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:599–607.<br />
6 Svarvar C, Böhling T, Berlin O, et al. Clinical course of nonvisceral<br />
soft tissue leiomyosarcoma in 225 patients from the Scandinavian<br />
Sarcoma Group. Cancer. 2007;<strong>10</strong>9:282–291.<br />
7 Brown MD. Recognition and management of unusual cutaneous tumors.<br />
Dermatol Clin. 2000;18:543–552.<br />
8 Ikari Y, Tokuhashi I, Haramoto I, et al. Cutaneous leiomyosarcoma.<br />
J Dermatol. 1992;19:99–<strong>10</strong>4.<br />
9 Swanson PE, Stanley MW, Scheithauer BW, Wick MR. Primary cutaneous<br />
leiomyosarcoma: a histological and immunohistochemical study<br />
of 9 cases, with ultrastructural correlation. J Cutan Pathol. 1988;15:<br />
129–141.<br />
<strong>10</strong> Fields JP, Helwig EB. Leiomyosarcoma of the skin and subcutaneous<br />
tissue. Cancer. 1981;47:156–169.<br />
11 Massi D, Franchi A, Alos L, Cook M. Primary cutaneous leiomyosarcoma:<br />
clinicopathological analysis of 36 cases. Histopathology. 20<strong>10</strong>;56:<br />
251–262.<br />
12 Tsut Sumido A, Yoshida T, Yamamoto Y, Itoh T. Management of superficial<br />
leiomyosarcoma: a retrospective study of <strong>10</strong> cases. Plast Reconst<br />
Surg. 2005;116:8–12.<br />
13 Humphreys TR, Finkelstein DH, Lee JB. Superficial leiomyosarcoma treated<br />
with Mohs micographic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:<strong>10</strong>8–112.<br />
14 Starling J 3rd, Coldiron BM. Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment<br />
of cutaneous leiomyosarcoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64:<br />
1119–1122.<br />
15 Huether MJ, Zitelli JA, Brodland DG. Mohs micographic surgery for<br />
the treatment of spindle tumors of the skin. J Am Acad Dermatol.<br />
2001;44:656–659.<br />
16 Annest NM, Grekin SJ, Stone MS, Messingham MJ. Cutaneous leiomyosarcoma:<br />
a tumor of the head and neck. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:628–633.<br />
It’s Not Just Who You Are
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> ���������������������<br />
INFECTIOUS DISEASE CAPSULE<br />
Jack M. Bernstein, MD, Section Editor<br />
It May Be Vulgar, but It Isn’t a Bad Word<br />
������������������� 1,2 ���������������������� 2 Jack M. Bernstein, MD 1,2<br />
A<br />
�����������������������������������������������������<br />
����������������������������������������������������������<br />
�������������� ������� ������� ��������� ���������� �����<br />
�����������������������������������������������������������������<br />
������� ������ ���� ������� ������������ ��������������� �����<br />
���������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�����������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
�����������������������������������������������������������������<br />
���������������������������������������������������������������<br />
����������� ���� �������������� ����� ������� �������� ��� ���� ������<br />
�������� ������� ������ ������������ ������������ ����� ������-<br />
������� ������� ������� ���� ����������� ����� ������������� ��������������<br />
����������������������������������������������������������� and<br />
������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
���������������������������������������������������������������<br />
���� ����������� ���������� ������������ ���� ������������� �����<br />
������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
���������������������������������������������������������������<br />
����������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�������������<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������������� 4 ����<br />
���������������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
����������������������������������� 3 ������������������������������������<br />
��������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
��������������������������������������������� 4 �����������������������<br />
�������������������������� � �������������������������������� 1<br />
DIAGNOSIS<br />
��������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
����������������������������������������������������������������<br />
��������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
����������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�����������������4����������������������������������������������� ������������� ����� ������� ���������� ��� ���� ��������� �������<br />
����������4������������ ����� �������� ���� ����������� ������ ��������<br />
�����������������������������������������������������������������<br />
��������������������������������������������������������������<br />
����������������������������������������������<br />
���������������������������������������������������������������<br />
��������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������1 ������������������������������������������������������������<br />
������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�����������������������������������2���������������������������� �����������������������������������������������������������<br />
����������������������������������3������������������������������� ��������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�����������������������������������������������������������1 TREATMENT<br />
��� ���� ������� ��� �������� ��� ������������� ��� ������� �� �������<br />
��� ���������� ���� ���������� ��� ��� ������� ���������� ���������<br />
��������� ������ �������� ����������� ���������� ������������ ����<br />
��������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�������������<br />
CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS<br />
��� ��������� ������������� ��� ������ ��������� ��� ������ ������������<br />
��������� ����� ��������� �������� ����� �������� ����������� ����<br />
��8��������������������������������������������������� ������� ��������� ���������������� ������������� ��� Mycobacterium<br />
tuberculosis��������������������������������������������������������<br />
�����������3 CONCLUSIONS<br />
������������� ��� �� ������������ ���������� ����� ��� ���������<br />
����� ��� ���������������� �������� �������� ������ ��������� ��� ��<br />
������������������������������������������������������������-<br />
������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
From the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dayton, OH, 1 and the Department of Medicine, Wright State University School of<br />
Medicine, Dayton, OH2 Address for Correspondence: Jack M. Bernstein, MD, Research (151), VA Medical Center, 4<strong>10</strong>0 West Third Street, Dayton, OH 45428<br />
�����������������������������������<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:42–43 42<br />
��������������������������������������������
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
Figure 1. �����������������������������������<br />
