17.12.2012 Views

January/February 2012 • Volume 10 • Issue 1 - SKINmed Journal

January/February 2012 • Volume 10 • Issue 1 - SKINmed Journal

January/February 2012 • Volume 10 • Issue 1 - SKINmed Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EDITORIAL<br />

Modesty and the Skin: Why They Shouldn’t Mix<br />

Campbell and Parish<br />

COMMENTARY<br />

Origin and Evolution of Syphilis: Drifting Myth<br />

Sehgal, Verma, Chatterjee, Chaudhuri, Chatterjee, and Rasool<br />

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS<br />

A New Paradigm in the Treatment of Kerions:<br />

Treat the Inflammation<br />

Dolder, O’Neill, O’Brien, Ross, Allen, and Allen<br />

Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris: Evolution of Challenges in<br />

Promising Treatment Options<br />

Sehgal, Srivastava, and Verma<br />

REVIEW<br />

The Role of Surgical Debridement in Healing of<br />

Diabetic Foot Ulcers<br />

Gordon, Lebrun, Tomic-Canic, and Kirsner<br />

CORE CURRICULUM<br />

Cutaneous Tuberculosis: A Diagnostic Dilemma<br />

Sehgal, Verma, Bhattacharya, Sharma, Singh, and Verma<br />

DEPARTMENTS<br />

COSMETIC SCIENCE<br />

Repelling Insects With Safe and Effective<br />

Alternatives to DEET<br />

Epstein<br />

<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />

PERILS OF DERMATOPATHOLOGY<br />

It’s Not Just Who You Are, It’s Also Where You Are:<br />

The Cutaneous Leiomyosarcoma Dilemma<br />

Tumer, Castilla, and Lambert<br />

INFECTIOUS DISEASE CAPSULE<br />

It May Be Vulgar, but It Isn’t a Bad Word<br />

Saunders, Herchline, and Bernstein<br />

CASE STUDIES<br />

Unusually Severe Case of Dermatosis Neglecta<br />

Turrentine, Blalock, and Davis<br />

Fixed-Drug Eruption Caused by Ashwagandha<br />

(Withania somnifera): A Widely Used Ayurvedic Drug<br />

Sehgal, Verma, and Bhattacharya<br />

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Revealed by a<br />

Granulomatous Zosteriform Eruption<br />

Trojjet, Hammami, Zaraa, Bouzguarrou, Joens,<br />

Haouet, Osman, and Mokni<br />

CORRESPONDENCE<br />

Mycobacterium marinum Cutaneous Infection<br />

With Sporotrichoid Distribution Treated With<br />

Azithromycin Monotherapy<br />

Rallis, Falidas, and Stavropoulos


DIFFERIN ® (adapalene) LOTION, 0.1%—<br />

THE ONLY RETINOID IN A LOTION FORMULATION<br />

ON THE JOB<br />

WITH GENTLE EFFICACY 1<br />

RESULTS PATIENTS WANT IN A FORMULATION THAT DOES THE WORK—<br />

PRESCRIBE DIFFERIN ® LOTION, 0.1% TODAY!<br />

* A 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of patients 12 to 18 years of age with acne vulgaris (N=<strong>10</strong>75).<br />

† The most frequent adverse event reported was dryness. Erythema, stinging/burning, and scaling may also occur. 1<br />

Important Safety Information<br />

Differin ® Lotion, 0.1% is indicated for the topical treatment of acne vulgaris in patients 12 years and older. A thin fi lm of<br />

Differin ® Lotion, 0.1% should be applied once per day to the face and other areas of the skin affected by acne. In clinical<br />

trials, the most common adverse event (>1%) reported with use of Differin ® Lotion, 0.1% was mild to moderate skin dryness.<br />

Erythema, scaling, stinging and burning may also occur. Excessive exposure to sunlight and sunlamps should be avoided<br />

during treatment, and use of sunscreen products and protective clothing is recommended. Concomitant use of drying or<br />

irritating topical products (like products containing resorcinol, salicylic acid or sulfur) should be used with caution. Instruct<br />

patients to avoid the eyes, lips and mucous membranes when applying Differin ® Lotion, 0.1%, and not to apply to areas<br />

that have been depilated with wax products. Differin ® Lotion, 0.1% has not been tested in pregnant or nursing women,<br />

or with the elderly. Pregnancy Category C.<br />

www.differin.com/HCP<br />

Please see Brief Summary<br />

of Prescribing Information<br />

on adjacent page.<br />

58.2% MEDIAN TOTAL LESION COUNT<br />

REDUCTION BY WEEK 12 1 *<br />

TOLERABILITY PROFILE SIMILAR TO<br />

DIFFERIN ® (adapalene) CREAM, 0.1% 1†<br />

AVAILABLE IN AN EASY-TO-USE<br />

PUMP DISPENSER


DIFFERIN ®<br />

Rx only<br />

(adapalene) Lotion 0.1%<br />

For Topical Use Only<br />

Not For Oral, Ophthalmic, or Intravaginal Use.<br />

BRIEF SUMMARY<br />

INDICATIONS AND USAGE<br />

DIFFERIN Lotion is a retinoid product indicated for the topical treatment of<br />

acne vulgaris in patients 12 years and older.<br />

CONTRAINDICATIONS<br />

None.<br />

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS<br />

Ultraviolet Light and Environmental Exposure: Avoid exposure to sunlight<br />

and sunlamps. Wear sunscreen when sun exposure cannot be avoided.<br />

Erythema, scaling, dryness, and stinging/burning may occur with use of<br />

DIFFERIN Lotion.<br />

ADVERSE REACTIONS<br />

Dry skin of mild to moderate severity was the most frequently reported<br />

(≥ 1%) treatment related adverse event. Erythema, scaling, dryness,<br />

burning/stinging were also seen during treatment.<br />

DRUG INTERACTIONS<br />

Concomitant use of topical products with a strong drying effect can increase<br />

skin irritation. Use with caution, especially in using preparations containing<br />

sulfur, resorcinol, or salicylic acid in combination with DIFFERIN Lotion. Wax<br />

depilation should not be performed on treated skin.<br />

Pregnancy<br />

Pregnancy Category C. There are no well-controlled trials in pregnant women<br />

treated with DIFFERIN Lotion. Therefore, DIFFERIN Lotion should be<br />

used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk<br />

to the fetus. Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with<br />

DIFFERIN Lotion. Furthermore, such studies are not always predictive of<br />

human response.<br />

Human Data<br />

In clinical trials involving DIFFERIN Lotion, 0.1% in the treatment of acne<br />

vulgaris, women of childbearing potential initiated treatment only after a<br />

negative pregnancy test. Two women became pregnant while using DIFFERIN<br />

Lotion, 0.1%. One patient delivered a healthy full term baby and the other<br />

patient electively terminated her pregnancy.<br />

Animal Data<br />

No teratogenic effects were observed in rats treated with oral doses of 0.15<br />

to 5.0 mg adapalene/kg/day, up to 25 times (mg/m2 /day) the maximum<br />

recommended human dose (MRHD) of 2 grams of DIFFERIN Lotion.<br />

However, teratogenic changes were observed in rats and rabbits when treated<br />

with oral doses of ≥ 25 mg adapalene/kg/day representing 123 and 246 times<br />

MRHD, respectively. Findings included cleft palate, microphthalmia,<br />

encephalocele and skeletal abnormalities in rats; and umbilical hernia,<br />

exophthalmos and kidney and skeletal abnormalities in rabbits.<br />

Dermal teratology studies conducted in rats and rabbits at doses of 0.6-<br />

6.0 mg adapalene/kg/day [25-59 times (mg/m2 ) the MRHD] exhibited no<br />

fetotoxicity and only minimal increases in supernumerary ribs in both species<br />

and delayed ossification in rabbits.<br />

Systemic exposure (AUC 0-24h) to adapalene at topical doses<br />

(6.0 mg/kg/day) in rats represented <strong>10</strong>1 times the exposure to adapalene in<br />

patients with acne treated with DIFFERIN Lotion applied to the face, chest<br />

and back (2 grams applied to <strong>10</strong>00 cm² of acne-involved skin).<br />

Nursing Mothers<br />

It is not known whether adapalene is excreted in human milk following<br />

use of DIFFERIN Lotion. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk,<br />

caution should be exercised when DIFFERIN Lotion is administered to a<br />

nursing woman.<br />

Pediatric Use<br />

Safety and effectiveness of DIFFERIN Lotion in pediatric patients under the<br />

age of 12 have not been established.<br />

Geriatric Use<br />

Clinical studies of DIFFERIN Lotion did not include sufficient numbers of<br />

subjects aged 65 and over to determine whether they respond differently<br />

from younger subjects.<br />

Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility<br />

No carcinogenicity, mutagenicity and impairment of fertility studies were<br />

conducted with DIFFERIN Lotion.<br />

Carcinogenicity studies with adapalene have been conducted in mice at<br />

topical doses of 0.4, 1.3, and 4.0 mg/kg/day (1.2, 3.9, and 12 mg/m²/day),<br />

and in rats at oral doses of 0.15, 0.5, and 1.5 mg/kg/day (0.9, 3.0, and<br />

9.0 mg/m 2 /day). In terms of body surface area, the highest dose levels are<br />

9.8 (mice) and 7.4 times (rats) the MRHD of 2 grams of DIFFERIN Lotion.<br />

In the rat study, an increased incidence of benign and malignant<br />

pheochromocytomas in the adrenal medulla of male rats was observed.<br />

No photocarcinogenicity studies were conducted with adapalene. However,<br />

animal studies have shown an increased tumorigenic risk with the use<br />

of pharmacologically similar drugs (e.g. retinoids) when exposed to UV<br />

irradiation in the laboratory or sunlight. Although the significance of these<br />

findings to humans is not clear, patients should be advised to avoid or<br />

minimize exposure to either sunlight or artificial irradiation sources.<br />

Adapalene did not exhibit mutagenic or genotoxic effects in vitro (Ames test,<br />

Chinese hamster ovary cell assay, mouse lymphoma TK assay) or in vivo<br />

(mouse micronucleus test).<br />

In rat oral studies, 20 mg adapalene/kg/day (120 mg/m 2 /day; 98 times the<br />

MRHD based on mg/m 2 /day comparison) did not affect the reproductive<br />

performance and fertility of F 0 males and females, or growth, development<br />

and reproductive function of F 1 offspring.<br />

PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION<br />

<strong>•</strong> Apply a thin film of DIFFERIN Lotion to the affected areas of the skin once<br />

daily, after washing gently with a mild soapless cleanser. Dispense a nickel<br />

size amount of DIFFERIN Lotion (3-4 actuations of the pump) to cover the<br />

entire face. Avoid application to the areas of skin around eyes, lips and<br />

mucous membranes. DIFFERIN Lotion may cause irritation such as<br />

erythema, scaling, dryness, stinging or burning.<br />

<strong>•</strong> Advise patients to cleanse the area to be treated with a mild or soapless<br />

cleanser; pat dry. Apply DIFFERIN Lotion to the entire face or other<br />

acne affected areas as a thin layer, avoiding the eyes, lips and mucous<br />

membranes.<br />

<strong>•</strong> Exposure of the eye to this medication may result in reactions such as<br />

swelling, conjunctivitis and eye irritation.<br />

<strong>•</strong> Patients should be advised not to use more than the recommended amount<br />

and not to apply more than once daily as this will not produce faster<br />

results, but may increase irritation.<br />

<strong>•</strong> Advise patients to minimize exposure to sunlight including sunlamps.<br />

Recommend the use of sunscreen products and protective apparel<br />

(e.g., hat) when exposure cannot be avoided.<br />

<strong>•</strong> Moisturizers may be used if necessary; however, products containing alpha<br />

hydroxy or glycolic acids should be avoided.<br />

<strong>•</strong> This medication should not be applied to cuts, abrasions, eczematous, or<br />

sunburned skin.<br />

<strong>•</strong> Wax depilation should not be performed on treated skin due to the<br />

potential for skin erosions.<br />

<strong>•</strong> This product is for external use only.<br />

Marketed by:<br />

GALDERMA LABORATORIES, L.P., Fort Worth, Texas 76177 USA<br />

Manufactured by:<br />

Galderma Production Canada Inc., Baie d’Urfé, QC, H9X 3S4 Canada<br />

Made in Canada.<br />

GALDERMA is a registered trademark.<br />

P51503-0<br />

Revised: March 20<strong>10</strong><br />

Reference: 1. Data on file. Galderma Laboratories, L.P.<br />

Galderma is a registered trademark.<br />

©20<strong>10</strong> Galderma Laboratories, L.P.<br />

Galderma Laboratories, L.P.<br />

14501 N. Freeway<br />

Fort Worth, TX 76177<br />

DIFF-113 Printed in USA 09/<strong>10</strong><br />

www.differin.com/HCP


EDITORIAL<br />

2<br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />

Modesty and the Skin: Why They Shouldn’t Mix ................................................................................................ 6<br />

Caren Campbell, BA; Lawrence Charles Parish, MD, MD (Hon)<br />

COMMENTARY<br />

Origin and Evolution of Syphilis: Drifting Myth .................................................................................................. 8<br />

Virendra N. Sehgal, MD; Prashant Verma, MD; Kingshuk Chatterjee, MBBS; Anita Chaudhuri, MD; Gautam Chatterjee, MS; Farhan Rasool, MBBS<br />

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS<br />

REVIEW<br />

A New Paradigm in the Treatment of Kerions: Treat the Inflammation ............................................................. 14<br />

Sarah E. Dolder, MD; Brendan J. O’Neill, MD; Meghan M. O’Brien, MD; Amy S. Ross, MD; Robert A. Allen, MD; Herbert B. Allen, MD<br />

Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris: Evolution of Challenges in Promising Treatment Options ............................................. 18<br />

Virendra N. Sehgal, MD; Govind Srivastava, MD; Prashant Verma, MD<br />

The Role of Surgical Debridement in Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers .............................................................. 24<br />

Katherine A. Gordon, BS; Elizabeth A. Lebrun, MD; Marjana Tomic-Canic, PhD; Robert S. Kirsner, MD, PhD<br />

CORE CURRICULUM<br />

Cutaneous Tuberculosis: A Diagnostic Dilemma ............................................................................................. 28<br />

Virendra N. Sehgal, MD; Prashant Verma, MD; Sambit N. Bhattacharya, MD; Sonal Sharma, MD; Navjeevan Singh, MD; Nishant Verma, MD<br />

Self-Test Review Questions (p. 34)<br />

DEPARTMENTS<br />

COSMETIC SCIENCE<br />

Howard A. Epstein, PhD, Section Editor<br />

Repelling Insects With Safe and Effective Alternatives to DEET ....................................................................... 36<br />

Howard A. Epstein, PhD<br />

PERILS OF DERMATOPATHOLOGY<br />

W. Clark Lambert, MD, PhD, Section Editor<br />

It’s Not Just Who You Are, It’s Also Where You Are: The Cutaneous Leiomyosarcoma Dilemma ......................... 40<br />

Gizem Tumer, MD; Carmen F. Castilla, BS; W. Clark Lambert, MD, PhD<br />

INFECTIOUS DISEASE CAPSULE<br />

Jack M. Bernstein, MD, Section Editor<br />

It May Be Vulgar, but It Isn’t a Bad Word......................................................................................................... 42<br />

David Saunders, MD;Thomas Herchline, MD; Jack M. Bernstein, MD<br />

CASE STUDIES<br />

Vesna Petronic-Rosic, MD, MSc, Section Editor<br />

Unusually Severe Case of Dermatosis Neglecta .............................................................................................. 46<br />

Jake E. Turrentine, BS; Travis W. Blalock, MD; Loretta S. Davis, MD<br />

Fixed-Drug Eruption Caused by Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera): A Widely Used Ayurvedic Drug ................ 48<br />

Virendra N. Sehgal, MD; Prashant Verma, MD; Sambit N. Bhattacharya, MD


3<br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Revealed by a Granulomatous Zosteriform Eruption ....................................... 50<br />

Sondes Trojjet, MD; Houda Hammami, MD; Inès Zaraa, MD; Alia Bouzguarrou, MD; Meriem Joens, MD; Slim Haouet, MD;<br />

Amel Ben Osman, MD; Mourad Mokni, MD<br />

CORRESPONDENCE<br />

Mycobacterium marinum Cutaneous Infection With Sporotrichoid Distribution Treated With<br />

Azithromycin Monotherapy ............................................................................................................................ 54<br />

Efstathios Rallis, MD, PhD; Evangelos Falidas, MD; Panagiotis Stavropoulos, MD, PhD<br />

ABOUT OUR JOURNAL<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>: Dermatology for the Clinician®, print ISSN 1540-9740, online<br />

ISSN 1751-7125, is published bimonthly by Pulse Marketing & Communications,<br />

LLC, located at 4 Peninsula Avenue, Sea Bright, NJ 07760.<br />

Printed in the USA.<br />

Disclaimer: The Publisher, Editors, and Editorial Board cannot be held<br />

responsible for errors or any consequences arising from the use of information<br />

contained in this journal; the views and opinions expressed herein<br />

do not necessarily reflect those of the Publisher, Editors, and Editorial<br />

Board, neither does the publication of advertisements constitute any endorsement<br />

by the Publisher, Editors, and Editorial Board of the products<br />

or services advertised. The Publisher, Editors, Editorial Board, Reviewers,<br />

Authors, and Affiliated Agents shall not be held responsible or in any way<br />

liable for the continued accuracy of the information or for any errors,<br />

inaccuracies, or omissions of any kind in this publication, whether arising<br />

from negligence or otherwise, or for any consequences arising thereafter.<br />

Copyright: © <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC. All rights<br />

reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted<br />

in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing<br />

from the Publisher. Requests should be addressed to the Permissions<br />

Editor at: Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC, 4 Peninsula Avenue,<br />

Sea Bright, NJ 07760.<br />

Abstracting & Indexing: The journal is indexed in Index Medicus/<br />

MEDLINE and Embase.<br />

To submit a manuscript for peer review, send as an e-mail attachment<br />

to the Editor in Chief at lparish@skinmedjournal.com. Please<br />

visit www.skinmedjournal.com for Information for Authors.<br />

EDITORIAL DIRECTOR<br />

Sarah D. Staats<br />

sstaats@skinmedjournal.com<br />

PUBLISHER<br />

Art Kalaka<br />

PRESIDENT<br />

Arthur Kalaka<br />

akalaka@skinmedjournal.com<br />

Editorial<br />

MEDIA WEB DIRECTOR<br />

Joan Osgoodby<br />

joan@skinmedjournal.com<br />

Publishing<br />

Corporate<br />

GENERAL COUNSEL<br />

Marianne Mckenzie<br />

mmckenzie@skinmedjournal.com<br />

COPYEDITOR<br />

Elizabeth Holcomb<br />

eholcomb@skinmedjournal.com<br />

ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER<br />

James R. Adams<br />

jadams@skinmedjournal.com<br />

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER<br />

Jo-Ann Kalaka-Adams<br />

jadams@skinmedjournal.com<br />

Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC<br />

4 Peninsula Avenue <strong>•</strong> Suite 401 <strong>•</strong> Sea Bright, NJ 07760<br />

Tel (732) 747-6525 <strong>•</strong> Fax (732) 747-70<strong>10</strong>


William Abramovits, MD<br />

Dallas, TX<br />

Mohamed Amer, MD<br />

Cairo, Egypt<br />

Robert L. Baran, MD<br />

Cannes, France<br />

Anthony V. Benedetto, DO<br />

Philadelphia, PA<br />

Brian Berman, MD, PhD<br />

Miami, FL<br />

Jack M. Bernstein, MD<br />

Dayton, OH<br />

Sarah Brenner, MD<br />

Tel Aviv, Israel<br />

Joaquin Calap Calatayud, MD<br />

Cadiz, Spain<br />

Henry H.L. Chan, MB, MD, PhD, FRCP<br />

Hong Kong, China<br />

Noah Craft, MD, PhD, DTMH<br />

Torrance, CA<br />

Ncoza C. Dlova, MBChB, FCDerm<br />

Durban, South Africa<br />

Richard L. Dobson, MD<br />

Mt Pleasant, SC<br />

William H. Eaglstein, MD<br />

Palo Alto, CA<br />

Boni E. Elewski, MD<br />

Birmingham, AL<br />

Charles N. Ellis, MD<br />

Ann Arbor, MI<br />

<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> EDITORIAL BOARD<br />

Howard A. Epstein, PhD<br />

Gibbstown, NJ<br />

Ibrahim Hassan Galadari, MD, PhD, FRCP<br />

Dubai, United Arab Emirates<br />

Anthony A. Gaspari, MD<br />

Baltimore, MD<br />

Michael Geiges, MD<br />

Zurich, Switzerland<br />

Michael H. Gold, MD<br />

Nashville, TN<br />

Lowell A. Goldsmith, MD, MPH<br />

Chapel Hill, NC<br />

Aditya K. Gupta, MD, PhD, FRCP(C)<br />

London, Ontario<br />

Seung-Kyung Hann, MD, PhD<br />

Seoul, Korea<br />

Roderick J. Hay, BCh, DM, FRCP, FRCPath<br />

London, UK<br />

Tanya R. Humphreys, MD<br />

Philadelphia, PA<br />

Camila K. Janniger, MD<br />

Englewood, NJ<br />

Abdul-Ghani Kibbi, MD<br />

Beirut, Lebanon<br />

Andrew P. Lazar, MD<br />

Highland Park, IL<br />

EDITOR IN CHIEF<br />

Lawrence Charles Parish, MD, MD (Hon)<br />

Philadelphia, PA<br />

W. Clark Lambert, MD, PhD<br />

Newark, NJ<br />

Vesna Petronic-Rosic, MD, MSc<br />

Chicago, IL<br />

DEPUTY EDITORS<br />

EDITORIAL BOARD<br />

4<br />

Larry E. Millikan, MD<br />

Meridian, MS<br />

Marcia Ramos-e-Silva, MD, PhD<br />

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil<br />

Jasna Lipozencic, MD, PhD<br />

Zagreb, Croatia<br />

Eve J. Lowenstein, MD, PhD<br />

New York, NY<br />

George M. Martin, MD<br />

Kihei, HI<br />

Marc S. Micozzi, MD, PhD<br />

Bethesda, MD<br />

George F. Murphy, MD<br />

Boston, MA<br />

Oumeish Youssef Oumeish, MD, FRCP<br />

Amman, Jordan<br />

Joseph L. Pace, MD, FRCP<br />

Naxxar, Malta<br />

Art Papier, MD<br />

Rochester, NY<br />

Johannes Ring, MD, DPhil<br />

Munich, Germany<br />

Roy S. Rogers III, MD<br />

Rochester, MN<br />

Donald Rudikoff, MD<br />

New York, NY<br />

Robert I. Rudolph, MD<br />

Wyomissing, PA<br />

Vincenzo Ruocco, MD<br />

Naples, Italy<br />

Jennifer L. Parish, MD<br />

Philadelphia, PA<br />

Noah S. Scheinfeld, MD, JD<br />

New York, NY<br />

Virendra N. Sehgal, MD<br />

Delhi, India<br />

Charles Steffen, MD<br />

Oceanside, CA<br />

Alexander J. Stratigos, MD<br />

Athens, Greece<br />

James S. Studdiford III, MD<br />

Philadelphia, PA<br />

Robert J. Thomsen, MD<br />

Los Alamos, NM<br />

Julian Trevino, MD<br />

Dayton, OH<br />

Snejina Vassileva, MD, PhD<br />

Sofia, Bulgaria<br />

Daniel Wallach, MD<br />

Paris, France<br />

Michael A. Waugh, MB, FRCP<br />

Leeds, UK<br />

Wm. Philip Werschler, MD<br />

Spokane, WA<br />

Joseph A. Witkowski, MD<br />

Philadelphia, PA<br />

Ronni Wolf, MD<br />

Rechovot, Israel


A New Tretinoin Therapy<br />

From Triax Pharmaceuticals<br />

©20<strong>10</strong> Triax Pharmaceuticals, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Printed in USA TX-06<strong>10</strong>-02<br />

%


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

Modesty and the Skin: Why They Shouldn’t Mix<br />

Caren Campbell, BA; 1 Lawrence Charles Parish, MD, MD (Hon) 2<br />

Some years ago, the American Cancer Society first<br />

mounted a campaign against modesty to publicize the<br />

need for breast examinations. All too often, women<br />

were not only too embarrassed to let their physicians fully<br />

examine their chests, but they were also reluctant to perform<br />

self-examination.<br />

This was not the case of the young woman who presented with<br />

a black lesion on her right breast. She was concerned about the<br />

peculiarity of the lesion since its appearance 2 months prior<br />

(Figure). Fortunately, modesty did not play a role in her situation.<br />

The lesion was quickly excised and proved to be a level<br />

3 melanoma. How many other patients are not so fortunate to<br />

have appropriate removal and treatment before it is too late?<br />

CANCER SCREENING<br />

Americans should be well informed on the importance of early<br />

detection in skin cancer. Much emphasis has been placed on this<br />

concept; however, while patients may be attuned to the idea of<br />

cancer screening for other body systems, they do not grasp the<br />

concept of the full body scan. This diagnostic procedure, needless<br />

to say, cannot be accomplished in a proper fashion without<br />

disrobing, but many patients are reluctant to do so.<br />

As any seasoned clinician can attest, melanomas and nonmelanoma<br />

skin cancers can be found in any area of the body from the<br />

breasts to the soles. They do not avoid the genitalia, let alone the<br />

intertriginous areas. Curiously, primary cutaneous melanomas in<br />

hidden anatomic sites are thicker than those in visible sites, likely<br />

because of a delay in diagnosis. 1,2 Additionally, the problem may<br />

be compounded by UV radiation from indoor tanning. Many a<br />

tanner disrobes completely to obtain his or her money’s worth at<br />

the tanning parlor but is reluctant to have the dermatologist see<br />

most of the body.<br />

MODESTY AT WORK<br />

Let’s reflect upon the skin examination. Isn’t its purpose to<br />

find anything that might create a problem? The reason for the<br />

procedure is to examine visually every skin surface. The act of<br />

wearing any clothing only serves to hinder and prolong the<br />

examination.<br />

Modesty is a behavior, manner, or appearance intended to avoid<br />

impropriety or indecency. During a physical examination, modesty<br />

is not serving to avoid impropriety or indecency. It is a false<br />

modesty. Much like the modesty panel underneath a desk or<br />

nude-colored hosiery worn by women, it is a social construct.<br />

The impropriety and judgment felt by the patient and others is<br />

also created by society.<br />

The subject of modesty has been examined in detail in other<br />

disciplines. For example, one such study on modesty sought to<br />

explore the role that culture played, finding that some perspectives<br />

on modesty are accounted for by culture, while others are<br />

not. 3 Modesty was found to be driven by maturity/age, religion/<br />

culture, or esteem/upbringing. For the maturity-driven group,<br />

modesty did not play a role in the health care setting, while the<br />

religiously/culturally driven group felt modesty should be considered<br />

in a health care setting. (Disrobing in this setting was not<br />

an issue.) Most interestingly, the esteem-driven group posed the<br />

greatest challenge to health care providers, as this group felt it<br />

stressful and uncomfortable to undress in the health care setting<br />

and would likely avoid screening for reasons of modesty.<br />

Although not formally studied, one realizes that body image plays<br />

a large role in patient modesty. Patients worry that as the physician<br />

examines their skin they are secretly being judged on their lingerie<br />

or less-than-ideal body weight. Here, the truth hurts—the clinicians<br />

are doing their job—to screen the patient for skin cancer.<br />

There are many papers detailing ways to protect patient modesty, 4–8<br />

but just as important as the patient’s comfort is the necessity to perform<br />

a thorough examination. The most obvious way to accomplish<br />

an appropriate examination to detect malignancy, including<br />

the scalp, oral cavity, genitals, and nails, would be disrobing. 9<br />

The patient may wear a gown to cover surfaces not being examined.<br />

An alternative involves the patient disrobing one quadrant at a<br />

time. It is both curious and unfortunate when a patient requests a<br />

full body scan but only permits limited views of the skin.<br />

From the Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; 1 and the Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous<br />

