International Legal Evangelism: Intelligence, Reconnaissance & Missions

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Group Polarization In social psychology, Group Polarization refers to the tendency for a group to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclination of its members. These more extreme decisions are towards greater risk if individuals' initial tendencies are to be risky and towards greater caution if individuals' initial tendencies are to be cautious. The phenomenon also holds that a group's attitude toward a situation may change in the sense that the individuals' initial attitudes have strengthened and intensified after group discussion, a phenomenon known as attitude polarization. Overview Group polarization is an important phenomenon in social psychology and is observable in many social contexts. For example, a group of women who hold moderately feminist views tend to demonstrate heightened pro-feminist beliefs following group discussion. Similarly, have shown that after deliberating together, mock jury members often decided on punitive damage awards that were either larger or smaller than the amount any individual juror had favored prior to deliberation. The studies indicated that when the jurors favored a relatively low award, discussion would lead to an even more lenient result, while if the jury was inclined to impose a stiff penalty, discussion would make it even harsher. Moreover, in recent years, the Internet and online social media have also presented opportunities to observe group polarization and compile new research. Psychologists have found that social media outlets such as Facebook and Twitter demonstrate that group polarization can occur even when a group is not physically together. As long as the group of individuals begins with the same fundamental opinion on the topic and a consistent dialogue is kept going, group polarization can occur. Research has suggested that well-established groups suffer less from polarization, as do groups discussing problems that are well known to them. However, in situations where groups are somewhat newly formed and tasks are new, group polarization can demonstrate a more profound influence on the decision-making. ________ Page 72 of 119
From 'Non-Discrimination' to 'Reasonableness': A Paradigm Shift in <strong>International</strong> Economic Law? Abstract Jean Monnet Working Paper No. 01/05 Posted: 10 Aug 2006 Federico Ortino King's College London – The Dickson Poon School of Law Date Written: April 2005 Among the few basic legal instruments employed in international economic law for the promotion of trade and investment, the National Treatment (NT) principle and the reasonableness principle constitute the two predominant ones. While both norms deal principally with national measures of legislative, administrative or judicial nature taken to regulate the internal market, they appear to represent two quite different legal paradigms. By requiring each member to treat products and investors of the other member (at least) as well as it treats its own products and investors, the NT principle provides for a 'relative' standard of treatment. In other words, the NT principle does not guarantee a specific level of protection or that foreign products or investors will receive a 'fair' or 'reasonable' treatment. On the other hand, the reasonableness principle provides for an 'absolute' standard of treatment, in as far as it requires States to recognize to foreign products and investors a certain level of treatment independently of the treatment afforded to domestic products and investors. Although the concept of reasonableness may be given potentially a broad range of meanings, it usually refers to both substantive and procedural requirements, including concepts such as 'suitability', 'necessity', 'proportionality', 'transparency' and Page 73 of 119
Page 1 and 2:
The e-Advocate Monthly …a Compend
Page 3 and 4:
The Advocacy Foundation, Inc. Helpi
Page 5 and 6:
Dedication ______ Every publication
Page 7 and 8:
The Transformative Justice Project
Page 9 and 10:
The Advocacy Foundation, Inc. Helpi
Page 11 and 12:
Biblical Authority ________ Evangel
Page 13 and 14:
Table of Contents …a compendium o
Page 15 and 16:
I. Introduction International Legal
Page 17 and 18:
kinds and sizes of audiences. Which
Page 19 and 20:
Everyday evangelism also listens to
Page 21 and 22: (37) Since evangelism has nothing t
Page 23 and 24: This means that we need to set an e
Page 25 and 26: II. Legal Intelligence & Reconnaiss
Page 27 and 28: In response to the information requ
Page 29 and 30: and television, but also local mili