Figure 2. ����������������������������������������������<br />
������������������������������������������������������������<br />
����������������������������������������������������<br />
��������� ��� ���������� ���� ����� ����� ������� ����������� ���<br />
���������������������������������������������������������������<br />
��������� ������������ ����� ��� �������� ������� ���� ��� ����<br />
��������� ��������������� ����� �������� ����������� ���������<br />
����������� ����������� ���������� ������������ ������ ���������<br />
����������������������������������������������������������<br />
���� ���������� ��� ������ ��������� ����� ��������� ������������<br />
�������� ���� ��������������� ����� ������������ ��� ��� ���� ���<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:42–43<br />
43<br />
��������������������������<br />
Figure 3. ������������������������������������������������<br />
����������������������������������<br />
������������������������������������������������������������<br />
������� ����� �� ����� ��������� ���������� ���� ���������� ��� ���<br />
������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
���������<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1 ����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
����������������������������������������������������J Am Acad Dermatol.<br />
����������������<br />
2 �����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
���������������������������������������������������Dermatology in General<br />
Medicine.���������������������������������������������������<br />
3 ���������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
������������Int J Tuberc Lung Dis.����������������<br />
4 ������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�������������������������� Int J Dermatol.�����������������<br />
5 ����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
��������������� Int J Dermatol.���������������<br />
6 ������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
����������� ��������� �������� ��� ��������� ���������� ��� ���������������<br />
MMWR Recomm Rep.��������������<br />
7 ��������� ���� �������� ���� ������� ���� ������� ��� ���� ������<br />
����� ��� �������������� ���� ������� ������������� ����������� JAMA.� �����<br />
��������������<br />
8 �����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
N Engl J Med.������������������<br />
�����������������������������������������
�������������������<br />
�������������<br />
������������<br />
��������������������������<br />
�������������������������������<br />
��������������<br />
������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
���������������������������������������������������������<br />
���������������������<br />
���������������������������������������������������������<br />
��������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������<br />
���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />
�������������������������������������<br />
�<br />
���������������������������������������<br />
�������������������������<br />
�������������������������������������<br />
����<br />
�������������������������������<br />
���������������������������<br />
�������������������<br />
���������������������������<br />
����������������<br />
�����������������������<br />
������������������������������������<br />
�������������������������������������
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />
The term dermatosis neglecta was originally coined in<br />
1995 when three cases of an “unwashed dermatosis”<br />
were presented by L. Poskitt and colleagues. 1<br />
In all cases, the patients committed what Poskitt described<br />
as “acts of omission” by failing to wash their skin in the<br />
affected areas. The resulting hyperpigmented, hyperkeratotic<br />
dermatosis resolved by vigorously washing with soap and<br />
water or, in severe areas, by applying 5% salicylic acid in<br />
aqueous cream twice daily. Our patient had a severe case that<br />
responded well to salicylic acid followed by routine washing.<br />
Because the patient was subsequently lost to follow-up, we were<br />
unable to evaluate hair regrowth.<br />
Periodic shedding of the outermost cellular layers is an essential<br />
component of normal keratinocyte development. In the<br />
stratum corneum, protein-rich, lipid-depleted keratinocytes<br />
are the “bricks” that are held together by hydrophobic intercellular<br />
membranes and desmosomes, making up the “mortar.” 2,3<br />
Genetic defects in this system—either in the keratinocytes themselves<br />
or their intercellular molding—can lead to abnormal retention<br />
of stratum corneum, causing disorders such as ichthyosis<br />
vulgaris and recessive X-linked ichthyosis. Ichthyosis vulgaris<br />
is caused by defective profilaggrin, a keratinocyte protein, and<br />
CASE STUDY<br />
Vesna Petronic-Rosic, MD, MSc, Section Editor<br />
Unusually Severe Case of Dermatosis Neglecta<br />
Jake E. Turrentine, BS; Travis W. Blalock, MD; Loretta S. Davis, MD<br />
An 18-year-old black woman with cerebral palsy was admitted for evaluation of an intrathecal baclofen pump site infection. The dermatology<br />
service was consulted for treatment suggestions of a presumed diagnosis of chronic tinea capitis. Three courses of oral griseofulvin during<br />
the past 2 years failed to resolve the patient’s chronic scalp dermatosis. Scalp lesions first began about 2 years earlier after hospitalization for<br />
placement of an intrathecal baclofen pump. The patient was unable to care for her scalp due to her cerebral palsy, and her mother interpreted<br />
the scalp condition as infectious. No routine shampoo care, scalp care, or topical treatment was performed for more than 1½ years.<br />
The mother felt that touching the patient’s scalp might cause pain and noted that the majority of her time was spent concentrating on more<br />
critical medical issues. Physical examination revealed coalescing hyperkeratotic plaques extending dorsally from the anterior hairline to the<br />
occipital scalp with small flecks of keratinous debris throughout the remaining hair (Figure 1). The plate-like plaques were devoid of hair,<br />
except at a few fissures where a few tufts of hair emerged. No cervical lymph nodes were appreciated on palpation. Treatment was initiated<br />
with compresses consisting of large warm water–soaked towels 4 times daily. Three times a day, a nursing staff applied 5% salicylic acid in<br />
olive oil to the scalp under a shower cap for approximately 1 hour. Over the following 2 days, a significant reduction in keratinous debris<br />
was appreciated. Within 2 weeks, the bulk of the plaques had been removed (Figure 2). At 6-week follow-up, the underlying scalp showed<br />
areas of fibrosis and possible scarring with a few emerging tufts of hair. On the basis of history and response to treatment with salicylic acid<br />