Biology, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA2 Address for Correspondence: Lawrence Charles Parish, MD, MD (Hon), 1760 Market Street, Suite 301, Philadelphia, PA 19<strong>10</strong>3<br />

<strong>•</strong> E-mail: larryderm@yahoo.com<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:6–7 6<br />

© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

Figure. A level 3 melanoma found on the right breast.<br />

REFLECTIONS<br />

When reflecting upon the situation, the role of modesty in<br />

prophylactic screening is raised. What stands out is a lack of compliance<br />

in both breast and colon cancer screening due to modesty.<br />

<strong>10</strong>,11 If patients are unwilling to undergo cancer screening<br />

developed for the sole purpose of early detection and prevention,<br />

we can only conclude that modesty should be considered<br />

dangerous to their health.<br />

Skin self-examination is one method that might prove an<br />

alternative for those too modest to allow yearly examination<br />

of the entire skin’s surface. Self-examination taught to<br />

both patient and partner improves self-efficacy for patients. 12<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:6–7<br />

7<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

Partnering with those trusted by the patient might improve<br />

detection and outcomes for patients too modest for frequent<br />

skin examination.<br />

Isn’t there an old adage: Modesty killed the cat?<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Nagore E, Oliver V, Moreno-Picot S, Fortea JM. Primary cutaneous melanoma<br />

in hidden sites is associated with thicker tumours—a study of 829<br />

patients. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:79–82.<br />

2 Hemo Y, Gutman M, Klausner JM. Anatomic site of primary melanoma<br />

is associated with depth of invasion. Arch Surg. 1999;134:148–150.<br />

3 Andrews CS. Defining and exploring modesty in Jewish American<br />

women. J Relig Health. 20<strong>10</strong>. http://www.springerlink.com.proxy1.lib.<br />

tju.edu:2048/content/r666v2x<strong>10</strong>0160487/. Accessed April 23, 2011.<br />

4 Baillie J. Making a difference to the patient experience. Health Estate.<br />

20<strong>10</strong>;64:48–50, 52–55.<br />

5 Wehbe-Alamah H. Bridging generic and professional care practices for<br />

Muslim patients through use of Leininger’s culture care modes. Contemp<br />

Nurse. 2008;28:83–97.<br />

6 Yosef ARO. Health beliefs, practice, and priorities for health care of Arab<br />

Muslims in the United States. J Transcult Nurs. 2008;19:284–291.<br />

7 Roberts KS. Providing culturally sensitive care to the child bearing Islamic<br />

family. Adv Neonatal Care. 2002;2:222–228.<br />

8 Lawrence P, Rozmus C. Culturally sensitive care of the Muslim patient.<br />

J Transcult Nurs. 2001;12:228–233.<br />

9 Craft N, Fox LP, Goldsmith LA. VisualDx: Essential Adult Dermatology.<br />

Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 20<strong>10</strong>.<br />

<strong>10</strong> Denberg TD, Melhado TV, Coombes JM, et al. Predictors of nonadherence<br />

to screening colonoscopy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:989–995.<br />

11 Parsa P, Kandiah M, Abdul Rahman H, Zulkefli NM. Barriers for breast<br />

cancer screening among Asian women: a mini literature review. Asian<br />

Pac J Cancer Prev. 2006;7:509–514.<br />

12 Robinson JK, Stapleton J, Turrisi R. Relationship and partner moderator<br />

variables increase self-efficacy of performing skin self-examination.<br />

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58:755–762.<br />

HISTORICAL DIAGNOSIS & TREATMENT<br />

Diagnosis and treatments have advanced over the past century. This feature depicts conditions from a<br />

collection of steroptic cards published in 19<strong>10</strong> by The Stereoscopic Skin Clinic, by Dr. S. I. Rainforth.<br />

(continued on page 12)<br />

Modesty and the Skin: Why They Shouldn’t Mix


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />

COMMENTARY<br />

Origin and Evolution of Syphilis: Drifting Myth<br />

Virendra N. Sehgal, MD; Prashant Verma, MD; Kingshuk Chatterjee, MBBS; Anita Chaudhuri, MD;<br />

Gautam Chatterjee, MS; Farhan Rasool, MBBS<br />

The venereal form of treponematosis, caused by the spirochete Treponema pallidum, plagued every major city in the preantibiotic era.<br />

“Civilization means syphilization,” was an idea touted by Richard von Krafft-Ebing in the late 19th, and early 20th centuries that the<br />

effects of modern life make men more susceptible to syphilis and other diseases. Christopher Columbus was thought of as an importer of<br />

syphilis to Europe. Because his serendipitous voyages to the New World initiated the process of Spanish colonization, which foreshadowed<br />

general European colonization of the New World, it is difficult to rule out the cultural and political animosity created by Columbus and<br />

his men. These recent revelations are intriguing and may create dialogue that may subsequently challenge the age-old theory of “East to<br />

West” spread of venereal syphilis. This contribution warrants the continuation of study in this direction, taking into account skeletal studies<br />

that utilized radiocarbon dating technique and the phylogenetic analysis of the bacterial strains, offering a possible consensus on the origin<br />

and evolution of syphilis.<br />

Syphilis, a treponemal disease, has undergone discernible<br />

metamorphosis in its natural history. The diverse clinical<br />

manifestations of syphilis are known to masquerade as<br />

a spectrum of clinical entities, earning itself the reputation of<br />

being the great imitator. 1 Syphilis was even mentioned in Act 3<br />

of Timon of Athens 2 by William Shakespeare:<br />

Live loathed and long,<br />

Most smiling, smooth, detested parasites,<br />

Courteous destroyers, affable wolves, meek bears,<br />

You fools of fortune, trencher-friends, time’s flies,<br />

Cap and knee slaves, vapours, and minute-jacks!<br />

Of man and beast the infinite malady<br />

Crust you quite o’er! What, dost thou go?<br />

Soft! take thy physic first—thou too—and thou;—<br />

Stay, I will lend thee money, borrow none.<br />

The name for syphilis is derived from Fracastorius’ 1530 epic<br />

poem in three parts, Syphilis sive morbus gallicus (“Syphilis or<br />

The French Disease”), about a shepherd boy named Syphilus<br />

who insulted the sun god of Haiti and was punished by that<br />

god with a horrible disease. The poem suggests using mercury<br />

and “guaiaco” as a cure. 3,4 Oil of guaiac is a fragrance used in<br />

soap, originating from the Palo Santo, sacred tree in Ecuador,<br />

which provides an essential oil that heals both body and spirit. 5<br />

Syphilis, with its antiquity, has carried social stigma. In order<br />

to avoid the cultural embarrassment, countries attempted “to<br />

pass the buck to others.” 6 Accordingly, variations in its nomenclature<br />

were likely; the English and the Germans called it the<br />

“French disease”; the French called it the “Neapolitan sickness”;<br />

the Russians, the “Polish sicknes”; the Poles, the “German<br />

sickness”; Flemish, Dutch, Portuguese, and North Americans<br />

called it the “Spanish sickness” or “Castilian sickness”; and<br />

the Japanese, the “Canton rash” or “Chinese ulcer.” The term<br />

Great pox was used for 2 centuries to differentiate syphilis from<br />

Smallpox. 7<br />

Christopher Columbus, the great Italian voyager, whose precise<br />

date of birth is only speculated, 8 left on his first voyage<br />

at the age of 41 years (1492–1493). His journey initiated the<br />

process of Spanish colonization, which foreshadowed the general<br />

European colonization of the “New World.” 9 The idea that<br />

“Civilization is Syphilization” has historically stamped Columbus<br />

as the importer of syphilis to Europe. <strong>10</strong> The current contribution<br />

attempts to review the more recent archeological reports,<br />

dendrochronologic findings, and radiocarbon dating studies in<br />

order to clarify the development of the disease. The origin and<br />

evolution of syphilis is currently unknown 11 and may continue<br />

to puzzle researchers until a plausible consensus is developed.<br />

From the Dermato-Venereology (Skin/VD) Center, Sehgal Nursing Home, Panchwati, Delhi; Department of Dermatology and STD, University<br />

College of Medical Sciences, and Associated Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Shahdara, Delhi; Department of Dermatology, Burdwan Medical<br />

College and Associated Hospital, Burdwan; Apollo Nursing Home, Burdwan; Skin Institute and School of Dermatology, Greater Kailash New<br />

Delhi, India<br />

Address for Correspondence: Virendra N. Sehgal MD, Dermato-Venerology (Skin/VD) Center, Sehgal Nursing Home, A/6 Panchwati,<br />

Delhi 1<strong>10</strong> 033 India <strong>•</strong> E-mail: drsehgal@ndf.vsnl.net.in<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:8–12 8<br />

© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

HYPOTHESIS OF THE ORIGIN OF SYPHILIS<br />

THE UNITARIAN THEORY<br />

Hudson 12 has been credited with the unitarian theory, which<br />

claims that treponemal diseases originating from one form,<br />

free-living treponemes in the mud, ultimately evolve into<br />

human saprophytes. “Yaws” appears to have first evolved in<br />

Central Africa, from where it spread to engulf the east and<br />

north, probably attributable to the importation of slaves to<br />

Egypt in 30th century BCE. 13,14 Yaws eventually spread to the<br />

Arabian Peninsula and the valleys of the Tigris and Euphrates<br />

rivers, where it was called Bejel. 15 Dissemination of yaws into<br />

Europe followed, peaking in the 8th century CE, when the<br />

Crusades made the slave trade from Africa more popular by<br />

transporting slaves for work to other countries. 16,17 The Crusades<br />

moved from Europe to the Holy Land between the 11th<br />

and 14th centuries.<br />

It was between the 17th and 19th centuries that a series of<br />

yaws-like diseases, the endemic syphilis, and pinta were identified<br />

in individuals who had a poor rural background and overcrowded<br />

living conditions. Endemic syphilis prevailed as the<br />

Spirocolon of Greece, the hills of Bosnia, the Pian of Nerac<br />

in South-West France, the Button scurvy of Ireland, the Sibbens<br />

of Scotland, the Radseyege of Scandinavia, Siti of Gambia,<br />

Therlijevo of Croatia, Njovera of Zimbawe, Frenjak of<br />

the Balkans, and nonvenereal endemic syphilis, Bejel disease.<br />

The Dithmarsh evil of Jutland and Schlesweig-Holstein is yet<br />

another entity. All of these diseases, including yaws, were considered<br />

to be a consequence of either direct or indirect social<br />

contact, affecting all age groups. Children and family members<br />

were the most susceptible.<br />

The histories of Button scurvy and Sibbens have also been documented.<br />

18,19 These entities have been defined and classified into<br />

endemic syphilis or treponarids, and are considered to be a form<br />

of yaws modified by climatic conditions, clothing customs, and<br />

even the sharing of drinking utensils. This seems plausible due to<br />

the fact that yaws was later shipped via slaves from West Africa<br />

to the West Indies. In addition, some treponemes adapted to<br />

the conditions by thriving in the moist and warm areas of the<br />

body and by mutating into more lethal organisms. The latter<br />

was acquired by sexual contact and expressed as syphilis in the<br />

contemporary context.<br />

In the absence of any viable means to control the transmission<br />

of treponemes, the advent of soap in the Arab peninsula and<br />

Europe in the 7th and the 14th century, respectively, and its<br />

widespread use was acknowledged as a possible mode for the<br />

reduced survival of treponemes in treponarids.<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:8–12<br />

9<br />

COMMENTARY<br />

NONUNITARIAN THEORY<br />

An African origin hypothesis developed, with endemic treponemes<br />

originally acquired from apes, brought back to Europe by<br />

the Portuguese during the Age of Exploration. 6<br />

Another theory for the post-1492 syphilis outbreak mentions<br />

the role of a human immunodeficiency virus–like immunosuppressive<br />

agent causing an uncharacteristically severe variant of<br />

syphilis, lues maligna.<br />

PRE-COLUMBIAN PERCEPTION<br />

The perception that treponemal infection existed in the pre-<br />

Columbian civilization, which is now the southwestern part of<br />

the United States, was documented by the lesions indicative of<br />

treponematosis in a burial site found in the central Great House<br />

of Chaco Canyon, Pueblo Bonito, New Mexico, an epicenter of<br />

a broad culture system that spanned the Four Corners regions, in<br />

contrast to numerous reports available from New World skeletal<br />

burial remains. This is an interesting revelation, which may open<br />

a venue for future workup. 20–24<br />

COLUMBIAN THEORY<br />

It is speculated that treponematoses was absent in Europe<br />

in the pre-Columbian era25 until the 13th century CE, when<br />

yaws appeared as a possible result of slave trading. 26 Berbers and<br />

Moors, from North and North-West Africa, established themselves<br />

in Southern Europe, mostly in Spain, in the 15th century.<br />

Half a century prior to Columbus’ first voyage (1492–1493),<br />

Spanish and Portuguese sailors already competed with more<br />

extensive journeys down the West coast of Africa and encouraged<br />

the migration of the Africans.<br />

Despite the efforts for quarantines, yaws spread to the European<br />

continent. According to the Columbian theory, venereal syphilis<br />

appears to have been brought from the New World and joined<br />

so-called endemic syphilis. An outbreak of the epidemic resurfaced<br />

upon the return of Columbus and his men from the New<br />

World. A similar presentation of the disease was identified in the<br />

indigenous people of the New World as well as in the members<br />

of Columbus’ crew. The epidemic in the earliest years, popularly<br />

called the Morbus gallicus, may have been the combination of<br />

2 diseases; the newly arrived sexually acquired venereal syphilis<br />

and the old socially acquired endemic syphilis forms of yaws. 19<br />

The changes in clinical presentation, particularly in the first half<br />

of the 16th century, might be the result of expanding influences<br />

of the Renaissance, including improved personal hygiene.<br />

Others explain the devastating Morbus gallicus as the relatively<br />

benign venereal syphilis of the New World, afflicting people with<br />

no previous contact with the condition and producing more<br />

Origin and Evolution of Syphilis


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

obvious signs and symptoms, both the views commensurate<br />

with the Columbian theory. Accordingly, the arguments for and<br />

against the Columbian theory are listed below.<br />

<strong>•</strong> Syphilis, as one form of pathologic treponematosis, has a<br />

skeletal signature. Rothschild demonstrated that the osseotype<br />

characteristics of syphilis were absent in specimens<br />

from pre-Columbian Europe, Africa, and Asia. 27<br />

<strong>•</strong> The sailors with Columbus in 1493 were said to have<br />

brought the disease back to Spain. The Spanish fleet, when<br />

they fought for King Alfonso II against the French forces of<br />

Charles VIII of France in 1494–1495, heavily infected the<br />

people of Naples. The illness spread rapidly around Europe<br />

and mercenaries, who in 1496 joined Perkin Warbeck in<br />

Scotland and with the support of James IV of Scotland,<br />

invaded England, bore both arms and the grandgore (Old<br />

French; grand gorre: grand = great + gore = syphilis), as it<br />

was then called. In 1497, the Minutes of the Town Council<br />

of Edinborough (Phil. Trans. XLII. 421) recognized: “This<br />

contagious sickness call it the Grandgore.” 28<br />

<strong>•</strong> The osseous evidence documents the presence of syphilis<br />

in Hispanola, where Columbus landed. Columbus’ crew<br />

had the opportunity and means to contract and spread this<br />

venereal disease. 27<br />

<strong>•</strong> In the work “Tractado contra el mal serpentino,” written<br />

in 15<strong>10</strong> and published in 1539, Ruy Diaz de Isla had<br />

been thought to have cured, during the travel of return in<br />

Europe, many members of the crew of Columbus, affections<br />

from certain luetic manifestations, and thought that<br />

the new disease was imported from Hispanola. This view<br />

was supported by Bartolomè de Las Casas. 29<br />

<strong>•</strong> The absence of evidence for congenital transmission of<br />

the disease in pre-1492 North America suggests that this<br />

treponemal disease was not the same venereal form we<br />

know today. 30<br />

CONTEMPORARY SCENARIO<br />

Several archeologic studies have taken cognizance of phylogenetically<br />

diverse material at different geographic locations and have<br />

gathered together enough evidence to suggest that the disease<br />

existed in Europe, long before the birth of Columbus (October<br />

31, 1451–May 20, 1506). 31 The osseotype characteristics of<br />

syphilis are absent in specimens from pre-Columbian Europe,<br />

Africa, and Asia. 32<br />

A study was conducted on approximately 240 skeletons exhumed<br />

at the site of a medieval friary in Hull. The skeletons were mostly<br />

of Augustinian friars, Mendicants serving the local poor, and seamen<br />

and prostitutes. Of the 245 well-preserved skeletons found,<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:8–12<br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

COMMENTARY<br />

207 were relatively complete. Many were buried in wooden<br />

coffins, prepared from the wood brought from the Baltic<br />

countries. Dendrochronologic examination indicated that the<br />

trees had fallen between 1340 and 1369. The interpretation of the<br />

findings was, therefore, found to be confusing. Three skeletons<br />

showed more variable and more widespread bony lesions. One<br />

of these three, number 1216, was that of a man aged between<br />

25 and 35 years. He showed signs of syphilitic stigmata; thickening<br />

with areas of localized disease of thigh bones, sabre-like<br />

thickening of shin bones, perforation of the palate, and erosion<br />

of the skull’s frontal bone, a condition called caries sicca.<br />

Caries sicca, a bony finding from gummatous syphilis has been<br />

described as “The only reliable and pathognomonic lesion of<br />

syphilis….” 33 Other findings are of variable reliability. 34<br />

Carbon-dating of the skeleton showed it to have lived sometime<br />

between 1300 and 1420, corresponding to about a century<br />

before Columbus’ first voyage in 1492 to 1493. Three paleopathologists<br />

opined on the skeleton number 1216. Charlotte<br />

Roberts recognized it as treponemal disease but could not distinguish<br />

among them, 35 while Rothschild suggested that the<br />

population frequency of skeletal involvement was too high for<br />

treponemal disease. Secondly, the pattern of disease in the Hull<br />

site is classic for yaws. It matches in all details the reports of skeletal<br />

findings in yaws and is quite different than those for syphilis.<br />

Much of what was diagnosed as disease appeared taphonomic. 36<br />

George Armalegos, with extensive experience in viewing New<br />

World, pre-Columbian bones allegedly showing changes due to<br />

syphilis, was impressed but wanted the confirmation in terms of<br />

quantity rather than quality.<br />

Support for the existence of venereal syphilis in pre-Columbian<br />

Europe comes from Dr Mattie Hennenberg 37 and his wife<br />

based on the examination of 300 Greek skeletons buried in a<br />

southern Italian port in 600 BCE, with the claim that many<br />

of them showed changes similar to those of the Hull friary<br />

skeletons, indicative of syphilis; however, taphonomy could be<br />

a confounder. The term taphonomy (from the Greek taphos<br />

[τα´ φος] meaning burial and nomos [vóμoς] meaning law) was<br />

introduced to paleontology in 1940 by Russian scientist Ivan<br />

Efremov to describe the study of the transition of remains, parts,<br />

or products of organisms from the biosphere to the lithosphere,<br />

that is a creation of fossil assemblages. 38<br />

Hennenberg, a dental specialist, claimed that the upper central<br />

incisor teeth from two skeletons showed “grooves,” proof of<br />

congenital syphilis. A second “dig” of old bones from a port near<br />

Pompeii offers similar bony findings. Recent research based on<br />

exhumed human skeletons from a cemetery at an East London<br />

church, St Mary Spital, identified rough patches on skulls and<br />

Origin and Evolution of Syphilis


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

limbs of some of the skeletons, pointing toward a syphilitic origin<br />

for such findings. This study scores over its predecessors in terms of<br />

executing radiocarbon dating of the exhumed samples, estimated<br />

to be 95% accurate. Brian Connell, an expert from the Museum<br />

of London who studied the bones, opined that the skeletons were<br />

buried before the Columbus voyage. He said “We’re confident that<br />

Christopher Columbus is simply not a feature of the emergence,<br />

and timing of the disease in Europe.” 39 Two of the syphilitic skeletons<br />

unearthed from the site were from 1200–1250, while the<br />

other 5 were from 1250–1400, preceding Columbus’ birth. They<br />

were buried with coins and other objects that helped the experts<br />

corroborate the radiocarbon dating results. 11,39<br />

The Unitarian hypothesis, based on skeletal morphology data, 40<br />

has recently been challenged by analysis of the molecular evolution<br />

of the tpr C, D, I, K, G, and J genes in the pathogenic genus<br />

Treponema. 41 The elusive outcome of past research warrants future<br />

exploration. The advent of phylogenetic systematic analysis may<br />

prove beneficial in exploring the veracity of the findings. It is that<br />

field of biology that deals with identifying and understanding the<br />

evolutionary relationships among the many different kinds of life<br />

on earth, both living (extant) and dead (extinct).<br />

Evolutionary theory states that similarity among individuals or species<br />

is attributable to common descent or inheritance from a common<br />

ancestor. Thus, the relationships established by phylogenetic<br />

systematics often describe a species’ evolutionary history and, hence,<br />

its phylogeny, the historical relationships among lineages or organisms<br />

or their parts, such as their genes. 42 This modality was made<br />

use of to analyze the data from 21 genetic regions examined in 26<br />

geographically disparate strains of pathogenic Treponema. 43 Of all<br />

the strains examined, the venereal syphilis–causing strains originated<br />

most recently and were more closely related to yaws-causing<br />

strains from South America than to other nonvenereal strains.<br />

Old World yaws–causing strains occupied a basal position on the<br />

tree, indicating that they first arose in human history, and a simian<br />

strain of Treponema pallidum was found to be indistinguishable<br />

from them. These results lend support to the Columbian<br />

theory of syphilis’ origin, while suggesting that the nonsexually<br />

transmitted subspecies arose earlier in the Old World. In yet<br />

another study, 44 using an integrative phylogenetic and paleopathologic<br />

approach, syphilis seems to have emerged in the time<br />

span between 5000 years before present (yBP) and 16,500 yBP,<br />

in the Americas, because the resulting evolutionary rate is compatible<br />

with those observed in other bacteria; however, these<br />

studies relied on 2 bacterial isolates from individuals with alleged<br />

yaws from a site where antibiotic treatment of yaws had altered<br />

the picture. It is unclear what disease was present in the two<br />

isolates on which they based their studies. The suggested time<br />

span for origin of syphilis of 5000 to 16,500 yBP is still debat-<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:8–12<br />

11<br />

COMMENTARY<br />

able, especially in view of skeletal evidence supporting origin<br />

2000 to 1800 yBP. In contrast, if the claims of pre-Columbian<br />

venereal syphilis outside the Americas are taken into account,<br />

the place of origin remains unresolved.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 King A, Nicol C, Rodin P, eds. Yaws: endemic syphilis: Bejel: Pinta. In:<br />

Venereal Diseases. 4th ed. London, England: Balliere Tindall; 1980:<br />

333–345.<br />

2 Soellner R. Timon of Athens: Shakespeare’s Pessimistic Tragedy. Columbus:<br />

Ohio State University Press; 1979.<br />

3 Baumgartner L, Fulton JF. A Bibliography of the Poem Syphilis Sive Morbus<br />

Gallicus, by Girolamo Fracastoro of Verona. New Haven, CT: Yale<br />

University Press; 1935:157–159.<br />

4 Opdyke DL. Bulnesia sarmientoi. Food Cosmet Toxicol. 1974;12:905<br />

5 Essential Oils Desk Reference. 4th ed. Orem, UT: Essential Science Publishing;<br />

2007.<br />

6 Rothschild BM. History of syphilis. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:<br />

1454–1463.<br />

7 Heymann WR. The history of syphilis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:<br />

322–323.<br />

8 Dunn O, Kelly J. The Diario of Christopher Columbus’s First Voyage<br />

to America 1492–1493. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press;<br />

1991:333–343.<br />

9 Stokes JH, Beerman H, Ingraham MR. Modern Clinical Syphilology.<br />

Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1945:1120–1121.<br />

<strong>10</strong> Miller H. Secrets of the Dead. London, England: Channel 4 Books: Mac-<br />

Millan; 2000:149–184.<br />

11 Morton R, Rashid S. “The syphilis enigma”: the riddle resolved? Sex<br />

Transm Inf. 2001;77:322–324.<br />

12 Hudson EH. Non-Venereal Syphilis: A Sociological and Medical Study of<br />

Bejel. Edinburgh and London: E & S Livingstone; 1958.<br />

13 Hackett CJ. On the origin of the human treponematosis. Bull World<br />

Health Organ. 1963;29:7–41.<br />

14 Scott HH. The influence of the slave trade in the spread of tropical diseases.<br />

Transcr R Soc Trop Med Hygiene. 1943;38:169.<br />

15 Wedad M. Is Bejel, Yaws? (In Arabic). Bagdad, Iraq: Government<br />

Press; 1936.<br />

16 Hudson EH. Treponematosis and African slavery. Br J Vener Dis.<br />

1964;40:43–52.<br />

17 Major RH. “Prince Henry the Navigator”: A Life. New Haven, CT: Yale<br />

University Press; 2000.<br />

18 Morton RS. The buttons scurvy of Ireland. Br J Vener Dis. 1964;40:<br />

271–274.<br />

19 Morton RS. A clinical look at the morbus gallicus. Eur J Sex Transm Dis.<br />

1985;2:133–140.<br />

20 Marden K, Ortner DJ. A case of treponematosis from pre-Columbian<br />

Chaco Canyon, New Mexico. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2011;21:19–31.<br />

