21.09.2018 Views

International Legal Evangelism: Intelligence, Reconnaissance & Missions

International Legal Evangelism: Intelligence, Reconnaissance & Missions

International Legal Evangelism: Intelligence, Reconnaissance & Missions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

'participation'. Accordingly, the reach of the reasonableness principle appears to be<br />

quite broad compared to that of the NT principle and the normative standards imposed<br />

on States by the former seem to bite deeper than those imposed by the latter.<br />

By focusing specifically on the experience of the WTO and NAFTA in promoting trade<br />

and investment across countries through the NT principle and the reasonableness<br />

principle (i.e., Articles III/XX GATT and 1102 NAFTA; Articles 2 TBT and 1105 NAFTA),<br />

this paper tries, first of all, to show that the two norms under consideration do not<br />

represent two completely different legal paradigms. On the contrary, the overlap<br />

between non-discrimination and reasonableness is quite broad and, depending on the<br />

actual drafting, it may even be total. Secondly, and without arguing for the total<br />

abandonment of the concept of nationality discrimination as an instrument for global<br />

economic governance, the paper argues that in terms of overall legitimacy, there are<br />

several reasons supporting the claim that a rationality-based regime should be favored<br />

to one based on non-discrimination.<br />

________<br />

Social Conflict Theory<br />

Social Conflict Theory is a Marxist-based social theory which argues that<br />

individuals and groups (social classes) within society interact on the basis<br />

of conflict rather than consensus. Through various forms of conflict, groups will tend to<br />

attain differing amounts of material and non-material resources (e.g. the wealthy vs. the<br />

poor). More powerful groups will tend to use their power in order to retain power and<br />

exploit groups with less power.<br />

Conflict theorists view conflict as an engine of change, since conflict produces<br />

contradictions which are sometimes resolved, creating new conflicts and contradictions<br />

in an ongoing dialectic. In the classic example of historical materialism, Karl<br />

Marx and Friedrich Engelsargued that all of human history is the result of conflict<br />

between classes, which evolved over time in accordance with changes in society's<br />

means of meeting its material needs, i.e. changes in society's mode of production.<br />

Example (Sample of The Following)<br />

Consider the relationship between the owner of a housing complex and a tenant in that<br />

same housing complex. A consensus theorist might suggest that the relationship<br />

between the owner and the tenant is founded on mutual benefit. In contrast, a conflict<br />

theorist might argue the relationship is based on a conflict in which the owner and<br />

tenant are struggling against each other. Their relationship is defined by the balance in<br />

their abilities to extract resources from each other, e.g. rent payments or a place to live.<br />

The bounds of the relationship are set where each is extracting the maximum possible<br />

amount of resources out of the other.<br />

Page 74 of 119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!