and routine scalp care, the patient was diagnosed with an unusually severe case of dermatosis neglecta.<br />
recessive X-linked ichthyosis is caused by a deficiency in steroid<br />
sulfatase, an enzyme in the intercellular domain. 4 These genetic<br />
abnormalities of adherent stratum corneum illustrate the importance<br />
of regular shedding of superficial keratinocyte layers.<br />
Dermatosis neglecta represents a failure to cleanse adequately a<br />
particular area of skin, leading to the buildup of adherent hyperpigmented<br />
scales. Thus, dermatosis neglecta can be understood<br />
as a self-induced “defect” in normal keratinocyte shedding that<br />
causes abnormal accumulation of cellular layers and debris. Dermatosis<br />
neglecta typically occurs in an area of hyperesthesia or<br />
prior trauma where the patient refuses to scrub the skin. 5 Also,<br />
as in our patient, dermatosis neglecta can develop in situations<br />
where a patient is unable to properly care for an area of skin<br />
because of physical or mental disability.<br />
A similar condition described in the literature is terra firma forme<br />
dermatosis (TFFD), which is a disorder of unknown etiology characterized<br />
primarily by disordered keratinization. 6–8 In TFFD, the<br />
classic clinical finding is a dark, dirty-looking, slightly raised hyperkeratotic<br />
skin lesion that is completely asymptomatic. Cases of<br />
TFFD respond to 70% isopropyl alcohol rubs but not to cleansing<br />
with normal soap and water; therefore, TFFD can be distinguished<br />
From the Division of Dermatology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA<br />
Address for Correspondence: Travis W. Blalock, MD, Medical College of Georgia, Division of Dermatology, <strong>10</strong>04 Chafee Avenue, Augusta,<br />
GA 30904 <strong>•</strong> E-mail: tblalock@mcg.edu<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:46–47 46<br />
© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
Figure 1. Crusted, plate-like plaques on the scalp at initial<br />
presentation.<br />
clinically from dermatosis neglecta by the lack of response to normal<br />
washing and, of course, the absence of historical clues of neglect.<br />
Given its rapid response to inexpensive and simple treatment,<br />
dermatosis neglecta should be considered in the evaluation of<br />
a pigmented, hyperkeratotic skin lesion. If identified, a skin<br />
biopsy can often be avoided. Physicians should always inquire<br />
about skin care habits when gathering history about an unexplained<br />
skin lesion and should review and recommend normal<br />
skin hygiene, when a patient fails to respond to a full course of<br />
standard therapy for an alternate diagnosis.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1 Poskitt L, Wayte J, Wojnarowska F, Wilkinson JD. “Dermatosis neglecta”:<br />
unwashed dermatosis. Br J Dermatol. 1995;112:827–829.<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:46–47<br />
VINTAGE LABEL<br />
Courtesy of BuyEnlarge, Philadelphia, PA<br />
47<br />
CASE STUDY<br />
Figure 2. Almost complete resolution of scalp plaque following<br />
2 weeks of therapy.<br />
2 Elias PM. Epidermal lipids, barrier function, and desquamation. J Invest<br />
Dermatol. 1983;80:44s–49s.<br />
3 Williams ML. Ichthyosis: mechanisms of disease. Pediatr Dermatol.<br />
1992;9:365–368.<br />
4 Elias PM, Crumrine D, Rassner U, et al. Basis for abnormal desquamation<br />
and permeability barrier dysfunction in RXLI. J Invest Dermatol.<br />
2004;122:314–319.<br />
5 Lucas JL, Brodell RT, Feldman SR. Dermatosis neglecta: a series of case<br />
reports and review of other dirty-appearing dermatoses. Dermatol Online<br />
J. 2006;12:5.<br />
6 Akkash L, Badran D, Al-Omari AQ. Terra firma forme dermatosis: case<br />
series and review of the literature. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2009;7:<strong>10</strong>2–<br />
<strong>10</strong>7.<br />
7 Guarneri C, Guarneri F, Cannavo SP. Terra firma-forme dermatosis. Int J<br />
Dermatol. 2008;47:482–484.<br />
8 Raveh T, Gilead LT, Wexler MR. Terra firma forme dermatosis. Ann Plast<br />
Surg. 1997;39:542–545.<br />
Dermatosis Neglecta
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />
CASE STUDY<br />
Fixed-Drug Eruption Caused by Ashwagandha<br />
(Withania somnifera): A Widely Used Ayurvedic Drug<br />
Virendra N. Sehgal, MD; Prashant Verma, MD; Sambit N. Bhattacharya, MD<br />
A 28-year-old man with decreased libido received ashwagandha in the usual daily dosage of 5 g for <strong>10</strong> days. During this period, he<br />
experienced a burning and/or itching sensation as well as discoloration of the skin/mucous membrane confined to the penis. He had a<br />
similar type of eruption at the same site 6 months prior while taking ashwagandha. Examination of the skin surface was conspicuous and<br />
marked by the presence of a dusky, erythematous, oval, eroded plaque of 3 cm, affecting the glans penis and prepuce (Figure). The drug<br />
was withdrawn and topical 0.05% clobetasol propionate cream was administered along with cetrizine dihydrochloride, an H 1 -receptor<br />
blocker, <strong>10</strong> mg daily for 1 month. There was a perceptible amelioration of the lesion, resulting in residual greyish white pigmentation. He<br />
was prescribed oral drug provocation with 1 g of ashwagandha powder. Within 12 hours, a flare-up developed at the earlier site, confirming<br />
the causality.<br />
Fixed-drug eruption, one of the most well-recognized<br />
adverse drug reactions, is characterized by a peculiar,<br />
sudden onset of round and/or oval, edematous, dusky<br />
red macules/plaques on the skin and/or mucous membranes<br />
accompanied by burning and/or itching. 1 Several drugs<br />
have been incriminated in its causation, the details of which<br />
have been specifically recounted in a recent comprehensive<br />
review. 2 Ashwagandha belongs to an alternative system of<br />
medicine and has a long medicinal history. It is an innocuous<br />
agent that has not been associated with any cutaneous drug<br />
reactions to date. Fixed-drug eruption following the use of<br />
ashwagandha is an uncommon occurence; hence, the current<br />
report.<br />
Ashwagandha literally means “horse smell” (ashwa = horse,<br />
gandha = smell), for its wet roots smell similar to horse’s urine.<br />
Withania somnifera, also known as ashwagangha, Indian ginseng,<br />
winter cherry, ajagandha, kanaje hindi, and samm al<br />
ferakh, the offending indigenous drug, is derived from a plant<br />
in the Solanaceae or nightshade family. 3 It is a beautiful, delicate<br />
plant native to India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. It is considered<br />
the king of herbs among ayurvedic medicines. It has<br />