21 Lahr MM, Bowman JE. Paleopathology of the Kechipawan site: health and<br />

disease in a southwestern Pueblo. J Archaeol Sci. 1992;19:639–654.<br />

22 Ortner DJ, Tuross N, Stix AI. New approaches to the study of disease in archaeological<br />

New World populations. Human Biology. 1992;64:337–360.<br />

23 Verano JW. Advances in the paleopathology of Andean South America.<br />

J World Prehistory. 1997;11:237–268.<br />

24 Baker BJ, Armelagos GJ. The origin and antiquity of syphilis: paleopathological<br />

diagnosis and interpretation. Curr Anthropol. 1988;29:703–738.<br />

25 Rothschild BM, Coppa A, Petrone PP. “Like a virgin”: absence of rheumatoid<br />

arthritis and treponematosis, good sanitation and only rare gout in<br />

Italy prior to the 15th century. Reumatismo. 2004;56:61–66.<br />

Origin and Evolution of Syphilis


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

26 Rothschild C, Rothschild BM. Patterns of periosteal reaction in England<br />

from Roman through Elizabethan epochs. J Paleopath 1995;7:130.<br />

27 Rothschild BM. History of syphilis. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:1454–1463.<br />

28 Pearce JMS. A note on the origins of syphilis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.<br />

1998;64:542.<br />

29 Di Cicco CO. History of syphilis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol.<br />

2005;19:1–11.<br />

30 Dutour O, Palfi G, Berato J, Brun JP. The Origin of Syphilis in Europe: Before<br />

or After 1493? Toulon: Centre Archéologique du Var; 1995.<br />

31 Stirland, A. Evidence for pre-Columbian treponematosis in Medieval Europe.<br />

In: L’Origine de la Syphilis en Europe Avant ou après 1493? Dutour<br />

O, Palfi G, Berato J, Brun JP, eds. Toulon, France: Centre Archéologique<br />

du Var; 1995:<strong>10</strong>9–115.<br />

32 Anderson T, Arcini C, Anda S, Tangerud A, Robertsen G. Suspected<br />

endemic syphilis (treponarid) in sixteenth-century Norway. Med Hist.<br />

1986;30:341–350.<br />

33 Virchow RLK. Beitrag zur geschichte der lues. Arch Dermatol. 1896;2:1–9.<br />

34 Lahr MM, Bowman JE. Palaeopathoogy of Kechipawan Site: health and<br />

disease in a south western pueblo. J Archeolog Sci. 1992;19:639–654.<br />

35 Roberts C, Millard A, Pearson G, Macpherson C, Nowell G. The origin<br />

and mobility of people with venereal syphilis buried in Hull, England in<br />

HISTORICAL DIAGNOSIS & TREATMENT: SYCOSIS (continued from page 7)<br />

SYNONYMS: ACNE SYCOSIS; SYCOSIS BARBAE, SEU MENTI;<br />

SYCOSIS NON PARASITICA; MENTAGRA; FOLLICULITIS<br />

BARBAE, SEU PILORUM.<br />

Sycosis is a chronic inflammatory disease of hairy parts of the<br />

skin characterized by tubercles, papules and pustules, each of<br />

which is pierced invariably by the shaft of a hair. In the great<br />

majority of cases the disease is limited to the region of the<br />

beard in men, though it may occur on the eyebrows, scalp,<br />

axillae and pubes. On the face it starts usually as one or more<br />

ill defined patches and may remain confined in certain areas or<br />

spread so as to include in time the whole bearded region. The<br />

disease does not extend to non-hairy parts. The lesions may<br />

be discrete and relatively few in number, or, in very severe<br />

cases, so numerous and closely set as to form almost continuous<br />

patches of infiltration. The inflammation starts in the walls<br />

of the hair follicles and the first surface manifestations are papules<br />

or tubercles situated at the orifices, with a hair passing<br />

through each little elevation. The papules and tubercles soon<br />

change into pustules. Occasionally in old patches, pustules<br />

develop about the hairs without preceding papulation. The pustules<br />

exhibit slight tendency to rupture, but the inflammatory<br />

exudate often escapes alongside the hairs from the mouths of<br />

the follicles and dries to form small crusts. When the lesions<br />

are closely set one crust may cover the openings of several<br />

follicles. The removal of such a crust does not expose a raw,<br />

oozing surface, but tears the top off a number of pustules. The<br />

amount of crusting is never very great. Burning and tension are<br />

usually the only subjective symptoms complained of. At the onset<br />

of an attack traction on the hairs which issue from inflamed<br />

follicles causes considerable pain, but later the root sheaths<br />

become swollen with pus and the hairs loosen and may be<br />

easily extracted. At times they fall out spontaneously. The hair<br />

loss is seldom permanent, though in some cases the thinning<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:8–12<br />

12<br />

COMMENTARY<br />

the late medieval period. Poster presented at: the 18th Paleopathology<br />

Association European Meeting, Vienna, Austria; 20<strong>10</strong>.<br />

36 Rothschild BM. History of syphilis. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:1454–1463.<br />

37 Henneberg RJ, Henneberg M. Possible occurrence of treponematosis<br />

in the ancient Greek colony of Metaponto. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1995<br />

(suppl 163):<strong>10</strong>7–<strong>10</strong>8.<br />

38 Efremov IA. Taphonomy: a new branch of paleontology. Pan-Am Geol.<br />

1940;74:81–93.<br />

39 Columbus Didn’t Sail Syphilis Back to Europe. Medieval Archives Illuminating<br />

the Dark Ages for the Digital World. Sci Technol. Oct 27, 20<strong>10</strong>.<br />

40 Hudson EH. Treponematosis and man’s social evolution. Am Anthropol.<br />

1965;67:885–901.<br />

41 Gray RR, Mulligan CJ, Molini BJ, et al. Molecular evolution of the tprC, D,<br />

I, K, G, and J genes in the pathogenic genus Treponema. Mol Biol Evol.<br />

2006;23:2220–2233.<br />

42 Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK, eds. Molecular Systematics. 2nd ed.<br />

Sunderland, MA; Sinauer Associates: 1996<br />

43 Harper KN, Ocampo PS, Steiner BM, et al. On the origin of the treponematoses:<br />

a phylogenetic approach. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2:e148.<br />

44 de Melo FL, de Mello JC, Fraga AM, et al. Syphilis at the crossroad of<br />

phylogenetics and paleopathology. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 20<strong>10</strong>;4:e575.<br />

of the beard is quite noticeable. Untreated the disease persists<br />

indefinitely. Periods of quiescence alternate with exacerbations<br />

and the outbreak of acute symptoms is as a rule without any<br />

apparent cause. Sycosis on the upper lip, which is a favorite<br />

location, is often associated with chronic rhinitis. The nasal<br />

secretion may be the cause of the sycosis or the sycosis by<br />

extension may affect the vibrissae and cause the Schneiderian<br />

membrane to become swollen and exquisitely sensitive. Sycosis<br />

sometimes develops from eczema of the bearded region.<br />

The disease is feebly contagious and in not infrequently transmitted<br />

by the barber shop razor. The pyogenic staphylococci<br />

are invariably present in the pus.<br />

DIAGNOSIS: Numerous pustules pierced by hairs are almost<br />

pathognomonic of the disease. Trichophytosis barbae begins<br />

as a scaling spot and later produces a lumpy condition of<br />

the skin; from every node many hairs project and these may<br />

be twisted, split or broken. The spores are easily found with<br />

the microscope. In pustular eczema the pustules are not so<br />

accurately located about the hairs, the crusting is greater and<br />

the crusts cover raw, oozing surfaces. The disease spreads<br />

readily to non-hairy parts. Itching is severe.<br />

TREATMENT: Epilation is the most essential part of the treatment.<br />

Each day all the hairs in a given area of the affected<br />

region should be extracted. Pasta zinci Lassar, N. F., is to be<br />

applied plentifully and kept as constantly as possible in close<br />

contact with the skin. In very obstinate cases with thickening<br />

of the skin the amount of salicylic acid may be increased to<br />

<strong>10</strong>-15 per cent. Exposures to the X-rays carried to the point<br />

of producing a slight erythema and falling of the hair, have a<br />

brilliant curative effect, but every precaution must be observed<br />

not to cause dermatitis actinica.<br />

Origin and Evolution of Syphilis


ABSTRACT<br />

<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION<br />

A New Paradigm in the Treatment of Kerions:<br />

Treat the Inflammation<br />

Sarah E. Dolder, MD; Brendan J. O’Neill, MD; Meghan M. O’Brien, MD; Amy S. Ross, MD;<br />

Robert A. Allen, MD; Herbert B. Allen, MD<br />

Kerions result from a massive delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to a dermatophyte. Treatment traditionally has been directed primarily<br />

toward the dermatophyte. The authors propose, however, that inflammation should be the initial target of treatment. Clinical findings and<br />

treatment outcomes for two patients with kerions, treated with short courses of anti-inflammatory agents, are presented. Earlier studies<br />

showing minimal effects with corticosteroid treatment of kerions may have had design flaws. The anti-inflammatory treatment of kerions<br />

is both safe and effective and permits the duration of therapy to be shortened dramatically. (<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:14–16)<br />

We present two patients with kerions who are representative<br />

of more than 3 dozen similar patients<br />

seen in more than 2 decades of observation in our<br />

clinic. Recognizing that kerions are delayed-type hypersensitivity<br />

(DTH) reactions, 1 we treated all our patients with short courses of<br />

anti-inflammatory agents, and all had resolution of their lesions.<br />

CASE 1<br />

Patient 1 was a 7-year-old African American boy who was taking<br />

oral cephalexin for a cultured methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus<br />

aureus markedly crusted, boggy, alopectic tumefaction on the left<br />

lateral scalp that was associated with markedly enlarged postauricular<br />

and posterior cervical nodes. He had taken the antibiotic for<br />

2 weeks without any resolution. A fungal culture obtained from a<br />

scaling scalp site distant from the kerion was positive for Trichophyton<br />

tonsurans, and the diagnosis was kerion. He was treated with<br />

two drops (94 mg) of saturated solution of potassium iodide (SSKI)<br />

three times daily2,3 and 2.5% selenium shampoo twice weekly. 4 Two<br />

weeks later, the crusting, swelling, and adenopathy had resolved,<br />

and 2 months later the hair had regrown without scarring.<br />

CASE 2<br />

Patient 2 was a 9-year-old African American boy who had been<br />

treated with adequate doses of griseofulvin for 4 weeks for a<br />

crusted, nodular, alopectic plaque on the posterior scalp (Figure 1)<br />

along with a markedly enlarged posterior cervical node. Bacterial<br />

and fungal cultures were negative. The clinical diagnosis was<br />

kerion, and treatment with prednisolone 1 mg/kg/d and selenium<br />

sulfide shampoo was instituted. Three weeks later, the plaque<br />

had cleared and new hair started to regrow (Figure 2). Within<br />

2 months, the hair had completely regrown without scarring.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Kerion formation is the inflammatory extreme of tinea capitis,<br />

producing a large, painful, crusted plaque on the scalp, often with<br />

purulent discharge and cervical lymphadenopathy. Kerions are<br />

the result of a massive DTH reaction to a dermatophyte. 1 Positive<br />

DTH skin tests, lesional histopathology, and immunofluorescence<br />

studies are all consistent with this concept, 1,5,6 proposed originally<br />

by Birt and Wilt7 in 1954 and later supported by Rasmussen and<br />

Ahmed. 8 Inasmuch as the kerion is an immunologic event, this<br />

helps explain why antibiotics, whether antibacterial or antifungal,<br />

are ineffective (in spite of positive cultures) and why all our<br />

patients responded to anti-inflammatory treatment with complete<br />

resolution of the kerions and subsequent regrowth of hair.<br />

Treatment of kerions has been directed primarily toward the<br />

underlying dermatophyte, often with protracted courses of griseofulvin;<br />

however, we believe the inflammation, rather than the<br />

infection, should be the initial focus of kerion treatment. The<br />

clinical findings and treatment outcomes for our two patients<br />

with kerion treated with short courses of anti-inflammatory<br />

agents are representative and exactly similar to the other patients<br />

with kerion seen in our clinic.<br />

From the Department of Dermatology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA<br />

Address for Correspondence: Herbert B. Allen, MD, Department of Dermatology, Drexel University College of Medicine, 219 North Broad<br />

Street, Philadelphia, PA 19<strong>10</strong>7 <strong>•</strong> E-mail: hallen@drexelmed.edu<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:14–16 14<br />

© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

Figure 1. Case 2: Kerion before treatment shows crusted<br />

pustular plaque on posterior scalp with significant lymphadenopathy.<br />

Figure 2. Case 2: Kerion shows total resolution 2 weeks after<br />

treatment with prednisone.<br />

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION<br />

In patients treated prior to 2001, we saw complete resolution<br />

in kerions treated with SSKI in 22 of 25 patients within 2 to 4<br />

weeks. This is similar to the resolution of kerions alluded to by<br />

Dobson 2 and was also similar to the resolution routinely seen<br />

in sporotrichosis. 9 The three patients who did not respond to<br />

SSKI (2 did not take it due to the taste, and 1 had worsening<br />

of his “id” reaction) had rapid clearance on prednisolone. After<br />

2001, when SSKI became scarce because of the threat of nuclear<br />

attacks and dirty bombs, we shifted to prednisolone and noted<br />

complete response to treatment in 15 of 15 patients. With both<br />

treatment protocols, the kerions cleared and the patients’ hair<br />

subsequently regrew without scarring.<br />

Two prospective randomized, controlled studies by other investigators<br />

have examined the treatment of kerions with oral doses of corticosteroids.<br />

<strong>10</strong>,11 Neither demonstrated a difference in the management<br />

of kerion between using oral corticosteroids plus griseofulvin vs griseofulvin<br />

alone. These findings are contrary to our observations that all<br />

our patients responded to short courses of anti-inflammatory agents<br />

and are also contrary to oral corticosteroids being recommended for<br />

kerions that present simultaneously with “id” eruptions, 12 as well as<br />

in situations in which the kerion becomes “inflamed.” 13 In addition,<br />

John Kenney (personal communication, 1983), who treated this<br />

disease in many children, routinely included oral corticoids in his<br />

regimen for kerions and saw results similar to ours.<br />

We believe the findings by some investigators 11 demonstrate the<br />

natural resolution of kerions. Similarly, findings in another study <strong>10</strong><br />

may also show the natural resolution; moreover, their treatment<br />

protocol, which included untapered prednisone at a maximum<br />

dose of 30 mg/d for only <strong>10</strong> days, in our opinion, may have been<br />

insufficient. 14<br />

We believe untreated kerions require 3 to 6 months to resolve.<br />

Many case reports consistent with this concept have been published.<br />

15–17 In one of our patients, who preferred not to take<br />

prednisolone and was treated with griseofulvin alone, the kerion<br />

took 4 months to resolve. In contrast, patients treated with antiinflammatory<br />

treatment responded rapidly.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Based on our observations, we believe the addition of prednisolone<br />

to the treatment of kerions is safe and allows the duration of therapy<br />

to be dramatically shortened. Adjunctive therapy with selenium<br />

sulfide shampooing remains useful, 4 and griseofulvin may<br />

be continued if scaling from tinea capitis remains after the kerion<br />

resolves. 18 Further studies would help resolve the differences in the<br />

prospective trials compared with the clinical observations.<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:14–16 15<br />

Treatment of Kerions


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

REFERENCES<br />

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION<br />

1 Arenas R, Toussaint S, Isa-Isa R. Kerion and dermatophytic granuloma.<br />

Mycological and histopathological findings in 19 children with<br />

inflammatory tinea capitis of the scalp. Int J Dermatol. 2006;45:<br />

215–219.<br />

2 Dobson RL. In: Dobson RL, ed. Yearbook of Dermatology. Chicago, IL:<br />

Yearbook Publishers; 1979:124.<br />

3 Sterling JB, Heymann WR. Potassium iodide in dermatology: a 19th century<br />

drug for the 21st century—uses, pharmacology, adverse effects,<br />

and contraindications. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43:691–697.<br />

4 Allen HB, Honig PJ, Leyden JJ, McGinley KJ. Selenium sulfide: adjunctive<br />

therapy for tinea capitis. Pediatrics. 1982; 69:81–83.<br />

5 Woodfolk JA, Platts-Mills TA. The immune response to dermatophytes.<br />

Res Immunol. 1998;149:436–445; discussion 522–523.<br />

6 Woodfolk JA. Allergy and dermatophytes. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18:<br />

30–43.<br />

7 Birt AR, Wilt JC. Mycology, bacteriology, and histopathology of suppurative<br />

ringworm. AMA Arch Derm Syphilol. 1954;69:441–448.<br />

8 Rasmussen JE, Ahmed AR. Trichophytin reactions in children with tinea<br />

capitis. Arch Dermatol. 1978;114:371–372.<br />

9 Sandhu K, Gupta S. Potassium iodide remains the most effective<br />

therapy for cutaneous sporotrichosis. J Dermatol Treat. 2003;14:<br />

200–202.<br />

<strong>10</strong> Honig PJ, Caputo GL, Leyden JJ, et al. Treatment of kerions. Pediatr<br />

Dermatol. 1994;11:69–71.<br />

11 Hussain I, Muzaffar F, Rashid T, et al. A randomized, comparative trial of<br />

treatment of kerion celsi with griseofulvin plus oral prednisolone vs. griseofulvin<br />

alone. Med Mycol. 1999;37:97–99.<br />

12 Alvarez MS, Silverberg NB. Tinea capitis. In: Kelly AP, Taylor SC,<br />

eds. Dermatology for Skin of Color. New York, NY: McGraw Hill;<br />

2009:253.<br />

13 Tinea capitis. In: James WD, Berger TG, Elston DM, eds. Andrews’<br />

Diseases of the Skin: Clinical Dermatology. <strong>10</strong>th ed. Philadelphia, PA:<br />

Elsevier; 2006:298.<br />

14 Pomeranz AJ, Sabnis SS. Tinea capitis: epidemiology, diagnosis and<br />

management strategies. Paediatr Drugs. 2002;4:779–783.<br />

15 Van Rooij P, Detandt M, Nolard N. Trichophyton mentagrophytes of rabbit<br />

origin causing family incidence of kerion: an environmental study.<br />

Mycoses. 2006;49:426–430.<br />

16 Schauder S. Itraconazole in the treatment of tinea capitis in children.<br />

Case reports with long-term follow-up evaluation. Review of the literature.<br />

Mycoses. 2002;45:1–9.<br />

17 Gibbon KL, Goldsmith P, Salisbury JA, Bewley AP. Unnecessary surgical<br />

treatment of fungal kerions in children. BMJ. 2000;320:696–697.<br />

18 Allen HB, Honig PJ. Scaling scalp diseases in children. Clin Pediatr<br />

(Phila). 1983;22:374–377.<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:14–16 16<br />

Treatment of Kerions


ONE PRESCRIPTION.<br />

TWO POWERFUL EFFECTS.<br />

The power to calm inflammatory acne<br />

Inflammation is an important aspect in the<br />

pathophysiology of acne 1<br />

Both laboratory and clinical studies document the<br />

anti-inflammatory effects of minocycline 1<br />

TM<br />

CALMING<br />

WIPES<br />

(30 WIPES)<br />

Complementary T 3 Calming Wipes<br />

Soothing and alcohol-free —<br />

part of a complete approach<br />

to acne treatment<br />

+<br />

The only pelletized form of Minocycline available...<br />

A dual approach to acne care<br />

The power to eradicate P acnes<br />

Significant reduction in P acnes—even up to 3 weeks<br />

after discontinuation 2<br />

A decrease in P acnes can lead to a drop in<br />

pro-inflammatory cytokines and reduced inflammation1 Minimal resistance in an in vitro study<br />

—The majority of tetracycline-resistant P acnes<br />

were cross-resistant to doxycycline—but sensitive<br />

to minocycline* 3<br />

The most common adverse events associated with MINOCIN are nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. CNS adverse effects may include<br />

dizziness, vertigo, and headache.<br />

Important Information<br />

The most common adverse events associated with MINOCIN are nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Central nervous system adverse events including<br />

light-headedness, dizziness, or vertigo have been reported with minocycline therapy, but are generally transient in nature. Other adverse events<br />

include tinnitus, headache, sedation, and skin pigmentation, particularly on the face and mucous membranes. MINOCIN is contraindicated in persons<br />

who have shown hypersensitivity to any of the tetracyclines or to any of the components of the product formulation. WARNING: MINOCIN Pellet-<br />

Filled Capsules, like other tetracycline-class antibiotics, can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. The use of drugs of the<br />

tetracycline class during tooth development (last half of pregnancy, infancy, and childhood to the age of 8 years) may cause permanent<br />

discoloration of teeth (yellow-gray-brown). Concurrent use of tetracyclines may render oral contraceptives less effective.<br />

References: 1. SapadinAN,Fleischmajer R.Tetracyclines:nonantibiotic properties and their clinical implications.JAmAcad Dermatol. 2006;54(2):258-265. 2. Leyden JJ,McGinley KJ,KligmanAM.Tetracycline and minocycline<br />

treatment.Arch Dermatol. 1982;118(1):19-22. 3. Hubbell CG,Hobbs ER,RistT,White JW Jr.Efficacy of minocycline compared with tetracycline in treatment of acne vulgaris.Arch Dermatol.1982;118(12):989-992.<br />

*In vitro activity does not necessarily correlate to in vivo activity.<br />

©20<strong>10</strong> Triax Pharmaceuticals, LLC All rights reserved. Printed in USA. MN-08<strong>10</strong>-280<br />

For more information, go to www.minocin-kit.com


ABSTRACT<br />

<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION<br />

Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris:<br />

Evolution of Challenges in<br />

Promising Treatment Options<br />

Virendra N. Sehgal, MD; 1 Govind Srivastava, MD; 2 Prashant Verma, MD3 Pityriasis rubra pilaris is an uncommon inflammatory dermatosis that is well recognized across the globe. Erythroderma is a common<br />

presentation. A precise diagnosis of pityriasis rubra pilaris is based on morphologic features and is classified into 6 types: classic adult<br />

onset (type I), atypical adult (type II), classic juvenile (type III), circumscribed juvenile (type IV), atypical juvenile (type V), and human<br />

immunodeficiency virus–associated (type VI). Several conventional systemic and/or topical treatments are currently in use. Largely, their<br />

results are unsatisfactory and limited by long-term toxicity. The authors investigate the efficacy of a wide spectrum of drugs by examining<br />

historical (archive) and promising (modern) treatment modalities for the treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris. (<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:18–23)<br />

Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) comprises a group of chronic<br />

disorders that demonstrate circumscribed follicular<br />

keratosis with palmoplantar keratoderma. Both familial<br />

and acquired forms have been recognized. The former is<br />

infrequent and usually occurs in childhood. The bimodal or<br />

trimodal distribution usually involves a peak case incidence<br />

in the first and second decades of life, 1,2 and it affects both<br />

men and women. Its etiology and management has remained a<br />

challenge. Occasionally, PRP is associated with other diseases,<br />

and it was speculated that the disorder might be the result<br />

of an abnormal immune response to some antigenic stimuli.<br />

Familial occurrence of the disease might point to genes that<br />

predispose the individual to develop the disorder after certain<br />

precipitating events. The occurrence of PRP in patients with<br />

the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/AIDS is a topic of<br />

recent debate. 3<br />

METHODS<br />

Medline/PubMed (1936–20<strong>10</strong>) was searched using the terms<br />

“PRP” and “treatment.” Accordingly, this contribution outlines<br />

the published reports on the topic, with the objective to<br />

focus on the evolution and challenges of promising treatment<br />

options.<br />

CLINICAL CRITERIA/CLASSIFICATION<br />

Management of PRP varies according to the type, extent, and age<br />

at onset of the disease. Thus, an understanding of the classification<br />

of the disease offers insight into individualizing treatment.<br />

Griffiths1 classified PRP into 6 types according to the age at onset,<br />

behavior, clinical appearance, and prognosis (Table I). Classic<br />

adult-onset PRP (type I) shows the characteristic generalized<br />

rash with palmo-plantar keratoderma, whereas atypical adultonset<br />

PRP (type II) is chronic, with ichthyosiform and lamellar<br />

scales on the palms and soles and alopecia of varying degrees. The<br />

association of PRP and HIV infection has recently been identified<br />

as type VI PRP, and most of the cases have been reported in<br />

young heterosexual/homosexual men. It is characterized by nodulocystic<br />

and lichen spinulosus–like lesions, with poor prognosis<br />

and resistance to treatment. 2 Another classification5 divides the<br />

disease into 4 types based only on physical findings (Table II);<br />

however, Griffiths1 classification continues to be the mainstay in<br />

practice for delineating the disease.<br />

CHALLENGES AND PROMISING TREATMENTS<br />

HISTORICALLY (ARCHIVE) IMPORTANT MODALITIES<br />

The diagnosis and treatment of PRP have always been a source<br />

of great interest. At present, there is no acclaimed treatment<br />

From the Dermato Venereology (Skin/VD) Center, Sehgal Nursing Home, Panchwati, Azadpur, Delhi, India; 1 the Skin Institute and School of<br />

Dermatology, Greater Kailash, New Delhi, India; 2 Department of Dermatology, and STD University College of Medical Sciences and Associated<br />

Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Shahdara, Delhi, India3 Address for Correspondence: Virendra N. Sehgal MD, Dermato Venerology (Skin/VD) Center, Sehgal Nursing Home, A/6 Panchwati, Delhi,<br />

1<strong>10</strong> 033, India <strong>•</strong> E-mail: drsehgal@ndf.vsnl.net.in<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:18–23 18<br />

© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> ���������������������<br />

Table I. Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris: Griffiths Clinical Classification<br />

CLINICAL TYPE LESIONS’ DISTRIBUTION NATURAL COURSE PERCENTAGE OF CASES<br />

������������� ����������� ������������������ 55<br />

�������������� ����������� ������������������� 5<br />

���������������� ����������� ������������������ <strong>10</strong><br />

���������������������� ��������� ������������� 25<br />

�������� ����������� ������������������� 5<br />

����������������������������<br />

������������������ �������������������� ���������� ����������<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������<br />

����������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

������ ����� ������ ����� ����� ��� ��� ��� ��������� ��� ���������� ��� ����<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������<br />

������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

��������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

���� � ����������������������������������������������������������<br />

����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������������������������������������<br />

PROMISING (MODERN) MODALITIES<br />

����������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������<br />

����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

����������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������� 15–18<br />

������������������������������������������������������������ 8<br />

����������������������������������������������������� �� �������-<br />

������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

��������������������������������������������������������� �����<br />

Table II. Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris: Piamphongsant and Akaraphant Classification 5<br />

TYPES<br />

168 PATIENTS<br />

ADULTS CHILDREN<br />

CLINICAL FEATURES<br />

������ ���������� ����������� �������� ������������� 22 � ���������<br />

��������� ����� ������������ 25 ������������������������������� �� �������<br />

�������������������� ���� ��� ������������� ��� ��������� �������<br />

����������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

����������������������������������������������������������������<br />

����������������� �����<br />

������ ����� ������������ ���� ����������� �������� ��� ������<br />

������ ���� ���� ��� ���������������� ���������� ��� ����������-<br />

����� ���������� ��� ���������� ������������ ����������� ��������<br />

��������� ���������� ������� ������������� ���� �� ���� ������<br />

��� ������� ������ ���������� ��� ���������� ��� ���� �������� �����<br />

���� �������� ��� �������� ����������� ������������ �������� ��-<br />

������� �������������� �������������� ��� ��������������� ���������<br />

���������� �������� ����� �������������� ���������� �� ����������<br />

������������� 21 �������������������� 28 ������������������������-<br />

������� �� �������������������������������������������<br />

RETINOIDS/VITAMIN A DERIVATIVES<br />

����������21�������������������������������������������������� �������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

�����������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�����������������������������������������������������������������<br />

���������� ���� ������ ������������� ��������� ��� ��������� ����<br />

������ 11 21 ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

���������������������������������<br />

������� �� �� ��������������������������������������������������<br />

�������� �� 20 �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������� <strong>10</strong> � �������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:18–23 ��<br />

������������������������


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> ���������������������<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������<br />

������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������������� �� ���������������������������<br />

��������������� ������������� ����� ��� �������� ������ ���� ���� �����<br />

������������������������������������������ ��<br />

��������������������������������������������������������������<br />

������������ ������� ���� ���� ���������� ��� ���� ���� ��������� ���<br />

�������������� �� ����������������������������������������������<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������������������������������������� 35<br />

IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPY<br />

����������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

������������������������������������������������������������������������- �������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

������������� ��� �� ������� ��� ��� ��� ��� ���� ��� ������ ���� �����<br />

����������������������������������������31��������������������������� ����������������������������������������������������������������� ��<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

������������� 32�����������������������������������������������- �����������������������������������������������������������������33 PHOTOTHERAPY<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������<br />

��������� �������� ���� 21� ��� ����� ��������� ��������� ����������<br />

��� ����������� ����� �������� �������� ����� ��������� �����<br />

������������������������������������������������������������<br />

����������������������������������������������� 28<br />

TOPICAL THERAPY<br />

������������������������������������������������������������� ���������������������������������������������������������������<br />

����������� ������� �� ��������������� ����������� ���������� ����<br />

�����������������������������������������������������������������- ���������������������������������������������������������������<br />

������������������� �������� �� ���� ����� ������ ���� ������������8 ������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

���������������������������������������������38 ����������������������������������������������������������������- �����������������������������8�����������������������������������<strong>10</strong> ���������11� �������������������� �������� �� �������� ��12 and<br />

�������������13�������������������������������������������������� ��� ���������� ���� ��������� ��� ����� ��� ������������ ��������<br />

����������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�����������������������������������������������<br />

BIOLOGICS<br />

������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������<br />

��������������������������������������������������������������� ����������������������������������������������������������������<br />

Table III. Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris: Challenges and Promising Treatment—Historical (Archive) Importance<br />

AUTHOR(S) YEAR(S) RECOMMENDED DRUG(S) DOSAGE RESPONSE/RESULT PATIENTS<br />

������ �<br />

������������������ �<br />

����<br />

����<br />

��������� �������������������´����� Good ����������<br />

����������� 8 ���� ���������������� ��������������������� ����������������������<br />