Page 31 and 32: Dissemination The processed intelli
Page 33 and 34: Discipline Types of Reconnaissance:
Page 35 and 36: econnaissance, the following techni
Page 37 and 38: concealment; bridge by construction
Page 39 and 40: III. The Fellowship of Internationa
Page 41 and 42: Latin America/ Caribbean LWOB conti
Page 43 and 44: IV. Foreign Diplomatic Missions and
Page 45 and 46: host state while being afforded spe
Page 47 and 48: citizens and residents. They are ne
Page 49 and 50: understanding and other instruments
Page 51 and 52: Paradiplomacy by Country Argentina
Page 53 and 54: Germany The Basic Law of Germany st
Page 55 and 56: this domain may be overruled by the
Page 57 and 58: V. The Lawyers’ War Room A war ro
Page 59 and 60: Choose the Right Lieutenant to Over
Page 61 and 62: done can be handled by staff that n
Page 63 and 64: VI. International Paradigm Shifting
Page 65 and 66: the Maxwellian electromagnetic worl
Page 67 and 68: caused or was itself part of a "par
Page 69 and 70: Marketing I n the later part of the
Page 71: In the next stage of the research,
Page 75 and 76: Conflict can take many forms and in
Page 77 and 78: VII. Evidence-Based Policy Deployme
Page 79 and 80: Collaboration conducts reviews on t
Page 81 and 82: using evidence and data in decision
Page 83 and 84: 8. Develop a monitoring and learnin
Page 85 and 86: VIII. References 1. https://zonderv
Page 87 and 88: Notes _____________________________
Page 89 and 90: Attachment A Evangelism and Social
Page 91 and 92: The tension If we cut out from the
Page 93 and 94: What does the Bible say? Social jus
Page 95 and 96: edemption (1 Thessalonians 1:9-10).
Page 97 and 98: Just Love Just Love is a movement t
Page 99 and 100: Attachment B A Religious View of Th
Page 101 and 102: The 2011 Charles E. Test Lectures a
Page 103 and 104: Lecture One: Wednesday, March 23---
Page 105 and 106: Caesarea, a local administrative ce
Page 107 and 108: My point about Pauls’ appeal to t
Page 109 and 110: law on the matter as a leading scho
Page 111 and 112: Nevertheless we thought it necessar
Page 113 and 114: Not only that, but each faith must
Page 115 and 116: me ye might have peace. In the worl
Page 117 and 118: They are hesitant, ambivalent, form
Page 119 and 120: granted and other things—like tor
Page 121 and 122: communities we inhabit to be govern
Page 123 and 124:
claim on us and no efficacy among u
Page 125 and 126:
intellectual elites who stand up fo
Page 127 and 128:
Lecture Two: Monday, March 28, 2011
Page 129 and 130:
can be said of Christian attitudes
Page 131 and 132:
proximity. It is the contingency of
Page 133 and 134:
that it is possible to love an enem
Page 135 and 136:
e characterized in terms of soverei
Page 137 and 138:
On the other hand, Finnis it seems
Page 139 and 140:
etween pride and faction and the fo
Page 141 and 142:
occasional enforcers, custom-genera
Page 143 and 144:
ound by them. The problem is gettin
Page 145 and 146:
usiness by treaties that the offend
Page 147 and 148:
Formalistically, some jurists still
Page 149 and 150:
Lecture 3: Wednesday, March 30, 201
Page 151 and 152:
municipal law. Lauterpacht’s sayi
Page 153 and 154:
But let me isolate this one view th
Page 155 and 156:
to envoys and mediators, by showing
Page 157 and 158:
or at best sovereign consent. 137 I
Page 159 and 160:
So, for example, Alberico Gentili,
Page 161 and 162:
Morally, we say (as philosophers) t
Page 163 and 164:
theory.” 152 The application of i
Page 165 and 166:
and it is the fact of its broad and
Page 167 and 168:
pigeon. And he took unto him all th
Page 169 and 170:
solemnized treaty agreements with r
Page 171 and 172:
all the odds. We shouldn’t assume
Page 173 and 174:
Page 92 of 119
Page 175 and 176:
The Functions of Religion in the In
Page 177 and 178:
and principles of state succession
Page 179 and 180:
Advocacy Foundation Publishers Page
Page 181 and 182:
Issue Title Quarterly Vol. I 2015 T
Page 183 and 184:
Issue Title Quarterly Vol. V 2019 O
Page 185 and 186:
LI Nonprofit Confidentiality In The
Page 187 and 188:
Vol. XVIII 2032 Public Policy LXXVI
Page 189 and 190:
African-American Youth in The May 2
Page 191 and 192:
The e-Advocate Quarterly Special Ed
Page 193 and 194:
Legal Missions International Page 1
Page 195 and 196:
Vol. V 2019 XVII Russia Q-1 2019 XV
Page 197 and 198:
The e-Advocate Newsletter Genesis o
Page 199 and 200:
Extras The Nonprofit Advisors Group
Page 201 and 202:
About The Author John C (Jack) John
Page 203:
Page 119 of 119
show all

International Legal Evangelism: Intelligence, Reconnaissance & Missions

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?