a medicinal history of 4000 years and is a well-accepted, vital<br />
drug in Ayurveda and Indian traditional medicine. 4 It has<br />
been conventionally used for calming the mind and relieving<br />
weakness, nervous exhaustion, and arthritis. In addition, it<br />
is used for building sexual energy. Ashwagandha root is said<br />
to be beneficial in people who do physical labor or exercise<br />
a lot, helping the body adapt to physical stress. In addition,<br />
its paste is recommended for external use in the treatment<br />
of carbuncles, ulcers, and nondescript swellings. Bedsores and<br />
wounds are also amenable to topical application of ashwagandha<br />
leaves.<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
Ashwagandha is said to possess anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor,<br />
antistress, antioxidant, immunomodulatory, hemopoeitic, and<br />
rejuvenating effects. 5 In addition, it is thought to exert a positive<br />
influence on the endocrine, cardiopulmonary, and central<br />
nervous systems. 6 Ashwagandha’s mechanism of action is still<br />
speculative, and toxicity studies have revealed it to be a safe compound.<br />
7–9<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1 Sehgal VN, Bhattacharya SN, Verma P. Physiopathology of adverse cutaneous<br />
drug reactions—applied perceptions: Part I. Skinmed. In press.<br />
2 Sehgal VN, Srivastava G. Fixed drug eruption (FDE): changing scenario<br />
of incriminating drugs. Int J Dermatol. 2006;45:897–908<br />
3 Winters M. Ancient medicine, modern use: Withania somnifera and its potential<br />
role in integrative oncology. Altern Med Rev. 2006;11:269–277.<br />
From the Dermato-Venereology (Skin/VD) Center, Sehgal Nursing Home, Panchwati-Delhi, India; the Department of Dermatology and STD,<br />
University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Shahdara, Delhi, India<br />
Address for Correspondence: Virendra N. Sehgal, MD, Dermato-Venereology (Skin/VD) Center, Sehgal Nursing Home, A/6 Panchwati,<br />
Delhi 1<strong>10</strong> 033, India <strong>•</strong> E-mail: drsehgal@ndf.vsnl.net.in<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:48–49 48<br />
© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
Figure. Fixed-drug eruption affecting the glans and prepuce<br />
of the penis.<br />
VINTAGE LABEL<br />
Courtesy of BuyEnlarge, Philadelphia, PA<br />
CASE STUDY<br />
4 Rasool M, Varalakshmi P. Protective effect of Withania somnifera root<br />
powder in relation to lipid peroxidation, antioxidant status, glycoproteins<br />
and bone collagen on adjuvant-induced arthritis in rats. Fundam Clin<br />
Pharmacol. 2007;21:157–164.<br />
5 Mishra LC, Singh BB, Dagenais S. Scientific basis for the therapeutic<br />
use of Withania somnifera (ashwagandha): a review. Altern Med Rev.<br />
2000;5:334–346.<br />
6 Sehgal VN, Srivastava G. Traditional/ayurvedic pharmacotherapy of skin<br />
diseases. Skinmed. 20<strong>10</strong>;8:282–284.<br />
7 Behl PN, Arora RB, Srivastava G. Traditional Indian Dermatology Concept<br />
of Past and Present. 1st ed. New Delhi, India: SISD Publication; 1992.<br />
8 Behl PN, Srivastava G. Herbs Useful in Dermatological Therapy. 2nd ed.<br />
New Delhi, India: CBS Publishers; 2004.<br />
9 Sehgal VN, Grangwani OP. Fixed drug eruptions: a study of<br />
epidemiological, clinical and diagnostic aspects of 89 cases from India.<br />
J Dermatol. 1988;15:50–54.<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:48–49 49<br />
Fixed-Drug Eruption Caused by Ashwagandha
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />
CASE STUDY<br />
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Revealed by a<br />
Granulomatous Zosteriform Eruption<br />
Sondes Trojjet, MD; 1 Houda Hammami, MD; 1 Inès Zaraa, MD; 1,2 Alia Bouzguarrou, MD; 1 Meriem Joens, MD; 1<br />
Slim Haouet, MD; 2,3 Amel Ben Osman, MD; 1,2 Mourad Mokni, MD1,2 A 70-year-old woman presented with an atypical erythematopapular zosteriform eruption of 3 weeks’ duration. The patient had no history<br />
of previous vesicular eruption. She developed a painful burning sensation on the neck. Clinical examination revealed a cluster of small<br />
erythematous firm papules and plaques in a zosteriform distribution on the left ear, face, neck, and shoulder (Figure 1A). The lesions were<br />
unilateral and did not cross the midline. Multiple cervical and axillary lymph nodes were palpable. Laboratory tests revealed an increase<br />
in white blood cells of 25,000/mm 3 , with 17,9<strong>10</strong>/mm 3 lymphocytes and a normal range of hemoglobin, platelets, creatinine, and liver<br />
enzymes. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 87 mm. Blood smear results showed small, morphologically mature lymphocyte cells. In<br />
immune phenotyping, lymphocyte cells co-express CD5 and B-cell–surface antigens CD19 and CD23, as well as a restriction of kappa<br />
immunoglobulin light chains. The cells were CD22-, CD79b-, CD38-, CD<strong>10</strong>-, CD25- and FMC7-. Computed thoracoabominal tomography<br />
revealed cervical, mediastinal, abdominal, and pelvic adenopathy confirming the diagnosis of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia<br />
(B-CLL) stage B. Histology of a skin biopsy from a papule showed a dense nodular granulomatous infiltrate in the dermis (Figure 2A).<br />
The infiltrate contained epithelioid and giant cells surrounded by lymphocytes and plasma cells. Small monomorphic lymphocytes without<br />
mitotic figures predominated (Figure 2B). The epidermis was irregularly thickened. Immunohistology revealed a polymorphous infiltrate<br />
with a phenotype of reactive T lymphocytes (CD3, CD5 positive) (Figure 2C), B lymphocytes (CD20 positive) (Figure 2D). Epithelioid<br />
and giant cells were positive for CD68 (Figure 2E). A latent herpes zoster infection with granulomatous reaction at the site of zoster lesions<br />
was highly suspected as the patient reported a unilateral burning sensation without a history of vesicular zosteriform eruption. She received<br />
treatment with intravenous acyclovir <strong>10</strong> mg/kg every 8 hours. The papular lesions resolved markedly (60%) on macular plaques at the end<br />
of the treatment. Following topical treatment with corticosteroids, the lesions healed completely within 4 weeks (Figure 1B). Concerning<br />
leukemia, our patient was monitored without therapy by the hematologist.<br />
Various cutaneous lesions may appear at sites of prior<br />
herpes zoster infection, such as annular granuloma, sarcoidal<br />
granuloma, granulomatous vasculitis, Kaposi’s<br />
sarcoma, and pseudolymphoma. 1 These cutaneous lesions may<br />
appear immediately after resolving vesicular lesions or at varying<br />
times after the acute eruption. We describe in this report an<br />
unusual case of a granulomatous zosteriform eruption revealing<br />