�������<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:18–23 20<br />

������������������������<br />

��������<br />

�������������� ���� ������������� �������� ���������� �����������<br />

��������������������<strong>10</strong> ���� ����������������� �������� Good –<br />

����������������11 ���� �������� – ������������������ –<br />

����������������12 ���� ���������������� ����������������������������<br />

����������������������������-<br />

�����������������<br />

��������� ����������<br />

������ 13 ���� ������������� ������������������������������ �������������������<br />

�����<br />

��������������� �� ���� ���������������<br />

��������������<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

���������������������������<br />

��������������������������<br />

��������� ����������<br />


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> ���������������������<br />

Table IV. Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris (PRP): Challenges and Promising Treatment—Modern Modalities<br />

AUTHOR(S) YEAR RECOMMENDED DRUG(S) DOSAGE RESPONSE/RESULT PATIENTS<br />

����������� �� ���� �����������������������-<br />

���������<br />

– – –<br />

��������30 ���� ������������ ���������� �������������� –<br />

�����������������31 ���� ������������ ����������� Good ������<br />

������������� 2000 ������������ ���������� ���������������������<br />

���<br />

�����������<br />

������������� ���� ��������������������� ����������� �������������������� ����������<br />

�����������������25 ���� ���������� ������ ��������������������<br />

�����<br />

�����������<br />

�������������������<br />

�������� ��<br />

���� ������������ ������������-<br />

�����������<br />

������������ 28 2000 ������������������� ������������<br />

�������<br />

������������<br />

���������������� 21 2000 �������������������������<br />

����<br />

����������<br />

�����������<br />

���������������������� �����������<br />

����������� �����������<br />

�������� –<br />

���������������� �� 2005 ������������ – ������ –<br />

�������������� �� ���� �����������������������-<br />

���������<br />

������ 2 /mo on<br />

��������������<br />

����<br />

������������������������<br />

�����<br />

�����������50 ���� ������������������������ – �������������������� –<br />

������������������� ���� ������������������-<br />

��������<br />

– ������������� –<br />

����������������� ���� ������������������ �������� ������������������ �����������<br />

������������������ ���� ��������� ����������<br />

�������������� 2008 ��������� ���������������<br />

���������������� 2008 ��������� ��������<br />

����������� 2008 ���������� ������������� ����������<br />

�������������� 2008 ���������� ����������<br />

������������������������� 2008 ������������������ �������� �����������������������<br />

���<br />

������������� ���� �������������������� ���������� �������� �����������<br />

�������<br />

�������<br />

�������������<br />

�����������<br />

�������������� ���� ����������� ����������� �������������<br />

������������������� ���� ���������� ����������� �������������<br />

���������������������20 ���� ��������������� ������������������� �����������<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:18–23 21<br />

������������������������<br />

–<br />

Continued »


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> ���������������������<br />

������������ 35 ���� ������������������������ ���������������<br />

��������������<br />

����������<br />

��������������� �� 20<strong>10</strong> ����������������������a<br />

���������������������<br />

������������������������<br />

���������������<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������<br />

���� �� ��� ������� ��������� ����������� ����� � ���� ������������<br />

����������� ������������ ��������� �������� � ���� ����������� ������<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

��������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������������� ��<br />

������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

������������������������������������������������������������<br />

������ ���� ������� ��� �������� ��� ������������ ������������� ��������<br />

����������������������������������������������������������������<br />

����� �� � ����������� ���� ����� ����� ������ ����� �������� ����� ���<br />

����������������������������� ����� �����������������������������<br />

������������������������������������������������������ �����<br />

�������������� � ������������ ����������� ���� ������������ �����<br />

����������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������<br />

���� ��������� ��������� ��������� ���������� ������ �� ������� �������<br />

������������ �����������������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

����� ������������ ��� ����� ��� ����� �������� ����� ��� ����� ����<br />

������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�����������������������������������������������������������-<br />

��������������������������������������<br />

FIVE-YEAR VIEW<br />

��������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�� ������������� ��������� ���� ����������� �������� ���� ��������� ����<br />

����������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�����������������������������������������������������������������<br />

��������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

��� ��� ��������� ������� ��������� ��� ���������� ��������������<br />

���������������<br />

��������<br />

�����������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

����������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

�����������������������������������������������������������������<br />

������������������������������������������������������������<br />

������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

���������<br />

��������������������������������������������������������������<br />

��������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������<br />

����������������������������������������������������������������<br />

������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

����������������������������������������������������������������<br />

��� ������������ �������������� ��� ���� ����� �� ������� �����������<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�����������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

���������������������������������������<br />

REFERENCES<br />

��������������������������<br />

�����������������������<br />

��������<br />

1 Griffiths WA. Pityriasis rubra pilaris–an historical approach. 2. Clinical<br />

features. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1976;1:37–50.<br />

2 Sehgal VN, Srivastava G, Dogra S. Adult onset pityriasis rubra pilaris.<br />

Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2008;74:311–321.<br />

3� ��������� ���� ������ ��� ��� ���� ������ ���� ��� ���� ����������� ��������laris<br />

and human immunodeficiency virus infection. Br J Dermatol.<br />

1995;133:990–993.<br />

4� �����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

and HIV infection: a part of the spectrum of HIV-associated follicular<br />

syndrome. Br J Dermatol. 1995;135:818–819.<br />

5 Piamphongsant T, Akarphant R. Pityriasis rubra pilaris: a new proposed<br />

classification. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994;19:134–138.<br />

6 Petter MF. Pityriasis rubra pilaris, with particular reference to vitamin<br />

medication and dietary control. Penn Med J. 1936;39:864–866.<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:18–23 22<br />

������������������������<br />

����������<br />

a �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

������������������������������������������������ b �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

������������������������� � ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������������������������


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> ���������������������<br />

7 Gunther S, Alston W. Follicular keratoses. Pilot studies of serum level of<br />

vitamin A and liver function tests during administration of retinoic acid in<br />

hyperkeratosis follicularis et parafollicularis (Kyrle’s disease), pityriasis<br />

rubra pilaris, and keratosis follicularis (Darier’s disease). Dermatologica.<br />

1973;147:274–283.<br />

8 Ayres S Jr, Mihan R, Scribner MD. Synergism of vitamin A and<br />

���������������������������������Cutis. 1979;23:600–603, 689–690.<br />

9� ������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

diseases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1981;5:222.<br />

<strong>10</strong>� ���������������������������������������������������������������������Arch<br />

Dermatol Syphilol. 1941;43:42–61.<br />

11� ������� ���� ������ ���� ����������� ������ �������� ��� ��������� ����� ������ence<br />

in therapy with carotene and vitamin A. Arch Dermatol Syphilol.<br />

1943;48:288–296.<br />

12 Webster JR, Falk AB. Pityriasis rubra pilaris; clinical and laboratory<br />

observation on combined treatment with corticotropin and vitamin A.<br />

AMA Arch Dermatol Syphilol. 1952;65:685–700.<br />

13 Irgang S. Pityriasis rubra pilaris responsive to ascorbic acid. Australas J<br />

Dermatol. 1968;9:211–217.<br />

14� ����� ���� �������� ���� ����������� ������ ������������������� ���� ����������������<br />

drugs as possible therapeutic agents. Arch Dermatol. 1965;92:428–430.<br />

15� ���������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

rubra pilaris. Arch Dermatol. 1981;117:749–750.<br />

16� ���������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

the retinol binding protein. Br J Dermatol. 1981;<strong>10</strong>4:253–256.<br />

17� ����������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

13-cis-retinoic acid (isotretinoin). J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982;6:7<strong>10</strong>–715.<br />

18� ����������������������������������������������������������������������������riasis<br />

rubra pilaris: unapproved use. Int J Dermatol. 2006;45:1238–1240.<br />

19� �����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

pilaris with calcipotriol. Br J Dermatol. 1994;130:675–678.<br />

20 Vergilis-Kalner IJ, Mann DJ, Wasserman J, Petronic-Rosic V, Tsoukas MM.<br />

Pityriasis rubra pilaris sensitive to narrow band-ultraviolet B light therapy.<br />

J Drugs Dermatol. 2009;8:270–273.<br />

21 Kirby B, Watson R. Pityriasis rubra pilaris treated with acitretin and<br />

���������������������������������������Br J Dermatol. 2000;142:376–377.<br />

22 Hanke CW, Steck WD. Childhood-onset pityriasis rubra pilaris treated with<br />

�����������������������������������������Cleve Clin Q. 1983;50:201–203.<br />

23 Wetzig T, Sticherleng M. Juvenile pityriasis rubra pilaris: successful<br />

treatment with cyclosporine. Br J Dermatol. 2003;149:202–203.<br />

24 Usuki K, Sekiyama M, Shimada T, et al. Three cases of pityriasis rubra<br />

pilaris successfully treated with cyclosporine A. Dermatology.<br />

2000;200:324–327.<br />

25� ������ ���� �������� ���� ����������� ��� ���� ���������� ��� ����������� ������<br />

pilaris. Arch Dermatol. 1985;121:<strong>10</strong>5–<strong>10</strong>6.<br />

26� ��������������� ��� �������� ��� ����� ��� ��� ���� ��������������� �����������<br />

rubra pilaris responsive to triple anti-retroviral therapy. Br J Dermatol.<br />

1999;140:931–934.<br />

27 Bonomo RA, Kormam N, Nagashima-Wholen I, et al. Pityriasis rubra<br />

pilaris–an unusual cutaneous complication of AIDS. Am J Med Sci.<br />

1997;314:118–121.<br />

28� ������� ���� ����������� ��� ������ ��� ��� ���� ��������� ������������ ���<br />

radiation and acitretin therapy as a treatment option for pityriasis rubra<br />

pilaris. Br J Dermatol. 2000;142:574–575.<br />

29� ����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

for the treatment of erythrodermic pityriasis rubra pilaris. Arch Dermatol.<br />

1999;135:475–476.<br />

30� �����������������������������������������������������������������Aust J<br />

Dermatol. 1966;8:183–185.<br />

31 Hunter GA, Forbes IJ. Treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris with azathioprine.<br />

Br J Dermatol. 1972;87:42–45.<br />

32 Wetzig T, Sticherling M. Juvenile pityriasis rubra pilaris: successful<br />

treatment with ciclosporin. Br J Dermatol. 2003;149:202–203.<br />

33� ���� ��� �������� ���� ��������� ���� �������� ���������� ��� ����������� ������<br />

pilaris with calcipotriol. Br J Dermatol. 1994;130:675–678.<br />

34� �������������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

�������� ���� ���� ���������� ��� ������������� ����������� ������ ��������� Clin<br />

Exp Dermatol. 2004;29:244–246.<br />

35� �����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

therapeutic agents in pityriasis rubra pilaris. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges.<br />

20<strong>10</strong>;8:354–356.<br />

36� ���������������������������������������������������������������������ment<br />

of pityriasis rubra pilaris with pimecrolimus cream 1%. J Drugs<br />

Dermatol. 2007;6:340–342.<br />

37� ��������������������������������������������������������������������scribed<br />

pityriasis rubra pilaris to topical tazarotene treatment. Pediatr<br />

Dermatol. 2008;25:125–126.<br />

38 Raza N, Bari AU, Dar NR. Juvenile onset classical pityriasis rubra pilaris:<br />

every patient may not require systemic therapy. J Coll Physicians Surg<br />

Pak. 2007;17:564–565.<br />

39� ����������� ���� ����������������� ���� ������������� ��� ��� ���� �����������<br />

������ �������� ������������� �������� ����� ����������� Acta Derm Venereol.<br />

2007;87:552–553.<br />

40� ����������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

pilaris with etanercept. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59:113–114.<br />

41� ������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

rubra pilaris. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158:642–644.<br />

42 Barth D, Harth W, Treudler R, et al. Successful treatment of pityriasis<br />

������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2009;7:<strong>10</strong>71–<strong>10</strong>73.<br />

43� ����������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

treatment for adult-onset pityriasis rubra pilaris: case report and review<br />

of the literature on biologic therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59:<br />

65–70.<br />

44� �����������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

������������������������������������������������J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol.<br />

2008;22:117–118.<br />

45 Garcovich S, Di Giampetruzzi AR, Antonelli G, Garcovich A, Didona B.<br />

Treatment of refractory adult-onset pityriasis rubra pilaris with TNFalpha<br />

antagonists: a case series. J Eur Acad Dermatol. 20<strong>10</strong>;24:<br />

881–884.<br />

46� ����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

of pityriasis rubra pilaris with adalimumab treatment. Clin Exp Dermatol.<br />

2009;35:e155–e156.<br />

47� ��������������������������������������������������������������������������mumab.<br />

Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:99–<strong>10</strong>1.<br />

48 Kerr AC, Ferguson J. Type II adult-onset pityriasis rubra pilaris successfully<br />

treated with intravenous immunoglobulin. Br J Dermatol.<br />

2007;156:<strong>10</strong>55–<strong>10</strong>56.<br />

49� ��������������������������������������������������������Clin Exp Dermatol.<br />

1991;16:181–184.<br />

50� ����������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

pilaris with combination eternacept and acitretin therapy. Arch Dermatol.<br />

2007;143:1597–1599.<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:18–23 23<br />

������������������������


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />

REVIEW<br />

The Role of Surgical Debridement in Healing<br />

of Diabetic Foot Ulcers<br />

Katherine A. Gordon, BS; Elizabeth A. Lebrun, MD; Marjana Tomic-Canic, PhD; Robert S. Kirsner MD, PhD<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

A critical question in the treatment of chronic wounds is whether and when debridement is needed. The three most common chronic<br />

wounds are the diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), the venous leg ulcer, and the pressure or decubitus ulcer. Surgical debridement, aimed at removing<br />

necrotic, devitalized wound bed and wound edge tissue that inhibits healing, is a longstanding standard of care for the treatment<br />

of chronic, nonhealing wounds. Debridement encourages healing by converting a chronic nonhealing wound environment into a more<br />

responsive acute healing environment. While the rationale for debridement seems logical, the evidence to support its use in enhancing<br />

healing is scarce. Currently, there is more evidence in the literature for debridement for DFUs than for venous ulcers and pressure ulcers;<br />

however, the studies on which clinicians have based their rationale for debridement in DFUs possess methodologic flaws, small sample<br />

sizes, and bias. Thus, further studies are needed to develop clinical evidence for its inclusion in treatment protocols for chronic wounds.<br />

Here, the authors review the scientific evidence for debridement of DFUs, the rationale for debridement of DFUs, and the insufficient data<br />

supporting debridement for venous ulcers and pressure ulcers. (<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:24–26)<br />

A<br />

question commonly encountered when treating chronic<br />

wounds is whether and when debridement is needed.<br />

The 3 most common chronic wounds are the diabetic<br />

foot ulcer (DFU), the venous leg ulcer, and the pressure or decubitus<br />

ulcer. The former 2 chronic wounds have been more extensively<br />

studied. Using DFU as an example, certainly the question<br />

is of importance, considering that an estimated 15% of the 170<br />

million people currently with diabetes mellitus will develop a<br />

foot ulcer during their lifetime. 1,2<br />

The multifactor etiology of DFUs includes peripheral vascular disease<br />

along with sensory, motor, and autonomic neuropathy. 3 DFUs<br />

are a major cause of morbidity and mortality due to increased<br />

amputations, infections, and hospitalizations in diabetic patients. 4<br />

At first glance it would seem to be a rather simple question.<br />

Surgical debridement is a longstanding standard of care for<br />

DFUs, aimed at removing necrotic, devitalized wound bed and<br />

wound edge tissue that inhibits healing. Such tissue includes<br />

hyperkeratotic epidermis (callus) and necrotic dermal tissue,<br />

foreign debris, and harmful bacterial elements. 5 Various debridement<br />

methods exist, including surgery, wet-to-dry dressings,<br />

biosurgery (ie, maggots), enzyme preparations, polysaccharide<br />

beads or paste dextranomer polysaccharide, and hydrogels. 3 This<br />

contribution focuses on surgical debridement.<br />

Debridement encourages healing by converting a chronic<br />

nonhealing wound environment into a more responsive acute<br />

healing environment. 6 Debridement is included in multiple<br />

guidelines for the care of DFUs, including the American Diabetes<br />

Association, the American College of Foot and Ankle<br />

Surgeons, and the Wound Healing Society; however, herein lies<br />

the issue: while the rationale for debridement seems logical, the<br />

evidence to support its use in enhancing healing is scarce.<br />

REVIEW OF CURRENT LITERATURE<br />

Many studies on which clinicians have based their rationale for<br />

debridement possess methodologic flaws, small sample sizes,<br />

and bias. 3 A recent paper7 systematically reviewed 5 published<br />

clinical trials that investigated surgical debridement of DFUs<br />

to enhance healing. 5,8,9 These clinical trials were found to be<br />

defective in their methodology, statistically insignificant, or<br />

lacking in definitive scientific evidence for surgical debridement<br />

in the treatment of DFUs. 7 In addition, most existing studies<br />

are not randomized clinical trials optimized to test the relationship<br />

between debridement of DFUs and wound healing.<br />

A focused, well-designed study is needed, therefore, to elucidate<br />

the effect of surgical debridement on the healing status of<br />

chronic wounds.<br />

From the Department of Dermatology & Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL<br />

Address for Correspondence: Robert S. Kirsner, MD, PhD, Department of Dermatology & Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller<br />

School of Medicine, 1600 NW <strong>10</strong>th Avenue, RMSB, Room 2023-A, Miami, FL 33136 <strong>•</strong> E-mail: rkirsner@med.miami.edu<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:24–26 24<br />

© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE FOR DFU DEBRIDEMENT<br />

The biological and molecular basis for debridement has been<br />

investigated in several studies. <strong>10</strong>,11 Molecular and histologic analyses<br />

of biopsies from the nonhealing edge of a chronic wound<br />

have been suggested to validate the use of debridement. <strong>10</strong><br />

Keratinocytes become activated following wounding and are key<br />

players in restoring the epidermal barrier during wound healing. 12<br />

Keratinocytes and fibroblasts at the nonhealing edges of chronic<br />

wounds were shown to exhibit not only a pathogenic phenotype<br />

detrimental to healing but also a slowed migratory capacity. <strong>10</strong>–13 In<br />

chronic wounds, the keratinocytes multiply at a higher rate than<br />

usual (hyperproliferation), yet they are unable to migrate into the<br />

wound as would be normally expected. <strong>10</strong>–13 Basically, keratinocytes<br />

on a chronic wound edge are capable of proliferating but are<br />

unable to migrate properly. 12 These nonhealing keratinocytes of the<br />

chronic wound edge are marked by induction of c-Myc and nuclearization<br />

of β-catenin, which may contribute to the inhibition of<br />

migration. <strong>10</strong>–12 Many clinicians visually identify this nonhealing<br />

phenotype as a “callus,” indicating the need for removal to facilitate<br />

wound healing. 14 Debridement seems to be a reasonable solution<br />

to the problem of nonmigratory tissue in the margins of chronic<br />

wounds. Researchers suggest that debridement will be effective if<br />

unresponsive cells are surgically removed, and cells responsive to<br />

wound healing signals and topical agents are optimized. 11<br />

RATIONALE FOR DEBRIDEMENT OF DFUS<br />

The benefits of debridement include removal of bacteria,<br />

senescent cells, and hyperproliferative nonmigratory tissue and<br />

stimulation of growth factor activity. 15<br />

Bacterial burden in a wound likely impedes healing, 16 as greater<br />

bacterial load and certain types of bacteria have been shown<br />

to reduce healing responses. 17,18 Bacteria in chronic wounds<br />

stimulate a prolonged inflammatory response with a concomitant<br />

release of free oxygen radicals and various lytic enzymes,<br />

ultimately causing tissue damage. 19 In addition, biofilms, which<br />

are communities of bacteria and other organisms embedded<br />

in an extrapolysaccharide matrix within the wound bed, show<br />

increased resistance to antimicrobial agents and to the host<br />

immune system. 20,21 Debridement is an effective way to remove<br />

bacterial burden and biofilms from nonhealing wounds.<br />

Additionally, growth factors are reduced in chronic wounds,<br />

including platelet-derived growth factor, fibroblast growth factor,<br />

epidermal growth factor, and transforming growth factor<br />

β. 22 Dead tissue within chronic wounds, which is removed by<br />

surgical debridement, is unreceptive to growth factors. 23 In addition,<br />

the bleeding and platelet activation caused by debridement<br />

stimulates the production of blood-borne growth factors, further<br />

promoting wound healing. 24<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:24–26<br />

25<br />

REVIEW<br />

Senescent cells have markedly decreased proliferation and protein<br />

production. 17 Chronic wound fibroblasts are less receptive to<br />

growth factor stimuli, 25 making these wounds less likely to heal<br />

or respond to treatments. 26 Overall, debridement removes both<br />

the hyperproliferative edge and the senescent cells of the chronic<br />

wound, thus allowing the remaining cells to undergo normal<br />

proliferation, migration, response to treatment, and healing.<br />

DEBRIDEMENT AND VENOUS ULCERS<br />

Another example of a chronic wound is venous ulcer. Venous insufficiency<br />

is the most common cause of lower-extremity ulcers and<br />

accounts for the development of approximately 1 million venous<br />

ulcers in patients in the United States with venous insufficiency. 27<br />

There are many theories for the mechanism of venous ulcer development,<br />

including pericapillary fibrin cuff deposition, abnormalities<br />

of the fibrinolytic system, trapping of growth factors by macromolecules<br />

in the dermis, and leukocyte plugging in the vessels of the lower<br />

extremities. 28–30 The treatment modalities for venous ulcers include<br />

bed rest with leg elevation31 ; compression therapy32 ; aspirin33 ; pentoxifylline34<br />

; skin grafting, 35 including cultured epidermal autografts<br />

and allografts36,37 ; superficial venous surgery38 ; and debridement. 17,39<br />

The data supporting debridement for venous ulcers are even<br />

more sparse than for DFUs. The role of debridement in the<br />

treatment of venous ulcers has not been proven, although it is<br />

used as a standard of care. 39 One controlled, prospective cohort<br />

study involving 53 patients for 12 months evaluated sharp<br />

debridement in combination with standard treatment regimens<br />

for nonhealing venous leg ulcers. 40 The study group contained<br />

ulcers that had slough, nonviable tissue and no granulation tissue,<br />

while the control group had ulcers with 15% to 20% granulation<br />

tissue without slough or nonviable tissue. Although they<br />

failed to reach statistical significance, the authors concluded that<br />

sharp debridement was effective at initiating the healing process.<br />

They found a 6-cm 2 reduction in the mean surface area of the<br />

study group ulcers, compared with a 1-cm 2 reduction in the<br />

control group in the first 4 weeks (P = .02). 40<br />

Clinical experience also dictates that venous ulcers are commonly<br />

more difficult to debride than most DFUs, and it is more<br />

time-consuming for the clinician to achieve viable tissue margins<br />

in these cases; therefore, chronic venous ulcers, much like DFUs,<br />

are in need of evidence-based standardized treatment plans.<br />

DEBRIDEMENT AND PRESSURE ULCERS<br />

The most common cause of chronic wounds is the pressure<br />

ulcer. While the rationale for debridement is excellent as part<br />

of standard care when treating pressure ulcers, given the multiple<br />

comorbidities coexistent in patients with pressure ulcers,<br />

the data supporting debridement for pressure ulcers are the least<br />

substantial of the 3 common chronic wounds.<br />

Surgical Debridement in DFUs


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Surgical debridement, despite the need for better data, is part of<br />

standard care in the treatment of chronic, nonhealing wounds,<br />

with better evidence for DFUs than for venous ulcers. Some may<br />

be concerned that debridement may create a new portal of entry<br />

for bacterial organisms, but studies have shown that the rate of<br />

infection does not increase in debrided wounds. 40 Debridement is<br />

relatively safe and convenient in the outpatient setting, but studies<br />

validating the effects on healing continue to be limited. While<br />

debridement continues to be a mainstay of treatment, further<br />

studies are needed to develop clinical evidence for its inclusion<br />

in treatment protocols for chronic wounds. Ideally, a randomized<br />

controlled trial would provide the necessary data for future<br />

evidence-based practice in the treatment of chronic wounds.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes:<br />

estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes<br />

Care. 2004;27:<strong>10</strong>47–<strong>10</strong>53.<br />

2 American Diabetes Association. Consensus development conference<br />

on diabetic foot wound care: April 7–8, 1999; Boston, MA. Adv Wound<br />

Care. 1999;12:353–361.<br />

3 Edwards J, Stapley S. Debridement of diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane<br />

Database Syst Rev. 20<strong>10</strong>;(1):CD003556.<br />

4 Margolis DJ, Kantor J, Berlin JA. Healing of diabetic neuropathic foot<br />

ulcers receiving standard treatment. A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care.<br />

1999;22:692–695.<br />

5 Cardinal M, Eisenbud DE, Armstrong DG, et al. Serial surgical<br />

debridement: a retrospective study on clinical outcomes in chronic lower<br />

extremity wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17:306–311.<br />

6 Golinko MS, Joffe R, Maggi J, et al. Operative debridement of diabetic<br />

foot ulcers. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:e1–e16.<br />

7 Lebrun E, Tomic-Canic M, Kirsner RS. The role of surgical debridement in<br />

healing of diabetic foot ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 20<strong>10</strong>;18:433–438.<br />

8 Steed DL, Donohoe D, Webster MW, Lindsley L. Effect of extensive<br />

debridement and treatment on the healing of diabetic foot ulcers.<br />

Diabetic Ulcer Study Group. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183:61–64.<br />

9 Piaggesi A, Schipani E, Campi F, et al. Conservative surgical approach<br />

versus non-surgical management for diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers: a randomized<br />

trial. Diabet Med. 1998;15:412–417.<br />

<strong>10</strong> Piaggesi A, Viacava P, Rizzo L, et al. Semiquantitative analysis of the<br />

histopathological features of the neuropathic foot ulcer: effects of pressure<br />

relief. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:3123–3128.<br />

11 Saap LJ, Falanga V. Debridement performance index and its correlation<br />

with complete closure of diabetic foot ulcers. Wound Repair Regen.<br />

2002;<strong>10</strong>:354–359.<br />

12 Brem H, Stojadinovic O, Diegelmann RF, et al. Molecular markers in<br />

patients with chronic wounds to guide surgical debridement. Mol Med.<br />

2007;13:30–39.<br />

13 Stojadinovic O, Brem H, Vouthounis C, et al. Molecular pathogenesis<br />

of chronic wounds: the role of beta-catenin and c-myc in the inhibition<br />

of epithelialization and wound healing. Am J Pathol. 2005;167:59–69.<br />

14 Tomic-Canic M, Ayello EA, Stojadinovic O, Golinko MS, Brem H.<br />

Using gene transcription patterns (bar coding scans) to guide wound<br />

debridement and healing. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2008;21:487–492;<br />

quiz 493–494.<br />

15 Morasso MI, Tomic-Canic M. Epidermal stem cells: the cradle of epidermal<br />

determination, differentiation and wound healing. Biol Cell.<br />

2005;97:173–183.<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:24–26<br />

26<br />

REVIEW<br />

16 Schultz GS, Sibbald RG, Falanga V, et al. Wound bed preparation: a<br />

systematic approach to wound management. Wound Repair Regen.<br />

2003;11 suppl 1:S1–S28.<br />

17 Zacur H, Kirsner RS. Debridement: rationale and therapeutic options.<br />

Wounds. 2002;14(suppl E):2E–7E.<br />

18 Bucknall TE. The effect of local infection upon wound healing: an experimental<br />

study. Br J Surg. 1980;67:851–855.<br />

19 Robson MC, Stenberg BD, Heggers JP. Wound healing alterations caused<br />

by infection. Clin Plast Surg. 1990;17:485–492.<br />

20 Robson MC, Heggers JP. Surgical infection. II. The beta-hemolytic<br />

streptococcus. J Surg Res. 1969;9:289–292.<br />

21 Serralta VW, Harrison-Balestra C, Cazzaniga AL, Davis SC, Mertz<br />

M. Lifestyles of bacteria in wounds: presence of biofilms? Wounds.<br />

2001;13:29–34.<br />

22 Kerstein MD, Reis ED. Current surgical perspectives in wound healing.<br />

Wounds. 2001;13:53–58.<br />

23 Mulder GD, Vande Berg JS. Cellular senescence and matrix metalloproteinase<br />

activity in chronic wounds. Relevance to debridement and new<br />

technologies. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2002;92:34–37.<br />