a B-cell chronic lymphocytic lymphoma.<br />
Our patient is of special interest because she presented with a<br />
granulomatous eruption arising after a probable latent zoster revealing<br />
B-CLL. Unfortunately, varicella-zoster virus DNA detection<br />
was not performed in our case.<br />
Granulomatous reactions and specific infiltrations at sites<br />
of resolved cutaneous herpes zoster lesions in patients with<br />
B-CLL have been described as a rare clinical event. 2,3 The<br />
cause of granulomatous reactions caused by varicella-<br />
zoster virus remains to be elucidated. 4 Type III and type<br />
IV hyper sensitivity reaction, 5 isotopic response, 6,7 and viral<br />
etiologies 2 are thought to be possible provoking factors.<br />
A study of granulomatous reactions associated with herpes<br />
zoster lesions for the presence of varicella-zoster virus<br />
genome using the polymerase chain reaction suggested<br />
that varicella-zoster virus DNA is detected in cases where<br />
eruption occurred immediately in the wake of resolving<br />
vesicular herpes zoster lesions. 2 In this case, differential<br />
diagnosis includes specific cutaneous infiltrates with<br />
neoplastic B cells. The clinical resolution of the lesions after<br />
treatment with acyclovir and topical steroids confirms the<br />
benign nature of the granulomatous infiltration.<br />
From the Department of Dermatology, La Rabat Hospital, Tunis Tunisia; 1 the Faculté de Médecine de Tunis, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia; 2<br />
and the Department of Pathology, La Rabta Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia3 Address for Correspondence: Ines Zaraa, MD, Dermatology Department, La Rabta Hospital, Jabbari, Bab Saadoun, Tunis, <strong>10</strong>07 Tunisia<br />
<strong>•</strong> E-mail: inesrania@yahoo.fr<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:50–52 50<br />
© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> CASE STUDY<br />
Figure 1A. Clustered erythematous papules and plaques on<br />
right neck and shoulder.<br />
Figure 1B. Healing of clustered erythematous papules and<br />
plaques within 4 weeks.<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
An atypical zosteriform eruption should alert dermatopathologists<br />
to the possibility of an associated hematological dyscrasia,<br />
mainly B-CLL.<br />
Figure 2A. Histology of skin papule showing a dense nodular<br />
granulomatous infiltrate in the dermis (hematoxylin and eosin<br />
stain, original magnification ×40).<br />
Figure 2B. Granulomatous infiltrate containing small mature<br />
lymphocytes with no significant atypia, epithelioid, or giant cells<br />
(hematoxylin and eosin stain, original magnification ×<strong>10</strong>0).<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1 Requena L, Kutzner H, Escalonilla P, et al. Cutaneous reactions at<br />
sites of herpes zoster scars: an expanded spectrum. Br J Dermatol.<br />
1998;138:161–168.<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:50–52 51<br />
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> CASE STUDY<br />
Figure 2C. The majority of infiltrating cells staining positively<br />
with the pan–T-cell marker CD3 (CD 3 staining [Novocastra,<br />
Newcastle upon Tyne, UK], original magnification ×40).<br />
Figure 2D. The infiltrating cells staining positively with the<br />
pan–B-cell marker CD20 (CD 20 staining [DakoCytomation,<br />
Glostrup, Denmark], original magnification ×40).<br />
VINTAGE LABEL<br />
Courtesy of BuyEnlarge, Philadelphia, PA<br />
Figure 2E. Epithelioid and giant cells staining positive with<br />
CD68 (CD 68 staining [DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark],<br />
original magnification ×40).<br />
2 Serfling U, Penneys NS, Zhu WY, et al. Varicella-zoster virus DNA in<br />
granulomatous skin lesions following herpes zoster. A study by the polymerase<br />
chain reaction. J Cutan Pathol. 1993;20:28–33.<br />
3 Wakelin SH, Young E, Kelly S, Turner M. Transient leukaemia cutis in<br />
chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1997;22;148–151.<br />
4 Cerroni L, Zenahlik P, Kerl H. Specific cutaneous infiltrates of<br />
B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia arising at the site of herpes<br />
zoster and herpes simplex scars. Cancer. 1995;76:<br />
5<br />
26–31.<br />
Gibney MD, Nahass GT, Leonardi CL. Cutaneous reactions following<br />
herpes zoster infections: report of three cases and a review of the<br />
literature. Br J Dermatol. 1996;134:504–509.<br />
6 Schena D, Barba A, Chieregato C. Granulomatous folliculitis as a manifestation<br />
of post-herpetic isotopic response. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol.<br />
2001;15:473–475.<br />
7 Ruocco V, Ruocco E, Ghersetich I, et al. Isotopic response after herpesvirus<br />
infection: an update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:90–94.<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:50–52 52<br />
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Grand Wailea, Maui <strong>•</strong> <strong>February</strong> 4–8, <strong>2012</strong><br />
Register Now for the 8th Annual Conference!<br />
<strong>February</strong> 4–8, <strong>2012</strong> Grand Wailea : Maui, Hawaii<br />
Plan to attend the 8th Annual Maui Derm Conference! “Cutting<br />
edge, a great blend of science and clinical medicine and a world<br />
class faculty” describe Maui Derm <strong>2012</strong>. Our faculty will share with<br />
you the most important developments in medical and cosmetic<br />
dermatology vital to your practice. Our live patient demonstration<br />
workshops in lasers, Botulinum Toxin A and fi llers have set<br />
the standard for “hands on” workshops. Our format has been<br />
specifi cally designed to allow optimal time for discussion with our<br />
faculty.We are certain that you will fi nd this to be an outstanding<br />
and memorable educational event that you will not want to miss.<br />
Put Maui Derm on your calendar for <strong>2012</strong>!<br />
Featured Lectures<br />
Hot Topics <strong>•</strong> Cases for the Panel <strong>•</strong><br />
Seminars <strong>•</strong> Workshops <strong>•</strong> Basic Science<br />
Medical Dermatology: Basic Science, Hot Topics, Cases for<br />
the Panel, Point:Counterpoint, Seminars, “How I Do It”<br />
Cutaneous Oncology <strong>•</strong> Acne/Rosacea <strong>•</strong> Pediatric Dermatology <strong>•</strong> Infectious Diseases<br />
Psoriasis <strong>•</strong> Skin of Color <strong>•</strong> Life Threatening Dermatoses <strong>•</strong> Master’s CPC <strong>•</strong> Offi ce<br />
Surgery <strong>•</strong> Practice Management<br />
Cosmetic Dermatology: From Basic Science to Case Based<br />
Discussion and “How I Do It”<br />
Botulinum Toxin A and Fillers <strong>•</strong> Lasers <strong>•</strong> Sclerotherapy<br />
“Lunch with the Faculty” –<br />
Controversial Topics, Case-based Discussions<br />
Interactive Workshops<br />
Small Group, Live Patient, Hands-On Demonstrations: Botulinum Toxins/Fillers,<br />
Sclerotherapy<br />
<strong>2012</strong> Faculty *<br />
Matthew Avram, MD<br />
Neal Bhatia, MD<br />
Andrew Blauvelt, MD<br />
Valerie Callender, MD<br />
Joel Cohen, MD<br />
Lawrence Eichenfi eld, MD<br />
Rebecca Fitzgerald, MD<br />
Keith T. Flaherty, MD<br />
Sheila Friedlander Fallon, MD<br />
Ilona Frieden, MD<br />
Michael Gold, MD<br />
Mitchel Goldman, MD<br />
Pearl Grimes. MD<br />
Derek Jones, MD<br />
Arthur Kavanaugh, MD<br />
Suzanne Kilmer, MD<br />
David Laub, MD<br />
Philip LeBoit, MD<br />
Craig Leonardi, MD<br />
Stuart Maddin, MD<br />
Ashfaq Marghoob, MD<br />
Chairman:<br />
Dr. George Martin<br />
20<br />
12<br />
Sam Moschella, MD<br />
Stuart Nelson, MD<br />
Kevin Pinski, MD<br />
Phoebe Rich, MD<br />
Ted Rosen, MD<br />
E. Vic Ross, MD<br />
Alan Shalita, MD<br />
Ava Shamban, MD<br />
Daniel Siegel, MD<br />
Eggert Stockfl eth, MD<br />
Bruce Strober, MD, PhD<br />
Neil Swanson, MD<br />
James Treat, MD<br />
Hensin Tsao, MD<br />
Sandy Tsao, MD<br />
Guy Webster, MD, PhD<br />
Wm. Philip Werschler, MD<br />
John Zone, MD<br />
* Subject to Change<br />
MAUI DERM <strong>2012</strong><br />
HAS SPECIAL/REDUCED RATES AT THE<br />
Grand Wailea and the Wailea Marriott<br />
For more details, visit our website at<br />
www.acmd-derm-hawaii.com
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />
MYCOBACTERIUM MARINUM CUTANEOUS<br />
INFECTION WITH SPOROTRICHOID DISTRIBUTION<br />
TREATED WITH AZITHROMYCIN MONOTHERAPY<br />
To the Editor:<br />
Mycobacterium marinum is an aerobic, waterborne mycobacterium<br />
commonly found in nonchlorinated water in a worldwide<br />
distribution. It is also the most common atypical Mycobacterium<br />
to cause infection in humans. Infection is not transmittable<br />
from person to person, and skin infections due to M marinum<br />
are rare. 1<br />
There is no established treatment of choice for M marinum<br />
infection, probably because it is a multidrug-resistant species.<br />
Its treatment has been based primarily on personal experience<br />
without the benefit of large studies. 2 To our knowledge, this is<br />
the first case of cutaneous M marinum infection treated with<br />
azithromycin monotherapy.<br />
A 52-year-old-woman, a cleaning worker in our hospital, was<br />
referred to our department because of the appearance of red<br />
nodules on the left palm and left forearm in a sporotrichoid<br />
distribution (Figure 1). She mentioned that the first lesion<br />
appeared on her hand 6 months previously and new lesions<br />
gradually appeared and increased in number and size during this<br />
period. She also reported a private fish aquarium usually cleaned<br />
by her without using hand protection. The remainder of her<br />
medical history was unremarkable.<br />
Figure 1. Mycobacterium marinum skin infection of the left<br />
palm with sporotrichoid distribution on the left forearm.<br />
CORRESPONDENCE<br />
Routine laboratory tests including human immunodeficiency<br />
virus test were within normal limits. The patient underwent<br />
surgical skin biopsy of the nodule of the forearm, and histologic<br />
examination revealed the presence of tuberculoid structures with<br />
neutrophils and macrophages (Figure 2). Results from periodic<br />
acid-Schiff and Ziehl-Neelsen stains were negative. Cultures taken<br />
from the lesions were negative for bacilli or atypical mycobacteria.<br />
Chest and right hand radiological evaluations were normal. The<br />
patient reported an episode of headache after doxycycline intake,<br />
a ciprofloxacin-associated morbilliform eruption, and frequent<br />
gastrointestinal symptoms after drug administration. She told<br />
us she could receive azithromycin without a problem; therefore,<br />
we decided to try azithromycin 500 mg (tabs Zinfect<br />
500 mg, Verisfield, Athens, Greece) 3 times a week for 2 months<br />
and re-evaluation. To our surprise, complete clinical cure was<br />
obtained after 8 weeks of treatment (Figure 3). No relapse has been<br />
observed after <strong>10</strong> months of follow-up.<br />
M marinum infection, also called “fish tank granuloma,”<br />
“aquarium granuloma,” or “swimming pool granuloma” seems to<br />
represent an opportunistic disease and occurs after approximately<br />
2 weeks of direct (traumatic) inoculation of the organism either<br />
from fish fins and bites or from the handling of aquariums. 1<br />
Solitary red-to-violaceous plaques or nodules with an overlying<br />
crust or verrucous and/or ulcerate surface is a common clinical<br />
presentation in immunocompetent patients. Inflammatory<br />
Figure 2. Histologic examination revealed the presence of<br />
tuberculoid structures (hematoxylin and eosin stain, original<br />
magnification ×<strong>10</strong>0).<br />
<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:54–55 54<br />
© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC
<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
nodules, abscesses with a sporotrichotic type of distribution,<br />
followed by nodular lymphangitis can develop in severely immunosuppressed<br />
patients. 3 Over a period of months, involvement<br />
of deeper soft tissues (tenosynovitis, arthritis, bursitis, and/or<br />
osteomyelitis of the underlying bone) may be life- threatening. 4<br />
Lesions may be either painful or painless. Lung involvement,<br />
disseminated infection, and bacteremia have been rarely<br />
reported. 1<br />
The organism can be isolated from the lesion as well as from<br />
infected fish or aquariums; however, in clinical practice,<br />
diagnosis remains largely presumptive based on clinicohistologic<br />
features. Histopathologic examination usually reveals a nonspecific<br />
inflammatory infiltrate. 1<br />
Treatment of M marinum infections is challenging. In superficial<br />
cutaneous infections, minocycline, clarithromycin, doxycycline,<br />
Figure 3. Complete clearance of the lesions was achieved<br />
after 8 weeks of azithromycin treatment.<br />
55<br />
CORRESPONDENCE<br />
trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole, and ciprofloxacine as monotherapy<br />
are usually effective treatment options. In severe infections,<br />
a combination of rifampicin and ethambutol seems to be<br />
the recommended regimen. Surgical treatment is usually unnecessary,<br />
and where it should be performed must be cautiously<br />
determined. 1,2<br />
Azithromycin shows good response in vitro against other than<br />
Mycobacterium tuberculosis mycobacteria. There is only one<br />
case of M marinum infection in a patient who underwent lung<br />