24 Hunt TK, Hopf H, Hussain Z. Physiology of wound healing. Adv Skin<br />

Wound Care. 2007;13(2 suppl):6–11.<br />

25 Hasan A, Murata H, Falabella A, et al. Dermal fibroblasts from venous<br />

ulcers are unresponsive to the action of transforming growth factor-beta<br />

1. J Dermatol Sci. 2007;16:59–66.<br />

26 Margolis DJ, Berlin JA, Strom BL. Which venous leg ulcers will heal with<br />

limb compression bandages? Am J Med. 2000;<strong>10</strong>9:15–19.<br />

27 Valencia IC, Falabella A, Kirsner RS, Eaglstein WH. Chronic venous insufficiency<br />

and venous leg ulceration. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;44:<br />

401–421; quiz 422–424.<br />

28 Falanga V, Eaglstein WH. The “trap” hypothesis of venous ulceration.<br />

Lancet. 1993;341:<strong>10</strong>06–<strong>10</strong>08.<br />

29 Browse NL, Burnand KG. The cause of venous ulceration. Lancet.<br />

1982;2:243–245.<br />

30 Thomas PR, Nash GB, Dormandy JA. White cell accumulation in dependent<br />

legs of patients with venous hypertension: a possible mechanism for trophic<br />

changes in the skin. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988;296:1693–1695.<br />

31 Abu-Own A, Scurr JH, Coleridge Smith PD. Effect of leg elevation on<br />

the skin microcirculation in chronic venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg.<br />

1994;20:705–7<strong>10</strong>.<br />

32 Blair SD, Wright DD, Backhouse CM, Riddle E, McCollum CN.<br />

Sustained compression and healing of chronic venous ulcers. BMJ.<br />

1988;297:1159–1161.<br />

33 Layton AM, Ibbotson SH, Davies JA, Goodfield MJ. Randomised trial of<br />

oral aspirin for chronic venous leg ulcers. Lancet. 1994;344:164–165.<br />

34 Jull AB, Waters J, Arroll B. Pentoxifylline for treating venous leg ulcers.<br />

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD001733.<br />

35 Douglas WS, Simpson NB. Guidelines for the management of<br />

chronic venous leg ulceration. Report of a multidisciplinary workshop.<br />

British Association of Dermatologists and the Research Unit of the<br />

Royal College of Physicians. Br J Dermatol. 1995;132:446–452.<br />

36 Limova M, Mauro T. Treatment of leg ulcers with cultured epithelial<br />

autografts: treatment protocol and five year experience. Wounds.<br />

1995;7:170–180.<br />

37 Phillips TJ, Kehinde O, Green H, Gilchrest BA. Treatment of skin ulcers<br />

with cultured epidermal allografts. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;21(2 pt<br />

1):191–199.<br />

38 Olivencia JA. Subfascial endoscopic ligation of perforator veins (SEPS) in<br />

the treatment of venous ulcers. Int Surg. 2000;85:266–269.<br />

39 de Araujo T, Valencia I, Federman DG, Kirsner RS. Managing the patient<br />

with venous ulcers. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:326–334.<br />

40 Williams D, Enoch S, Miller D, et al. Effect of sharp debridement using<br />

curette on recalcitrant nonhealing venous leg ulcers: a concurrently<br />

controlled, prospective cohort study. Wound Repair Regen.<br />

2005;13:131–137.<br />

Surgical Debridement in DFUs


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />

Tuberculosis (TB) is a common disease worldwide, 1<br />

and its clinical incidence has been impacted by the<br />

emergence of the human immunodeficiency virus<br />

(HIV), increased transmigration from endemic countries,<br />

and its transmission in health care facilities, prisons, homeless<br />

shelters, and other crowded settings. 2–5 TB is largely an airborne<br />

infection; however, skin manifestations may be caused<br />

by hematogenous spread or the contiguity from latent and/or<br />

active foci of infection. Primary inoculation, although uncommon,<br />

is another known mode of transmission. HIV infection,<br />

intravenous drug abuse, diabetes mellitus, immunosuppressive<br />

therapy, malignancies, end-stage renal disease, and infancy may<br />

predispose to TB. Although cutaneous TB (CTB) is a well-<br />

recognized clinical entity, it often poses a diagnostic dilemma<br />

for physicians 6 ; therefore, it is important to perform a careful<br />

review of clinical presentations in each patient, which may prove<br />

predictive of its diagnosis. 7,8<br />

CLASSIFICATION<br />

The most widely accepted CTB classification is based on the<br />

route of infection. 6,9 Exogenous inoculation occurs after the<br />

direct inoculation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis into the skin of a<br />

person who is susceptible to infection (vide infra). This may cause<br />

TB verrucosa cutis (TBVC), TB chancre, and some cases of lupus<br />

vulgaris (LV), whereas endogenous infection is caused by either<br />

lymphatic or hematogenous spread or a contiguous extension.<br />

Occasionally, lymphatic spread is seen in LV. Hematogenous<br />

spread, on the other hand, is responsible for acute miliary TB,<br />

metastatic tubercular abscess, gummatous TB, papulonecrotic<br />

tuberculid (PNT), and lupus vugaris. Contiguous extension<br />

CORE CURRICULUM<br />

Virendra N. Sehgal, MD, Section Editor<br />

Cutaneous Tuberculosis: A Diagnostic Dilemma<br />

Virendra N. Sehgal, MD; 1 Prashant Verma, MD; 2 Sambit N. Bhattacharya, MD; 2 Sonal Sharma, MD; 3<br />

Navjeevan Singh, MD; 3 Nishant Verma, MD 4<br />

Cutaneous tuberculosis continues to be one of the most difficult conditions to diagnose. It is a challenge particularly in developing<br />

countries due to the lack of resources. The authors define the classification and clinical manifestations considered predictive of its diagnosis.<br />

from the underlying lesion is a characteristic feature of both<br />

scrofuloderma and TB cutis orificialis (TBCO).<br />

In attempt to embellish the preceding classification, it has been<br />

divided into multibacillary and paucibacillary variants based on<br />

the bacterial load. The former is recognized by the characteristic<br />

morphology of the organism in the tissue sections stained<br />

with Ziehl-Neelsen method, complemented by in vitro recovery<br />

of M tuberculosis, while sparse bacilli on histological examination<br />

and rare in vitro culture isolation 2 identify the latter.<br />

Unfortunately, it is difficult to distinguish the organisms in<br />

paucibacillary TB.<br />

CLINICAL FEATURES<br />

Although the prevalence of CTB accounts for 1.5% of all cases<br />

of TB, it is, nevertheless, important to consider the entity when<br />

patients present with a suggestive clinical morphology. CTB has<br />

many forms, including multibacillary and paucibacillary CTB,<br />

which are defined in detail below.<br />

MULTIBACILLARY CTB<br />

TB CHANCRE/INOCULATION TB<br />

Tuberculous chancre (primary inoculation TB) is a variant of<br />

multibacillary CTB that results from direct introduction of<br />

mycobacteria into the skin or mucosa of an individual who neither<br />

had tubercular infection in the past nor was immunized<br />

with Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG). Trauma also facilitates the<br />

entry of the organism into the skin. <strong>10</strong>,11<br />

Face and other exposed areas are vulnerable sites of introduction.<br />

The organism multiplies in tissue macrophages and migrates to<br />

From the Dermato-Venereology (Skin/VD) Center, Sehgal Nursing Home, Panchwati, Delhi; 1 the Departments of Dermatology and STD2 and<br />

Pathology, 3 University College of Medical Sciences and Associated Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi; and the Department of Microbiology,<br />

Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya, Delhi, 4 India<br />

Address for Correspondence: Virendra N. Sehgal, MD, Dermato-Venerology (Skin/VD) Center, Sehgal Nursing Home, A/6 Panchwati, Delhi<br />

1<strong>10</strong> 033 India <strong>•</strong> E-mail: drsehgal@ndf.vsnl.net.in<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:28–33 28<br />

© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

regional lymph nodes. An inflammatory papule develops in 2<br />

to 4 weeks after inoculation that breaks down into a firm, nonhealing,<br />

shallow, nontender, undermined ulcer with a granulomatous<br />

base. Painless regional lymphadenopathy is a cardinal<br />

sign, appearing after about 3 to 8 weeks. Numerous bacilli are<br />

demonstrable at the inoculation site and regional lymph node.<br />

The ultimate ulceroglandular lesion is a “mirror image” of the<br />

Ghon’s complex. Its clinical course varies according to the hostimmune<br />

response. 12<br />

The primary lesion heals with scarring after 1 to 3 months;<br />

however, with a less effective host-immune response, the bacterial<br />

load remains high, and healing may be delayed up to<br />

12 months. Regional nodes may suppurate, erode, and perforate<br />

the surface of overlying skin, resulting in scrofuloderma. Latent<br />

foci of infection may persist at the site and progress to either<br />

LV or TBVC despite evident tuberculin sensitivity. Hematogenous<br />

dissemination of mycobacteria from skin can result in TB<br />

at other sites, particularly bones or joints, or progress to acute<br />

miliary disease with poor outcome.<br />

SCROFULODERMA (TB COLLIQUATIVE CUTIS)<br />

Scrofuloderma (TB colliquative cutis) is the most common<br />

form of CTB in children. It results from the direct extension<br />

from an underlying TB focus, such as a regional lymph node<br />

or infected bone or joint, to the overlying skin. Lesions present<br />

as firm, painless, subcutaneous, red-brown nodules overlying an<br />

infected focus, which gradually enlarge and suppurate, forming<br />

ulcers and sinus tracts that drain watery, purulent, and/or caseous<br />

material. The ulcers heal with typical puckered scarring. 13<br />

TB CUTIS ORIFICIALIS<br />

The lesions associated with TBCO are frequently characterized<br />

by erythematous, edematous nodules, and/or plaques. Painful<br />

central ulceration covered by necrotic pseudomembranous<br />

material with an irregular border is apparent. Constitutional<br />

symptoms of TBCO include fever, malaise, weight loss, and<br />

night sweats. The oral mucosa and tongue are the most commonly<br />

afflicted sites. 2 The exact mechanism resulting in TBCO<br />

is unknown; however, ingestion of bacilli in sputum from active<br />

pulmonary TB, hematogenous and lymphatic spread, and direct<br />

spread from adjacent organs has been alleged, 14 with ingestion<br />

of bacilli in sputum being the most accepted mode. 15 There has<br />

been a reported case of isolated perianal TB without pulmonary<br />

or gastrointestinal involvement. 16<br />

DISSEMINATED MILIARY TB<br />

Disseminated miliary TB is characterized by a wide dissemination<br />

of M tuberculosis in the body and shows a distinctive<br />

CORE CURRICULUM<br />

pattern of millet-sized, multiple, tiny lesions on chest x-ray,<br />

distributed throughout the lung fields. It may hematogenously<br />

infect any number of organs including the lungs, liver, and<br />

spleen in patients with advanced TB. There is a systemic failure<br />

of the cell-mediated immune system that allows and facilitates<br />

the spread of infection, resulting in rapid deterioration<br />

and death. 4,17,18 Certain events, infections, and medications<br />

that suppress the body’s cell-mediated immune system may<br />

precipitate this infection. Although miliary TB is rare and<br />

well known for its occurrence in children, it is an increasingly<br />

serious infection in immunosuppressed patients, such as those<br />

infected with HIV and those on long-term oral corticosteroid<br />

therapy or other immunosuppressive therapies for organ<br />

transplant or inflammatory and autoimmune conditions.<br />

Cutaneous skin lesions associated with miliary TB consist of<br />

small, erythematous to violaceous papules or pustules with<br />

hemorrhagic necrosis and umbilication affecting a substantial<br />

portion of the body. Healing is indicated by the presence of<br />

atrophic, depressed scars surrounded by a brownish, hyperpigmented<br />

halo.<br />

METASTATIC TUBERCULOUS ABSCESSES (GUMMA)<br />

Metastatic tuberculous abscesses (gumma) may either arise<br />

from the breakdown of an old healed tubercle that still has<br />

live organisms or in immunocompromised individuals. 2,4<br />

Accordingly, it is usually seen in malnourished children and<br />

immunosuppressed adults. 6 Single or multiple, nontender, fluctuant<br />

nodules develop, forming draining sinuses and abscesses<br />

(Figure 1). Nodules may occur at any location without specific<br />

predominance.<br />

Figure 1. Metastatic tuberculous abscesses (gumma): a<br />

single, nontender, fluctuant nodule, draining sinus is apparent.<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:28–33 29<br />

Cutaneous Tuberculosis


PAUCIBACILLARY CTB<br />

<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

TB VERRUCOSA CUTIS<br />

TBVC occurs after direct inoculation of M tuberculosis into the<br />

skin of previously infected individuals. It manifests as a painless,<br />

solitary, purplish or brownish red warty plaque that may extend<br />

peripherally, causing central atrophy, or form fissures that exude<br />

pus or keratinous material (Figure 2). It is often accompanied by<br />

lymphadenopathy. Skin lesions may evolve and persist for years,<br />

although spontaneous resolution may also occur. Response to<br />

treatment is favorable. 6,19<br />

LUPUS VULGARIS<br />

LV is a chronic and progressive form of CTB that is widely<br />

described as the most common form. Lesions occur on normal<br />

skin as a result of direct extension from underlying deeper TB<br />

focus, by lymphatic or hematogenous spread, after primary inoculation<br />

or BCG vaccination, or in scars of old scrofuloderma. 20<br />

Lesions are typically small, solitary, nodular, sharply defined,<br />

and reddish brown with a gelatinous consistency. “Apple-jelly”<br />

nodules present on the head and neck of individuals in Western<br />

Figure 2. Tuberculosis verrucosa cutis illustrating verrucous,<br />

hyperkeratotic fissured lesions.<br />

CORE CURRICULUM<br />

Figure 3. Lupus vulgaris: well-circumscribed plaque,<br />

displaying coalesce of discrete, red-brown papules, elevated<br />

verrucous border, and central atrophy.<br />

countries, while lesions on the lower extremities or buttocks<br />

are present in individuals in tropical and subtropical areas. It<br />

has several clinical variations such as classic plaque or keratotic<br />

hypertrophic, ulcerative, and vegetating. The plaque type begins<br />

as discrete, red-brown papules that coalesce and form plaques<br />

with a slightly elevated verrucous border and central atrophy<br />

(Figure 3). Persistent lesions may damage underlying tissue and<br />

ulcerate, causing severe disfigurement and an increased risk of<br />

skin cancer. 21<br />

TUBERCULIDS<br />

The relationship between tuberculids and TB is a subject of continuing<br />

debate. They are generalized exanthems with a moderate<br />

to high degree of host immunity to TB. Patients are usually in<br />

good health and show (1) positive tuberculin skin test results;<br />

(2) inactive tuberculous involvement of viscera or lymph nodes;<br />

(3) negative staining and culture for pathogenic mycobacteria<br />

in affected tissue; and (4) skin lesions that heal with remission<br />

or treatment of TB. Its morphological variations include lichen<br />

scrofulosorum (LS), 22 erythema induratum of Bazin (EIB),<br />

and PNT.<br />

Tuberculids may be classified into 2 groups: (1) true tuberculids,<br />

and (2) facultative tuberculids. M tuberculosis plays a major<br />

etiologic role in the former, while it is one of several possible<br />

etiologic agents in the latter. Tuberculids were once believed to<br />

be a result of hypersensitivity to the presence of mycobacterial<br />

antigens within a host of previously acquired immunity to TB;<br />

however, most are now known not to be uniquely caused by<br />

M tuberculosis. PNT and LS are still widely accepted as true<br />

tuberculids and EIB as a facultative tuberculid. 22<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:28–33 30<br />

Cutaneous Tuberculosis


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

Figure 4. Lichen scrofulosorum: multiple, small, grouped,<br />

firm, perifollicular, lichenoid papules and/or plaques.<br />

LICHEN SCROFULOSORUM<br />

LS is an eruption of multiple, small, grouped, asymptomatic,<br />

firm, perifollicular, lichenoid papules and/or plaques (Figure<br />

4), most often affecting children or young adults, that progresses<br />

and subsides within weeks to months without scarring.<br />

4,23 An association between LV, caries of the spine, LS, 24<br />

and its unusual occurrence in pulmonary TB25 has been<br />

described in the past.<br />

ERYTHEMA INDURATUM OF BAZIN<br />

EIB is a TB-associated panniculitis that presents with multiple,<br />

painful, recurring, ulcerated nodules that affect the legs of<br />

women. 4,6 Pre-existing vascular disease may predispose patients<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:28–33<br />

31<br />

CORE CURRICULUM<br />

to lesions during exposure to cold weather. Lesions are chronic,<br />

slow to resolve (if at all), and result in atrophic hyperpigmented<br />

scarring after several months (Figure 5). Although patients show<br />

TB skin hypersensitivity, acid-fast bacilli (AFB) are rarely identified.<br />

A study from Spain demonstrated that about <strong>10</strong>% of cases<br />

were positive for M tuberculosis using polymerase chain reaction<br />

(PCR). 26 A case series and literature review revealed that organisms,<br />

such as Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium marinum,<br />

may also be involved in the etiology of EIB, although no<br />

evidence of such was found during the investigation. It was<br />

suggested that EIB has diverse etiologies with varying pathogenesis,<br />

leading to similar histological changes, and the cases<br />

analyzed may not have had an infectious etiology (suggesting a<br />

facultative tuberculid picture). 27<br />

PAPULONECROTIC TUBERCULID<br />

Papulonecrotic tuberculid occurs as a chronic and recurrent symmetric<br />

eruption of necrotizing skin papules appearing in clusters<br />

and healing with varioliform scars (Figure 6). Tubercle bacilli are<br />

difficult to demonstrate, but patients typically have an internal<br />

focus of TB and are tuberculin sensitive, and skin lesions resolve<br />

after anti-TB therapy. TB DNA has been detected in these<br />

lesions using PCR amplification reactions. 28 Lesions appear on<br />

the exterior aspects of extremities, knees, elbows, buttocks, and<br />

lower trunk in a symmetric distribution, often in clusters. Individual<br />

lesions are asymptomatic, small, dusky red papules with<br />

a central punctum or crust. Involution is common after 6 to 8<br />

weeks. 29<br />

DIAGNOSIS<br />

Diagnosis of CTB is based on relative and absolute criteria, in<br />

addition to supportive immunologic evidence. 30<br />

Figure 5. Erythema induratum occupying the lower leg. Figure 6. Papulonecrotic tuberculid.<br />

Cutaneous Tuberculosis


RELATIVE DIAGNOSIS<br />

<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

CARDINAL MORPHOLOGIC FEATURES (VIDE SUPRA)<br />

A characteristic history of evolution of the disease is distinct<br />

in re-infection and re-activation. In re-infection, a history<br />

of primary infection or BCG vaccination must be obtained.<br />

The latter forms an important component of the immunization<br />

program in some countries, including India, and may be<br />

identified by a BCG vaccination scar at the insertion point on<br />

the left deltoid. In re-activation, on the other hand, a history<br />

of TB, established by clinical and/or investigative procedures,<br />

followed by cure and an asymptomatic period on completion<br />

of specific anti-tubercular therapy. Often, the only evidence<br />

of past infection may be pulmonary scarring and calcification<br />

visible on radiography. Subsequently, any event that lowers<br />

the cell-mediated immunity may re-activate the condition,<br />

resulting in its relapse.<br />

MANTOUX TEST<br />

A positive Mantoux test indicates the cell-mediated skin hypersensitivity<br />

to tuberculin. The response in re-infection may be<br />

higher as compared with that in re-activation TB. This in vivo<br />

test correlates well with the migratory index of lymphocytes to<br />

tuberculin antigen, assayed through leukocyte migration inhibition<br />

test. A strongly positive reaction, however, indicates<br />

active TB. It has only a limited diagnostic application in countries<br />

where the infection is highly prevalent and BCG forms an<br />

integral part of the immunization program and the majority of<br />

adults are tuberculin positive; nevertheless, it may be a useful<br />

adjunct in developed countries.<br />

Microscopic examination of the tissue section may depict a<br />

tuberculoid and tuberculous granuloma. The former, characterized<br />

by a focal accumulation of epithelioid cells, a few giant<br />

cells, and surrounding mantle of mononuclear cells, is a relative<br />

parameter encountered in LV and TBVC. It also demonstrates<br />

caseation necrosis in the center. It may be possible to demonstrate<br />

AFB on Fite’s stain. This granuloma fulfills an absolute<br />

criterion for diagnosis of TB and typifies scrofuloderma.<br />

ABSOLUTE DIAGNOSIS<br />

An absolute diagnosis consists in the demonstration of AFB on<br />

Ziehl-Neelsen’s staining of the smear, prepared from material<br />

from lesions. The colonies should be further subjected to biochemical<br />

and pigment production tests to confirm M tuberculosis.<br />

Recovery of M tuberculosis on inoculation of material from<br />

lesions into guinea pigs.<br />

In an effort to achieve universal access to high-quality diagnosis<br />

and ultimate patient-centered treatment as envisaged by World<br />

CORE CURRICULUM<br />

Health Organization (WHO), it is important to be aware of the<br />

diagnostic modalities thus far available in the global arena. 31<br />

NONTUBERCULOUS MYCOBACTERIA<br />

Physicians should be aware of nontuberculous mycobacteria<br />

(NTMB) in the current context, because they are environmental<br />

organisms capable of causing chronic disease in humans worldwide.<br />

The prevalence of NTMB disease is steadily increasing and<br />

has emerged in previously unrecognized populations. They, too,<br />

are a diagnostic challenge. 32 TB verrucosa cutis–like lesions may<br />

be caused by M bovis. 33<br />

ATYPICAL MYCOBACTERIOSIS<br />

Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare (MAI) is now a wellestablished<br />

cause of cervical lymphadenitis, simulating scrofuloderma,<br />

especially in the pediatric age group in the developed<br />

world. 34 In addition, LV-like morphology may also be encountered<br />

following primary MAI infection. 35<br />

HIV INFECTION AND CTB<br />

HIV-infected patients are vulnerable to contract TB. 36 TB may present<br />

as a rapidly progressive disease in immunosuppressed patients.<br />

Miliary TB is common and may be associated with cutaneous<br />

manifestations. 37 Disseminated CTB may show a high yield of<br />

mycobacterium from an unusual dermatitis in this group. Despite<br />

the dissemination of the organism, the diagnosis of TB may be difficult.<br />

38,39 In addition, atypical presentations of oesophago-pleurocutaneous<br />

and pleuro-cutaneous fistula may be seen. 40,41<br />

In addition to the decrease in tuberculin reactivity, atypical<br />

chest radiographic patterns are common. Biopsy and aspirates<br />

of peripheral and regional lymph nodes, liver, and bone marrow<br />

provide the highest yield and are used for early diagnosis. 42<br />

Co-lesional acquired immunodeficiency syndrome– associated<br />

cutaneous Kaposi’s sarcoma and M tuberculosis–associated<br />

granulomatous inflammation have recently been documented. 43<br />

Tuberculous gumma, new-onset cervical lymphadenopathy, and<br />

worsening of the pre-existing lymphadenitis, yet another highrisk<br />

immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, has previously<br />

been described. 44<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Reviewing the prevalence and variations in the clinical expression<br />

of CTB across the globe may assist in evolving a uniform<br />

pattern of the disease vital for a core curriculum. The comprehension<br />

of the text is, therefore, crucial in developing treatment<br />

strategy through the recommendations of WHO. WHO<br />

believes that the same treatment regimen for pulmonary and/or<br />

extrapulmonary TB should be used. 45<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:28–33 32<br />

Cutaneous Tuberculosis


REFERENCES<br />

<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

1 Sehgal VN, Wagh SA. The history of cutaneous tuberculosis.<br />

Int J Dermatol. 1990;29:666–668.<br />

2 Bravo FG, Gotuzzo E. Cutaneous tuberculosis. Clin Dermatol.<br />

2007;25:173–180.<br />

3 Fariña MC, Gegundez MI, Piqué E, et al. Cutaneous tuberculosis: a<br />

clinical, histopathologic, and bacteriologic study. J Am Acad Dermatol.<br />

1995;33:433–440.<br />

4 MacGregor RR. Cutaneous tuberculosis. Clin Dermatol. 1995;13:245–255.<br />

5 Bhutto AM, Solangi A, Khaskhely NM, et al. Clinical and epidemiological<br />

observations of cutaneous tuberculosis in Larkana, Pakistan. Int J Dermatol.<br />

2002;41:159–165.<br />

6 Barbagallo J, Tager P, Ingleton R, et al. Cutaneous tuberculosis: diagnosis<br />

and treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002;3:319–328.<br />

7 Regnier S, Ouagari Z, Perez ZL, et al. Cutaneous miliary resistant tuberculosis<br />

in a patient infected with human immunodeficiency virus: case<br />

report and literature review. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009;34:e690–e692.<br />

8 Rai VM, Shenoi SD, Gowrinath. Tuberculous gluteal abscess coexisting<br />

with scrofuloderma and tubercular lymphadenitis. Dermatol Online J.<br />

2005;11:14.<br />

9 Lai-Chong JE, Perez A, Tang V, et al. Cutaneous manifestations of tuberculosis.<br />

Clin Exp Dermatol. 2007;32:461–466.<br />

<strong>10</strong> Glickman FS, Price E. Primary inoculation complex (tuberculous chancre).<br />

Arch Dermatol. 1969;<strong>10</strong>0:646–647.<br />

11 Ara M, Seral C, Baselga C, et al. Primary tuberculous chancre caused by<br />

Mycobacterium bovis after goring with a bull’s horn. J Am Acad Dermatol.<br />

2000;43:535–537.<br />

12 Mataix J, Botella R, Herrero A, et al. Tuberculous primary complex of the<br />

skin. Int J Dermatol. 2008;47:479–481.<br />

13 Kiliç A, Gül U, Soylu S, et al. Scrofuloderma: a forgotten disease?<br />

Skinmed. 2007;6:303–304.<br />

14 Sharma MP, Bhatia V. Abdominal tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res.<br />

2004;120:305–315.<br />

15 Ichihashi K, Katoh N, Takenaka H, et al. Orificial tuberculosis: presenting<br />

as a refractory perianal ulcer. Acta Derm Venereol. 2004;84:331–332.<br />

16 Akgun E, Tekin F, Ersin S, et al. Isolated perianal tuberculosis. Neth J<br />

Med. 2005;63:115–117.<br />

17 Sehgal VN, Sharma S, Verma P, et al. Disseminated cutaneous tuberculosis<br />

an atypical presentation of re-infection (secondary) tuberculosis in<br />

an immuno-competent individual. Am J Dermatopathol. 2011. Sep 13.<br />

[Epub ahead of print]<br />

18 Regnier S, Ouagari Z, Perez ZL, et al. Cutaneous miliary resistant tuberculosis<br />

in a patient infected with human immunodeficiency virus: case<br />

report and literature review. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009;34:e690–e692.<br />

19 Afshar K, Mundi M. Tuberculosis verrucosa cutis. Mayo Clin Proc.<br />

2004;79:1562.<br />

20 Marcoval J, Servitje O, Moreno A, et al. Lupus vulgaris. Clinical, histopathologic,<br />

and bacteriologic study of <strong>10</strong> cases. J Am Acad Dermatol.<br />

1992;26:404–407.<br />

21 Akoglu G, Karaduman A, Boztepe G, et al. A case of lupus vulgaris successfully<br />

treated with antituberculous therapy despite negative PCR and<br />

culture. Dermatology. 2005;211:290–292.<br />

22 Frankel A, Penrose C, Emer J. Cutaneous tuberculosis: a practical<br />

case report and review for the dermatologist. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol.<br />

2009;2:19–27.<br />

23 Singal A, Bhattacharya SN. Lichen scrofulosorum: a prospective study of<br />

39 patients. Int J Dermatol. 2005;44:489–493.<br />

24 Sehgal VN, Srivastava G, Sharma VK. Lupus vulgaris, caries of the spine<br />

and lichen scrofulosorum—an intriguing association. Clin Exp Dermatol.<br />

1987;12:280–282.<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:28–33<br />

33<br />

CORE CURRICULUM<br />

25 Seghal VN, Chander R, Logani K. Lichen scrofulosorum: an unusual<br />

expression of pulmonary tuberculosis in a child. J Eur Acad Dermatol<br />

Venereol. 1995;4:71–74.<br />

26 Vieites B, Suárez-Peñaranda JM, Pérez Del Molino ML, et al. Recovery of<br />

Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in biopsies of erythema induratum—<br />

results in a series of patients using an improved polymerase chain reaction<br />

technique. Br J Dermatol. 2005;152:1394–1396.<br />

27 Bayer-Garner IB, Cox MD, Scott MA, et al. Mycobacteria other than<br />

Mycobacterium tuberculosis are not present in erythema induratum/<br />

nodular vasculitis: a case series and literature review of the clinical and<br />

histologic findings. J Cutan Pathol. 2005;32:220–226.<br />

28 Quirós E, Bettinardi A, Quirós A, et al. Detection of mycobacterial DNA<br />

in papulonecrotic tuberculid lesions by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin<br />

Lab Anal. 2000;14:133–135.<br />

29 Freiman A, Ting P, Miller M, et al. Papulonecrotic tuberculid: a rare form<br />

of cutaneous tuberculosis. Cutis. 2005;75:341–346.<br />

30 Sehgal VN. Cutaneous tuberculosis. Dermatol Clin. 1994;12:645–653.<br />

31 The Regional Strategic Plan for TB Control 2006–2015. World Health<br />

Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, World Health<br />

House, Indraprastha Estate, Mahatma Gandhi Road, New Delhi<br />

1<strong>10</strong>002, India.<br />

32 Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, et al. An official ATS/IDSA statement:<br />

diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of non tuberculous mycobacterial<br />

diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:367–416.<br />

33 Wolff K, Tappeiner G. Mycobacterial diseases: tuberculosis and<br />

atypical mycobacterial infection. In: Fitzpatrick TB, Eisen AZ, Wolff<br />

K, eds. Dermatology in General Medicine. 3rd ed. New York, NY:<br />

McGraw Hill; 1987:2152–2170.<br />

34 Starke JR. Management of nontuberculous mycobacterial cervical adenitis.<br />

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000;19:674–675.<br />

35 Kullavanijaya P, Sirimachan S, Surarak S. Primary cutaneous infection<br />

with Mycobacterium avium intracellulare complex resembling<br />

lupus vulgaris. Br J Dermatol. 1997;136:264–266.<br />

36 Starke JR. Tuberculosis. In: Jenson HB, Baltimore RS, eds. Pediatric<br />

Infectious Diseases: Principles and Practices. Philadelphia, PA: WB<br />

Saunders; 2002:396–419.<br />

37 Sharma SK, Mohan A, Sharma A, et al. Miliary tuberculosis: new insights<br />

into an old disease. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:415–430.<br />

38 Regnier S, Ouagari Z, Perez ZL, et al. Cutaneous miliary resistant tuberculosis<br />

in a patient infected with human immunodeficiency virus: case<br />

report and literature review. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009;34:e690-e692.<br />

39 Corbett EL, Crossley I, De Cock KM, et al. Disseminated cutaneous<br />

Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in a patient with AIDS. Genitourin<br />

Med. 1995;71:308–3<strong>10</strong>.<br />

40 Arif M. Oesophago-pleuro-cutaneous fistula in an HIV-positive patient.<br />

Braz J Infect Dis. 20<strong>10</strong>;14:183–185.<br />

41 Gulinelli A, Toledo DO, Coelho-Neto AP, et al. Parasternum pleuralcutaneous<br />

fistula in a severely immunosuppressed HIV-positive patient.<br />

Braz J Infect Dis. 20<strong>10</strong>;14:183–185.<br />

42 Shafer RW, Kim DS, Weiss JP, Quale JM. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis<br />

in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Medicine<br />

(Baltimore). 1991;70:384–397.<br />

43 Ramdial PK, Sing Y, Subrayan S, et al. Granulomas in acquired<br />

immunodeficiency syndrome-associated cutaneous Kaposi sarcoma:<br />

evidence for a role for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Cutan Pathol.<br />

20<strong>10</strong>;37:827–834.<br />

44 Sharma SK, Dhooria S, Barwad P, et al. A study of TB-associated<br />

immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome using the consensus<br />

case-definition. Indian J Med Res. 20<strong>10</strong>;131:804–808.<br />

45 World Health Organization. Treatment of tuberculosis guidelines.<br />

Treatment of extrapulmonary TB and of TB in special situations.<br />

4th ed. Geneva 27, Switzerland; 2009: 95–99.<br />

Cutaneous Tuberculosis


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

SELF-TEST REVIEW QUESTIONS<br />

34<br />

<strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />

W. Clark Lambert, MD, PhD, Section Editor<br />

Instructions: For each of the following numbered questions, choose the most appropriate lettered response(s) Unless directed to choose only one lettered<br />

response, all, some, or none of the responses may be correct.<br />

1) Exogenous inoculation, due to the direct inoculation of Mycobacterium<br />

tuberculosis into the skin of a person who is susceptible<br />

to infection, may be responsible for: (Answer as<br />

many as apply.)<br />

a. acute military tuberculosis.<br />

b. gummatous tuberculosis.<br />

c. lupus vulgaris.<br />

d. papulo-necrotic tuberculid.<br />

e. tuberculous chancre.<br />

f. tuberculosis verrucosa cutis.<br />

2) Exogenous inoculation, due to the direct inoculation of Mycobacterium<br />

tuberculosis into the skin of a person who has<br />

been previously infected but is susceptible to infection, is<br />

most likely to be responsible for: (Choose the single best<br />

response.)<br />

a. acute military tuberculosis.<br />

b. gummatous tuberculosis.<br />

c. lupus vulgaris.<br />

d. papulo-necrotic tuberculid.<br />

e. tuberculous chancre.<br />

f. tuberculosis verrucosa cutis.<br />

3) Which of the following is widely described as the most common<br />

form of cutaneous tuberculosis? (Choose the single best<br />

response.)<br />

a. Acute military tuberculosis<br />

b. Gummatous tuberculosis<br />

c. Lupus vulgaris<br />

d. Papulo-necrotic tuberculid<br />

e. Tuberculous chancre<br />

f. Tuberculosis verrucosa cutis<br />

4) The most accepted mode of development of tuberculosis<br />

cutis oroficialis is: (Choose the single best response.)<br />

a. direct spread from adjacent organs.<br />

b. hematogenous spread.<br />

c. ingestion of bacilli in sputum.<br />

d. lymphatic spread.<br />

e. exogenous inoculation due to the direct inoculation of<br />

Mycobacterium tuberculosis into the skin/mucosa of a<br />

person who is susceptible to infection.<br />

5) “Apple-jelly” nodules present on the head and neck of individuals<br />

in Western countries are most characteristic of: (Choose<br />

the single best response.)<br />

a. erythema induratum of Bazin.<br />

b. lichen scrofulosorum.<br />

c. lupus vulgaris.<br />

d. papulonecrotic tuberculid.<br />

e. tuberculosis verrucosa cutis.<br />

ANSWERS TO SELF-TEST REVIEW QUESTIONS:<br />

1) c, e, f; 2) f; 3) c; 4) c; 5) c<br />

From the Departments of Pathology and Dermatology, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ<br />

Address for Correspondence: W. Clark Lambert, MD, PhD, Room C520 MSB, UMDNJ-NJMS, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07<strong>10</strong>1<br />

<strong>•</strong> E-mail: lamberwc@umdnj.edu<br />

RESTLESS LEG SYNDROME<br />

Drugs that may cause restless leg syndrome (RLS)<br />

Alcohol Haldol Prozac Topamax<br />

Caffeine Iron Remeron Ultram<br />

Celexa Klonopin Risperdal Zoloft<br />

Dilantin Neurotin Seroquel Zyprexa<br />

Elavil Paxil<br />

Adapted from Litt, JZ. Curious, Odd, Rare, and Abnormal Reactions to Medications. Fort Lee,<br />

NJ: Barricade Books; 2009:<strong>10</strong>7.<br />

© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC


Arnika Forte ®<br />

SPEED THE HEALING<br />

Arnika Forte ®<br />

The New Gold Standard<br />

for treating bruising,<br />

swelling, pain<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�<br />

1st and only combination<br />

of Arnica Montana 30x and<br />

Bromelain<br />

One convenient capsule<br />

twice a day<br />

All natural, safe,<br />

physician - formulated<br />

Speed the healing time<br />

from bruising, swelling and<br />

pain after surgery or dermal<br />

filler injections<br />

To Order Call 484-568-0306


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />

COSMETIC SCIENCE<br />

Howard A. Epstein, PhD, Section Editor<br />

Repelling Insects With Safe and Effective<br />

Alternatives to DEET<br />

In addition to the annoying itch that results from biting<br />

insects, insect-borne diseases, including Lyme disease,<br />

encephalitis, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, and West Nile<br />

virus, are all causes of concern for many individuals who wish to<br />

enjoy the outdoor environment during the warmer months of the<br />

year. The military of various nations experienced the same problems<br />

and have conducted much research in developing repellents<br />

to protect their soldiers. The Indian Army used oils of citronella,<br />

camphor, and paraffin as repellents. These agents were effective<br />

for limited periods and therefore the search for more effective<br />

repellents continued. In 1953, N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide<br />

(DEET) was discovered (Figure 1). As of 2007, it was estimated<br />

that 15 million people in the United Kingdom, 78 million people<br />

in the United States, and 200 million people globally use<br />

DEET each year. 1 Over the years, as cases of insect-borne diseases<br />

continued to be reported in the news, so has the use of<br />

DEET. Reports of adverse reactions associated with DEET have<br />

increased with its use.<br />

HEALTH-RELATED ISSUES AND<br />

CONSUMER CONCERNS<br />

In 2004, the Oregon State University (OSU) Agricultural Experiment<br />

Station issued a press release entitled “OSU Scientist Gives<br />

Safety Tips for Use of DEET Against Mosquitoes & West Nile<br />

Virus.” In the release, Dr Damiel Sudakin, an assistant professor<br />

at OSU’s Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology<br />

and toxicologist at the Agricultural Experiment Station was quoted<br />

as expressing concern that hundreds of adverse reactions, most commonly<br />

affecting the skin, are reported each year. The majority of<br />

these adverse reactions occur when DEET is overused or misused. 2<br />

In 2009, Science Daily published a paper entitled “Popular Insect<br />

Repellent DEET Is Neurotoxic.” 3 The contribution referenced a<br />

study that concluded that DEET is not simply a behavior-modifying<br />

chemical, but also inhibits the activity of a key central nervous system<br />

enzyme, acetylcholinesterase, in both insects and mammals. 4<br />

Howard A. Epstein, PhD<br />

In 2004, the Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry issued<br />

a report on the health effects of DEET in humans. The report mentioned<br />

6 cases of DEET ingestion, 3 led to death after ingestion<br />

of 15 mL to 50 mL of 47.5% to 95% DEET filled in bottles. In<br />

2 of these cases, the individuals drank an unspecified amount of<br />

alcohol. In the third case, the individual ingested an unspecified<br />

number of pills with 50 mL of DEET. In yet another case, a woman<br />

ingested 15 mL to 25 mL of 95% DEET and was admitted to a<br />

hospital with right and left atrial enlargement that returned to normal<br />

within 24 hours. This woman survived with no further cardiac<br />

abnormalities. 5 From 1961 to 2002, the Agency reported 8 deaths<br />

related to DEET exposure, 3 resulting from deliberate ingestion,<br />

and 2 following dermal exposure to DEET. The remaining 3 cases<br />

were girls aged 17 months, 5 years, and 6 years. All 3 children were<br />

described as having “heavy, frequent, or nightly applications of<br />

DEET.” The 6-year-old had congenital ornithine carbamoyl transferase<br />

deficiency, which may have contributed to her death. 5 Two<br />

other reported cases involved 2 men, aged 27 and 30 years, who<br />

developed severe psychological effects from exposure to DEET. In<br />

both cases, the men recovered after hospitalization. 5<br />

MILITARY AND GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL:<br />

DERMAL EFFECTS OF DEET EXPOSURE<br />

Unique cutaneous side effects were reported in 15 soldiers who<br />

applied military-issued DEET repellents. One soldier applied a<br />

33% DEET repellent to his skin without washing it off at bedtime.<br />

He developed a vesiculobullous eruption, which cleared after<br />

14 days. Another soldier who went to bed without removing<br />

DEET applied to his skin woke up 8 hours later complaining of<br />

a burning sensation and skin eruptions. A <strong>10</strong>-day treatment with<br />

corticosteroids cleared the condition. Other soldiers reported<br />

burning skin and erythema after application of 50% DEET<br />

solution applied just before bedtime. Three soldiers were referred<br />

to treatment by a dermatologist: 2 of the soldiers developed a<br />

permanent scar and 1 required corrective surgery. 5<br />

From EMD Chemicals Inc, Gibbstown, NJ<br />

Address for Correspondence: Howard A. Epstein, PhD, EMD Chemicals Inc, One International Plaza, Suite 300, Philadelphia, PA 19113 <strong>•</strong><br />

E-mail: howard.epstein@merckgroup.com<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:36–39 36<br />

© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

O<br />

N<br />

Figure 1. DEET CAS<br />

134–62–3.<br />

Other controlled studies in which DEET was applied to 63 volunteers<br />

with a gauze pad soaked in DEET determined that DEET<br />

should be washed from skin prior to sleeping directly related to the<br />

irritant effects of DEET. 5 Additional studies involving 143 National<br />

Park Service employees at Everglades National Park resulted in 36<br />

of the workers having adverse health effects to the applied DEET.<br />

The effects included skin or mucous membrane irritation, transient<br />

numb or burning lips, dizziness, disorientation, and difficulty in<br />

concentration. Headache and nausea were also reported. 5<br />

MULTIPLE CASE STUDIES OF DEET EXPOSURE<br />

An analysis of phone calls to poison control centers in the United<br />

States from 1985 to 1989 represented more than 6 million human<br />

exposures to a variety of chemicals. Of these, 9086 were related to<br />

DEET. Of the DEET-related calls, 54% of patients had no symptoms<br />

at the time of the call and 40% had symptoms thought<br />

to be related to DEET exposure. The most commonly reported<br />

exposure was inhalation of DEET or spray into the eyes. These<br />

exposures were more likely to cause adverse reactions compared<br />

with cases in which small quantities of DEET were ingested. Of<br />

the individuals with symptoms, 88% did not require medical<br />

attention, 35% had minor skin irritation, and 1% experienced<br />

disorientation or brief seizures. There was a reported death from<br />

deliberate consumption of an 8-oz bottle of DEET. Children<br />

were not more likely to develop side effects than adults. 5<br />

CASE REPORTS OF CHILD EXPOSURES<br />

During 1961 to 2002, 14 of the 17 reported cases of significant<br />

DEET toxicity were in children younger than 8 years. The most<br />

frequently reported symptoms of DEET toxicity in children<br />

were lethargy, headaches, tremors, involuntary movements, seizures,<br />

and convulsions. 5 The common route of exposure in children<br />

is frequently dermal or accidental ingestion. Adverse effects<br />

have been reported in an 18.5-month child who was sprayed<br />

with 20% DEET daily for 3 months and a 6-year-old who was<br />

sprayed with 15% DEET on <strong>10</strong> occasions. Generally, children<br />

recover from exposure. In 1989, there were 4 cases of children<br />

ages 3 to 7 years and a 29-year-old man having generalized<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:36–39<br />

37<br />

COSMETIC SCIENCE<br />

seizures associated with the dermal application of DEET, with<br />

fewer than 3 applications. 5<br />

ALTERNATIVES TO DEET<br />

Picaridin, 1-piperidine carboxylic acid-2(2-hydroxxyethyl)-1methpropylester<br />

(Figure 2) was developed by Bayer in the 1980s.<br />

It is a synthetic molecule chemically based on the active agent<br />

in pepper (Piper sp). Picaridin was first registered with the US<br />

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2001 and entered<br />

the market in 2005. Picaridin has a favorable safety profile, most<br />

likely because the compound has not been as commercially<br />

available for as long as DEET, and therefore there is far less information<br />

regarding adverse reactions.<br />

The first report of a contact allergy during commercial use was<br />

reported in 2005, in which a 39-year-old man experienced an<br />

itchy erythematous reaction to a spray a few hours after application<br />

to the skin. 1 Australian soldiers evaluated 19.2% Picaridin<br />

compared with 35% DEET in a gel formulation, with significantly<br />

more soldiers reporting mild discomfort and irritation<br />

with the use of the DEET gel. Published studies indicate that<br />

Picaridin may be as effective as DEET. There are variations in<br />

repellent efficacy depending on species of insect and levels of<br />

use. The literature reports that Picaridin is aesthetically more<br />

“elegant” than DEET in various formulations. 1 It is registered<br />

for use on the human body and clothing to repel biting flies,<br />

ticks, chiggers, fleas, and mosquitoes. 6<br />

NATURAL AND EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVES<br />

IR3535, [3-(N-acetyl-N-butyl)aminopropionic acid ethyl ester]<br />

(Figure 3) has been marketed by Merck KGaA, Darmstadt,<br />

Germany, for the past 30 years. It was registered by the US EPA<br />

in 1999. IR3535 is unique in that it is classified as a biopesticide<br />

repellent. DEET and Picaridin are classified as conventional<br />

insect repellent pesticides. The EPA defines a biopesticide as a<br />

pesticide derived from natural materials including animal, plant,<br />

bacteria, and minerals. Canola oil and baking soda have pesticidal<br />

applications and are considered biopesticides. 7 Biochemical<br />

pesticides are naturally occurring substances that control pests<br />

N<br />

O<br />

C O<br />

CH 2<br />

Me<br />

CH 2<br />

CH<br />

Figure 2. Picaridin,<br />

Chemical Abstracts<br />

Service registry number<br />

119515–38–7.<br />

Et<br />

OH<br />

O O<br />

Figure 3. Ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate<br />

(IR3535), Chemical<br />

Abstracts Service registry<br />

number 52304–36–6.<br />

Alternatives to DEET<br />

N O


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

by nontoxic mechanisms. The EPA has established a special<br />

committee to determine the most appropriate classification<br />

based on established criteria. 7<br />

Biopesticides are usually less toxic than conventional pesticides.<br />

They generally affect only the target pest and closely<br />

related organisms compared with broad-spectrum conventional<br />

pesticides that may affect other organisms including birds and<br />

mammals. 7 IR3535 received this classification because it is functionally<br />

identical to naturally occurring b-alanine. It is a substituted<br />

B amino acid that contains 98% 3-(N-acetyl-N-butyl)<br />

aminopropionic acid, ethyl ester as an active ingredient and 2%<br />

inert ingredients. The end groups are not likely to contribute<br />

to toxicity and it acts to control the target pest via a nontoxic<br />

mode of action. 7 In various studies, IR3535 has been shown to<br />

be as effective as DEET. As with Picaridin the formulation, level<br />

of repellent, and species of insect may be a factor with respect<br />

to repellent efficacy. 1 IR3535 is also reported to be more cosmetically<br />

elegant than DEET when evaluated in various human<br />

Table I. Comparative Toxicology Data for IR3535, 7,8 Picaridin, 9 and DEET <strong>10</strong><br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:36–39<br />

38<br />

COSMETIC SCIENCE<br />

studies. As of publication in 2007, the authors of Insect Repellents:<br />

Principles, Methods, and Uses claim there were no reported<br />

adverse reactions to IR3535. 1 IR3535 is registered for use as an<br />

insect repellent against mosquitoes, deer ticks, body lice, and<br />

biting flies. The formulated products are applied directly to skin.<br />

The low toxicity data for IR3535 implies that there is reasonable<br />

certainty of no harm for the general population, as well as subgroups<br />

including infants and children. 7<br />

REVIEW OF TOXICITY DATA FOR DEET,<br />

PICARIDIN, AND IR3535<br />

Tables I and II review toxicological data obtained from various<br />

sources. Regarding safety classification, the World Health<br />

Organization (WHO) classification for IR3535 is hazard class<br />

U, indicating that the compound is unlikely to present acute<br />

hazard in normal use. 8 The WHO classified Picaridin as class III,<br />

indicating a slight hazard. 9,11 DEET was also designated as class<br />

III by the WHO. 12,13<br />

TEST IR3535 PICARIDIN DEET REPORTED DOSE<br />

Acute toxicity oral rat (lethal dose, 50%) >5000 2236 2170 mg/kg body weight<br />

Acute dermal toxicity rabbit or rat (lethal dose, 50%) >3000 >2000 4280 mg/kg body weight<br />

Acute inhalation (lethal dose, 50%) >5.1 >4.3 NA mg/L<br />

Eye irritation in rabbit Irritating to eye Moderate irritant Irritating<br />

Skin sensitization in guinea pig No No No<br />

Dermal sensitization human (NOEL) No No No mg/kg/d<br />

Subchronic dermal rat (NOEL) 3000 200 300 mg/kg/d<br />

Developmental rat (oral) <strong>10</strong>00 400 250 mg/kg/d<br />

Ames test (Salmonella typhimurium) Nonmutagenic Nonmutagenic Nonmutagenic<br />

Micronucleus assay Nonmutagenic Nonmutagenic Nonmutagenic<br />

Abbreviations: DEET, N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide; NA, not applicable; NOEL, no observed effect level. Higher scores indicate lower potential<br />

for toxicity.<br />

Table II. Information From Various EPA Fact Sheets5,7,9 EPA FACT SHEET CLASS IR3535 PICARIDIN DEET<br />

Acute inhalation toxicity IV IV IV<br />

Primary dermal irritation IV IV III<br />

Acute oral IV III III<br />

Acute dermal III III III<br />

Primary eye II III III<br />

Abbreviations: DEET, N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide; EPA, Environmental Protection Agency. Category I, very highly or highly toxic; category<br />

II, moderately toxic; category III, slightly toxic; category IV, practically nontoxic.<br />

Alternatives to DEET


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Insect repellents are more effective at higher concentrations. In<br />

addition to the level of actives in the formulation, the degree<br />

of efficacy may be related to the species of insect to be repelled.<br />

Another factor is proper use of the repellent. When there is<br />

concern that label directions for use may not be properly followed,<br />

the best option is to suggest the compound with the<br />

least hazard risk. The WHO notes that classification criteria are<br />

guide-points intended to supplement but never substitute for<br />

special knowledge, sound clinical judgment, or experience with<br />

a compound. 13<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Debboun M, Frances SP, Strickman D, eds. Insect Repellents: Principles,<br />

Methods, and Uses. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2006.<br />

2 Gewin V. OSU scientist gives safety tips for use of DEET against<br />

mosquitoes & West Nile virus. http://extension.oregonstate.edu/news/<br />

release/2004/08/osu-scientist. Accessed June 24, 2011.<br />

3 Science Daily. Popular insect repellant DEET is neurotoxic. http://www.<br />

sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08/090804193230.htm. Accessed<br />

June 24, 2011.<br />

4 Corbel V, Stankiewicz M, Pennetier C, et al. Evidence for inhibition of<br />

cholinesterases in insect and mammalian nervous systems by the insect<br />

repellant deet. BMC Biology. 2009;7:47.<br />

5 Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry Division of Toxicology<br />

and Environmental Medicine. Health Effects in Humans: DEET (N,N-<br />

Diethyl-meta-toluamide). Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and<br />

Disease Registry; December 6, 2004. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/consultations/deet/health-effects.html.<br />

Accessed July 12, 2011.<br />

VINTAGE LABEL<br />

Courtesy of BuyEnlarge, Philadelphia, PA<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:36–39<br />

39<br />

COSMETIC SCIENCE<br />

6 National Pesticide Information Center. Picaridin Technical Fact Sheet.<br />

Corvalis, OR: Oregon State University; March 2009. http://npic.orst.<br />

edu. Accessed July 14, 2011.<br />

7 United States Environmental Protection Agency. Pesticides: Regulating<br />

Pesticides. 3-[N-Butyl-N-acetyl]-aminopropionic acid, ethyl ester (113509)<br />

Technical Document. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection<br />

Agency; <strong>February</strong> 1999. http://.epa.gov/opp00001/biopesticides/<br />

ingredients. Accessed July 13, 2011.<br />

8 World Health Organization. Specifications and Evaluations for Public<br />

Health Pesticides. Ethyl Butylacetylaminopropionate also known as<br />

IR3535 3-(N-acetyl-N-butyl) aminopropionic acid ethyl ester. Geneva,<br />

Switzerland: World Health Organization; <strong>February</strong> 2006. htt://www.who.<br />

int/quality/en/. Accessed July 12, 2011.<br />

9 United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA New Pesticide Fact<br />

Sheet Picaridin. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection<br />

Agency; May 2005. http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/factsheets/.<br />

Accessed July 12, 2011.<br />

<strong>10</strong> United States Environmental Protection Agency. Reregistration<br />

Eligibility Decision (RED) DEET. Washington, DC: United States Environmental<br />

Protection Agency; September 1998. EPA738-R-0<strong>10</strong>.<br />

11 World Health Organization. Specifications and Evaluations for Public Health<br />

Pesticides. Icaridin, 1-piperidinecarboxylic acid 2-(2-hydroxxxyethyl)-1methylpropylester<br />

also known as isobutyl piperidine carboxylate. Geneva,<br />

Switzerland: World Health Organization; October 2004. http://www.who.<br />

int/quality/en/. Accessed July 12, 2011.<br />

12 World Health Organization. International Program on Chemical Safety PCS<br />

INCHEM. Data Sheet on Pesticide No. 80 DEET. Geneva, Switzerland:<br />

World Health Organization. WHO/VBC/DS/87.80. http://www.inchem.<br />

org/documents/pds/pds/pest80. Accessed June 24, 2011.<br />

13 World Health Organization. IPCS, IOMC. The WHO Recommended<br />

Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification<br />

2009. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 20<strong>10</strong>.<br />

http://www.who.int/ipcs/publications/pesticides_hazard. Accessed<br />

July 12, 2011.<br />

Alternatives to DEET


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />

PERILS OF DERMATOPATHOLOGY<br />

W. Clark Lambert, MD, PhD, Section Editor<br />

It’s Not Just Who You Are, It’s Also Where You Are:<br />

The Cutaneous Leiomyosarcoma Dilemma<br />

Gizem Tumer, MD; Carmen F. Castilla, BS; W. Clark Lambert, MD, PhD<br />

“To understand a name you must be acquainted with the particular of which it is a name.”—Bertrard Russell<br />