transplantation successfully treated with surgical removal of the<br />
lesions and a 12-month administration of a combination of<br />
azithromycin and ethambutol. 5<br />
Azithromycin seems to be a promising option to treat M marinum<br />
skin infections, although, further studies—or at least cases—are<br />
needed to establish the effectiveness of the drug.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
FORMULARY OF DR GEORGE C. ANDREWS<br />
Nail Bleach<br />
Oxalic acid Gm xxx<br />
Distilled water 2000 cc<br />
Perfume Qs ad<br />
The above may be irritating—ingredients should be on<br />
poison label with a word of caution.<br />
Submitted by Douglas D. Altchek, MD, New York, NY<br />
1 Rallis E, Koumantaki-Mathioudaki E. Treatment of Mycobacterium<br />
marinum cutaneous infections. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2007;8:<br />
2965–2978.<br />
2 Edelstein H. Mycobacterium marinum skin infections. Report of<br />
31 cases and review of the literature. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:<br />
1359–1364.<br />
3 Bartralot R, Garcia-Patos V, Sitjas, et al. Clinical patterns of cutaneous<br />
nontuberculous mycobacterial infections. Br J Dermatol.<br />
2005;152:727–734.<br />
4 Wu TS,Chiu CH,Su LH et al. Mycobacterium marinum infection in Taiwan.<br />
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2002;35:42–46.<br />
5 Torres F, Hodges T, Zamora MR. Mycobacterium marinum infection<br />
in a lung transplant recipient. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001;20:<br />
486–489.<br />
—Efstathios Rallis, MD, PhD, Department of Dermatology, Veterans<br />
Administration Hospital (NIMTS), Athens, <strong>•</strong> E-mail: efrall@otenet.gr;<br />
Evangelos Falidas, MD, 1st Department of General Surgery, Veterans<br />
Administration Hospital (NIMTS), Athens; Panagiotis Stavropoulos, MD,<br />
PhD, Department of Dermatology, University of Athens, “A.Syggros”<br />
Hospital, Athens, Greece
THE Aesthetic Show<br />
of the Year<br />
Register with Promo Code TAS3AD:<br />
������������������������������������<br />
����������������������������������������������������<br />
���������������������������Aesthetic TV<br />
World-Class Faculty<br />
Pre-Show Educational Sessions<br />
Advanced Hands-On Training<br />
THE Aesthetic Awards<br />
Patient Tx Workshops<br />
TM<br />
To register visit www.aestheticshow.com or call + 1 (949) 830-5409
CANCUN CANCUN <strong>2012</strong><br />
<strong>2012</strong><br />
<strong>January</strong> 31st to <strong>February</strong> 4th<br />
Cancun Quintana Roo, Mexico<br />
www.WCOCD<strong>2012</strong>.com<br />
info@WCOCD<strong>2012</strong>.com<br />
+ (52 55) 5531- 0865<br />
+ (52 55) 5203- 6454<br />
Abstract submission deadline:<br />
October 30th, 2011
�������������������������������<br />
������������������������������������������������<br />
���������������������<br />
��������������������<br />
����������������<br />
������������������������<br />
���������������<br />
�������������<br />
��������������������������������������<br />
��������������������������������<br />
������������������������������<br />
����������������������<br />
������������������<br />
���������������������<br />
��������������<br />
�������������������������<br />
�������������<br />
������������������������<br />
������������������<br />
����������������������<br />
�������������������������<br />
������������������<br />
��������<br />
�<br />
����������������������������������������<br />
�������������������������������<br />
���� �������<br />
�������������������<br />
�����������������<br />
��������������������<br />
���������������������<br />
����������������<br />
�����������������������<br />
�������������������
Locoid Lipocream ® Cream, 0.1% Rx Only<br />
(hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1% cream)<br />
For Topical Use Only<br />
BRIEF SUMMARY<br />
INDICATIONS AND USAGE<br />
Locoid Lipocream is a topical corticosteroid indicated for: relief of the inflammatory<br />
and pruritic manifestations of corticosteroid-responsive dermatoses in adults and<br />
the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis in patients 3 months to 18 years<br />
of age.<br />
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS<br />
Reversible hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis suppression may occur, with<br />
the potential for glucocorticosteroid insufficiency. Consider periodic evaluations for<br />
HPA axis suppression if Locoid Lipocream is applied to large surface areas or used<br />
under occlusion. If HPA axis suppression is noted, reduce the application frequency,<br />
discontinue use, or switch to a lower potency corticosteroid.<br />
Systemic effects of topical corticosteroids may also include manifestations of<br />
Cushing’s syndrome, hyperglycemia, and glucosuria.<br />
Pediatric patients may be more susceptible to systemic toxicity due to their larger<br />
skin surface-to-body-mass ratios.<br />
Initiate appropriate therapy if concomitant skin infections develop.<br />
Discontinue use if irritation develops.<br />
ADVERSE REACTIONS<br />
The most common adverse reactions (>1%) are HPA axis suppression and<br />
application site reactions.<br />
The following additional local adverse reactions have been reported infrequently<br />
with topical corticosteroids, and they may occur more frequently with the use of<br />
occlusive dressings and higher potency corticosteroids. These reactions included:<br />
irritation, folliculitis, acneiform eruptions, hypopigmentation, perioral dermatitis,<br />
allergic contact dermatitis, secondary infection, skin atrophy, striae, miliaria and<br />
telangiectasia.<br />
USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS<br />
Pregnancy<br />
Pregnancy Category C. Corticosteroids have been shown to be teratogenic in<br />
laboratory animals when administered systemically at relatively low dosage levels.<br />
Some corticosteroids have been shown to be teratogenic after dermal application<br />
in laboratory animals.There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in<br />
pregnant women. Therefore, Locoid Lipocream should be used during pregnancy<br />
only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus.<br />
Please refer to full prescribing information for detailed information regarding<br />
systemic embryofetal development studies.<br />
Nursing Mothers<br />
Systemically administered corticosteroids appear in human milk and could<br />
suppress growth, interfere with endogenous corticosteroid production, or cause<br />
other untoward effects. It is not known whether topical administration of<br />
corticosteroids could result in sufficient systemic absorption to produce detectable<br />
quantities in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution<br />
should be exercised when Locoid Lipocream is administered to a nursing woman.<br />