Leiomyosarcoma of the skin is a rare soft tissue neoplasm<br />

of smooth muscle origin. Treatment and prognosis of<br />

this lesion are dependent on its depth, with deep soft tissue<br />

tumors carrying a significantly worse prognosis and requiring<br />

more extensive surgery than cutaneous ones. It is essential<br />

that all physicians involved know this. It is also critical that the<br />

dermatopathologist report the depth of a leiomyosarcoma in<br />

order for the clinician to render appropriate therapy. Failure to<br />

report the location of this neoplasm and/or failure to comprehend<br />

the prognostic significance of this information, can lead to<br />

inappropriate therapy and increased morbidity in patients.<br />

CLASSIFICATION<br />

Three classifications of smooth muscle tumors of the skin have<br />

been described1 :<br />

<strong>•</strong> Atypical smooth muscle tumor of the dermis (purely dermal<br />

lesion);<br />

<strong>•</strong> Cutaneous leiomyosarcoma (dermal lesion with minimal<br />

extension into the subcutis);<br />

<strong>•</strong> Subcutaneous leiomyosarcoma. 2<br />

Microscopically, the cutaneous leiomyosarcoma lesion involves<br />

the dermis and focally, the subcutis. It is composed of bluntended,<br />

cigar-shaped fusiform neoplastic spindle cells with eosinophillic<br />

cytoplasm forming fascicles and bundles. 2–5 This neoplasm<br />

may appear in two different architectural patterns: a fasciculated<br />

growth pattern and a pilar-type architectural pattern (Figure 1 and<br />

Figure 2). The latter generally represents a low-grade neoplasm<br />

showing histologic features suggestive of pilar leiomyoma with the<br />

addition of a variable degree of cytological atypia and mitoses. 2<br />

CLINICAL FINDINGS<br />

Cutaneous leiomyosarcomas typically follow an indolent clinical<br />

course. Local recurrence does occur; however, distant metastasis<br />

is uncommon and mortality related to tumor progression<br />

is unusual. 2,6–<strong>10</strong> In contrast to cutaneous leiomyosarcoma,<br />

subcutaneous leiomyosarcoma presents as a larger mass of a<br />

higher grade. Although still superficially located above the fascia,<br />

the local recurrence rate and metastatic rate of subcutaneous<br />

leiomyosarcoma is closer to the more ominous deep soft tissue<br />

leiomyosarcoma. 5,6,11<br />

Based on the differences in their prognoses, investigators proposed<br />

the term atypical intradermal smooth muscle neoplasm<br />

instead of cutaneous leiomyosarcoma to highlight the benign<br />

nature of cutaneous leiomyosarcoma vs the more aggressive<br />

soft tissue leiomyosarcoma and subcutaneous leiomyosarcoma.<br />

The same group also argued that grading primary dermal atypical<br />

smooth muscle neoplasms is inappropriate given the fact<br />

that the only prognostic predictor is margin status at the time of<br />

excision and no other reliable prognostic factor has been identified.<br />

5 While we respect these investigators’ opinion, we believe<br />

that thus terming such lesions is a bit like a tail wagging the<br />

dog. We believe it is more sensible to name a tumor in the most<br />

logical way based on its histological features, and subsequently<br />

to note if some subset of these lesions has a different prognosis.<br />

TREATMENT<br />

Treatments for cutaneous and deep soft tissue leiomyosarcoma<br />

differ significantly. Unlike deep soft tissue leiomyosarcoma,<br />

which requires extensive surgery, the standard treatment for<br />

cutaneous leiomyosarcoma and subcutaneous leiomyosarcoma is<br />

wide local excision, with margins ranging from 2 cm to 5 cm. 12,13<br />

Mohs’ micrographic surgery (MMS) has also been used for cutaneous<br />

leiomyosarcomas. This technique can be beneficial as it<br />

provides the ability to examine all margins as the lesion is excised<br />

while sparing normal tissue. 9 At this time, only a few small studies<br />

investigating MMS have been reported and further studies<br />

are required to investigate this technique. 13–16<br />

From the Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ<br />

Address for Correspondence: W. Clark Lambert, MD, PhD, Room C520 MSB, UMDNJ-NJMS, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07<strong>10</strong>3<br />

<strong>•</strong> E-mail: lamberwc@umdnj.edu<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:40–41 40<br />

© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

Figure 1. Subcutaneous skin biopsy of tumor cells composed<br />

of cigar-shaped spindle cells with mitotic figures (black arrows)<br />

(hematoxylin-eosin stain, original magnification ×20).<br />

OBSERVATIONS<br />

Due to the increased risk of metastasis and the worse prognosis of<br />

subcutaneous leiomyosarcoma, an analysis of the subcutaneous<br />

tissue is crucial when the diagnosis of cutaneous leiomyosarcoma<br />

is made. Undergrading of the tumor may occur if a shave biopsy<br />

is utilized to diagnose the lesion.<br />

In contrast to deep soft tissue leiomyosarcomas, which may<br />

require extensive surgery, overly aggressive treatment or mutilating<br />

surgeries are not warranted in cutaneous leiomyosarcoma.<br />

The standard of care for cutaneous leiomyosarcoma remains<br />

wide excisional biopsy; however, recent studies have shown benefits<br />

to using MMS.<br />

The dermatopathologist must report the depth of the tumor<br />

and the closest distance from the margin in order to provide the<br />

best therapeutic approach. The clinician must then understand<br />

the significance of this interpretation. Failure to distinguish and<br />

report the exact depth of this neoplasm or a failure of the clinician<br />

to understand the significance of this information may lead<br />

to inappropriate and aggressive treatment with excess morbidity.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Hornick JL, Fletcher CD. Criteria for malignancy in nonvisceral smooth<br />

muscle tumors. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2003;7;60–66.<br />

2 Massi D, Franchi A, Alos L, et al. Primary cutaneous leiomyosarcoma:<br />

clinicopathological analysis of 36 cases. Histopathology. 20<strong>10</strong>;56:<br />

251–262.<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:40–41<br />

41<br />

PERILS OF DERMATOPATHOLOGY<br />

Figure 2. Spindle cell lesion with areas of mitosis (arrowheads).<br />

3 Mentzel T. Sarcomas in the skin of the elderly. Clin Dermatol.<br />

2011;29:80–90.<br />

4 De Giorgi V, Sestini S, Massi D, et al. Superficial cutaneous leiomyosarcoma:<br />

a rare, misleading tumor. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2008;9:185–187.<br />

5 Kraft S, Fletcher CD. Atypical intradermal smooth muscle neoplasms:<br />

clinicopathologic analysis of 84 cases and a reappraisal of cutaneous<br />

“leiomyosarcoma.” Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:599–607.<br />

6 Svarvar C, Böhling T, Berlin O, et al. Clinical course of nonvisceral<br />

soft tissue leiomyosarcoma in 225 patients from the Scandinavian<br />

Sarcoma Group. Cancer. 2007;<strong>10</strong>9:282–291.<br />

7 Brown MD. Recognition and management of unusual cutaneous tumors.<br />

Dermatol Clin. 2000;18:543–552.<br />

8 Ikari Y, Tokuhashi I, Haramoto I, et al. Cutaneous leiomyosarcoma.<br />

J Dermatol. 1992;19:99–<strong>10</strong>4.<br />

9 Swanson PE, Stanley MW, Scheithauer BW, Wick MR. Primary cutaneous<br />

leiomyosarcoma: a histological and immunohistochemical study<br />

of 9 cases, with ultrastructural correlation. J Cutan Pathol. 1988;15:<br />

129–141.<br />

<strong>10</strong> Fields JP, Helwig EB. Leiomyosarcoma of the skin and subcutaneous<br />

tissue. Cancer. 1981;47:156–169.<br />

11 Massi D, Franchi A, Alos L, Cook M. Primary cutaneous leiomyosarcoma:<br />

clinicopathological analysis of 36 cases. Histopathology. 20<strong>10</strong>;56:<br />

251–262.<br />

12 Tsut Sumido A, Yoshida T, Yamamoto Y, Itoh T. Management of superficial<br />

leiomyosarcoma: a retrospective study of <strong>10</strong> cases. Plast Reconst<br />

Surg. 2005;116:8–12.<br />

13 Humphreys TR, Finkelstein DH, Lee JB. Superficial leiomyosarcoma treated<br />

with Mohs micographic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:<strong>10</strong>8–112.<br />

14 Starling J 3rd, Coldiron BM. Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment<br />

of cutaneous leiomyosarcoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64:<br />

1119–1122.<br />

15 Huether MJ, Zitelli JA, Brodland DG. Mohs micographic surgery for<br />

the treatment of spindle tumors of the skin. J Am Acad Dermatol.<br />

2001;44:656–659.<br />

16 Annest NM, Grekin SJ, Stone MS, Messingham MJ. Cutaneous leiomyosarcoma:<br />

a tumor of the head and neck. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:628–633.<br />

It’s Not Just Who You Are


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> ���������������������<br />

INFECTIOUS DISEASE CAPSULE<br />

Jack M. Bernstein, MD, Section Editor<br />

It May Be Vulgar, but It Isn’t a Bad Word<br />

������������������� 1,2 ���������������������� 2 Jack M. Bernstein, MD 1,2<br />

A<br />

�����������������������������������������������������<br />

����������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������������� ������� ������� ��������� ���������� �����<br />

�����������������������������������������������������������������<br />

������� ������ ���� ������� ������������ ��������������� �����<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�����������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

�����������������������������������������������������������������<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������<br />

����������� ���� �������������� ����� ������� �������� ��� ���� ������<br />

�������� ������� ������ ������������ ������������ ����� ������-<br />

������� ������� ������� ���� ����������� ����� ������������� ��������������<br />

����������������������������������������������������������� and<br />

������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������<br />

���� ����������� ���������� ������������ ���� ������������� �����<br />

������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������<br />

����������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������������<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������������� 4 ����<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

����������������������������������� 3 ������������������������������������<br />

��������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

��������������������������������������������� 4 �����������������������<br />

�������������������������� � �������������������������������� 1<br />

DIAGNOSIS<br />

��������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

����������������������������������������������������������������<br />

��������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

����������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�����������������4����������������������������������������������� ������������� ����� ������� ���������� ��� ���� ��������� �������<br />

����������4������������ ����� �������� ���� ����������� ������ ��������<br />

�����������������������������������������������������������������<br />

��������������������������������������������������������������<br />

����������������������������������������������<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������<br />

��������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������1 ������������������������������������������������������������<br />

������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�����������������������������������2���������������������������� �����������������������������������������������������������<br />

����������������������������������3������������������������������� ��������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�����������������������������������������������������������1 TREATMENT<br />

��� ���� ������� ��� �������� ��� ������������� ��� ������� �� �������<br />

��� ���������� ���� ���������� ��� ��� ������� ���������� ���������<br />

��������� ������ �������� ����������� ���������� ������������ ����<br />

��������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������������<br />

CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS<br />

��� ��������� ������������� ��� ������ ��������� ��� ������ ������������<br />

��������� ����� ��������� �������� ����� �������� ����������� ����<br />

��8��������������������������������������������������� ������� ��������� ���������������� ������������� ��� Mycobacterium<br />

tuberculosis��������������������������������������������������������<br />

�����������3 CONCLUSIONS<br />

������������� ��� �� ������������ ���������� ����� ��� ���������<br />

����� ��� ���������������� �������� �������� ������ ��������� ��� ��<br />

������������������������������������������������������������-<br />

������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

From the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dayton, OH, 1 and the Department of Medicine, Wright State University School of<br />

Medicine, Dayton, OH2 Address for Correspondence: Jack M. Bernstein, MD, Research (151), VA Medical Center, 4<strong>10</strong>0 West Third Street, Dayton, OH 45428<br />

�����������������������������������<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:42–43 42<br />

��������������������������������������������


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

Figure 1. �����������������������������������<br />

Figure 2. ����������������������������������������������<br />

������������������������������������������������������������<br />

����������������������������������������������������<br />

��������� ��� ���������� ���� ����� ����� ������� ����������� ���<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������<br />

��������� ������������ ����� ��� �������� ������� ���� ��� ����<br />

��������� ��������������� ����� �������� ����������� ���������<br />

����������� ����������� ���������� ������������ ������ ���������<br />

����������������������������������������������������������<br />

���� ���������� ��� ������ ��������� ����� ��������� ������������<br />

�������� ���� ��������������� ����� ������������ ��� ��� ���� ���<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:42–43<br />

43<br />

��������������������������<br />

Figure 3. ������������������������������������������������<br />

����������������������������������<br />

������������������������������������������������������������<br />

������� ����� �� ����� ��������� ���������� ���� ���������� ��� ���<br />

������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

���������<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 ����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

����������������������������������������������������J Am Acad Dermatol.<br />

����������������<br />

2 �����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

���������������������������������������������������Dermatology in General<br />

Medicine.���������������������������������������������������<br />

3 ���������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

������������Int J Tuberc Lung Dis.����������������<br />

4 ������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������� Int J Dermatol.�����������������<br />

5 ����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

��������������� Int J Dermatol.���������������<br />

6 ������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

����������� ��������� �������� ��� ��������� ���������� ��� ���������������<br />

MMWR Recomm Rep.��������������<br />

7 ��������� ���� �������� ���� ������� ���� ������� ��� ���� ������<br />

����� ��� �������������� ���� ������� ������������� ����������� JAMA.� �����<br />

��������������<br />

8 �����������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

N Engl J Med.������������������<br />

�����������������������������������������


�������������������<br />

�������������<br />

������������<br />

��������������������������<br />

�������������������������������<br />

��������������<br />

������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

���������������������������������������������������������<br />

���������������������<br />

���������������������������������������������������������<br />

��������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������<br />

���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������������������<br />

�<br />

���������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������<br />

�������������������������������������<br />

����<br />

�������������������������������<br />

���������������������������<br />

�������������������<br />

���������������������������<br />

����������������<br />

�����������������������<br />

������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������������������


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />

The term dermatosis neglecta was originally coined in<br />

1995 when three cases of an “unwashed dermatosis”<br />

were presented by L. Poskitt and colleagues. 1<br />

In all cases, the patients committed what Poskitt described<br />

as “acts of omission” by failing to wash their skin in the<br />

affected areas. The resulting hyperpigmented, hyperkeratotic<br />

dermatosis resolved by vigorously washing with soap and<br />

water or, in severe areas, by applying 5% salicylic acid in<br />

aqueous cream twice daily. Our patient had a severe case that<br />

responded well to salicylic acid followed by routine washing.<br />

Because the patient was subsequently lost to follow-up, we were<br />

unable to evaluate hair regrowth.<br />

Periodic shedding of the outermost cellular layers is an essential<br />

component of normal keratinocyte development. In the<br />

stratum corneum, protein-rich, lipid-depleted keratinocytes<br />

are the “bricks” that are held together by hydrophobic intercellular<br />

membranes and desmosomes, making up the “mortar.” 2,3<br />

Genetic defects in this system—either in the keratinocytes themselves<br />

or their intercellular molding—can lead to abnormal retention<br />

of stratum corneum, causing disorders such as ichthyosis<br />

vulgaris and recessive X-linked ichthyosis. Ichthyosis vulgaris<br />

is caused by defective profilaggrin, a keratinocyte protein, and<br />

CASE STUDY<br />

Vesna Petronic-Rosic, MD, MSc, Section Editor<br />

Unusually Severe Case of Dermatosis Neglecta<br />

Jake E. Turrentine, BS; Travis W. Blalock, MD; Loretta S. Davis, MD<br />

An 18-year-old black woman with cerebral palsy was admitted for evaluation of an intrathecal baclofen pump site infection. The dermatology<br />

service was consulted for treatment suggestions of a presumed diagnosis of chronic tinea capitis. Three courses of oral griseofulvin during<br />

the past 2 years failed to resolve the patient’s chronic scalp dermatosis. Scalp lesions first began about 2 years earlier after hospitalization for<br />

placement of an intrathecal baclofen pump. The patient was unable to care for her scalp due to her cerebral palsy, and her mother interpreted<br />

the scalp condition as infectious. No routine shampoo care, scalp care, or topical treatment was performed for more than 1½ years.<br />

The mother felt that touching the patient’s scalp might cause pain and noted that the majority of her time was spent concentrating on more<br />

critical medical issues. Physical examination revealed coalescing hyperkeratotic plaques extending dorsally from the anterior hairline to the<br />

occipital scalp with small flecks of keratinous debris throughout the remaining hair (Figure 1). The plate-like plaques were devoid of hair,<br />

except at a few fissures where a few tufts of hair emerged. No cervical lymph nodes were appreciated on palpation. Treatment was initiated<br />

with compresses consisting of large warm water–soaked towels 4 times daily. Three times a day, a nursing staff applied 5% salicylic acid in<br />

olive oil to the scalp under a shower cap for approximately 1 hour. Over the following 2 days, a significant reduction in keratinous debris<br />

was appreciated. Within 2 weeks, the bulk of the plaques had been removed (Figure 2). At 6-week follow-up, the underlying scalp showed<br />

areas of fibrosis and possible scarring with a few emerging tufts of hair. On the basis of history and response to treatment with salicylic acid<br />

and routine scalp care, the patient was diagnosed with an unusually severe case of dermatosis neglecta.<br />

recessive X-linked ichthyosis is caused by a deficiency in steroid<br />

sulfatase, an enzyme in the intercellular domain. 4 These genetic<br />

abnormalities of adherent stratum corneum illustrate the importance<br />

of regular shedding of superficial keratinocyte layers.<br />

Dermatosis neglecta represents a failure to cleanse adequately a<br />

particular area of skin, leading to the buildup of adherent hyperpigmented<br />

scales. Thus, dermatosis neglecta can be understood<br />

as a self-induced “defect” in normal keratinocyte shedding that<br />

causes abnormal accumulation of cellular layers and debris. Dermatosis<br />

neglecta typically occurs in an area of hyperesthesia or<br />

prior trauma where the patient refuses to scrub the skin. 5 Also,<br />

as in our patient, dermatosis neglecta can develop in situations<br />

where a patient is unable to properly care for an area of skin<br />

because of physical or mental disability.<br />

A similar condition described in the literature is terra firma forme<br />

dermatosis (TFFD), which is a disorder of unknown etiology characterized<br />

primarily by disordered keratinization. 6–8 In TFFD, the<br />

classic clinical finding is a dark, dirty-looking, slightly raised hyperkeratotic<br />

skin lesion that is completely asymptomatic. Cases of<br />

TFFD respond to 70% isopropyl alcohol rubs but not to cleansing<br />

with normal soap and water; therefore, TFFD can be distinguished<br />

From the Division of Dermatology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA<br />

Address for Correspondence: Travis W. Blalock, MD, Medical College of Georgia, Division of Dermatology, <strong>10</strong>04 Chafee Avenue, Augusta,<br />

GA 30904 <strong>•</strong> E-mail: tblalock@mcg.edu<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:46–47 46<br />

© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

Figure 1. Crusted, plate-like plaques on the scalp at initial<br />

presentation.<br />

clinically from dermatosis neglecta by the lack of response to normal<br />

washing and, of course, the absence of historical clues of neglect.<br />

Given its rapid response to inexpensive and simple treatment,<br />

dermatosis neglecta should be considered in the evaluation of<br />

a pigmented, hyperkeratotic skin lesion. If identified, a skin<br />

biopsy can often be avoided. Physicians should always inquire<br />

about skin care habits when gathering history about an unexplained<br />

skin lesion and should review and recommend normal<br />

skin hygiene, when a patient fails to respond to a full course of<br />

standard therapy for an alternate diagnosis.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Poskitt L, Wayte J, Wojnarowska F, Wilkinson JD. “Dermatosis neglecta”:<br />

unwashed dermatosis. Br J Dermatol. 1995;112:827–829.<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:46–47<br />

VINTAGE LABEL<br />

Courtesy of BuyEnlarge, Philadelphia, PA<br />

47<br />

CASE STUDY<br />

Figure 2. Almost complete resolution of scalp plaque following<br />

2 weeks of therapy.<br />

2 Elias PM. Epidermal lipids, barrier function, and desquamation. J Invest<br />

Dermatol. 1983;80:44s–49s.<br />

3 Williams ML. Ichthyosis: mechanisms of disease. Pediatr Dermatol.<br />

1992;9:365–368.<br />

4 Elias PM, Crumrine D, Rassner U, et al. Basis for abnormal desquamation<br />

and permeability barrier dysfunction in RXLI. J Invest Dermatol.<br />

2004;122:314–319.<br />

5 Lucas JL, Brodell RT, Feldman SR. Dermatosis neglecta: a series of case<br />

reports and review of other dirty-appearing dermatoses. Dermatol Online<br />

J. 2006;12:5.<br />

6 Akkash L, Badran D, Al-Omari AQ. Terra firma forme dermatosis: case<br />

series and review of the literature. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2009;7:<strong>10</strong>2–<br />

<strong>10</strong>7.<br />

7 Guarneri C, Guarneri F, Cannavo SP. Terra firma-forme dermatosis. Int J<br />

Dermatol. 2008;47:482–484.<br />

8 Raveh T, Gilead LT, Wexler MR. Terra firma forme dermatosis. Ann Plast<br />

Surg. 1997;39:542–545.<br />

Dermatosis Neglecta


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />

CASE STUDY<br />

Fixed-Drug Eruption Caused by Ashwagandha<br />

(Withania somnifera): A Widely Used Ayurvedic Drug<br />

Virendra N. Sehgal, MD; Prashant Verma, MD; Sambit N. Bhattacharya, MD<br />

A 28-year-old man with decreased libido received ashwagandha in the usual daily dosage of 5 g for <strong>10</strong> days. During this period, he<br />

experienced a burning and/or itching sensation as well as discoloration of the skin/mucous membrane confined to the penis. He had a<br />

similar type of eruption at the same site 6 months prior while taking ashwagandha. Examination of the skin surface was conspicuous and<br />

marked by the presence of a dusky, erythematous, oval, eroded plaque of 3 cm, affecting the glans penis and prepuce (Figure). The drug<br />

was withdrawn and topical 0.05% clobetasol propionate cream was administered along with cetrizine dihydrochloride, an H 1 -receptor<br />

blocker, <strong>10</strong> mg daily for 1 month. There was a perceptible amelioration of the lesion, resulting in residual greyish white pigmentation. He<br />

was prescribed oral drug provocation with 1 g of ashwagandha powder. Within 12 hours, a flare-up developed at the earlier site, confirming<br />

the causality.<br />

Fixed-drug eruption, one of the most well-recognized<br />

adverse drug reactions, is characterized by a peculiar,<br />

sudden onset of round and/or oval, edematous, dusky<br />

red macules/plaques on the skin and/or mucous membranes<br />

accompanied by burning and/or itching. 1 Several drugs<br />

have been incriminated in its causation, the details of which<br />

have been specifically recounted in a recent comprehensive<br />

review. 2 Ashwagandha belongs to an alternative system of<br />

medicine and has a long medicinal history. It is an innocuous<br />

agent that has not been associated with any cutaneous drug<br />

reactions to date. Fixed-drug eruption following the use of<br />

ashwagandha is an uncommon occurence; hence, the current<br />

report.<br />

Ashwagandha literally means “horse smell” (ashwa = horse,<br />

gandha = smell), for its wet roots smell similar to horse’s urine.<br />

Withania somnifera, also known as ashwagangha, Indian ginseng,<br />

winter cherry, ajagandha, kanaje hindi, and samm al<br />

ferakh, the offending indigenous drug, is derived from a plant<br />

in the Solanaceae or nightshade family. 3 It is a beautiful, delicate<br />

plant native to India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. It is considered<br />

the king of herbs among ayurvedic medicines. It has<br />

a medicinal history of 4000 years and is a well-accepted, vital<br />

drug in Ayurveda and Indian traditional medicine. 4 It has<br />

been conventionally used for calming the mind and relieving<br />

weakness, nervous exhaustion, and arthritis. In addition, it<br />

is used for building sexual energy. Ashwagandha root is said<br />

to be beneficial in people who do physical labor or exercise<br />

a lot, helping the body adapt to physical stress. In addition,<br />

its paste is recommended for external use in the treatment<br />

of carbuncles, ulcers, and nondescript swellings. Bedsores and<br />

wounds are also amenable to topical application of ashwagandha<br />

leaves.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Ashwagandha is said to possess anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor,<br />

antistress, antioxidant, immunomodulatory, hemopoeitic, and<br />

rejuvenating effects. 5 In addition, it is thought to exert a positive<br />

influence on the endocrine, cardiopulmonary, and central<br />

nervous systems. 6 Ashwagandha’s mechanism of action is still<br />

speculative, and toxicity studies have revealed it to be a safe compound.<br />

7–9<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Sehgal VN, Bhattacharya SN, Verma P. Physiopathology of adverse cutaneous<br />

drug reactions—applied perceptions: Part I. Skinmed. In press.<br />

2 Sehgal VN, Srivastava G. Fixed drug eruption (FDE): changing scenario<br />

of incriminating drugs. Int J Dermatol. 2006;45:897–908<br />

3 Winters M. Ancient medicine, modern use: Withania somnifera and its potential<br />

role in integrative oncology. Altern Med Rev. 2006;11:269–277.<br />

From the Dermato-Venereology (Skin/VD) Center, Sehgal Nursing Home, Panchwati-Delhi, India; the Department of Dermatology and STD,<br />

University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Shahdara, Delhi, India<br />

Address for Correspondence: Virendra N. Sehgal, MD, Dermato-Venereology (Skin/VD) Center, Sehgal Nursing Home, A/6 Panchwati,<br />

Delhi 1<strong>10</strong> 033, India <strong>•</strong> E-mail: drsehgal@ndf.vsnl.net.in<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:48–49 48<br />

© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

Figure. Fixed-drug eruption affecting the glans and prepuce<br />

of the penis.<br />

VINTAGE LABEL<br />

Courtesy of BuyEnlarge, Philadelphia, PA<br />

CASE STUDY<br />

4 Rasool M, Varalakshmi P. Protective effect of Withania somnifera root<br />

powder in relation to lipid peroxidation, antioxidant status, glycoproteins<br />

and bone collagen on adjuvant-induced arthritis in rats. Fundam Clin<br />

Pharmacol. 2007;21:157–164.<br />

5 Mishra LC, Singh BB, Dagenais S. Scientific basis for the therapeutic<br />

use of Withania somnifera (ashwagandha): a review. Altern Med Rev.<br />

2000;5:334–346.<br />

6 Sehgal VN, Srivastava G. Traditional/ayurvedic pharmacotherapy of skin<br />

diseases. Skinmed. 20<strong>10</strong>;8:282–284.<br />

7 Behl PN, Arora RB, Srivastava G. Traditional Indian Dermatology Concept<br />

of Past and Present. 1st ed. New Delhi, India: SISD Publication; 1992.<br />

8 Behl PN, Srivastava G. Herbs Useful in Dermatological Therapy. 2nd ed.<br />

New Delhi, India: CBS Publishers; 2004.<br />

9 Sehgal VN, Grangwani OP. Fixed drug eruptions: a study of<br />

epidemiological, clinical and diagnostic aspects of 89 cases from India.<br />

J Dermatol. 1988;15:50–54.<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:48–49 49<br />

Fixed-Drug Eruption Caused by Ashwagandha


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />

CASE STUDY<br />

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Revealed by a<br />

Granulomatous Zosteriform Eruption<br />

Sondes Trojjet, MD; 1 Houda Hammami, MD; 1 Inès Zaraa, MD; 1,2 Alia Bouzguarrou, MD; 1 Meriem Joens, MD; 1<br />

Slim Haouet, MD; 2,3 Amel Ben Osman, MD; 1,2 Mourad Mokni, MD1,2 A 70-year-old woman presented with an atypical erythematopapular zosteriform eruption of 3 weeks’ duration. The patient had no history<br />

of previous vesicular eruption. She developed a painful burning sensation on the neck. Clinical examination revealed a cluster of small<br />

erythematous firm papules and plaques in a zosteriform distribution on the left ear, face, neck, and shoulder (Figure 1A). The lesions were<br />

unilateral and did not cross the midline. Multiple cervical and axillary lymph nodes were palpable. Laboratory tests revealed an increase<br />

in white blood cells of 25,000/mm 3 , with 17,9<strong>10</strong>/mm 3 lymphocytes and a normal range of hemoglobin, platelets, creatinine, and liver<br />

enzymes. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 87 mm. Blood smear results showed small, morphologically mature lymphocyte cells. In<br />

immune phenotyping, lymphocyte cells co-express CD5 and B-cell–surface antigens CD19 and CD23, as well as a restriction of kappa<br />

immunoglobulin light chains. The cells were CD22-, CD79b-, CD38-, CD<strong>10</strong>-, CD25- and FMC7-. Computed thoracoabominal tomography<br />

revealed cervical, mediastinal, abdominal, and pelvic adenopathy confirming the diagnosis of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia<br />

(B-CLL) stage B. Histology of a skin biopsy from a papule showed a dense nodular granulomatous infiltrate in the dermis (Figure 2A).<br />

The infiltrate contained epithelioid and giant cells surrounded by lymphocytes and plasma cells. Small monomorphic lymphocytes without<br />

mitotic figures predominated (Figure 2B). The epidermis was irregularly thickened. Immunohistology revealed a polymorphous infiltrate<br />

with a phenotype of reactive T lymphocytes (CD3, CD5 positive) (Figure 2C), B lymphocytes (CD20 positive) (Figure 2D). Epithelioid<br />

and giant cells were positive for CD68 (Figure 2E). A latent herpes zoster infection with granulomatous reaction at the site of zoster lesions<br />

was highly suspected as the patient reported a unilateral burning sensation without a history of vesicular zosteriform eruption. She received<br />

treatment with intravenous acyclovir <strong>10</strong> mg/kg every 8 hours. The papular lesions resolved markedly (60%) on macular plaques at the end<br />

of the treatment. Following topical treatment with corticosteroids, the lesions healed completely within 4 weeks (Figure 1B). Concerning<br />

leukemia, our patient was monitored without therapy by the hematologist.<br />

Various cutaneous lesions may appear at sites of prior<br />

herpes zoster infection, such as annular granuloma, sarcoidal<br />

granuloma, granulomatous vasculitis, Kaposi’s<br />

sarcoma, and pseudolymphoma. 1 These cutaneous lesions may<br />

appear immediately after resolving vesicular lesions or at varying<br />

times after the acute eruption. We describe in this report an<br />

unusual case of a granulomatous zosteriform eruption revealing<br />

a B-cell chronic lymphocytic lymphoma.<br />

Our patient is of special interest because she presented with a<br />

granulomatous eruption arising after a probable latent zoster revealing<br />

B-CLL. Unfortunately, varicella-zoster virus DNA detection<br />

was not performed in our case.<br />

Granulomatous reactions and specific infiltrations at sites<br />

of resolved cutaneous herpes zoster lesions in patients with<br />

B-CLL have been described as a rare clinical event. 2,3 The<br />

cause of granulomatous reactions caused by varicella-<br />

zoster virus remains to be elucidated. 4 Type III and type<br />

IV hyper sensitivity reaction, 5 isotopic response, 6,7 and viral<br />

etiologies 2 are thought to be possible provoking factors.<br />

A study of granulomatous reactions associated with herpes<br />

zoster lesions for the presence of varicella-zoster virus<br />

genome using the polymerase chain reaction suggested<br />

that varicella-zoster virus DNA is detected in cases where<br />

eruption occurred immediately in the wake of resolving<br />

vesicular herpes zoster lesions. 2 In this case, differential<br />

diagnosis includes specific cutaneous infiltrates with<br />

neoplastic B cells. The clinical resolution of the lesions after<br />

treatment with acyclovir and topical steroids confirms the<br />

benign nature of the granulomatous infiltration.<br />

From the Department of Dermatology, La Rabat Hospital, Tunis Tunisia; 1 the Faculté de Médecine de Tunis, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia; 2<br />

and the Department of Pathology, La Rabta Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia3 Address for Correspondence: Ines Zaraa, MD, Dermatology Department, La Rabta Hospital, Jabbari, Bab Saadoun, Tunis, <strong>10</strong>07 Tunisia<br />

<strong>•</strong> E-mail: inesrania@yahoo.fr<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:50–52 50<br />

© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> CASE STUDY<br />

Figure 1A. Clustered erythematous papules and plaques on<br />

right neck and shoulder.<br />

Figure 1B. Healing of clustered erythematous papules and<br />

plaques within 4 weeks.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

An atypical zosteriform eruption should alert dermatopathologists<br />

to the possibility of an associated hematological dyscrasia,<br />

mainly B-CLL.<br />

Figure 2A. Histology of skin papule showing a dense nodular<br />

granulomatous infiltrate in the dermis (hematoxylin and eosin<br />

stain, original magnification ×40).<br />

Figure 2B. Granulomatous infiltrate containing small mature<br />

lymphocytes with no significant atypia, epithelioid, or giant cells<br />

(hematoxylin and eosin stain, original magnification ×<strong>10</strong>0).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Requena L, Kutzner H, Escalonilla P, et al. Cutaneous reactions at<br />

sites of herpes zoster scars: an expanded spectrum. Br J Dermatol.<br />

1998;138:161–168.<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:50–52 51<br />

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> CASE STUDY<br />

Figure 2C. The majority of infiltrating cells staining positively<br />

with the pan–T-cell marker CD3 (CD 3 staining [Novocastra,<br />

Newcastle upon Tyne, UK], original magnification ×40).<br />

Figure 2D. The infiltrating cells staining positively with the<br />

pan–B-cell marker CD20 (CD 20 staining [DakoCytomation,<br />

Glostrup, Denmark], original magnification ×40).<br />

VINTAGE LABEL<br />

Courtesy of BuyEnlarge, Philadelphia, PA<br />

Figure 2E. Epithelioid and giant cells staining positive with<br />

CD68 (CD 68 staining [DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark],<br />

original magnification ×40).<br />

2 Serfling U, Penneys NS, Zhu WY, et al. Varicella-zoster virus DNA in<br />

granulomatous skin lesions following herpes zoster. A study by the polymerase<br />

chain reaction. J Cutan Pathol. 1993;20:28–33.<br />

3 Wakelin SH, Young E, Kelly S, Turner M. Transient leukaemia cutis in<br />

chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1997;22;148–151.<br />

4 Cerroni L, Zenahlik P, Kerl H. Specific cutaneous infiltrates of<br />

B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia arising at the site of herpes<br />

zoster and herpes simplex scars. Cancer. 1995;76:<br />

5<br />

26–31.<br />

Gibney MD, Nahass GT, Leonardi CL. Cutaneous reactions following<br />

herpes zoster infections: report of three cases and a review of the<br />

literature. Br J Dermatol. 1996;134:504–509.<br />

6 Schena D, Barba A, Chieregato C. Granulomatous folliculitis as a manifestation<br />

of post-herpetic isotopic response. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol.<br />

2001;15:473–475.<br />

7 Ruocco V, Ruocco E, Ghersetich I, et al. Isotopic response after herpesvirus<br />

infection: an update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:90–94.<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:50–52 52<br />

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia


Grand Wailea, Maui <strong>•</strong> <strong>February</strong> 4–8, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Register Now for the 8th Annual Conference!<br />

<strong>February</strong> 4–8, <strong>2012</strong> Grand Wailea : Maui, Hawaii<br />

Plan to attend the 8th Annual Maui Derm Conference! “Cutting<br />

edge, a great blend of science and clinical medicine and a world<br />

class faculty” describe Maui Derm <strong>2012</strong>. Our faculty will share with<br />

you the most important developments in medical and cosmetic<br />

dermatology vital to your practice. Our live patient demonstration<br />

workshops in lasers, Botulinum Toxin A and fi llers have set<br />

the standard for “hands on” workshops. Our format has been<br />

specifi cally designed to allow optimal time for discussion with our<br />

faculty.We are certain that you will fi nd this to be an outstanding<br />

and memorable educational event that you will not want to miss.<br />

Put Maui Derm on your calendar for <strong>2012</strong>!<br />

Featured Lectures<br />

Hot Topics <strong>•</strong> Cases for the Panel <strong>•</strong><br />

Seminars <strong>•</strong> Workshops <strong>•</strong> Basic Science<br />

Medical Dermatology: Basic Science, Hot Topics, Cases for<br />

the Panel, Point:Counterpoint, Seminars, “How I Do It”<br />

Cutaneous Oncology <strong>•</strong> Acne/Rosacea <strong>•</strong> Pediatric Dermatology <strong>•</strong> Infectious Diseases<br />

Psoriasis <strong>•</strong> Skin of Color <strong>•</strong> Life Threatening Dermatoses <strong>•</strong> Master’s CPC <strong>•</strong> Offi ce<br />

Surgery <strong>•</strong> Practice Management<br />

Cosmetic Dermatology: From Basic Science to Case Based<br />

Discussion and “How I Do It”<br />

Botulinum Toxin A and Fillers <strong>•</strong> Lasers <strong>•</strong> Sclerotherapy<br />

“Lunch with the Faculty” –<br />

Controversial Topics, Case-based Discussions<br />

Interactive Workshops<br />

Small Group, Live Patient, Hands-On Demonstrations: Botulinum Toxins/Fillers,<br />

Sclerotherapy<br />

<strong>2012</strong> Faculty *<br />

Matthew Avram, MD<br />

Neal Bhatia, MD<br />

Andrew Blauvelt, MD<br />

Valerie Callender, MD<br />

Joel Cohen, MD<br />

Lawrence Eichenfi eld, MD<br />

Rebecca Fitzgerald, MD<br />

Keith T. Flaherty, MD<br />

Sheila Friedlander Fallon, MD<br />

Ilona Frieden, MD<br />

Michael Gold, MD<br />

Mitchel Goldman, MD<br />

Pearl Grimes. MD<br />

Derek Jones, MD<br />

Arthur Kavanaugh, MD<br />

Suzanne Kilmer, MD<br />

David Laub, MD<br />

Philip LeBoit, MD<br />

Craig Leonardi, MD<br />

Stuart Maddin, MD<br />

Ashfaq Marghoob, MD<br />

Chairman:<br />

Dr. George Martin<br />

20<br />

12<br />

Sam Moschella, MD<br />

Stuart Nelson, MD<br />

Kevin Pinski, MD<br />

Phoebe Rich, MD<br />

Ted Rosen, MD<br />

E. Vic Ross, MD<br />

Alan Shalita, MD<br />

Ava Shamban, MD<br />

Daniel Siegel, MD<br />

Eggert Stockfl eth, MD<br />

Bruce Strober, MD, PhD<br />

Neil Swanson, MD<br />

James Treat, MD<br />

Hensin Tsao, MD<br />

Sandy Tsao, MD<br />

Guy Webster, MD, PhD<br />

Wm. Philip Werschler, MD<br />

John Zone, MD<br />

* Subject to Change<br />

MAUI DERM <strong>2012</strong><br />

HAS SPECIAL/REDUCED RATES AT THE<br />

Grand Wailea and the Wailea Marriott<br />

For more details, visit our website at<br />

www.acmd-derm-hawaii.com


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>•</strong> <strong>Issue</strong> 1<br />

MYCOBACTERIUM MARINUM CUTANEOUS<br />

INFECTION WITH SPOROTRICHOID DISTRIBUTION<br />

TREATED WITH AZITHROMYCIN MONOTHERAPY<br />

To the Editor:<br />

Mycobacterium marinum is an aerobic, waterborne mycobacterium<br />

commonly found in nonchlorinated water in a worldwide<br />

distribution. It is also the most common atypical Mycobacterium<br />

to cause infection in humans. Infection is not transmittable<br />

from person to person, and skin infections due to M marinum<br />

are rare. 1<br />

There is no established treatment of choice for M marinum<br />

infection, probably because it is a multidrug-resistant species.<br />

Its treatment has been based primarily on personal experience<br />

without the benefit of large studies. 2 To our knowledge, this is<br />

the first case of cutaneous M marinum infection treated with<br />

azithromycin monotherapy.<br />

A 52-year-old-woman, a cleaning worker in our hospital, was<br />

referred to our department because of the appearance of red<br />

nodules on the left palm and left forearm in a sporotrichoid<br />

distribution (Figure 1). She mentioned that the first lesion<br />

appeared on her hand 6 months previously and new lesions<br />

gradually appeared and increased in number and size during this<br />

period. She also reported a private fish aquarium usually cleaned<br />

by her without using hand protection. The remainder of her<br />

medical history was unremarkable.<br />

Figure 1. Mycobacterium marinum skin infection of the left<br />

palm with sporotrichoid distribution on the left forearm.<br />

CORRESPONDENCE<br />

Routine laboratory tests including human immunodeficiency<br />

virus test were within normal limits. The patient underwent<br />

surgical skin biopsy of the nodule of the forearm, and histologic<br />

examination revealed the presence of tuberculoid structures with<br />

neutrophils and macrophages (Figure 2). Results from periodic<br />

acid-Schiff and Ziehl-Neelsen stains were negative. Cultures taken<br />

from the lesions were negative for bacilli or atypical mycobacteria.<br />

Chest and right hand radiological evaluations were normal. The<br />

patient reported an episode of headache after doxycycline intake,<br />

a ciprofloxacin-associated morbilliform eruption, and frequent<br />

gastrointestinal symptoms after drug administration. She told<br />

us she could receive azithromycin without a problem; therefore,<br />

we decided to try azithromycin 500 mg (tabs Zinfect<br />

500 mg, Verisfield, Athens, Greece) 3 times a week for 2 months<br />

and re-evaluation. To our surprise, complete clinical cure was<br />

obtained after 8 weeks of treatment (Figure 3). No relapse has been<br />

observed after <strong>10</strong> months of follow-up.<br />

M marinum infection, also called “fish tank granuloma,”<br />

“aquarium granuloma,” or “swimming pool granuloma” seems to<br />

represent an opportunistic disease and occurs after approximately<br />

2 weeks of direct (traumatic) inoculation of the organism either<br />

from fish fins and bites or from the handling of aquariums. 1<br />

Solitary red-to-violaceous plaques or nodules with an overlying<br />

crust or verrucous and/or ulcerate surface is a common clinical<br />

presentation in immunocompetent patients. Inflammatory<br />

Figure 2. Histologic examination revealed the presence of<br />

tuberculoid structures (hematoxylin and eosin stain, original<br />

magnification ×<strong>10</strong>0).<br />

<strong>SKINmed</strong>. <strong>2012</strong>;<strong>10</strong>:54–55 54<br />

© <strong>2012</strong> Pulse Marketing & Communications, LLC


<strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

nodules, abscesses with a sporotrichotic type of distribution,<br />

followed by nodular lymphangitis can develop in severely immunosuppressed<br />

patients. 3 Over a period of months, involvement<br />

of deeper soft tissues (tenosynovitis, arthritis, bursitis, and/or<br />

osteomyelitis of the underlying bone) may be life- threatening. 4<br />

Lesions may be either painful or painless. Lung involvement,<br />

disseminated infection, and bacteremia have been rarely<br />

reported. 1<br />

The organism can be isolated from the lesion as well as from<br />

infected fish or aquariums; however, in clinical practice,<br />

diagnosis remains largely presumptive based on clinicohistologic<br />

features. Histopathologic examination usually reveals a nonspecific<br />

inflammatory infiltrate. 1<br />

Treatment of M marinum infections is challenging. In superficial<br />

cutaneous infections, minocycline, clarithromycin, doxycycline,<br />

Figure 3. Complete clearance of the lesions was achieved<br />

after 8 weeks of azithromycin treatment.<br />

55<br />

CORRESPONDENCE<br />

trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole, and ciprofloxacine as monotherapy<br />

are usually effective treatment options. In severe infections,<br />

a combination of rifampicin and ethambutol seems to be<br />

the recommended regimen. Surgical treatment is usually unnecessary,<br />

and where it should be performed must be cautiously<br />

determined. 1,2<br />

Azithromycin shows good response in vitro against other than<br />

Mycobacterium tuberculosis mycobacteria. There is only one<br />

case of M marinum infection in a patient who underwent lung<br />

transplantation successfully treated with surgical removal of the<br />

lesions and a 12-month administration of a combination of<br />

azithromycin and ethambutol. 5<br />

Azithromycin seems to be a promising option to treat M marinum<br />

skin infections, although, further studies—or at least cases—are<br />

needed to establish the effectiveness of the drug.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

FORMULARY OF DR GEORGE C. ANDREWS<br />

Nail Bleach<br />

Oxalic acid Gm xxx<br />

Distilled water 2000 cc<br />

Perfume Qs ad<br />

The above may be irritating—ingredients should be on<br />

poison label with a word of caution.<br />

Submitted by Douglas D. Altchek, MD, New York, NY<br />

1 Rallis E, Koumantaki-Mathioudaki E. Treatment of Mycobacterium<br />

marinum cutaneous infections. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2007;8:<br />

2965–2978.<br />

2 Edelstein H. Mycobacterium marinum skin infections. Report of<br />

31 cases and review of the literature. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:<br />

1359–1364.<br />

3 Bartralot R, Garcia-Patos V, Sitjas, et al. Clinical patterns of cutaneous<br />

nontuberculous mycobacterial infections. Br J Dermatol.<br />

2005;152:727–734.<br />

4 Wu TS,Chiu CH,Su LH et al. Mycobacterium marinum infection in Taiwan.<br />

J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2002;35:42–46.<br />

5 Torres F, Hodges T, Zamora MR. Mycobacterium marinum infection<br />

in a lung transplant recipient. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001;20:<br />

486–489.<br />

—Efstathios Rallis, MD, PhD, Department of Dermatology, Veterans<br />

Administration Hospital (NIMTS), Athens, <strong>•</strong> E-mail: efrall@otenet.gr;<br />

Evangelos Falidas, MD, 1st Department of General Surgery, Veterans<br />

Administration Hospital (NIMTS), Athens; Panagiotis Stavropoulos, MD,<br />

PhD, Department of Dermatology, University of Athens, “A.Syggros”<br />

Hospital, Athens, Greece


THE Aesthetic Show<br />

of the Year<br />

Register with Promo Code TAS3AD:<br />

������������������������������������<br />

����������������������������������������������������<br />

���������������������������Aesthetic TV<br />

World-Class Faculty<br />

Pre-Show Educational Sessions<br />

Advanced Hands-On Training<br />

THE Aesthetic Awards<br />

Patient Tx Workshops<br />

TM<br />

To register visit www.aestheticshow.com or call + 1 (949) 830-5409


CANCUN CANCUN <strong>2012</strong><br />

<strong>2012</strong><br />

<strong>January</strong> 31st to <strong>February</strong> 4th<br />

Cancun Quintana Roo, Mexico<br />

www.WCOCD<strong>2012</strong>.com<br />

info@WCOCD<strong>2012</strong>.com<br />

+ (52 55) 5531- 0865<br />

+ (52 55) 5203- 6454<br />

Abstract submission deadline:<br />

October 30th, 2011


�������������������������������<br />

������������������������������������������������<br />

���������������������<br />

��������������������<br />

����������������<br />

������������������������<br />

���������������<br />

�������������<br />

��������������������������������������<br />

��������������������������������<br />

������������������������������<br />

����������������������<br />

������������������<br />

���������������������<br />

��������������<br />

�������������������������<br />

�������������<br />

������������������������<br />

������������������<br />

����������������������<br />

�������������������������<br />

������������������<br />

��������<br />

�<br />

����������������������������������������<br />

�������������������������������<br />

���� �������<br />

�������������������<br />

�����������������<br />

��������������������<br />

���������������������<br />

����������������<br />

�����������������������<br />

�������������������


Locoid Lipocream ® Cream, 0.1% Rx Only<br />

(hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1% cream)<br />

For Topical Use Only<br />

BRIEF SUMMARY<br />

INDICATIONS AND USAGE<br />

Locoid Lipocream is a topical corticosteroid indicated for: relief of the inflammatory<br />

and pruritic manifestations of corticosteroid-responsive dermatoses in adults and<br />

the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis in patients 3 months to 18 years<br />

of age.<br />

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS<br />

Reversible hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis suppression may occur, with<br />

the potential for glucocorticosteroid insufficiency. Consider periodic evaluations for<br />

HPA axis suppression if Locoid Lipocream is applied to large surface areas or used<br />

under occlusion. If HPA axis suppression is noted, reduce the application frequency,<br />

discontinue use, or switch to a lower potency corticosteroid.<br />

Systemic effects of topical corticosteroids may also include manifestations of<br />

Cushing’s syndrome, hyperglycemia, and glucosuria.<br />

Pediatric patients may be more susceptible to systemic toxicity due to their larger<br />

skin surface-to-body-mass ratios.<br />

Initiate appropriate therapy if concomitant skin infections develop.<br />

Discontinue use if irritation develops.<br />

ADVERSE REACTIONS<br />

The most common adverse reactions (>1%) are HPA axis suppression and<br />

application site reactions.<br />

The following additional local adverse reactions have been reported infrequently<br />

with topical corticosteroids, and they may occur more frequently with the use of<br />

occlusive dressings and higher potency corticosteroids. These reactions included:<br />

irritation, folliculitis, acneiform eruptions, hypopigmentation, perioral dermatitis,<br />

allergic contact dermatitis, secondary infection, skin atrophy, striae, miliaria and<br />

telangiectasia.<br />

USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS<br />

Pregnancy<br />

Pregnancy Category C. Corticosteroids have been shown to be teratogenic in<br />

laboratory animals when administered systemically at relatively low dosage levels.<br />

Some corticosteroids have been shown to be teratogenic after dermal application<br />

in laboratory animals.There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in<br />

pregnant women. Therefore, Locoid Lipocream should be used during pregnancy<br />

only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus.<br />

Please refer to full prescribing information for detailed information regarding<br />

systemic embryofetal development studies.<br />

Nursing Mothers<br />

Systemically administered corticosteroids appear in human milk and could<br />

suppress growth, interfere with endogenous corticosteroid production, or cause<br />

other untoward effects. It is not known whether topical administration of<br />

corticosteroids could result in sufficient systemic absorption to produce detectable<br />

quantities in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution<br />

should be exercised when Locoid Lipocream is administered to a nursing woman.<br />

Pediatric Use<br />

Safety and efficacy in pediatric patients below 3 months of age have not been<br />

established.<br />

Because of higher skin surface-to-body-mass ratios, pediatric patients are at a<br />

greater risk than adults of HPA axis suppression when they are treated with topical<br />

corticosteroids. They are therefore also at a greater risk of glucocorticosteroid<br />

insufficiency after withdrawal of treatment and of Cushing’s syndrome while on<br />

treatment.<br />

Eighty-six (86) pediatric subjects (5 months to less than 18 years of age) with<br />

moderate to severe atopic dermatitis affecting at least 25% of body surface area<br />

(BSA) treated with Locoid Lipocream three times daily for up to 4 weeks were<br />

assessed for HPA axis suppression. The disease severity (moderate to severe<br />

atopic dermatitis) and the dosing regimen (three times daily) in this HPA axis study<br />

were different from the subject population (mild to moderate atopic dermatitis) and<br />

the dosing regimen (two times daily) for which Locoid Lipocream is indicated.<br />

Five of the 82 evaluable subjects (6.1%) demonstrated laboratory evidence of<br />

suppression, where the sole criterion for defining HPA axis suppression was a<br />

serum cortisol level of less than or equal to 18 micrograms per deciliter after<br />

cosyntropin stimulation. Suppressed subjects ranged in age from 5 months to<br />

16 years and, at the time of enrollment, had 25% to 95% BSA involvement. These<br />

subjects did not develop any other signs or symptoms of HPA axis suppression.<br />

At the first follow up visit, approximately one month after the conclusion of<br />

treatment, cosyntropin stimulation results of all subjects had returned to normal,<br />

with the exception of one subject. This last subject recovered adrenal function by<br />

the second post treatment visit, 65 days post-treatment.<br />

Cushing’s syndrome, linear growth retardation, delayed weight gain, and<br />

intracranial hypertension have also been reported in pediatric patients receiving<br />

topical corticosteroids. Manifestations of adrenal suppression in pediatric patients<br />

include low plasma cortisol levels to an absence of response to ACTH stimulation.<br />

Manifestations of intracranial hypertension include bulging fontanelles, headaches,<br />

and bilateral papilledema.<br />

Geriatric Use<br />

Clinical studies of Locoid Lipocream did not include sufficient numbers of subjects<br />

aged 65 and over to determine whether they respond differently from younger<br />

subjects.<br />

Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility<br />

No studies were conducted to determine the photococarcinogenic or dermal<br />

carcinogenic potential of Locoid Lipocream.<br />

Hydrocortisone butyrate revealed no evidence of mutagenic or clastogenic<br />

potential based on the results of two in vitro genotoxicity tests (Ames test and<br />

L5178Y/TK + mouse lymphoma assay) and one in vivo genotoxicity test (mouse<br />

micronucleus assay).<br />

No evidence of impairment of fertility or effect on mating performance was<br />

observed in a fertility and general reproductive performance study conducted in<br />

male and female rats at subcutaneous doses up to and including 1.8 mg/kg/day<br />

(0.7X maximum topical human dose [MTHD]). Mild effects on maternal animals,<br />

such as reduced food consumption and a subsequent reduction in body weight gain,<br />

were seen at doses ≥0.6 mg/kg/day (0.2X MTHD).<br />

PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION<br />

Patients using Locoid Lipocream should receive the following information<br />

and instructions:<br />

Apply a thin layer to the affected skin two or three times daily for corticosteroidresponsive<br />

dermatoses in adults. Consult with your physician to determine if<br />

treatment is needed beyond 2 weeks. Apply a thin film to the affected skin areas<br />

two times daily for atopic dermatitis in patients 3 months of age and older.<br />

Safety of Locoid Lipocream in pediatric patients has not been established beyond 4<br />

weeks of use.<br />

Rub in gently.<br />

Avoid contact with the eyes.<br />

Do not bandage, otherwise cover, or wrap the affected skin area so as to be<br />

occlusive unless directed by your physician.<br />

Do not use Locoid Lipocream in the diaper area, as diapers or plastic pants may<br />

constitute occlusive dressings.<br />

Do not use Locoid Lipocream on the face, underarms, or groin areas unless<br />

directed by your physician.<br />

If no improvement is seen within 2 weeks, contact your physician.<br />

Do not use other corticosteroid-containing products while using Locoid Lipocream<br />

without first consulting your physician.<br />

Store at 25°C (77°F); excursions permitted to 15-30°C (59-86°F) [see USP Controlled<br />

Room Temperature]. Protect from freezing. Keep out of the reach of children.<br />

Manufactured for: Triax Pharmaceuticals, LLC<br />

Cranford NJ 07016<br />

By: Ferndale Laboratories, Inc.<br />

Ferndale MI 48220<br />

Locoid Lipocream is a registered trademark of<br />

Astellas Pharma Europe BV licensed to<br />

Triax Pharmaceuticals, LLC.<br />

Marketed and Distributed By:<br />

Triax Pharmaceuticals, LLC<br />

Cranford NJ 07016<br />

www.Locoid.com<br />

131B301<br />

Rev 11/09


Now younger eczema<br />

patients have something<br />

to smile about<br />

Now approved for use in children<br />

down to 3 months of age<br />

The power of an ointment with the elegance of a cream<br />

Locoid Lipocream is indicated for the relief of the inflammatory and pruritic manifestations of corticosteroid-responsive dermatoses,<br />

including the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis in patients 3 months of age and older.<br />

Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients below 3 months of age have not been established.<br />

Reversible HPA axis suppression may occur, with the potential for corticosteroid insufficiency. Consider periodic evaluations for HPA<br />

axis suppression if applied to large surface areas or used under occlusion . Systemic effects of topical corticosteroids may also include<br />

manifestations of Cushing’s syndrome, hyperglycemia, and glucosuria. Pediatric patients may be more susceptible to systemic toxicity<br />

due to their large skin surface-to-body-mass ratios. Initiate appropriate therapy if concomitant skin infection develops. Discontinue use<br />

if irritation develops. Please see full Prescribing Information on adjacent page. Visit us at www.locoid.com<br />

(hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1%) Cream<br />

©20<strong>10</strong> Triax Pharmaceuticals, LLC. All rights reserved. Locoid is a registered trademark of Astellas Pharma Europe B.V. licensed to Triax Pharmaceuticals, LLC. LOC-04<strong>10</strong>-01

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!