Pediatric Use<br />
Safety and efficacy in pediatric patients below 3 months of age have not been<br />
established.<br />
Because of higher skin surface-to-body-mass ratios, pediatric patients are at a<br />
greater risk than adults of HPA axis suppression when they are treated with topical<br />
corticosteroids. They are therefore also at a greater risk of glucocorticosteroid<br />
insufficiency after withdrawal of treatment and of Cushing’s syndrome while on<br />
treatment.<br />
Eighty-six (86) pediatric subjects (5 months to less than 18 years of age) with<br />
moderate to severe atopic dermatitis affecting at least 25% of body surface area<br />
(BSA) treated with Locoid Lipocream three times daily for up to 4 weeks were<br />
assessed for HPA axis suppression. The disease severity (moderate to severe<br />
atopic dermatitis) and the dosing regimen (three times daily) in this HPA axis study<br />
were different from the subject population (mild to moderate atopic dermatitis) and<br />
the dosing regimen (two times daily) for which Locoid Lipocream is indicated.<br />
Five of the 82 evaluable subjects (6.1%) demonstrated laboratory evidence of<br />
suppression, where the sole criterion for defining HPA axis suppression was a<br />
serum cortisol level of less than or equal to 18 micrograms per deciliter after<br />
cosyntropin stimulation. Suppressed subjects ranged in age from 5 months to<br />
16 years and, at the time of enrollment, had 25% to 95% BSA involvement. These<br />
subjects did not develop any other signs or symptoms of HPA axis suppression.<br />
At the first follow up visit, approximately one month after the conclusion of<br />
treatment, cosyntropin stimulation results of all subjects had returned to normal,<br />
with the exception of one subject. This last subject recovered adrenal function by<br />
the second post treatment visit, 65 days post-treatment.<br />
Cushing’s syndrome, linear growth retardation, delayed weight gain, and<br />
intracranial hypertension have also been reported in pediatric patients receiving<br />
topical corticosteroids. Manifestations of adrenal suppression in pediatric patients<br />
include low plasma cortisol levels to an absence of response to ACTH stimulation.<br />
Manifestations of intracranial hypertension include bulging fontanelles, headaches,<br />
and bilateral papilledema.<br />
Geriatric Use<br />
Clinical studies of Locoid Lipocream did not include sufficient numbers of subjects<br />
aged 65 and over to determine whether they respond differently from younger<br />
subjects.<br />
Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility<br />
No studies were conducted to determine the photococarcinogenic or dermal<br />
carcinogenic potential of Locoid Lipocream.<br />
Hydrocortisone butyrate revealed no evidence of mutagenic or clastogenic<br />
potential based on the results of two in vitro genotoxicity tests (Ames test and<br />
L5178Y/TK + mouse lymphoma assay) and one in vivo genotoxicity test (mouse<br />
micronucleus assay).<br />
No evidence of impairment of fertility or effect on mating performance was<br />
observed in a fertility and general reproductive performance study conducted in<br />
male and female rats at subcutaneous doses up to and including 1.8 mg/kg/day<br />
(0.7X maximum topical human dose [MTHD]). Mild effects on maternal animals,<br />
such as reduced food consumption and a subsequent reduction in body weight gain,<br />
were seen at doses ≥0.6 mg/kg/day (0.2X MTHD).<br />
PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION<br />
Patients using Locoid Lipocream should receive the following information<br />
and instructions:<br />
Apply a thin layer to the affected skin two or three times daily for corticosteroidresponsive<br />
dermatoses in adults. Consult with your physician to determine if<br />
treatment is needed beyond 2 weeks. Apply a thin film to the affected skin areas<br />
two times daily for atopic dermatitis in patients 3 months of age and older.<br />
Safety of Locoid Lipocream in pediatric patients has not been established beyond 4<br />
weeks of use.<br />
Rub in gently.<br />
Avoid contact with the eyes.<br />
Do not bandage, otherwise cover, or wrap the affected skin area so as to be<br />
occlusive unless directed by your physician.<br />
Do not use Locoid Lipocream in the diaper area, as diapers or plastic pants may<br />
constitute occlusive dressings.<br />
Do not use Locoid Lipocream on the face, underarms, or groin areas unless<br />
directed by your physician.<br />
If no improvement is seen within 2 weeks, contact your physician.<br />
Do not use other corticosteroid-containing products while using Locoid Lipocream<br />
without first consulting your physician.<br />
Store at 25°C (77°F); excursions permitted to 15-30°C (59-86°F) [see USP Controlled<br />
Room Temperature]. Protect from freezing. Keep out of the reach of children.<br />
Manufactured for: Triax Pharmaceuticals, LLC<br />
Cranford NJ 07016<br />
By: Ferndale Laboratories, Inc.<br />
Ferndale MI 48220<br />
Locoid Lipocream is a registered trademark of<br />
Astellas Pharma Europe BV licensed to<br />
Triax Pharmaceuticals, LLC.<br />
Marketed and Distributed By:<br />
Triax Pharmaceuticals, LLC<br />
Cranford NJ 07016<br />
www.Locoid.com<br />
131B301<br />
Rev 11/09
Now younger eczema<br />
patients have something<br />
to smile about<br />
Now approved for use in children<br />
down to 3 months of age<br />
The power of an ointment with the elegance of a cream<br />
Locoid Lipocream is indicated for the relief of the inflammatory and pruritic manifestations of corticosteroid-responsive dermatoses,<br />
including the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis in patients 3 months of age and older.<br />
Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients below 3 months of age have not been established.<br />
Reversible HPA axis suppression may occur, with the potential for corticosteroid insufficiency. Consider periodic evaluations for HPA<br />
axis suppression if applied to large surface areas or used under occlusion . Systemic effects of topical corticosteroids may also include<br />
manifestations of Cushing’s syndrome, hyperglycemia, and glucosuria. Pediatric patients may be more susceptible to systemic toxicity<br />
due to their large skin surface-to-body-mass ratios. Initiate appropriate therapy if concomitant skin infection develops. Discontinue use<br />
if irritation develops. Please see full Prescribing Information on adjacent page. Visit us at www.locoid.com<br />
(hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1%) Cream<br />
©20<strong>10</strong> Triax Pharmaceuticals, LLC. All rights reserved. Locoid is a registered trademark of Astellas Pharma Europe B.V. licensed to Triax Pharmaceuticals, LLC. LOC-04<strong>10</strong>-01